Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women worldwide. Many genes are involved in the development of breast cancer, including the Kruppel Like Factor 12 (KLF12) gene, which has been implicated in the development and progression of several cancers. However, the comprehensive regulatory network of KLF12 in breast cancer has not yet been fully elucidated. This study examined the role of KLF12 in breast cancer and its associated molecular mechanisms. KLF12 was found to promote the proliferation of breast cancer and inhibit apoptosis in response to genotoxic stress. Subsequent mechanistic studies showed that KLF12 inhibits the activity of the p53/p21 axis, specifically by interacting with p53 and affecting its protein stability via influencing the acetylation and ubiquitination of lysine370/372/373 at the C-terminus of p53. Furthermore, KLF12 disrupted the interaction between p53 and p300, thereby reducing the acetylation of p53 and stability. Meanwhile, KLF12 also inhibited the transcription of p21 independently of p53. These results suggest that KLF12 might have an important role in breast cancer and serve as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Breast cancer is the leading cancer in women and the fourth cause of cancer-related death in China [1]. Surgery is the best treatment approach for primary breast cancer, while chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and radiotherapy remain the most effective therapeutic methods for advanced-stage breast cancer. However, despite significant advances in early detection and steady progress in treating systemic agents, most patients are resistant to drugs. Over the years, understanding the underlying biological mechanisms of breast cancer has led to identifying novel molecular targets and developing targeted therapies.
The Kruppel-like family (KLF) of transcription factors involves multiple processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, migration, and pluripotency [2, 3]. KLF12 was first identified as a transcription factor for activating protein-2 (AP-2). KLF12 has a Pro-Xaa-Asp-Leu-Ser (PVDLS) motif at the N-terminus, allowing it to bind to the transcription corepressor C-terminal binding protein (CtBP). In addition, KLF12 binds to promotors of its target genes at the consensus sequence CAGTGGG [4, 5]. Increasing evidence has shown that KLF12 has an important role in several kinds of cancer by affecting different biological processes [6, 7]. Furthermore, KLF12 has been reported to be a tumor suppressor or inducer tightly dependent on the different signaling crosstalks or partners in a specific cellular environment [6,7,8,9,10]. However, the comprehensive regulatory network of KLF12 in cancer has not been fully elucidated.
More recently, the tumor suppressor microRNA-205 has been reported to directly target KLF12 and inhibit the invasion and apoptosis of basal-like breast carcinoma (BLBC), suggesting that KLF12 may be a potential biomarker of BLBC [11, 12]. In addition, through Expression Data Analysis, Rajeswary and coworkers have verified KLF12 as a potential target for controlling breast cancer development without harming pregnancy and the fetal developmental process [13]. These findings suggest that KLF12 may have an important role in breast cancer. However, these studies lack direct experimental data. Thus, exploring the molecular mechanism of KLF12 in breast cancer may provide new information for improving breast cancer treatment.
The tumor suppressor p53 functions as a transcription factor and regulates downstream targets responsible for homeostasis and defense against tumorigenesis [14]. KLF4, a member of the KLF family, can interact with p53 and mediate the transcription of p21 [15]. KLF9, another member of the KLF family, can inhibit the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and cause apoptosis by inducing the transcription of p53 [16]. Besides, genome-wide analysis of p53 ChIP-Seq has predicted KLF12 to be a co-regulator with p53 [17]. Therefore, we speculated that KLF12 might regulate the occurrence and development of breast cancer through the p53 signaling pathway. As a cellular gatekeeper for growth, p53 mediates the events in the cell cycle and apoptosis by regulating the expression of downstream target genes [18,19,20], such as p21, GADD45, PUMA, and cyclin G [21, 22]. p21 is an important inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and in the regulation of CDK activity and cell cycle progression, p21 has also been found to be involved in cell differentiation, senescence, DNA repair, and apoptosis [23, 24]. In breast cancer, p21 is regarded as a protein with dual functions, as it is thought to be the chief mediator of p53-dependent cell cycle arrest caused by a stimulus, such as DNA damage, oncogene activation, and hypoxia [24]. Cisplatin (CDDP), a chemotherapeutic agent commonly used in the clinic, can cause DNA damage and induce the tumor cells to undergo apoptosis with increased expression of p53 and p21 [25, 26]. However, p21 may also be an oncogene because it can inhibit cell apoptosis [27]. Therefore, careful planning is needed if p21 is the intended target of the therapy for breast cancer patients.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of p53, such as methylation, acetylation, SUMOylation, and ubiquitination, have important roles in regulating the transcriptional activity and protein stability of p53 [28]. p53 is subject to acetylation by p300/CBP at multiple lysine residues (residues 370, 372,373, 381, 382, and 386) [29]. Lys216 and Lys305 were later found to be acetylated by p300/CBP [30, 31]. These six lysine residues (Lys 370, 372,373, 381, 382, and 386) can also be ubiquitinated. Acetylation at these sites prevents p53 from being ubiquitinated, thus increasing its stability [31, 32].
In this study, we examined the role of KLF12 in breast cancer and its associated molecular mechanisms. The results showed that KLF12 could promote the proliferation of breast cancer cells and inhibit the apoptosis of cancer cells treated with CDDP. Such effects of KLF12 on breast cancer cells appeared to stem from its ability to inhibit the stability of p53 by reducing p300-mediated acetylation of p53 and to directly inhibit the transcription p21 by binding to the promoter of p21. This data may further our understanding of the molecular mechanism of KLF12 in breast cancer.
Results
KLF12 has an important role in the proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis of breast cancer cells
Previous studies have shown that KLF12 may have an important role in breast cancer [11, 13]. To further investigate the role of KLF12 in breast cancer, we first examined the protein levels of KLF12 in breast cancer cells (MCF-7, ZR-75-30, T47D, and MDA-MB-231). A higher level of KLF12 was found in ZR-75-30, MDA-MB-231 cells, and T47D cells compared with MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1a).
Next, the effect of KLF12 on the growth and tumorigenesis of breast cancers was determined by evaluating its effect on the viability of the cells using an MTT assay. A significant increase in cell viability was detected in MCF-7 cells that overexpressed KLF12 compared with those that did not overexpress KLF12 (Fig. 1b). After knocking down the expression of KLF12, the viability of ZR-75-30 cells was reduced (Figs. 1c and S1a).
To further consolidate this observation, colony formation was performed. The results showed that overexpression of KLF12 resulted in a marked increase in cell number, while the knockdown of KLF12 decreased the colony formation (Fig. S1b). Collectively, the results suggested that KLF12 could promote the growth of breast cancer cells.
These cells were further subjected to cell cycle and apoptosis assays. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that overexpression of KLF12 in MCF-7 cells reduced the number of cells in the G0/G1 phase and G2/M phase and increased the number of cells in the S phase (Fig. 1d). Conversely, the knockdown of KLF12 expression in ZR-75-30 cells increased the number of cells in the G0/G1 phase and G2/M (Fig. 1d). Notably, the percentage of early apoptotic cells significantly decreased in KLF12-overexpressing MCF-7 cells when treated with CDDP (Fig. 1e). Meanwhile, the percentage of early apoptotic cells was significantly increased in ZR-75-30 cells with KLF12 knockdown (Fig. 1e). Collectively, these results suggested that KLF12 might have an important role in promoting growth and inhibiting apoptosis in breast cancer cells.
KLF12 is a transcription repressor of p21 that inhibits p53-mediated transcriptional activation of p21
The molecular mechanisms underlying the proliferative and anti-apoptotic effect of KLF12 were further explored. Previous studies have predicted that KLF12 may be a co-regulator of p53 [17]. Therefore, we hypothesized that KLF12 might regulate the development of breast cancer cells through the p53 signaling pathway. To verify our hypothesis, qPCR was used to check the mRNA levels of TP53 and p53 downstream target genes in KLF12-overexpressing MCF-7 cells and KLF12-knockdown ZR-75-30 cells. The mRNA levels of p53 target genes, such as p21, GADD45, PUMA, and cyclin G decreased while the mRNA level of TP53 remained relatively unchanged in KLF12-overexpressing MCF-7 cells (Figs. 2a and S2a), demonstrating that KLF12 down-regulate the transcription of p53 target genes. Consistent with this result, the mRNA levels of p53 target genes increased while the mRNA level of TP53 remained unchanged in KLF12-knockdown ZR-75-30 cells (Fig. S2b, c).
As a CDK inhibitor and a classical gene transcriptionally regulated by p53, p21 bridges the function of a tumor suppressor with the cell cycle [33]. Following the activation of p53, e.g., by a viral infection or induction of DNA damage, the p21 gene is transcriptionally activated by p53 [34]. Therefore, we next assessed the effect of KLF12 on the p53/p21 signal axis via luciferase reporter assay. The activity of p21-Luc was inhibited in MCF-7 cells that overexpressed KLF12 (Fig. 2b), while the activity of p53-Luc did not significantly change (Fig. S2d). Contrary, the knockdown of KLF12 expression in ZR-75-30 cells resulted in increased activity of p21-Luc in these cells (Fig. 2c). Taken together, KLF12 could down-regulate the mRNA level of p21 by transcriptionally suppressing the activity of its promoter.
To investigate the mechanism through which KLF12 down-regulates the activity of the p21 promoter, we checked for a KLF12-binding site on the p21 promoter. Three KLF12 binding sites (−1677 to −1671, −1589 to −1583, − 1300 to −1294) close to the binding site of p53 (−1396 to −1377) were found on the p21 promoter (Fig. 2d). ChIP experiment was then conducted, and the result showed that KLF12 could bind to the p21 promoter (Fig. 2e). However, when all three KLF12-binding sites were mutant, a dramatic drop in the inhibitory effect of KLF12 occurred, yielding an approximately 30% decrease in the inhibition of p21 transcription. Nonetheless, the inhibition did not completely disappear (Fig. 2f), which means the KLF12-binding sites may not be the only way KLF12 inhibits the transcription of p21. Previous studies have shown that KLF12 may be the co-regulator of p53. Therefore, we suspected that KLF12 could inhibit the transcription of p21 through p53. Knocking down the expression of p53 abolished the KLF12-mediated suppression of KLF12-mut-p21-Luc activity (Figs. 2g and S2e). Moreover, KLF12 also inhibited p53-mediated transcriptional activation of p21 (Fig. 2h). These findings confirmed that KLF12 inhibits the transcription of p21 by affecting p53.
To further verify that KLF12 is a co-regulator of p53, a ChIP-Re-ChIP assay was carried out using HEK293T cells. The result indicated that KLF12 and p53 were co-located with the p21 promoter, indicating that KLF12 may interact with p53 on the promoter of p21 (Fig. 2i). Yet, the knockdown of p53 did not affect the binding of KLF12 to the p21 promoter, suggesting that the binding of KLF12 to the p21 promoter was independent of p53 (Fig. 2j). Subsequent reporter gene assays further indicated that KLF12 could inhibit the activity of p53-mut-p21-Luc with p53 binding sequence mutation, which means KLF12 could inhibit p21 transcription independently of p53 (Fig. 2k). Besides, deletion of the ZNF (Zinc-finger) domain in KLF12 (Flag-Δ2KLF12) abolished the KLF12-mediated inhibition of p53-mut-p21-Luc (Fig. 2k). To sum up, KLF12 inhibits p21 transcription in both p53-dependent and p53-independent ways.
To further explore this hypothesis, a series of p21-Luc truncated constructs (Fig. 2l) were used to verify the specific binding sites through which KLF12 could regulate the transcription of p21. The p21-Luc lost about 75% of the reporter activity in the presence of KLF12 overexpression. Deletion of KLF12-binding site 1 (−1677 to −1671) led to an approximately 15% decrease in KLF12 inhibitory activity; deletion of KLF12-binding site 1 (−1677 to −1671) and KLF12-binding site 2 (−1589 to −1583) led to a 27% decrease in KLF12 inhibitory activity. Interestingly, the deletion of KLF12-binding sites 1 and 2 and the p53-binding site (−1396 to −1377) resulted in an almost complete loss of KLF12 inhibitory activity. The above experiments indicate that KLF12 can inhibit p21-Luc activity through KLF12-binding sites 1 and 2 as well as the p53-binding site on the p21 promoter (Fig. 2l). Thus, KLF12 could act as a co-regulator of p53 and regulate the transcription of p21 through its effect on p53.
KLF12 interacts with p53
The ability of KLF12 to inhibit the transcription of p21 via p53 and co-localization with p53 on the p21 promoter led us to hypothesize that KLF12 might inhibit the transcriptional activity of p53 by interacting with p53. To confirm this hypothesis, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) assay in ZR-75-30 (Fig. 3a, b) and HEK293T cells (Fig. 3c, d). The results showed an interaction between endogenous and exogenous KLF12 and p53. Immunofluorescence and GST-pulldown assays were conducted to further verify the interaction between KLF12 and p53. Immunofluorescence assay demonstrated that KLF12 co-localized with p53 in the nucleus (Fig. 3e), and GST-pulldown revealed evidence of direct interaction between purified GST-KLF12 and endogenous p53 in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 3f). Moreover, to validate which region of the two proteins was involved in the interaction, mutants of KLF12 and p53 were constructed (Fig. 3g, h). The CoIP results indicated that KLF12 interacted with p53 through its N-terminal 1–144aa (Fig. 3g), and only full-length p53 could interact with KLF12 (Fig. 3h). Taken together, these results indicate the existence of physical interaction between KLF12 and p53 in breast cancer cells.
KLF12 reduces the stability of p53
To further establish the detailed mechanism through which KLF12 could inhibit p53-mediated transcription of p21, the influence of KLF12 on the protein level of p53 was first determined. A dose-dependent reduction of exogenous p53 occurred with increasing doses of KLF12 in HEK293T cells (Fig. 4a). Similarly, endogenous p53 and p21 also decreased in MCF-7 cells with overexpressed KLF12 (Fig. 4b). On the other hand, knocking down the expression of KLF12 in ZR-75-30 cells increased protein levels of endogenous p53 and p21 (Fig. 4c). Subsequent experiment showed that the reduction of p53 in the cells with overexpressed KLF12 could be prevented by treating cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Fig. 4d), which suggested that KLF12 could reduce the stability of p53. Meanwhile, the half-life of p53 was shorter in MCF7 cells with overexpressed KLF12 (Fig. 4e, f). These results indicate that KLF12 can probably affect the stability of p53 through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. To further verify this speculation, the effect of KLF12 on the ubiquitination system-mediated degradation of p53 was investigated.
Furthermore, a significant rise in ubiquitinated p53 was observed in HEK293T cells with overexpressed KLF12 (Fig. 4g). K48-Ub and K63-Ub ubiquitin linkages are the two main forms of ubiquitin chains [35]. Overexpression of KLF12 mainly induced the accumulation of K48-linked poly-ubiquitylated p53, while no visible change was detected for the level of K63-linked poly-ubiquitylated p53 (Fig. 4h). Taken together, these results suggested that KLF12 could effectively reduce its stability and promote the degradation of p53.
KLF12 inhibits p300-catalyzed acetylation of p53
The mechanism associated with KLF12-promoted ubiquitination and degradation of p53 was further explored. Ubiquitination of lys 370, 372, 373, 381, 382, and 386 at the C-terminus of p53 mediate the degradation of p53. Also, acetylation at these sites will prevent p53 from being ubiquitinated, thus increasing its stability [31]. Considering that KLF12 might act as a co-regulator of p53, we hypothesized that KLF12 could regulate the protein stability of p53 by blocking the acetylation of p53. To test this hypothesis, the acetylation level of endogenous p53 in MCF-7 cells was determined by CoIP assay. Overexpression of KLF12 reduced the acetylation level of p53 (Fig. 5a).
Next, we verified whether KLF12 could reduce the acetylation of the lysine site at the C terminal of p53. Two p53 mutants (Flag-p53K370/372/373R and Flag-p53K381/382/386R) were constructed. Western blot analysis showed that the protein level of Flag-p53K370/372/373R was not affected by KLF12, but the protein level of Flag-p53K381/382/386R and the protein level of wild-type p53 were reduced by KLF12 (Fig. 5b). Thus, KLF12 reduced the stability of p53 depends on lysine 370, K372 and K373 of p53. Replacing K370, K372, and K373 with arginine abolished the reduction of acetylation and ubiquitination of p53 (Fig. 5c, d). This suggests that KLF12 affects the protein stability of p53 by regulating its acetylation and ubiquitination of lysine 370/372/373.
p300/CBP are known to regulate the acetylation of p53, which are recruited to the p21 promoter by p53 to co-regulate the transcription of p21 [36]. The acetylation of p53 catalyzed by p300 can enhance the DNA-binding activity of p53 and stabilize it by preventing its ubiquitination at C-terminal [37, 38]. Thus, we hypothesized that KLF12 could probably block the p300-catalyzed acetylation of p53 by interfering with the interaction between p53 and p300. Such an action would require the interaction between KLF12 and p300. CoIP assay demonstrated the interaction between KLF12 and p300 (Fig. 5e). The interaction between p53 and p300 was also analyzed in HEK293T cells. CoIP assay revealed a reduced interaction between p53 and p300 in HEK293T cells with overexpressed KLF12, indicating that KLF12 interfered with the interaction between p53 and p300 (Fig. 5f). Besides, GST-pull down assay revealed KLF12 also inhibited p53 interaction with p300 in vitro (Fig. 5g). In conclusion, the above results indicated that KLF12 could negatively regulate the transcriptional activity and stability of p53 by reducing acetylation of p53 catalyzed by p300.
KLF12 promotes the proliferation of breast cancer cells in vivo
The results obtained from cell culture experiments suggest that KLF12 may specifically repress the p53/p21 axis and promote the proliferation of breast cancer cells. Human breast cancer xenograft mouse model was constructed to further investigate the role of KLF12 in tumorigenesis. Mice implanted with ZR-75-30 cells in which the KLF12 expression was knockdown by shKLF12#1 exhibited smaller tumor volume and weight than the control mice (Fig. 6a–c). Besides, the MTT assay revealed that the cell proliferation-inhibiting role of the knockdown of KLF12 could be attenuated following the knockdown of p21 (Figs. 6d and S2e). The above data suggest that KLF12 could partially play a role in cell proliferation through p21.
To further investigate the effect of KLF12 on breast cancer patients, the relationship between KLF12 expression levels and the prognosis of breast cancer patients was then analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier Plotter database. The results showed that patients (1147 individuals) with high KLF12 expression experienced a shorter relapse-free survival time (RFS) and poorer prognosis than patients (885 individuals) with low KLF12 expression (Fig. 6e). Taken together, these results indicate an oncogenic effect of KLF12 with respect to the proliferation and tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells with wild-type p53, both at the cell and whole organism level. A high level KLF12 expression in the cancer cells or tissue may indicate a poor prognosis.
Discussion
Many studies have suggested that KLF12 may contribute to tumor development in many types of carcinoma, and that its expression level is closely associated with the progression of malignancy and prognosis [6, 8, 39,40,41]. Previous studies have also shown that circ-NOTCH3 and the long non-coding RNA NEAT1 can promote breast cancer development by up-regulating KLF12 expression [12]. However, in this study, bioinformatics analysis using public datasets GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn) revealed no significant differences in KLF12 expression between breast cancer and normal breast tissues (Fig. S2g). To further investigate the role of KLF12 in the proliferation of breast cancer cells, we carried out extensive experiments. Our data revealed a positive effect of KLF12 on breast cancer proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis (Fig. 1a–e).
A dual function of p21Cip1/Waf1 was observed in carcinogenesis. In the presence of low doses of DNA damage, p21 causes cell cycle arrest and inhibits apoptosis, allowing DNA repair. After extensive DNA damage, the amount of p21Cip1/Waf1 protein is decreased, and the cell undergoes apoptosis [42]. While, there still some other studies have shown that up-regulated p21 expression promotes apoptosis [43, 44]. Hence, it is possible that KLF12 inhibit apoptosis by regulating p21 expression, but this needs further experimental verification. Besides, better understanding of the role of p21Cip1/Waf1 in various conditions would help to develop better cancer-treatment strategies. Moreover, studies have also shown that besides regulating p21, KLF12 also inhibit the expression of PUMA, an anti-apoptotic factor (Fig. 2a). In the presence of extensive DNA damage, cells initiate apoptosis through pro-apoptotic proteins downstream of p53, including PUMA. Therefore, KLF12 may inhibit apoptosis through PUMA, which also needs further experimental verification.
Furthermore, previous studies have predicted that KLF12 may be a co-regulator of p53 [17]. Consistently, we found that the overexpression of KLF12 could inhibit the expression of p53-targeted genes related to cell cycle and apoptosis (Fig. 2a), indicating that KLF12 could modulate the p53 pathway. Unlike KLF9 [16], KLF12 significantly inhibits the transcription of p21 but does not affect the level of p53 mRNA (Figs. 2a and S2d). Subsequent experiments identified KLF12 as a transcription factor of p21. KLF12 could inhibit the transcription of p21 through its transcriptional activity (Fig. 2k). At the same time, KLF12 inhibited the p53-mediated transcriptional activation of p21 (Fig. 2f–h). In addition, direct interaction between KLF12 and p53 might even occur on the p21 promoter since the Ch-Re-ChIP assay showed the co-localization of KLF12 and p53 on the p21 promoter (Fig. 2i). Such interaction between KLF12 and p53 was also demonstrated by the subsequent CoIP assay (Fig. 3a–c). Further investigation revealed a reduced level of p53 as a result of enhanced p53 ubiquitination facilitated by the overexpression of KLF12 (Fig. 4g, h). Since p53 is a tumor suppressor that regulates downstream targets responsible for homeostasis and defense against tumorigenesis [45], reducing the level of p53 could be a way for KLF12 to promote tumor proliferation and resist apoptosis.
Previous studies have shown that Yin Yang 1 (YY1) can inhibit p300-mediated acetylation and stabilization of p53 [46], while human ssDNA-binding protein SSB1 (hSSB1) can interact with p53 and protect p53 from ubiquitin-mediated degradation by recruiting p300 to p53 [47]. These two studies suggest that the stability of p53 is regulated by proteins that can affect its modification and alter its susceptibility to protease-mediated degradation. The acetylated lysine residues in p53 are located in its C-terminus and coincide with residues important for the protein’s ubiquitination and degradation [27, 45]. Similar to YY1, KLF12 could also inhibit the acetylation of p53 by interacting with p300, thereby blocking the stabilization and accumulation of p53 (Fig. 5a, b, g). Thus, p300 could be the critical protein through which KLF12 might regulate the transcriptional activity, acetylation, ubiquitination, and stability of p53. Unlike hSSB1, KLF12 was found to affect the transcriptional activity and protein stability of p53 by inhibiting the acetylation at lys370, lys372, and lys373 rather than the acetylation at lys382 (Fig. 5b–d).
Acetylation of p53 is a dynamic process. In addition to acetylase, deacetylases, including HDACs and SIRTs, also has important roles in regulating the acetylation of p53 [36, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. For example, HDAC1 and SIRT1 can abolish the acetylation of MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of p53 [48, 50, 52]. Western blot assay showed that KLF12 still reduced p53 protein levels in MCF-7 treated with HDACs and SIRTs inhibitors (Fig. S2h), which means KLF12 does not affect the ubiquitination of p53 by interfering with its deacetylation.
In the xenotransplantation experiment, the tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells was found to decrease when KLF12 expression in the cells was knocked down (Fig. 6a–c). Besides, patients with high KLF12 expression were those with a shorter relapse-free survival time (RFS) and poorer prognosis (Fig. 6d). Thus, the findings of this study indicated an important role for KLF12 in promoting human breast cancer growth and provided new insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms, with the p53/p21axis being a vital part of this mechanism. According to one previous study [55], p53 was found to down-regulate KLF12 expression by up-regulating the expression of microRNA-34a and microRNA-205. Moreover, the mRNA level of KLF12 also gradually decreased with the increase of doxorubicin (DOX) treatment time in p53-positive cells. Therefore, there may be negative feedback regulation between KLF12 and p53, which still needs further verification.
In conclusion, our datas suggest that KLF12 could inhibit p21 transcription in breast cancer through two pathways. The first pathway is binding to the conserved binding site of the p21 promoter and acting as a transcriptional repressor (Fig. 7); the second pathway is by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of p53 from interfering with the interaction between p53 and its co-activator p300 and effectively preventing the acetylation of p53 from promoting its ubiquitination and subsequent degradation (Fig. 7). The present research provides a new perspective on the treatment of breast cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and transfection
HEK293T, ZR-75-30, MCF-7, and HeLa cells were purchased from China’s infrastructure of cell line resources; these cells were previously used in our other studies [56, 57]. HEK293T, MCF-7, and HeLa cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS; ZR-75-30 cells were maintained in RPIM1640 supplemented with 10% FBS. All cells were in a humidified atmosphere containing 5%CO2/95% air at 37 °C. Cell transfection was carried out in a standard way using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Auckland, New Zealand).
Plasmids and Antibodies
Human KLF12 was cloned from a human cDNA library using the forward primer 5′-CGGAATTCGAATATCCATATGAAGAG-3′ (underlined bases indicate EcoR I site) and reverse primer 5′-CGCGGATCCCACCAACATATGCCTC-3′ (underlined bases indicate BamH I site). The obtained KLF12 fragment was inserted into the expression vector pEGFP-C1 to yield pEGFP-C1-KLF12. Flag-tagged full-length KLF12 (Flag-KLF12) and Flag-tagged truncated KLF12 (KLF12Δ1 (1–144aa), Flag-KLF12 Δ2 (1–317aa) and Flag-KLF12Δ3 (145–402aa) were generated by standard PCR using specific primers with pEGFP-C1-KLF12 as the template. The PCR fragments were inserted into pCMV-N-Flag at the EcoRI-XhoI sites. The amplified full-length fragments of KLF12 were also inserted into pcDNA3.1-3HA and pGEX-4T-3 at the EcoRI-XhoI sites. GFP-p53, Flag-p53, and GFP-tagged truncated versions of p53 (GFP-p53Δ1 (1–97aa), GFP-p53Δ2 (98–292aa), GFP-p53Δ3 (293–393aa)), HA-48-Ub [58], HA-63-Ub [58], HA-p300 [59] and pGL3-p21 reporter construct (p21-Luc) were taken from the plasmid stock kept in our laboratory. p21-Luc contains approximately 1716 bp of sequence upstream of p21 TSS. A series of truncated p21 promoters (−1670 to 1, −1582 to 1, −1376 to 1, and −1293 to 1) was also constructed according to a standard PCR-based cloning procedure using specific primers with p21-Luc as the template. The amplified promoter fragments were inserted into the pGL3-Luc luciferase reporter vector at the MluI-XhoI sites. KLF12-mut-p21-Luc was constructed by changing the KLF12 binding sequence 5′-CATGGGG-3′ into 5′-CACAAAG-3′ [60]. p53-mut-p21-Luc was constructed by changing the p53 binding sequence 5′-GAAGACTGGGCATGTCTGGGCAGAG-3’ into 5′-GAAGATGTTTACCGTCTGGGCAGAG-3′. KLF12-mut-p21-Luc and p53-mut-p21-Luc were constructed by following the instructions of the Quick-Change site-directed mutagenesis system (Stratagene) using p21-Luc as the template. The specific shRNA for KLF12 was inserted into the cloning vector pRNAT-U6.1/Hygro at the BamH I-HindIII sites. The KLF12 mRNA targeting sequence are as follows shKLF12#1: 5′-GCAATCGAATGAATAATCA-3′ [61], shKLF12#2: 5′-GACCTTAGATAGCGTTAA T-3′ [6]. The specific shRNA for p53 was from our laboratory. The effect of shp53 was verified by western blot. The p21 mRNA targeting sequences are as follows siRNAp21#1: 5′-AGACCAUGUGGACCUGUCATT-3′, siRNAp21#2: 5′-GACAGAU UUCUACCACUCCAATT-3′.
The primary antibodies were the following: anti-Flag (1:2000 for WB, F1804, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Mo, USA), anti-Flag (1:2000 for WB, 1:500 for IP, F7425, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Mo, USA), anti-MYC (1:2000 for WB, PLA0001, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Mo, USA); anti-GFP (1:2000 for WB, TA150052, Origene, Rockville, MD, USA), anti-Myc (1:2000 for WB, TA150121, Origene, Rockville, MD, USA), anti-GFP (1:3000 for WB, 1:500 for IP, GTX113617, GeneTex, San Antonio, TX, USA), anti-HA (1:3000 for WB, 1:500 for IP, GTX115044, GeneTex, San Antonio, TX, USA), anti-GST (1:2000 for WB, ABN116, Millipore, Boston, MA, USA), anti-β-actin (C-2) (Santa Cruz, sc-9104, Dallas, CA, USA). Anti-GAPDH (GeneTex, GTX627408, Texas, USA), anti-GST (Millipore, ABN116, Boston, MA, USA), and anti-acetylated-lysine was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Cell Signaling Technology, #9441, Boston, MA, USA). anti-KLF12 (Santa Cruz,sc-134373, Dallas, CA, USA), anti-KLF12 (Abcam, Cambridge,ab129459, MA, USA), anti-p53 (Santa Cruz,sc-126, Dallas, CA, USA), and anti-p21 (Affinity Biosciences, #AF6290, Jiangsu, China).
Luciferase reporter assay
Transcriptional activity was examined by a luciferase assay. Cells were seeded into a 24-well plate at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well and cultured for 24 h. The cells were then transfected with the appropriate plasmid using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Three samples were used for each experimental group. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were subjected to luciferase and Renilla activity assays using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Luciferase activity was measured and normalized against the β-galactosidase activity.
RNA preparation and real-time qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from transfected MCF-7 cells using RNAiso reagents (Takara, Dalian, China). Quantitative PCR analysis was performed with the 2X SYBR Green qPCR master mix (Takara, Dalian, China) under standard conditions. Three samples for each experimental group. The primers used in the qPCR samples are shown in Table S1.
Western blot, CoIP, ChIP, and ChIP-Re-ChIP assays
Western blot, co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), and CHIP-Re-CHIP assays were conducted as previously described [62]. The primers for amplifying the p21 promoter used in ChIP and ChIP-Re-ChIP assays are shown in Table S2.
Cell proliferation assay
MCF-7 cells or ZR-75-30 cells were cultured in a 96-well plate (2500 cells/well) for 24 h. MCF-7 cells were transfected with pEGFP-C1 or GFP-KLF12 for 1–5 days. ZR-75-30 cells were separately transfected with NC, shKLF12#1, or shKLF12#2 for 1–6 days. The medium was replaced with fresh medium daily for the cells transfected for more than 1 day. At the end of the transfection, 10 µl of MTT reagent (5 mg/ml) was added to each well containing the cells, followed by 4 h of incubation. After removal of the medium, 100 μl of DMSO was added to each well and properly mixed for another 10 min. The absorbance at 490 nm was determined using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Five samples were used for each experimental group.
A colony formation assay was carried out by plating 2000 cells in a six-well plate. Then, cells were cultured for 2 weeks and subjected to crystal violet staining as previously described. After staining, wells were washed three times with PBS and distained with acetic acid, and the absorbance of the crystal violet solution was measured at 590 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, CA, USA).
Flow cytometric cell cycle and apoptosis assays
MCF-7 cells and ZR-75-30 cells were transfected with the appropriate plasmids for the cell cycle assay. After 48 hours of transfection, 1 × 106 cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed three times with PBS, and fixed in 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight. After that, the cells were again washed with cold PBS three times, re-suspended in 500 µl of propidium iodide (PI)/RNase staining solution (Sungene Biotech Co, Ltd., Tianjin, China), incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and then subjected to analysis by FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA). The obtained data were analyzed with ModFit software (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA). Apoptosis of MCF-7 cells and ZR-75-30 cells treated with 20μm CDDP (Selleck, S1166, Texas, USA) for 16 h was assessed using the AnnexinV-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, C1062S, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The data were collected by BD AccuriTM C6 Plus Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) and subsequently analyzed by the Flow Jo 10 (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA).
Xenograft model
Five-week-old female athymic nude mice (BALB/C nude mice) were purchased from Changsheng Biotechnology Company (Dalian, Liaoning province, China). All the animals were housed in an environment with a temperature of 22 ± 1 °C, relative humidity of 50 ± 1%, and a light/dark cycle of 12/12 h. All animal studies (including the mice euthanasia procedure) were done in compliance with the regulations and guidelines of Dalian University of Technology institutional animal care and conducted according to the AAALAC and the IACUC guidelines.
All the mice were weighed and randomly divided into two groups according to body weight [random numbers were generated using the standard = RAND () function in Microsoft Excel] (5 mice per group): NC group and shKLF12#1 group. NC group was inoculated with ZR-75-30 cells transfected with NC; the shKLF12#1 group was inoculated with ZR-75-30 cells transfected with SHKLF12#1. Stably transfected ZR-75-30 cells were prepared in advance. First, the cells were digested with trypsin, then diluted to 1 × 105 per 50 μl, and mixed well with the matrix adhesive (356234, Corning, USA) in a ratio of 1:1 and kept on ice. After the mice were anesthetized, each mice will be inoculated at right mammary fat pad with the mixture of cells and matrix adhesive. After 45 days, the nude mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were removed, measured, and photographed. The volume of each tumor was calculated using the standard formula V = 0.5 × L × W2, where L is the longest diameter and W is the shortest diameter.
GST pull-down assay and immunofluorescence assay
GST alone, GST-KLF12 and GST-p53 were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (Takara, Dalian, China) and purified using Pierce GST Spin Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instruction. The purified GST and GST-KLF12 were seperately immobilized on a different Pierce Spin Column and used to pull down endogenous p53 from MCF-7 cell lysate. The purified GST and GST-p53 were seperately immobilized on a different Pierce Spin Column and used to pull down exogenous p300 from HEK293T cell lysate. An immunofluorescence assay was conducted as described previously [63].
Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated at least three times. Data were presented as mean ± SDs, and Student’s t test (unpaired, two-tailed) was used to compare two groups of independent samples. p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All datasets generated and analyzed during this study (luciferase reporter assay data, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence assay data, xenograft model data, GST pull-down assay data, chromatin Immunoprecipitation assay data, cell proliferation assay data, cell cycle assay data) will be made available on reasonable request from the corresponding author Dr. Huijian Wu, email address: wuhj@dlut.edu.cn. Original full-length western blots are part of Supplementary Files.
References
Zheng R, Zhang S, Zeng H, Wang S, Sun K, Chen R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016. J Natl Cancer Center. 2022;2:1–9.
McConnell BB, Yang VW. Mammalian Kruppel-like factors in health and diseases. Physiol Rev. 2010;4:1337–81.
Suske G, Bruford E, Philipsen S. Mammalian SP/KLF transcription factors: bring in the family. Genomics. 2005;5:551–6.
Suske G, Bruford E, Philipsen S. Genomic structure and DNA binding properties of the human zinc finger transcriptional repressor AP-2rep (KLF12). Genomics. 2000;63:384–90.
Schuierer M, Hilger-Eversheim K, Dobner T, Bosserhoff AK, Moser M, Turner J, et al. Induction of AP-2α expression by adenoviral infection involves inactivation of the AP-2rep transcriptional corepressor CtBP1. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:27944–9.
Nakamura Y, Migita T, Hosoda F, Okada N, Gotoh M, Arai Y, et al. Krüppel-like factor 12 plays a significant role in poorly differentiated gastric cancer progression. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1859–67.
Ding L, Ding Y, Kong X, Wu J, Fu J, Yan G, et al. Dysregulation of Krüppel-like factor 12 in the development of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152:177–184.
Zhang Q, Wang J, Qiao H, Huyan L, Liu B, Li C, et al. ISG15 is downregulated by KLF12 and implicated in maintenance of cancer stem cell-like features in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;9:4395–407.
Godin-Heymann N, Brabetz S, Murillo MM, Saponaro M, Santos CR, Lobley A, et al. Tumour-suppression function of KLF12 through regulation of anoikis. Oncogene. 2016;35:3324–34.
Tang C, Wang M, Dai Y, Wei X. Krüppel-like factor 12 suppresses bladder cancer growth through transcriptionally inhibition of enolase 2. Gene. 2021;769:145338–42.
Guan B, Li Q, Shen L, Rao Q, Wang Y, Zhu Y, et al. MicroRNA-205 directly targets Kruppel-like factor 12 and is involved in invasion and apoptosis in basal-like breast carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2016;49:720–34.
Guan B, Li Q, Zhang H-Z, Yang H-S. circ_NOTCH3 functions as a protooncogene competing with miR-205-5p, modulating KLF12 expression and promoting the development and progression of basal-like breast carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;10:602094–104.
Thanmalagan RR, Naorem LD, Venkatesan A. Expression data analysis for the identification of potential biomarker of pregnancy associated breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2017;3:537–44.
Mello SS, Attardi LD. Deciphering p53 signaling in tumor suppression. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018;51:65–72.
Zhang W, Geiman DE, Shields JM, Dang DT, Manhattan CS, Kaestner KH, et al. The gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor (Kruppel-like factor 4) mediates the transactivating effect of p53 on the p21WAF1/Cip1 promoter. J Biol Chem. 2000;24:18391–8.
Sun J, Wang B, Liu Y, Zhang L, Ma A, Yang Z, et al. Transcription factor KLF9 suppresses the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vivo and positively regulates p53 expression. Cancer Lett. 2014;355:25–33.
Yao J, Lei P-J, Li Q-L, Chen J, Tang S-B, Xiao Q, et al. GLIS2 promotes colorectal cancer through repressing enhancer activation. Oncogenesis. 2020;9:57–72.
Levine J. A. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. cell. 1997;3:323–31.
Lacroix M, Riscal R, Arena G, Linares LK, Le Cam L. Metabolic functions of the tumor suppressor p53: implications in normal physiology, metabolic disorders, and cancer. Mol Metab. 2020;33:2–22.
Sionov RV, Haupt Y. The cellular response to p53: the decision between life and death. Oncogene. 1999;45:6145–57.
Enge M, Bao W, Hedstro¨ m E, Jackson SP, Moumen A, Selivanova G. MDM2-dependentdownregulation of p21 and hnRNPK provides a switch between apoptosis and growth arrest induced by pharmacologically activated p53. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:171–83.
Piscopo DM, Hinds PW. A role for the cyclin box in the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of cyclin G1. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5581–90.
Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ. The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cipl is a potent inhibitor of Gl cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell. 1993;75:805–16.
Georgakilas AG, Martin OA, Bonner WM. p21: A two-faced genome guardian. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23:310–9.
Sun X, Shi B, Zheng H, Min L, Yang J, Li X. Senescence-associated secretory factors induced by cisplatin in melanoma cells promote non-senescent melanoma cell growth through activation of the ERK1/2-RSK1 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:260.
Watanabe J, Nishiyama H, Matsui Y, Ito M, Kawanishi H, Kamoto T, et al. Dicoumarol potentiates cisplatin-induced apoptosis mediated by c-Jun N-terminal kinase in p53 wild-type urogenital cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 2006;25:2500–8.
Zohny SF, Al-Malki AL, Zamzami MA, Choudhry H. p21 Waf1/Cip1: its paradoxical effect in the regulation of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2019;2:131–7.
Wang Y, Chen Y, Chen Q, Zhang X, Wang H, Wang Z, et al. The role of acetylation sites in the regulation of p53 activity. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;1:381–91.
Gu W, Roeder RG. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell. 1997;4:595–606.
Wang Y-H, Tsay Y-G, Tan BC-M, Lo W-Y, Lee S-C. Identification and characterization of a novel p300-mediated p53 acetylation site, lysine 305. J Biol Chem. 2003;28:25568–76.
Liu Y, Tavana O, Gu W. p53 modifications: exquisite decorations of the powerful guardian. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019;7:564–77.
Wang D, Kon N, Lasso G, Jiang L, Leng W, Zhu W, et al. Acetylation-regulated interaction between p53 and SET reveals a widespread regulatory mode. Nature. 2016;7623:118–22.
Marx J. How p53 suppresses cell growth. Science. 1993;262:1644–5.
Engeland K. Cell cycle regulation: p53-p21-RB signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2022;5:946–60.
Tracz M, Bialek W. Beyond K48 and K63: non-canonical protein ubiquitination. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2021;1:1–18.
Brooks CL, Gu W. The impact of acetylation and deacetylation on the p53 pathway. Protein Cell. 2011;6:456–62.
Li M, Luo J, Brooks CL, Gu W. Acetylation of p53 inhibits its ubiquitination by Mdm2. J Biol Chem. 2022;52:50607–11.
Rodriguez MS, Desterro JM, Lain S, Lane DP, Hay RT. Multiple C-terminal lysine residues target p53 for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 2022;22:8458–67.
Kim S-H, Park Y-Y, Cho S-N, Margalit O, Wang D, DuBois RN. Krüppel-like factor 12 promotes colorectal cancer growth through early growth response protein 1. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0159899.
Chen Y, Geng Y, Huang J, Xi D, Xu G, Gu W, et al. CircNEIL3 promotes cervical cancer cell proliferation by adsorbing miR-137 and upregulating KLF12. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:34–46.
Zhang H, Zhu X, Chen J, Jiang Y, Zhang Q, Kong C, et al. Krüppel-like factor 12 negatively regulates human endometrial stromal cell decidualization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;433:11–7.
Jana C, Řezáčová M. Protein and its function based on a subcellular localization. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:3502–6.
Bai X, Yang H, Pu J, Zhao Y, Jin Y, Yu Q. MKRN1 ubiquitylates p21 to protect against intermittent hypoxia-induced myocardial apoptosis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:13–6.
Lee J, Kim K, Ryu TY, Jung C-R, Lee M-S, Lim JH, et al. EHMT1 knockdown induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in lung cancer cells by increasing CDKN1A expression. Mol Oncol. 2021;15:2989–3002.
Nakamura S, Roth JA, Mukhopadhyay T. Multiple lysine mutations in the C-terminal domain of p53 interfere with MDM2-dependent protein degradation and ubiquitination. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;24:9391–8.
Grönroos E, Terentiev AA, Punga T, Ericsson J. YY1 inhibits the activation of the p53 tumor suppressor in response to genotoxic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;33:12165–70.
Xu S, Wu Y, Chen Q, Cao J, Hu K, Tang J, et al. hSSB1 regulates both the stability and the transcriptional activity of p53. Cell Res. 2013;23:423–35.
Ito A, Kawaguchi Y, Lai C-H, Kovacs JJ, Higashimoto Y, Appella E, et al. MDM2-HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of p53 is required for its degradation. EMBO J. 2002;21:6236–45.
Fu G, Chen S, Liang L, Li X, Tang P, Rao X, et al. SIRT1 inhibitors mitigate radiation-induced GI syndrome by enhancing intestinal-stem-cell survival. Cancer Lett. 2021;501:20–30.
Insinga A, Monestiroli S, Ronzoni S, Carbone R, Pearson M, Pruneri G, et al. Impairment of p53 acetylation, stability and function by an oncogenic transcription factor. EMBO J. 2004;23:1144–54.
Ryu H-W, Shin D-H, Lee DH, Choi J, Han G, Lee KY, et al. HDAC6 deacetylates p53 at lysines 381/382 and differentially coordinates p53-induced apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 2017;391:162–71.
Yi J, Luo J. SIRT1 and p53, effect on cancer, senescence and beyond. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1804:1684–9.
Ocker M, Schneider-Stock R. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: signalling towards p21cip1/waf1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39:1367–74.
Yang H, Yan B, Liao D, Huang S, Qiu Y. Acetylation of HDAC1 and degradation of SIRT1 form a positive feedback loop to regulate p53 acetylation during heat-shock stress. Cell Death Dis. 2015;5:e1747.
Hünten S, Kaller M, Drepper F, Oeljeklaus S, Bonfert T, Erhard F, et al. p53-regulated networks of protein, mRNA, miRNA, and lncRNA expression revealed by integrated pulsed stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (pSILAC) and next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;10:2609–29.
Aman S, Li Y, Cheng Y, Yang Y, Lv L, Li B, et al. DACH1 inhibits breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis by down-regulating the transcription of matrix metalloproteinase 9. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7:351.
Bai X-Y, Li S, Wang M, Li X, Yang Y, Xu Z, et al. Krüppel-like factor 9 down-regulates matrix metalloproteinase 9 transcription and suppresses human breast cancer invasion. Cancer Lett. 2018;412:224–35.
Jia Z, Wang M, Li S, Li X, Bai X-Y, Xu Z, et al. U-box ubiquitin ligase PPIL2 suppresses breast cancer invasion and metastasis by altering cell morphology and promoting SNAI1 ubiquitination and degradation. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:63–77.
Li X, Li S, Li B, Li Y, Aman S, Xia K, et al. Acetylation of ELF5 suppresses breast cancer progression by promoting its degradation and targeting CCND1. Precis Oncol. 2021;5:20.
Zhang H, Zhu X, Chen J, Jiang Y, Zhang Q, Kong C, et al. Krüppel-like factor 12 is a novel negative regulator of forkhead box O1 expression: a potential role in impaired decidualization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:80.
He Z, Guo X, Tian S, Zhu C, Chen S, Yu C, et al. MicroRNA-137 reduces stemness features of pancreatic cancer cells by targeting KLF12. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:126.
Beischlag TV, Prefontaine GG, Hankinson O. ChIP-re-ChIP: co-occupancy analysis by sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1689:103–12.
Bi H, Li S, Qu X, Wang M, Bai X, Xu Z, et al. DEC1 regulates breast cancer cell proliferation by stabilizing cyclin E protein and delays the progression of cell cycle S phase. Cell Death Dis. 2015;9:e1891.
Acknowledgements
The pGL3-p53-reporter construct (p53-Luc) was a gift kindly provided by Professor Liu Yong Zhong (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine). Flag-p53K370/372/373R and Flag-p53K381/382/383R were gifts kindly given by Professor Tian (State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome, Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences). We thank Dr. Alan K. Chang for his devoted effort in editing the manuscript during its preparation.
Funding
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 58481872263 to HW) and Liaoning Province Applied Basic Research Program Project (2023JH2/101300068 to PR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yanan Li performed study investigation, formal analysis, data curation, and writing original draft; SL performed conceptualization, formal analysis, development of methodology, sources, and writing review; XS performed formal analysis and writing—review and editing. ZX performed the formal analysis; YY performed the formal analysis; BZ performed the formal analysis; Yulin Li performed the formal analysis; LL performed the formal analysis, PR performed the formal analysis; HW performed supervision, formal analysis, data curation, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal experiments were performed according to the regulation set by the Ethics Committee for Biology and Medical Science of Dalian University of Technology.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Francesca Bernassola
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Li, S., Shi, X. et al. KLF12 promotes the proliferation of breast cancer cells by reducing the transcription of p21 in a p53-dependent and p53-independent manner. Cell Death Dis 14, 313 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05824-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05824-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Inhibition of ABI2 ubiquitination-dependent degradation suppresses TNBC cell growth via down-regulating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway
Cancer Cell International (2024)
-
Crosstalk between SUMOylation and other post-translational modifications in breast cancer
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters (2024)