Abstract
Mitochondria dysfunctions and mitophagy failure have been associated with several Alzheimer’s disease (AD) related molecular actors including amyloid beta (Aβ) and recently the amyloid precursor protein-C terminal fragments (APP-CTFs). The efficacy of the mitophagy process in neurons relies on regulated mitochondrial transport along axons involving a complex molecular machinery. The contribution of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its derived fragments to the mitochondrial transport machinery alterations in AD have not been investigated before. We report herein a change of the expression of mitochondrial transport proteins (SNPH and Miro1), motor adapters (TRANK1 and TRAK2), and components of the dynein and kinesin motors (i.e., IC1,2 and Kif5 (A, B, C) isoforms) by endogenous APP and by overexpression of APP carrying the familial Swedish mutation (APPswe). We show that APP-CTFs and Aβ concomitantly regulate the expression of a set of transport proteins as demonstrated in APPswe cells treated with β- and γ-secretase inhibitors and in cells Knock-down for presenilin 1 and 2. We further report the impact of APP-CTFs on the expression of transport proteins in AAV-injected C99 mice brains. Our data also indicate that both Aβ oligomers (Aβo) and APP-CTFs impair the colocalization of mitochondria and transport proteins. This has been demonstrated in differentiated SH-SY5Y naive cells treated with Aβo and in differentiated SH-SY5Y and murine primary neurons expressing APPswe and treated with the γ-secretase inhibitor. Importantly, we uncover that the expression of a set of transport proteins is modulated in a disease-dependent manner in 3xTgAD mice and in human sporadic AD brains. This study highlights molecular mechanisms underlying mitochondrial transport defects in AD that likely contribute to mitophagy failure and disease progression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mitochondria ensures several vital functions, including energy production through the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) by the oxidative phosphorylation system [1]. Mitochondria organelles follow a dynamic transport via microtubules (MT) to fulfill their role locally in polarized cells such as neurons [2]. Thus, the anterograde transport occurring from the nucleus to the cell’s periphery (i.e., axons, dendrites, and synapses) distributes newly synthesized and healthy mitochondria, thereby ensuring the replenishment of these high energy demanding sites with ATP that is necessary for synaptic transmission and plasticity [3, 4]. In an opposite manner, dysfunctional mitochondria undergo a retrograde transport backward to the soma where they are degraded by mitophagy (i.e., the specific degradation systems of altered mitochondria) upon fusion of the mitophagosomes with lysosomes [5].
Mitochondrial transport along MT is achieved by a set of ATP-driven motors including kinesin for anterograde transport and cytoplasmic dynein for retrograde transport [6]. Mammalian kinesin isoforms include the neuronal Kif5A and Kif5C and the ubiquitous Kif5B [7]. Cytoplasmic dynein is a multi-subunit nanomotor composed of intermediate chains (ICs), light intermediate chains (LICs), and light chains (LCs) built around a core of large dimeric heavy chains (HCs), which perform ATP hydrolysis [8]. These motor proteins can carry several organelles and vesicles and interact with specific cargoes or cargo-adapter proteins to transport mitochondria [6]. Among motor adapters proteins, kinesin-binding proteins (TRAK1 and TRAK2) are implicated in the trafficking of different organelles, including endosomes, and interact indirectly with mitochondria through the mitochondrial rho (MIRO), an RHO family GTPase expressed at the mitochondrial outer membrane [9]. Miro1 isoform is the major mitochondrial acceptor in neurons [10]. The mechanisms linking dynein to mitochondria are not well characterized. However, it seems that MIRO may also be required for dynein-mediated retrograde mitochondrial transport [11]. Another protein that regulates mitochondrial transport is syntaphilin (SNPH) that blocks the global movement of mitochondria by directly anchoring the organelle on MT [4].
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease initially defined by a proteinopathy associated with the accumulation of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides that are produced through the sequential cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the β- and the γ-secretases [12]. These Aβ peptides accumulate extracellularly in senile plaques [13] and interact with different intracellular cellular components and organelles, including mitochondria [14, 15]. Besides Aβ, APP processing generates other fragments that have several toxic features contributing to the etiology of AD [16], namely the APP C-terminal fragments (APP-CTFs: C99 and C83). C99 fragment results from of the cleavage of APP by the β- secretase and C83 fragment derives from the cleavage of both APP and C99 by the α-secretase [17,18,19,20]. Accumulation of APP-CTFs in cellular models mimicking familial and sporadic forms of AD triggers an autolysosomal defect, which in turn impairs APP-CTFs degradation and induces their pathogenic accumulation [21, 22]. In a recent study, we reported that APP-CTFs accumulation is associated with mitochondrial structure and function alterations and triggers mitophagy failure in both cellular and mice AD models [23]. These findings are supported by a recent study demonstrating the accumulation of APP-CTFs in mitochondria and their causality of impaired mitophagy function in AD patient-induced neural stem cells (iNSCs) [24]. Importantly, APP-CTFs accumulation in sporadic human AD brains correlates with a mitophagy failure molecular signature and is associated with neurodegeneration [23, 25].
In parallel to mitochondria structure, function, and mitophagy alterations, isolated studies reported impaired mitochondrial transport in AD-related conditions [26]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying mitochondrial transport defect in AD remain partially understood. Here, we investigated the implication of APP, APP-CTFs, and Aβ on the expression and localization of mitochondrial transport components (i.e., SNPH, Miro1, TRAK1 and 2, Kif5 A, B, C isoforms and IC 1, 2) using complementary cellular and mice AD models. We also studied the molecular signature of mitochondrial transport proteins associated with AD progression in post-mortem human brains.
Materials and methods
Human brain samples
We studied control and sporadic AD (SAD) post-mortem human brains (Control, n = 5; I–III, n = 5; and IV–VI, n = 14). Cases were anonymized, but information was provided regarding sex, age at death, and neuropathology (Table 1). Studies involving human brain samples were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical studies. Brain samples were obtained from the Brain Bank “NeuroCEB” run by a consortium of patient associations: ARSEP (association for research on multiple sclerosis), CSC (cerebellar ataxias), and France Parkinson. The consents were signed by the patients themselves or their next of kin in their name, in accordance with the French Bioethical (agreement AC-2013-1887).
Animals
Experiments were performed on hippocampi dissected from 3xTgAD female mice (APPswe: KM670/671NL, TauP301L, and presenelin1 (PS1) M146V) (n = 8 aged 4 months and n = 7 aged 13 months) [27] and wild-type female mice (WT; non-transgenic) (n = 7 aged 4 months and n = 5 aged 13 months). We also used the brains of female mice aged 6 months and injected at day 1 post-natal with adeno associated virus (AAV)-C99 (n = 5) or AAV-Free (empty virus) (n = 4) [22]. Virus production of AAV10 expressing empty vector (AAV-Free) or the human APP C99 fragment (AAV-C99) under the control of the synapsin-1 promoter was performed following a protocol previously described [28]. For AAV-mediated in vivo delivery, 1-day-old C57BL6 mice (Janvier Labs., France) were injected with 4 µl of AAV virus (5.5 × 1012 vg/ml (viral genomes per ml)) into the left ventricle, as described [22]. Only left brain was used for protein extraction. Mice were housed with a 12:12 h light/dark cycle and were given free access to food and water.
Ethical approval
Studies on animals were performed following the guidelines established by the European Community Council (Directive of November 24th, 1986), and applying ethical standards of the institution. Animal experimentation protocols were approved by the Nice University Animal Care and Use Committee, and the National Council on Animal Care of the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research (project #00253.02 and APAFIS#20495-201904231352370). These projects were evaluated and followed by the welfare animal use committee of the institute.
Cells
We used human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells (CRL-2266, ATCC) stably expressing empty pcDNA3.1 vector (Control), or the human βAPP harboring the double Swedish mutations cDNA (APPswe: APPKM670/671NL) [29]. We also used mouse embryonic fibroblasts: MEFs either control (MEF APPWT or MEF PSWT), invalidated for APP and for APP-like proteins 1 and 2 (APLP1 and APLP2) (MEF APPKO) [30], or doubly knocked out for presenilin 1 (PS1) and presenilin 2 (PS2) (PSDKO) [31]. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, GIBCO 41965-039) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (50 μg/ml) (Pen/Strep), and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Control and APPswe SHSY5Y cells were cultured in the presence of 400 μg/ml geneticin (MP Biomedicals) [29].
Treatments
Cells were treated with DMSO (Sigma D2650) as control (vehicle), γ-secretase inhibitor ELDN006 (3 nM in DMSO) [32] or β-secretase inhibitor LY2811376 (30 nM in DMSO) [33] for 16 h. Differentiated SHSY-5Y-APPswe were treated with γ-secretase inhibitor (0.3 nM) for 16 h to limit cell death.
Differentiation of SHSY5Y cell lines
We used a protocol adapted from a previously reported protocol [34]. Briefly, cells were plated in a 6-well plate at a confluence of 30–40% to reach 70% maximum 5 days later. The first week of culture, we used M1 medium (DMEM supplemented with Pen/Strep and 2.5% of FBS, and 10 µM retinoic acid (RA, Merck R2526). Cells were then split into new 6-well plates and cultured in M2 medium (DMEM supplemented with Pen/Strep, 1% of FBS, and 10 µM RA). Cells were then split 2 days later in plates coated with 0.5 µg/ml Poly-L-lysin (Sigma–Aldrich P2636) in neurobasal medium complemented with B27 (1X), Pen/Strep, 50 ng/mL BNDF (Merck B3795), 2 mM Glutamax (Gibco 35050061), 20 mM KCL solution and 10 µM RA. Differentiated cells were used 3 weeks later.
Primary cultures of murine neurons
Primary neuronal cultures were obtained from the hippocampus and cortices of mice at 16 days of embryonic stage. Isolated hippocampi and cortices were placed in a dissection medium (0.25% glucose, 1 mM Sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES, HBSS), washed two times in HBSS, and dissociated by trypsin digestion (2.5% Trypsin, 0.025% BSA, 0.625% glucose in PBS) at 37 °C for 10 min. Hippocampi and cortices were then mechanically dissociated with DNAse (1 mg/mL, Sigma). Neurons were centrifugated at 200 × g for 5 min and the pellet was resuspended in Neurobasal medium (Gibco) supplemented with 2% B27 (Gibco), 1% GlutaMax (Gibco), and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco). Neurons were then filtered using 70 µm filter and seeded (50,000 per well) in 24-well plates on coverslips precoated with poly-L-lysine (0.05 mg/mL, Sigma). Neurons were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.
Transfection of primary neuronal cultures
Premature neurons were transfected at 7 days in vitro (DIV 7) with Mit-RFP [35] and pcDNA3.1 empty vector or APPswe construct [23] using Lipofectamine 2000 following the manufacturer’s instructions. At 14 DIV, neurons were treated with γ-secretase inhibitor at 5 µM for 4 h [23].
Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 sandwich ELISA tests
The concentrations of human Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 were measured in total protein extract of human brains (temporal lobe area) by using the respective ELISA kits (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 50 µg of total protein extracts were dissolved in 5 M Guanidine HCl/ 50 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0, to yield detection of both soluble and insoluble Aβ peptides.
Immunofluorescence
Differentiated control or APPswe-expressing SH-SY5Y cells and primary neurons were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min, washed twice with 1X PBS, and then permeabilized with 0.5% (cells) or 0.3% (neurons) Triton X-100 for 5 min. Non-specific binding sites were blocked for 1–2 h in 3% PBS-BSA containing 0.05% tween at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted (Supplementary Table 1) in PBS-BSA 0.3% containing 0.005% tween and applied overnight (ON). After three washes with 1xPBS, AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) were applied for 1 h. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (1/10000, Invitrogen) and slides were mounted with Vectamount medium (Vector). Images were taken with a confocal Leica TCS SP5 microscope or LSM 780. The colocalization quantification was determined using the Fiji plug-in JACoP (Just Another Colocalization Plug-in).
Protein extraction and SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis
Total protein extracts were obtained from cells, dissected mice hippocampi of WT and 3xTgAD, cortices of AAV-Free or AAV-C99 mice, or human temporal cortex using lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8, 10% glycerol, 200 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet p-40, and 0.1 mM EDTA) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete cocktail, Roche diagnostics 04693132001). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE following standard procedures and APP-CTFs were resolved on 16.5% Tris-Tricine SDS-PAGE [23]. Information about the primary antibodies used for western blot can be found in Supplement Table 1.
Statistical analyses
Data were expressed as means ± SEM. Sample size for each experiment is indicated in the Figure captions and data are presented in bar blots and scatter plots. The data are averaged from technical replicates in each independent experiment. The quantification of imaging experiments was performed on different (>5) fields of view obtained from independent experiments. Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 9 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA; https://www.graphpad.com). Experiments were not blinded. However, they were conducted and replicated by different authors. Data were first analyzed for normal distribution. We used the Mann–Whitney test when the two groups of variables had not passed the normality test. Groups of more than two variables that have passed the normality test were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s or Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-test. Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test were used when groups of variables have not passed the normality test. Correlations were analyzed with non-parametric Spearman’s correlation. We compute correlation between every pair of data sets and when a value is missing, we remove the entire row from the calculation. Significant differences are: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 and ns non-significant.
Results
APP and its derived fragments modulate the expression of proteins of the mitochondrial transport machinery
We studied the expression of the mitochondrial stop protein syntaphilin (SNPH), the mitochondrial rho protein (Miro1), the kinesin-binding proteins (TRAK1 and TRAK2), the motor kinesin (Kif5 (A, B, C) isoforms), and the ICs of the cytoplasmic dynein motor (lC1,2) in neuroblastoma cells expressing APP carrying the double Swedish familial mutations KM670/671NL (APPswe) and their control cells expressing pcDNA3.1 empty vector (Control) [29] (Fig. 1). This cellular model has been previously described to accumulate APP-derived fragments (i.e., Aβ and APP-CTFs) and to manifest mitochondrial structure and function alterations and a defect of mitophagy process [23]. We noticed a reduction in the expression of Miro1 and TRAK1 (Fig. 1A, C), and Kif5 (A, B, C) (Fig. 1A, D) in APPswe versus control cells, while the expression of SNPH (Fig. 1A) and TRAK2 (Fig. 1C) remained unchanged (Fig. 1A, C) and that of IC1, 2 level is slightly but not significantly increased (Fig. 1A, D). We identified a low molecular weight (≈50 kDa) second band recognized by the Kif5 (A, B, C) antibody that we labeled as Kif5 (low) showing in APPswe cells a mirror upregulation versus full-length Kif5 (A, B, C) (Fig. 1A, D).
Because APP is involved in several housekeeping cellular functions [36], we investigated whether the down expression of full-length wild-type APP may impact the expression of mitochondrial transport proteins. Since APP shares some functional redundancies with the amyloid precursor-like proteins APLP1 and APLP2, we compared control mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF APPWT) with cells depleted of APP and of APP-like proteins 1 and 2 (APLP1 and APLP2) (MEF APPKO). We confirmed reduced APP expression and observed the absence of endogenous APP-CTFs levels in MEFs APPKO cells (Fig. 2A). We evidenced an enhanced expression of SNPH, Miro1, and Kif5 (A, B, C) in MEFs APPKO cells when compared to controls (Fig. 2A–D) and noticed a mirror downregulation of Kif5 (low) band versus full-length Kif5 protein and of IC1, 2 protein in MEFs APPKO (Fig. 2A, D).
Neuroblastoma cells show a “compacted dense shape” of the mitochondria reticulum that was technically not adapted for the analyses of mitochondrial movement using imagery and time-laps acquisition. Thus, we studied mitochondria movement in MEF presenting “a flat shape mitochondria reticulum” and we revealed a reduced mitochondrial movement in MEF APPKO compared to MEF APPWT (Supplementary Video. 1, and Supplementary Fig. 1A). Since the expression levels of several proteins implicated in mitochondria movement are upregulated in MEF APPKO, we speculate that the reduction of mitochondria motile fraction in APPKO cells is associated with enhanced expression of SNPH known to block mitochondria movement (Fig. 2A, B).
Together, these pieces of data point out a contribution of endogenous APP and of APP-derived fragments accumulation in the control of the expression of a set of proteins constituting the mitochondrial transport machinery complex.
Accumulation of both Aβ and APP-CTFs modulates the expression of several proteins of the mitochondrial transport machinery complex
In order to discriminate between the impact of Aβ and APP-CTFs on the expression of transport proteins, we used: i) the β- and the γ-secretases inhibitors in APPswe cells, to modulate the processing of APP and the levels of APP-CTFs (C99 and C83) and Aβ; and ii) MEF double knock-out for presenilins 1 and 2 (components of the γ-secretase complex) (MEF PSDKO). We previously reported that both β- and γ-secretases inhibitors block Aβ production in APPswe cells [37]. We also performed a new set of experiments and confirmed that, while the inhibition of the γ-secretase triggers an accumulation of both C99 and C83 fragments in APPswe cells (Fig. 3A, and Supplementary Fig. 2A), the inhibition of the β-secretase blocks C99 production and enhances the level of C83 (Supplementary Fig. 2A). We then showed that γ-secretase inhibition in APPswe cells triggers a reduction in SNPH levels (Fig. 3B, C) and potentiates the reduction in the expression of KIF5 (A, B, C) (Fig. 3B, E). In parallel, we observed that the reduced expression in Miro1 and TRAK1 in APPswe cells remained unchanged upon γ-secretase inhibition (Fig. 3B, D), suggesting the prevalence of APP-CTFs accumulation over Aβ blockade in these alterations. Finally, we showed that the inhibition of the γ-secretase abolishes the APP-induced increases in Kif5 (low) and IC1,2 (Fig. 2B, E), thus signifying a potential implication of Aβ accumulation in these alterations. These observations indicate that the expression levels of mitochondrial transport proteins are mitigated by either APP-CTFs or Aβ accumulation.
In the same sets of experiments, we assessed the impact of γ-secretase inhibition in control cells and noticed that the endogenous accumulation of APP-CTFs [23] does not impact the expression of mitochondrial transport proteins (Supplementary Fig. 3 A–C). We also reported that β-secretase inhibition in APPswe cells does not impact the expression of our proteins of interest (Supplementary Fig. 2B), indicating the prevalence of C99 over C83 in the observed effects upon γ-secretase inhibition.
Since γ-secretase has over 150 substrates [38], we undertook to ascertain that the changes we observed in APPswe cells are genuinely linked to APP-CTFs over accumulation and not to other γ-secretase substrates. We thus demonstrated that the reported modulations of mitochondrial transport proteins (Fig. 2) are not observed in MEF APPKO treated with the γ-secretase inhibitor (Supplementary Fig. 4). This confirmed that the modulation of protein expressions observed in APPswe cells was not due to the processing of other substrates than APP by γ-secretase.
In addition, we studied the expression of the mitochondrial transport machinery complex in MEF PSDKO in which an accumulation of APP-CTFs occurs (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, MEF PSDKO showed a significant reduction in SNPH, Miro1, TRAK1, and IC1,2 levels when compared to control MEF (MEFs PSWT) (Fig. 4A–D), thus almost mimicking the results obtained in APPswe cells treated with the γ-secretase inhibitor and supporting a contribution of APP-CTFs accumulation to the alteration of the expression of mitochondrial transport machinery.
Intriguingly, we noticed that the expression of full-length Kif5 (A, B, C) and its lower band were not altered in MEF PSDKO (Fig. 4A, D), while they were regulated in APPswe-cells treated with the γ-secretase inhibitor. This may suggest that Kif5 low band production is regulated in a cell-type specific manner (SH-SY5Y versus MEFs) and/or does not solely implicate APP-CTFs accumulation.
All together, these data point out a drastic deregulation of mitochondrial transport proteins linked to PS knock-down. In fact, we revealed a reduced mitochondrial movement in MEF PSDKO when compared to their controls (Supplementary Video 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1B).
Thus, both genetic depletion and pharmacological blockade of γ-secretase concur to support a major deleterious effect of APP-CTFs accumulation on the expression of mitochondrial transport machinery.
APP and some of its derived fragments alter the colocalization of several proteins of the mitochondrial transport machinery complex with mitochondria
We used differentiated SH-SY5Y cellular models to investigate the localization of proteins of the mitochondrial transport machinery complex in a polarized cellular context. We first notice a reduction of the proliferation of control and APPswe cells and validate their morphological changes towards a phenotype of polarized cells approaching that of neurons (Supplementary Fig. 5). Differentiated control and APPswe SH-SY5Y cells show branched morphology as revealed by an increase of the staining with two microtubule markers (β3-tubulin and microtubule-associated proteins, MAP2) (Supplementary Fig. 5). Differentiated cells also show an increase of the staining of neuronal marker NeuN and of tyrosine hydroxylase (a marker for dopaminergic and adrenergic neurons) (Supplementary Fig. 5). We also verified that differentiated APPswe cells provides an AD “neuronal-like” study model showing an evident colocalization of APP-CTFs with mitochondria (γ-secretase inhibitor treatment of APPswe) in both the soma and dendrites (Fig. 5A).
We then determined the intracellular localization of SNPH, Miro1, TRAK1, TRAK2, Kif5, and IC1,2 by immunofluorescence and we stained mitochondria using TOMM20 antibody. Differentiated APPswe cells show a reduction of the localization of SNPH (Fig. 5B, C), and Kif5 (Fig. 5B, E) in mitochondria, and an increase of the localization of TRAK1 (Fig. 5B, D) in mitochondria, while the localization of Miro1, TRAK2, and IC1,2 remained unchanged (Fig. 5C–E). Interestingly, γ-secretase inhibition amplifies this phenomenon by triggering an additional diminution of the mitochondrial localization of SNPH and Miro1 (Fig. 5F, G), and of TRAK1 and TRAK2 (Fig. 5F, H). These data demonstrate that the localization of a set of transport machinery components to mitochondria is impacted by APP-CTFs accumulation. Noticeably, we observed an increase in the localization of Kif5 in mitochondria upon γ-secretase inhibition (Fig. 5F, I), while the localization of IC1,2 remained unchanged (Fig. 5I). It should be mentioned here that Kif5 (A, B, C) antibody used in the immunofluorescence analyses cannot discriminate between full-length Kif5 or cleaved Kif5 (low) forms as detected by SDS-PAGE (Figs. 1–4). We then thought to validate these observations in primary murine neurons co-transfected with APPswe construct and mit-RFP probe (Fig. 6A). We first report enhanced localization of APP with Mit-RFP probe in APPswe expressing neurons that are exacerbated upon γ-secretase inhibition as compared to control neurons expressing the empty vector. As in differentiated neuroblastoma cells, the colocalization of APP-CTFs with mitochondria was observed in both the soma and dendrites. We also evidenced a fragmentation of mitochondria structure upon γ-secretase inhibition in both control and APPswe-expressing neurons (Fig. 6A, inset 2). Importantly, we observe in primary neurons, that APP-CTFs accumulation triggered by the γ-secretase inhibition induces a reduction of the mitochondrial localization of SNPH and Miro1 (Fig. 6B, C), and of TRAK1 and Kif5 (A, B, C) (Fig. 6B, D). Noticeably, only Kif5 (A, B, C) show opposite results between differentiated neuroblastoma (increased localization with mitochondria) and primary neurons (reduced localization with mitochondria), likely linked to stable versus transient expression of APPswe in both models. Intriguingly, while the expression of transport proteins was almost not altered in APPswe cells treated with β-secretase inhibitor (Supplementary Fig. 2), we noticed in these cells a reduction in the localization of Miro1, TRAK 1 and TRAK2 (Supplementary Fig. 6A–C) and a slight increase in IC1, 2 localization to the mitochondria (Supplementary Figs. 6A, D). These data support a contribution of the α-secretase-derived APP fragment (C83) accumulation to the alteration of the localization of some transport machinery components to mitochondria.
In a complementary set of experiments, we investigated the specific impact of Aβ oligomers (Aβo) on the localization of the same set of transport proteins in mitochondria using control differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. Aβo treatment triggers a reduction in the localization of SNPH, Miro1 (Supplementary Fig. 7A, B), and TRAK1 (Supplementary Fig. 7A, C) to mitochondria, while the localization of TRAK2, Kif5, and IC1, 2 remains unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 7A, C and D).
Together, these data (Figs. 5 and 6 and Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7) firmly demonstrate a defect of the mitochondrial transport machinery localization to mitochondria linked to Aβ and APP-CTFs (C99 and C83).
The expression of several proteins of the mitochondrial transport machinery complex is altered in 3xTgAD and AAV-C99 mice
We then studied the expression of our proteins of interest in the hippocampus of the 3xTgAD mice that harbor an early and progressive accumulation of APP-CTFs starting at 2–3 months of age followed by the production and the accumulation of Aβ at 6 months of age and forming the amyloid plaques at 10–11 months of age [18, 27, 39]. We first revealed an increase in SNPH expression in young 3xTgAD mice (aged 4 months) hippocampi when compared to age-matched control mice hippocampi (Fig. 7A, B), while the levels of the expression of Miro1, TRAK1, TRAK2, Kif5, and IC1,2 expressions remain unchanged or slightly but not significantly increased (Fig. 7A, C, and D). On the contrary, we reported a significant decrease in SNPH, Miro1, and TRAK2 in old 3xTgAD mice (aged 13 months) when compared to age-matched control mice (Fig. 7E, F, and G). In parallel, while we noticed a trend decrease in the expression of TRAK1 and IC1,2 in old 3xTgAD mice hippocampi, Kif5 (A, B, C) and Kif5 (low) remain unchanged (Fig. 7A, G, and H). In addition to APPswe mutation, the 3xTgAD mice overexpress a mutated form of the Tau protein (TauP301L) and are knocked in for presenilin1 (PS1) carrying M146V mutation. Thus, in addition to an impact of APP-derived fragments, we cannot exclude a potential contribution of mutated PS1 and/or phosphorylated Tau to the alterations of the expression of the mitochondrial transport machinery complex observed in this model. To investigate the specific impact of the C99 accumulation on mitochondrial transport machinery in vivo, we used AAV-C99 mice overexpressing C99 fragment in an endogenous APP, PS, and Tau background [23]. Interestingly, SDS-PAGE analyses revealed a drastic reduction in the expression of SNPH, Miro1, TRAK1, TRAK2, and Kif5 (A, B, C) in AAV-C99 injected mice brains when compared to AAV-Free injected controls (Fig. 8A–D), thus revealing a role of APP-CTFs accumulation in mitochondrial transport alteration in vivo.
The expression of a set proteins of the mitochondrial transport machinery complex is altered in sporadic AD human brains
We lastly questioned whether human SAD brains manifest an altered expression of mitochondrial transport proteins. We stratified AD brains into early Braak stages (I-III) and late Braak stages (IV–VI) (patients’ information in Table 1). Quantitative analyses revealed a significant reduction in the expression of SNPH in Braak IV-VI AD brains versus age-matched non-demented control brains (Fig. 9A, B), while TRAK2 (Fig. 9A, E) and IC1,2 (Fig. 9A, H) levels were gradually reduced in a disease-dependent manner (i.e., Braak IV–VI AD brains versus Braak stages (I–III) AD brains). Interestingly, correlation studies including control and AD brains revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between the expression levels of several transport proteins (Fig. 9K), namely between SNPH and TRAK1, TRAK2, and Kif5 (A, B, C). Miro1 expression also positively correlates with that of TRAK1, Kif5 (A, B, C), Kif5 low, and IC1, 2. Both TRAK1 and TRAK2 expressions correlate with Kif5 (A, B, C). Finally, IC1, 2 expression level correlates with TRAK2 and Kif5 (A, B, C) (Fig. 9K). These correlations have to be put in perspective with the fact that transport proteins follow a decreased expression trend in a disease-dependent manner in AD. We further documented the relationship between the level of APP-CTFs and Aβ (Fig. 9I-K and Supplementary Fig. 8A), and the expression of transport proteins and showed statistically significant negative correlations of SNPH, and TRAK1 levels with APP-CTFs levels, and of TRAK2 expressions with Aβ level (Fig. 9K). These AD brains also manifest enhanced phosphorylation of Tau on threonine231(pTauT231) and serine422 (pTauS422) residues quantified versus total Tau protein (tTau) (Supplementary Fig. 8B). However, we did not find significant correlations between the expression of transport proteins and pTauS422 but not with pTauT231 levels (Supplementary Fig. 8C).
Together, these data support the findings in cellular and mice AD models mimicking familial forms of the disease and point out altered expression of mitochondrial transport proteins in human AD brains, mostly contributed by APP-CTFs.
Discussion
In the current study, we unraveled several alterations in the expression and localization of different components of the mitochondrial transport machinery in cellular and mice AD models and in human post-mortem SAD brains. We reported that depletion of the endogenous full-length APP is associated with a reduced mitochondria movement that is most likely linked to an enhanced expression of the stop protein SNPH and to reduced expression of dynein (lC 1,2) motor. Moreover, the enhanced expression of Miro1, TRAK1, TRAK2, and Kif5 (A, B, C) in APPKO cells further highlights a potential direct or indirect role for the endogenous APP in the control of mitochondrial transport proteins. In fact, previous studies have shown that vesicular APP is transported along axons and that APP directly interacts with Disrupted-In-SChizophrenia 1 (DISC1), shown to regulate anterograde mitochondrial transport and to interact with Miro1 and TRAK1/2 [40]. In addition, APP also interacts with the kinesin light chain subunit KLC1 (Kinesin light chain 1) and acts as a conventional cargo for kinesin-I microtubule motor protein [41].
We carried out experiments to investigate the specific impact of the accumulation of APP-derived fragments on mitochondrial transport components and used a cellular model overexpressing an AD familial mutation (SH-SY5Y APPswe). This cellular model combined with pharmacological modulation of β- and γ-secretase activities allows us to demonstrate that both Aβ and C99 contribute to the alteration of the expression of mitochondrial transport components. As a matter of fact, the reduction in the expression of Miro1 and TRAK1 in APPswe cells is maintained upon γ-secretase inhibition that blocks Aβ production and exacerbates APP-CTFs overaccumulation. Moreover, we reported a reduction in the expression of SNPH and of full-length Kif5 (A, B, C) in APPswe cells treated with the γ-secretase inhibitor. Our results in AAV-C99 mice brains further support a pathogenic molecular signature of the mitochondrial transport proteins linked to C99 accumulation in vivo.
The defect of mitochondrial movement and the alterations of the expression of transport proteins in PSDKO cells could likely be associated to APP-CTFs accumulation. However, we must not exclude that the defects reported in this model could occur in a γ-secretase-independent manner, through PS-mediated control of vesicular transport and trafficking [42]. This assumption is supported by a pioneer study by Kamal et al. demonstrating that vesicular PS1 is transported with APP along axons by kinesin 1 [41]. In light of our findings and this observation, one may speculate that PS depletion (or loss of function linked to familial forms of AD) could destabilize vesicular transport and impact global transport machinery.
Our experiments in APPswe cells revealed an increase in the expression of Kif5 (low band) and IC 1,2 that seems to be linked with Aβ production since these alterations are reversed by γ-secretase inhibition. Consistent with a specific toxic effect of Aβ on transport machinery, a recent study reported a reduction of Miro1 level by Aβo [43]. Accordingly, we reported a reduction of Miro1 colocalization with mitochondria in differentiated neuroblastoma cells treated with Aβo.
Previous studies have suggested that APP axonal transport by kinesin-I may interfere with vesicular APP processing to Aβ and APP-CTFs occurring in an axonal membrane compartment containing β-secretase and PS1 [41]. A second study demonstrated that knock-down of DISC1, is accompanied by an increase in APP-CTFα and a decrease in Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels [44]. Our findings provide original observations demonstrating that endogenous full-length APP as well as the accumulation of APP-derived fragments occurring under AD conditions interfere in turn with transport machinery. Since these alterations affect both dynein and kinesin motors and implicate several mitochondrial adapters as well as the stop protein SNPH, we may hypothesize that APP and its derived fragments impact global anterograde and retrograde mitochondrial transport under physiological and AD conditions.
Although differentiated neuroblastoma cells are not fully functional neurons, they are an alternative study system mimicking polarized primary culture of neurons. Moreover, differentiated SH-SY5Y APPswe cells still overproduce APP-derived fragments, the accumulation of which is enhanced by γ-secretase inhibitor. Using these models, we demonstrated that the loss of the localization of the transport proteins to mitochondria is an additional molecular event regulated by APP-derived fragments (C99, C83, and Aβ) and likely perturbing mitochondria anterograde and retrograde transport. Importantly, we also demonstrate the impact of APP-CTFs accumulation on the localization of mitochondria and transport machinery in murine primary neuron cultures. These data fully consolidate our biochemical data demonstrating an alteration of the expression of a set of mitochondrial transport machinery components linked to APPswe overexpression and concomitantly implicating C99 and Aβ accumulation.
Mitophagy failure is commonly associated with several AD-related proteins (Tau, Aβ, APP-CTFs, and APOE) [45] and is likely associated with a defect of mitochondrial transport along axons. Importantly, genetic deletion of Miro1 or the blockade of Miro1 ubiquitination and subsequent degradation leads to a delayed translocation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin onto damaged mitochondria and reduced mitochondrial clearance by mitophagy in both fibroblasts and cultured neurons [46]. On the other side, Pink1 and Parkin act in concert to target Miro1 to proteasomal degradation to arrest mitochondria motility [47, 48]. These observations and other studies have proposed Miro1 as a molecular marker for the risk of Parkinson’s disease and as a potential therapeutic target for the disease [49, 50]. Interestingly, our data revealed that Miro1 expression is drastically reduced in APPswe cells and is also modulated in AAV-C99 and 3xTgAD-aged mice brains. We also revealed that Miro1 localization to mitochondria is impacted by APP-CTFs accumulation and Aβo treatment in differentiated neuroblastoma cells. These observations place Miro1 as a key molecular actor likely controlling both mitochondrial transport and mitophagy defects occurring in AD.
We reported that SNPH expression is reduced in concert with APP-CTFs accumulation in APPswe cells, in aged 3xTgAD mice (13-month-old) hippocampi and AAV-C99 injected mice brains and also noticed a slight decrease in human SAD brains at advanced stages of the disease. Moreover, the reduced expression level of SNPH in human brains significantly correlates with APP-CTFs and to a lesser extent with Aβ and pathogenic pTau (T231 and S422). SNPH deficit may likely contribute to AD development or progression. In fact, SNPH is linked to synaptic dysfunction accompanying the loss of static mitochondria [4]. On the contrary, enhanced levels of SNPH in young 3xTgAD mice could be taken as a compensatory mechanism that ensures local mitochondria movement arrest allowing calcium buffering and ATP release at the level of altered synapses [51]. In fact, previous studies reported that SNPH expression increases in mature neurons in mice [52] and plays an essential role in synaptic plasticity and in the stimulation of the liberation of synaptic vesicles [53, 54].
TRAK1/2 adapters coordinate opposing motors (i.e., kinesin-1 and dynein) for the proper transport of mitochondria [6]. While a previous study has shown that TRAK2 protein level is reduced by caspase3-truncated Tau [55], the specific impact of Aβ and APP-CTFs was unknown. We unraveled herein a reduction of the expression and the localization in mitochondria of TRAK1 and/or TRAK2 linked to APP-CTFs accumulation and/or Aβo treatment. Importantly, our results in human brains at late AD stages support a reduction of TRAK1/2 expression linked to AD progression that correlates with Aβ (TRAK2) or APP-CTFs (TRAK1).
The contribution of the kinesin Kif5 (A, B, C) to mitochondria transport defect in AD is still not clear. While a previous study showed enhanced Kif5A levels at late Braak stages [56], a second paper reported a diminution of Kif5A by Aβ [57]. Our results show on the one hand an Aβ-dependent Kif5 (A, B, C) down-expression in APPswe cells and on the other hand that the lesser localization of KiF5 (A, B, C) to mitochondria is linked to both APP-CTFs and Aβ. Strikingly, we did not observe any significant alteration of the expression of Kif5 (A, B, C) or its cleaved form in human post-mortem brains cohort. Moreover, while IC1, 2 down expression positively correlates with TRAK2 and Kif5 (A, B, C) levels, it did not correlate with any of AD-related proteins. These observations may question the genuine role of Kif5 (A, B, C) and IC1,2 in AD development.
We and other laboratories have reported that 3xTgAD mice models develop in an age-dependent manner alteration of synaptic markers, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive deficits [58, 59]. Similarly, we previously reported synaptic plasticity deficit (i.e., reduced long-term potentiation) in AAV-C99 mice [22] and demonstrated a link between APP-CTFs accumulation and decreased spontaneous activity, altered LTP and learning deficits in 3xTgAD mice [18]. Moreover, our recent study reported altered mitochondria structure in neurons and of autophagy/mitophagy in brains of 3xTgAD (at 5-6 months old) and AAV-C99 mice (at both 2–3 and 12 months old) [23]. Decreased mitochondria respiration was also described in young 3xTgAD mice at 3 months old [60]. These results strongly suggest that altered neuronal function and cognitive deficits in our mice models are likely linked to altered mitochondria function and to the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria. The current study reports a dysregulation of the expression of key mitochondrial transport proteins (in cells, two different AD murine models, and in human SAD brains) and an altered colocalization of mitochondria with transport machinery (in differentiated neuroblastoma model and murine primary neurons). These results led us to assume that altered mitochondria transport likely contributes to the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria (defect of retrograde transport) and to neuronal demise (anterograde transport) in our AD murine models. However, we still need a dedicated study to fully demonstrate the functional link between mitochondrial transport and neuronal plasticity.
Together, our data unravel novel molecular mechanisms impacting mitochondria transport, the defect of which may contribute to the loss of the transport of dysfunctional mitochondria to their sites for degradation by mitophagy and of healthy ones for the delivery of ATP to synapses. This study will certainly stimulate further research targeting mitochondria transport machinery as a means to modulate simultaneously defects of mitochondria movement and mitophagy processes occurring in AD.
References
Kann O, Kovacs R. Mitochondria and neuronal activity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;292:C641–57.
Seager R, Lee L, Henley JM, Wilkinson KA. Mechanisms and roles of mitochondrial localisation and dynamics in neuronal function. Neuronal Signal. 2020;4:NS20200008.
Rossi MJ, Pekkurnaz G. Powerhouse of the mind: mitochondrial plasticity at the synapse. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019;57:149–55.
Kang JS, Tian JH, Pan PY, Zald P, Li C, Deng C, et al. Docking of axonal mitochondria by syntaphilin controls their mobility and affects short-term facilitation. Cell 2008;132:137–48.
Roney JC, Cheng XT, Sheng ZH. Neuronal endolysosomal transport and lysosomal functionality in maintaining axonostasis. J Cell Biol. 2022;221:e202111077.
Kruppa AJ, Buss F. Motor proteins at the mitochondria-cytoskeleton interface. J Cell Sci. 2021;134:jcs226084.
Kanai Y, Okada Y, Tanaka Y, Harada A, Terada S, Hirokawa N. KIF5C, a novel neuronal kinesin enriched in motor neurons. J Neurosci. 2000;20:6374–84.
Pfister KK, Shah PR, Hummerich H, Russ A, Cotton J, Annuar AA, et al. Genetic analysis of the cytoplasmic dynein subunit families. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e1.
Brickley K, Stephenson FA. Trafficking kinesin protein (TRAK)-mediated transport of mitochondria in axons of hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:18079–92.
Zinsmaier KE. Mitochondrial Miro GTPases coordinate mitochondrial and peroxisomal dynamics. Small GTPases. 2021;12:372–98.
Russo GJ, Louie K, Wellington A, Macleod GT, Hu F, Panchumarthi S, et al. Drosophila Miro is required for both anterograde and retrograde axonal mitochondrial transport. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5443–55.
Andrew RJ, Kellett KA, Thinakaran G, Hooper NM. A Greek Tragedy: the growing complexity of Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein proteolysis. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:19235–44.
Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, Holstege H, Chetelat G, Teunissen CE, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2021;397:1577–90.
Del Prete D, Suski JM, Oulès B, Debayle D, Gay AS, Lacas-Gervais S, et al. Localization and processing of the amyloid-β protein precursor in mitochondria-associated membranes. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;55:1549–70.
Eysert F, Kinoshita PF, Mary A, Vaillant-Beuchot L, Checler F, Chami M. Molecular dysfunctions of mitochondria-associated membranes (mams) in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:9521.
De Strooper B, Karran E. The cellular phase of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 2016;164:603–15.
Kim S, Sato Y, Mohan PS, Peterhoff C, Pensalfini A, Rigoglioso A, et al. Evidence that the rab5 effector APPL1 mediates APP-betaCTF-induced dysfunction of endosomes in Down syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:707–16.
Bourgeois A, Lauritzen I, Lorivel T, Bauer C, Checler F, Pardossi-Piquard R. Intraneuronal accumulation of C99 contributes to synaptic alterations, apathy-like behavior, and spatial learning deficits in 3xTgAD and 2xTgAD mice. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;71:21–31.
Mondragon-Rodriguez S, Gu N, Manseau F, Williams S. Alzheimer’s transgenic model is characterized by very early brain network alterations and beta-CTF fragment accumulation: reversal by beta-secretase inhibition. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:121.
Lauritzen I, Pardossi-Piquard R, Bourgeois A, Becot A, Checler F. Does intraneuronal accumulation of carboxyl-terminal fragments of the amyloid precursor protein trigger early neurotoxicity in Alzheimer’s disease? Curr Alzheimer Res. 2019;16:453–7.
Jiang Y, Mullaney KA, Peterhoff CM, Che S, Schmidt SD, Boyer-Boiteau A, et al. Alzheimer’s-related endosome dysfunction in Down syndrome is Abeta-independent but requires APP and is reversed by BACE-1 inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:1630–5.
Lauritzen I, Pardossi-Piquard R, Bourgeois A, Pagnotta S, Biferi M-G, Barkats M, et al. Intraneuronal aggregation of the β-CTF fragment of APP (C99) induces Aβ-independent lysosomal-autophagic pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;132:257–76.
Vaillant-Beuchot L, Mary A, Pardossi-Piquard R, Bourgeois A, Lauritzen I, Eysert F, et al. Accumulation of amyloid precursor protein C-terminal fragments triggers mitochondrial structure, function, and mitophagy defects in Alzheimer’s disease models and human brains. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;141:39–65.
Lee SE, Kwon D, Shin N, Kong D, Kim NG, Kim HY, et al. Accumulation of APP-CTF induces mitophagy dysfunction in the iNSCs model of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8:1.
Pulina MV, Hopkins M, Haroutunian V, Greengard P, Bustos V. C99 selectively accumulates in vulnerable neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020;16:273–82.
Flannery PJ, Trushina E. Mitochondrial dynamics and transport in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2019;98:109–20.
Oddo S, Caccamo A, Shepherd JD, Murphy MP, Golde TE, Kayed R, et al. Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Abeta and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron 2003;39:409–21.
Benkhelifa-Ziyyat S, Besse A, Roda M, Duque S, Astord S, Carcenac R, et al. Intramuscular scAAV9-SMN injection mediates widespread gene delivery to the spinal cord and decreases disease severity in SMA mice. Mol Ther. 2013;21:282–90.
Oules B, Del Prete D, Greco B, Zhang X, Lauritzen I, Sevalle J, et al. Ryanodine receptor blockade reduces amyloid-beta load and memory impairments in Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J Neurosci. 2012;32:11820–34.
Heber S, Herms J, Gajic V, Hainfellner J, Aguzzi A, Rulicke T, et al. Mice with combined gene knock-outs reveal essential and partially redundant functions of amyloid precursor protein family members. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7951–63.
Herreman A, Serneels L, Annaert W, Collen D, Schoonjans L, De Strooper B. Total inactivation of gamma-secretase activity in presenilin-deficient embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:461–2.
Probst G, Aubele DL, Bowers S, Dressen D, Garofalo AW, Hom RK, et al. Discovery of (R)-4-cyclopropyl-7,8-difluoro-5-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenylsulfonyl)-4,5-dihydro- 1H-pyrazolo[4,3-c]quinoline (ELND006) and (R)-4-cyclopropyl-8-fluoro-5-(6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-4,5-dihydr o-2H-pyrazolo[4,3-c]quinoline (ELND007): metabolically stable gamma-secretase Inhibitors that selectively inhibit the production of amyloid-beta over Notch. J Med Chem. 2013;56:5261–74.
May PC, Dean RA, Lowe SL, Martenyi F, Sheehan SM, Boggs LN, et al. Robust central reduction of amyloid-beta in humans with an orally available, non-peptidic beta-secretase inhibitor. J Neurosci. 2011;31:16507–16.
Shipley MM, Mangold CA, Szpara ML. Differentiation of the SH-SY5Y Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line. J Vis Exp. 2016(108):e53193.
Chami M, Oules B, Szabadkai G, Tacine R, Rizzuto R, Paterlini-Brechot P. Role of SERCA1 truncated isoform in the proapoptotic calcium transfer from ER to mitochondria during ER stress. Mol Cell. 2008;32:641–51.
Cho Y, Bae HG, Okun E, Arumugam TV, Jo DG. Physiology and pharmacology of amyloid precursor protein. Pharm Ther. 2022;235:108122.
Bussiere R, Lacampagne A, Reiken S, Liu X, Scheuerman V, Zalk R, et al. Amyloid beta production is regulated by beta2-adrenergic signaling-mediated post-translational modifications of the ryanodine receptor. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:10153–68.
Wolfe MS. Unraveling the complexity of gamma-secretase. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020;105:3–11.
Lauritzen I, Pardossi-Piquard R, Bauer C, Brigham E, Abraham JD, Ranaldi S, et al. The beta-secretase-derived C-terminal fragment of betaAPP, C99, but not Abeta, is a key contributor to early intraneuronal lesions in triple-transgenic mouse hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2012;32:16243–1655a.
Quintero H, Shiga Y, Belforte N, Alarcon-Martinez L, El Hajji S, Villafranca-Baughman D, et al. Restoration of mitochondria axonal transport by adaptor Disc1 supplementation prevents neurodegeneration and rescues visual function. Cell Rep. 2022;40:111324.
Kamal A, Stokin GB, Yang Z, Xia CH, Goldstein LS. Axonal transport of amyloid precursor protein is mediated by direct binding to the kinesin light chain subunit of kinesin-I. Neuron 2000;28:449–59.
Vetrivel KS, Zhang YW, Xu H, Thinakaran G. Pathological and physiological functions of presenilins. Mol Neurodegener. 2006;1:4.
Kam MK, Lee DG, Kim B, Huh J-W, Lee HJ, Park Y-H, et al. Amyloid-beta oligomers induce Parkin-mediated mitophagy by reducing Miro1. Biochem J. 2020;477:4581–97.
Shahani N, Seshadri S, Jaaro-Peled H, Ishizuka K, Hirota-Tsuyada Y, Wang Q, et al. DISC1 regulates trafficking and processing of APP and Abeta generation. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:874–9.
Mary A, Eysert F, Checler F, Chami M. Mitophagy in Alzheimer’s disease: Molecular defects and therapeutic approaches. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;28:202–16.
Lopez-Domenech G, Howden JH, Covill-Cooke C, Morfill C, Patel JV, Burli R, et al. Loss of neuronal Miro1 disrupts mitophagy and induces hyperactivation of the integrated stress response. EMBO J. 2021;40:e100715.
Wang X, Winter D, Ashrafi G, Schlehe J, Wong YL, Selkoe D, et al. PINK1 and Parkin target Miro for phosphorylation and degradation to arrest mitochondrial motility. Cell 2011;147:893–906.
Shlevkov E, Kramer T, Schapansky J, LaVoie MJ, Schwarz TL. Miro phosphorylation sites regulate Parkin recruitment and mitochondrial motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E6097–E106.
Grossmann D, Berenguer-Escuder C, Chemla A, Arena G, Kruger R. The emerging role of RHOT1/Miro1 in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2020;11:587.
Hsieh CH, Li L, Vanhauwaert R, Nguyen KT, Davis MD, Bu G, et al. Miro1 marks Parkinson’s disease subset and Miro1 reducer rescues neuron loss in Parkinson’s models. Cell Metab. 2019;30:1131–40.e7.
Lin M-Y, Cheng X-T, Tammineni P, Xie Y, Zhou B, Cai Q, et al. Releasing syntaphilin removes stressed mitochondria from axons independent of mitophagy under pathophysiological conditions. Neuron 2017;94:595–610.e6.
Zhou B, Yu P, Lin MY, Sun T, Chen Y, Sheng ZH. Facilitation of axon regeneration by enhancing mitochondrial transport and rescuing energy deficits. J Cell Biol. 2016;214:103–19.
Lao G, Scheuss V, Gerwin CM, Su Q, Mochida S, Rettig J, et al. Syntaphilin: a syntaxin-1 clamp that controls SNARE assembly. Neuron 2000;25:191–201.
Boczan J, Leenders AG, Sheng ZH. Phosphorylation of syntaphilin by cAMP-dependent protein kinase modulates its interaction with syntaxin-1 and annuls its inhibitory effect on vesicle exocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:18911–9.
Quintanilla RA, Tapia-Monsalves C, Vergara EH, Perez MJ, Aranguiz A. Truncated tau induces mitochondrial transport failure through the impairment of TRAK2 protein and bioenergetics decline in neuronal cells. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:175.
Hares K, Miners JS, Cook AJ, Rice C, Scolding N, Love S, et al. Overexpression of kinesin superfamily motor proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60:1511–24.
Wang Q, Tian J, Chen H, Du H, Guo L. Amyloid beta-mediated KIF5A deficiency disrupts anterograde axonal mitochondrial movement. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;127:410–8.
Baglietto-Vargas D, Prieto GA, Limon A, Forner S, Rodriguez-Ortiz CJ, Ikemura K, et al. Impaired AMPA signaling and cytoskeletal alterations induce early synaptic dysfunction in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell. 2018;17:e12791.
Cisse M, Duplan E, Lorivel T, Dunys J, Bauer C, Meckler X, et al. The transcription factor XBP1s restores hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory by control of the Kalirin-7 pathway in Alzheimer model. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:1562–75.
Yao J, Irwin RW, Zhao L, Nilsen J, Hamilton RT, Brinton RD. Mitochondrial bioenergetic deficit precedes Alzheimer’s pathology in female mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:14670–5.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge PhD fellow support from the research ministry to LVB. We thank Dr LaFerla for providing 3xTgAD mice, Dr. Fraser for the APP-Cter antibody and Dr. U. Muller for MEF APPKO and their control MEF, and Dr. De Strooper for MEF PSDKO and their control MEF.
Funding
This work was supported by LABEX (excellence laboratory, program investment for the future) DISTALZ (Development of Innovative Strategies for a Transdisciplinary approach to Alzheimer’s disease) (FC and LB), IDEX UCAJedi: Appel Jeunes Chercheurs 2022 (MC and FE), France Alzheimer (Grant # 8217) (MC), Université Côte d’Azur (Living-systems-complexity-and-diversity) (MC), and São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Grant #2018/14289-6) (PFK and MC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MC conceived and designed the study, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. LVB set up and performed experiments, analyzed data, and participated in manuscript writing. FE, BD, and PFK conducted biochemistry in mice models. FE performed experiments in primary neurons. RPP produced AAV-C99 mice. CB maintained mice colonies and performed Aβ ELISA analyses. SE and LB performed Tau ELISA analyses.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Consent for publication All authors read the final version of the article and consent to its publication.
Edited by Massimiliano Agostini
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vaillant-Beuchot, L., Eysert, F., Duval, B. et al. The amyloid precursor protein and its derived fragments concomitantly contribute to the alterations of mitochondrial transport machinery in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Death Dis 15, 367 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06742-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06742-2
- Springer Nature Limited