Abstract
Interferon lambda-2 (IL28A) has a wide antiviral effect with fewer side-effects. Autophagy is a host mechanism to maintain intracellular homeostasis and defends invasion of pathogenic microorganisms. HCV NS5A can disable host defense systems to support HCV replication. Thus, molecular mechanism of interaction among interferon lambda, autophagy, and HCV was concerned and explored in this study. We report that HCV NS5A activated an incomplete autophagy by promoting the autophagic ubiquitylation-like enzymes ATG3, ATG5, ATG7, ATG10, and autophagosome maker LC3B, but blocked autophagy flux; IL28A bound to NS5A at NS5A-ISDR region, and degraded HCV-NS5A by promoting autolysosome formations in HepG2 cells. A software prediction of IL28A protein conformation indicated a potential structure of IL28A homotetramer; the first α-helix of IL28A locates in the interfaces among the four IL28A chains to maintain IL28A homotetrameric conformation. Co-IP and cell immunofluorescence experiments with sequential deletion mutants demonstrate that IL28A preferred a homotetramer conformation to a monomer in the cells; the IL28A homotetramer is positively correlated with autolysosomal degradation of HCV NS5A and the other HCV proteins. Summarily, the first α-helix of IL28A protein is the key domain for maintaining IL28A homotetramer which is required for promoting formation of autolysosomes and degradation of HCV proteins in vitro.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important human pathogen. HCV infection incidence has increased globally and its complication remains a problem for a long time. In recent years, several medicines directed against HCV proteins (direct-acting antiviral agents, DAAs) have been in clinical use, including NS3/4A-targeted Telaprevir and Simeprevir, NS5A-targeted Daclatasvir and Ledipasvir, and NS5B-targeted Sofosbuvir, which have greatly improved treatment of HCV infection. Unfortunately, a number of reports of drug resistance have emerged as more and more patients being treated with DAAs1,2,3,4,5. Thus, host factors with anti-virus property have been got attention again. Interferons (IFNs) are the first line of host defense against invading viral pathogens6. IFNs are classified as type I, type II, and type III based on their structural features, receptor usage, and biological activities7. For decades, type I IFNs have been considered indispensable and important antiviral mediators. Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) plus ribavirin (RBV) combination antiviral therapy has been used as the standard treatment for patients with chronic HCV infection for more than 10 years, but the HCV clear efficiency is only in 50% of patients8. Type II IFN is limited in direct antiviral effect, but have pleiotropic effects on a diverse set of immune cells promoting both adaptive and innate responses9. Type III interferons, also called Interferon λs (Interferon λ1–IL29, Interferon λ2–IL28A, Interferon λ3–IL28B), as a new class of IFNs which share several common features with type I IFNs, have functions in antiviral, antiproliferative, and antitumor activity, but with fewer side-effects10. Exogenously administered IFN-λs have been shown to inhibit the replication of a wide variety of viruses, such as VSV, EMCV, HBV, HCV and human cytomegaloviruses in vitro and vaccinia virus and herpes simplex virus type 2 in vivo11,12. However, whether IFN-λs directly target and degrade virus components is unclear. Thus, IL28A was studied in this work as a representative member of the type III interferon family.
Autophagy is one of the homeostatic mechanisms the host cell employs to clear unused intracellular materials and impaired organelles through lysosomal degradation13,14. Moreover, many studies have reported that autophagy has a synergistic action with interferons in defending the host from many pathogen infections15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22. Autophagy dysfunction is usually associated with various pathologies, including cancer, infectious diseases, and neurodegenerative disorders23,24,25,26. However, some studies present contradictory opinions respecting autophagy facilitating HCV replication, namely, how HCV exploits the autophagy pathway to support its replication. Wang and Ou reviewed the impacts of HCV proteins on autophagy pathway, such as HCV NS3/4A protease binding to mitochondria-associated IRGM, HCV NS4B forming a complex with Rab5, hVps34 and Beclin-1, and HCV core activating UPR, HCV NS5A upregulating the expression of Beclin-1, and HCV NS5B binding to ATG5, and so on; all the actions of the HCV proteins benefit to promote autophagosome formation to support virus replication27. The autophagy pathway activated by viruses is usually incomplete, which cannot cause elimination of the viruses due to both inhibition in autolysosome formation or in lysosomal degradation28,29,30,31,32. HCV NS5A is a nonstructural (NS) protein critical for HCV RNA replication, virion assembly, and interactions with cellular immunity factors33,34,35 because it directs the virus replication complex to translocate to the ER and autophagosome membranes36,37. The ISDR sequence of NS5A is a critical domain for NS5A interaction with IFN-alpha in clinic treatment response38. However, until now, there have been no reports describing the direct interactions among the HCV NS5A protein, IFNλs, and autophagy. Our previous studies showed that the IL28A protein cooperated with ATG10S to degrade HCV sub-replicons by promoting fusion of autophagosome to lysosomes39,40. In this study, we explored whether IL28A has direct interactions with HCV NS5A protein and the autophagic apparatus, and how IL28A plays its roles in promotion of complete autophagy pathway to eliminate HCV NS5A and other HCV proteins. We find that the HCV proteins can be cleared by IL28A homotetramer mediated complete autophagy process. We hope that the findings will make a substantial contribution to the understanding of IL28A anti-HCV mechanism and will provide new clues for the development of anti-HCV medicines.
Results
The HCV NS5A protein induces incomplete autophagy in HepG2 cells
HCV can interfere with host defense mechanisms including immunity and autophagy by HCV proteins interacting with host factors. Respecting that HCV NS5A has a critical role in HCV genome replication through docking the HCV replication complex to the autophagosome membrane36,37, we examined whether the HCV NS5A protein functions in formation of autophagosomes. An HCV NS5A expression plasmid was constructed and transfected into HepG2 cells, and autophagy marker, ratio of LC3B-II to LC3B-I, and the selective receptor p62 protein were estimated by western blot. The result showed the levels of LC3B-II/I and p62 protein significantly higher in the NS5A-expressing cells than in controls (Fig. 1a), which implies that NS5A activated autophagy. We also tested autophagy-related proteins and heterodimer that are involved in the two autophagy ubiquitination systems: ATG3, ATG5-ATG12, ATG7, and ATG10; HCV NS5A protein also induced higher expression of the four proteins than the mock group (Fig. 1a). NS5A promoted combination of LC3B with p62 as confirmed by Co-IP tests; however, it did not promote interactions between LC3B and the lysosomal membrane protein LAMP2, and between p62 and LAMP2 (Fig. 1b). Further, Cell immunofluorescence assay showed that significantly more p62 co-localized with LC3B in cells with the HCV NS5A expression than in control HepG2 cells or in the mock-transfected groups (Fig. 1c). However, NS5A expression did not promote the co-localization of LC3B with LAMP2 (Fig. 1d) or p62 with LAMP2 (Fig. 1e). Moreover, the HCV-NS5A protein co-localized with p62 (Fig. 1f) and with LC3B (Fig. 1g) confirm that NS5A was bound to both the selective receptor p62 and autophagosomes. However, NS5A did not interact with LAMP2 (Fig. 1h). These results suggested that NS5A induced an incomplete autophagy process, leading to the accumulation of autophagosomes, and blocked the fusion of lysosomes with autophagosomes; in other words, HCV-NS5A expression provided a larger area of membrane surface for HCV replication but inhibited lysosomal degradation.
IL28A promotes degradation of NS5A by inducing the formation of autolysosomes
Our earlier studies showed that IL28A activated and promoted a complete autophagy process in which the HCV sub-genomic replicon was inhibited39. In this study, we asked whether IL28A could also degrade the NS5A protein by promoting autophagy flux. Co-immunoprecipitation tests showed that IL28A overexpression was associated with decreased levels of NS5A, LAMP2, p62, and LC3B proteins (Fig. 2a), indicating that autophagy flux was smooth and the NS5A protein had been degraded compared to transfection with NS5A alone. In contrast, knockdown of endogenous IL28A expression by MOil28a reversed the results—the NS5A protein level was much higher than in the group of NS5A alone, and the p62, LC3B, and LAMP2 levels recovered to the levels of the NS5A group (Fig. 2a). These results indicate that IL28A plays a role in the degradation of NS5A protein. Meanwhile, Co-IP results showed that IL28A overexpression promoted interactions among LAMP2, LC3B, p62, IL28A, and NS5A proteins, which implies the formation of autophagolysosomes containing NS5A-p62 complexes; conversely, IL28A knockdown significantly reduced the association among these proteins (Fig. 2a). Cell Immunofluorescence double staining experiments confirmed that IL28A overexpression led to the formation of the complexes containing LAMP2 associated with LC3B and with NS5A, together with LC3B-p62 aggregates, compared to the NS5A group. Conversely, the colocalized particles of LAMP2 with LC3B, LAMP2 with NS5A, and LC3B with p62 were almost absent in cells of il28a knockdown groups with MOil28a transfection (Fig. 2b–d). These results demonstrated that IL28A facilitated the formation of autolysosomes and normal autophagy flux that led to the breakdown of the NS5A protein. However, at which stage of autophagy process IL28A exerts its action is not known. We used two autophagy inhibitors [3-methyladenine (3-MA) and chloroquine (CQ)] to study IL28A effects on NS5A levels and autophagy flux. We found that CQ blocked autophagy flux and increased NS5A level no matter whether IL28A was overexpressed compared with the results of NS5A and IL28A were co-expressed. These results suggested that IL28A may act before lysosomal degradation because CQ functions to increase the pH and inhibit the digestive activity of lysosomes (Fig. 2e). The inhibitor 3-MA that interferes with the formation of autophagosomes caused NS5A levels to decline significantly, while an increase in autophagy flux induced by IL28A overexpression was unaffected by 3-MA, meaning IL28A action occurs after autophagosome formation. Meanwhile, a modest fall of NS5A level was observed in the group of 3-MA without IL28A compared to cells transfected only with NS5A (Fig. 2e), suggesting the fall probably resulted from 3-MA inhibition on autophagosomes. Thus, we infer that IL28A may function in promoting the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes.
The D4 domain of IL28A functions in the formation of autolysosomes
We used a sequential deletion method to identify specific domains of IL28A that are indispensable for its action in autophagy and digesting the HCV NS5A protein. We constructed nine sequential deletion constructs of Flag-IL28A, D1–D9 (Fig. 3a, b). These nine deletion mutants of IL28A were transfected separately into NS5A-HepG2 cells. Potential target domains were examined using Co-IP test. In the input assay, protein levels of NS5A, p62, and LC3B were decreased, meaning autophagy flux opened in the cells expressing wildtype (WT) IL28A or flag-labeled IL28A-D0, -D1, -D2, -D3, -D5, -D6, -D7, -D8, and -D9, but not IL28A-D4, compared to the control group of NS5A alone (Fig. 3c). Interestingly, in the co-immunoprecipitation experiments using LAMP2 or LC3B antibodies, when IL28A-D4 was overexpressed, complexes of LAMP2 with both LC3B and p62 were reduced greatly, indicating a decrease in the autophagosome fusion with lysosomes compared to the other IL28A mutant groups (Fig. 3c). Similarly, levels of NS5A and IL28A complexed with LC3B and with LAMP2 were also reduced in D4 overexpression group. In addition, when immunoprecipitated with NS5A antibody, levels of LC3B, LAMP2, p62, and IL28A proteins were substantially lower in the IL28A-D4 group than in the other IL28A mutant groups (Fig. 3c), which may mean that most of NS5A was not bound to IL28A and autophagosomes, and therefore would not be degraded by lysosomes. Importantly, when immunoprecipitated with Flag antibody (representing IL28A), levels of NS5A and the autophagy markers LC3B, p62, and LAMP2 were significantly reduced in the D4 group (Fig. 3c). These results implied that the deleted sequence in IL28A-D4 contributes to the binding site on the proteins involved in autophagolysosome formation, and to its binding on NS5A protein (Fig. 3c). Thus, the deleted sequence in IL28A-D4 is likely to be a critical domain for IL28A in its role of promoting autolysosome formation.
Further, we confirmed the above results using cellular immunofluorescence assay. The results showed that overexpression of IL28A WT, D0, D1, D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, or D9 constructs increased the number of co-localization particles in which LC3B was associated with LAMP2, IL28A was associated with LC3B, with LAMP2, and with p62, in the NS5A-expressed cells. Conversely, the particles containing the co-localized proteins disappeared or were diminished in number in cells expressing IL28A-D4 (Fig. 4a–d). These results indicate the D4 sequence of IL28A being an important functional domain for the promotion of autolysosome formation by IL28A.
The recognition of NS5A by IL28A is mediated by the NS5A ISDR domain
Then, we examined whether NS5A ISDR domain also interacts with type III interferon IL28A, and whether the IL28A-D4 domain is involved in the interaction. We tested the interaction between NS5A and IL28A proteins using an NS5A-ISDR deletion mutant and the IL28A-D4 deletion mutant with double immunofluorescence staining. The results showed that colocalized particles of WT NS5A with IL28A were found at the perinuclear region, but NS5A-ISDR–IL28A interaction was weakened in both the particle number and Pearson co-localization coefficient (Fig. S4A), and the position of the particles shifted from the perinuclear region to the cytoplasm widely (Fig. 5a), indicating that the ISDR domain has an essential role in recognizing and binding to IL28A, as with type 1 interferon. The number of co-localized particles of LC3B with p62 were significantly reduced in the NS5A-ISDR groups compared with the WT NS5A groups (Fig. 5b) and the associations of LAMP2 with LC3B and with p62 proteins still were not occurred as the same as in the WT NS5A group (Fig. 5c, d).
Next, we evaluated the effects of the ISDR domain and the dD4 sequence on the interaction using flag-labeled IL28A mutants and NS5A-ISDR. Particles of the flag-IL28A mutants colocalized with NS5A could be seen clustered near one side of the nucleus in the IL28A-D0, -D2, and -D4 groups, but were reduced considerably in particle number and Pearson co-localization coefficient in IL28A-D4 group (Figs. 5e and S4E). Under conditions of NS5A-ISDR overexpression, the numbers of colocalized particles of NS5A-ISDR with the IL28A mutants were significantly less than those of the NS5A groups and the particles scattered around the nucleus in the IL28A-D0 and -D2 groups. In the IL28A-D4 group, hardly any colocalized particles were detected (Figs. 5f and S4F). These findings suggested that the ISDR domain of NS5A is crucial for direct association with the IL28A protein, and its absence affected the intracellular particle distribution. The deletion of the dD4 sequence in IL28A further prohibits the association between IL28A and HCV NS5A proteins, leading to their complete dissociation from one another (Fig. 5f).
The IL28A homotetramer functions in the promotion of autophagolysosome formation
To investigate the molecular mechanism of IL28A anti-HCV effects and pro-autophagy, we attempted to define the structure of IL28A for the IL28A protein functional motif and stereostructure using online software at the ncbi and ebi sites (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/icn3d/full.html?&mmdbid=75484&bu=0&showanno=1; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/databases/cgi-bin/pdbsum/GetPage.pl?pdbcode=3hhc&template=interfaces.html&c=999). We based the structure prediction on IL28B with 196 amino acid-long, because there is a more than 96% identity between the IL28A and IL28B proteins. The prediction showed that the IL28A conformation might be a homotetramer of the A, B, C, and D chains. Their secondary structures include mainly helixes and coils. There are six helixes and six coils dispersed in the 159 amino acid residues of the A, B, and C chains, and three helixes and four coils in the 159 residues of the D chain. There are three intrachain disulfide bonds in A, B, and C chains, and one intrachain disulfide bond in D chain. There is a single interchain disulfide bond between the A and C chains, (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/icn3d/full.html?&mmdbid=75484&bu=0&showanno=1). Among these conserved domains, the first α-helix corresponds exactly to the deleted sequence dD4 in IL28A-D4 mutant (Fig. 6a). Based on the IL28B homotetramer model, both interface areas between the A and C chains and between the B and D chains are significantly larger than the other three interface areas between pairs of A–B, A–D, or B–C chains (Table 1). There are interchain cross-linkages among the four IL28A molecules, three pairs of chains (A–D, B–C, and B–D) interacting through salt bridges, hydrogen bonds, and non-bonded contacts; the A–B chains bonded by salt bridges and hydrogen bonds; the A–C chains held together by four kinds of bonds: an interchain disulfide bond and the above three kinds of bonds (Fig. 6b; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/mmdb/mmdbsrv.cgi?dps=2&uid=3HHC;41). According to the above model, the first α-helix participates in the interfaces between A–B, A–C, and B–D chains (Fig. 6c–e, h), while the linkages between A and D chains and between B and C chains may not be dependent on the first α-helix (Fig. 6c, f, g). No linkage between the C and D chains was predicted (Fig. 6i). Because our previous results showed that the D4 mutant without the first α-helix lost IL28A pro-autophagy activity, we examined whether the deletion of the first α-helix could disrupt the IL28A oligomer structure and result in loss of IL28A function by using Co-IP. Western blot results (input panel) showed that the IL28A protein exhibited mainly two bands of about 70 kDa and 20 kDa, suggesting the existence of IL28A tetramers. Deletion of dD4 sequence in the IL28A-D4 mutant caused a reduced amount of the IL28A homotetramer while NS5A increased, and autophagy flux became blocked (manifested by increased levels of LC3B and p62 proteins compared with D0 and D2). The only difference between D0 and D2 was the presence or absence of the signal peptide; both had the same activity (Fig. 6j, left panel), meaning that the signal peptide did not affect the IL28A function. In co-immunoprecipitation studies using anti-flag antibody, in the “D4-deleted” group, the IL28A homotetramer was also reduced, but the IL28A monomer increased, indicating that the first α-helix is positively associated with IL28A oligomer formation; at the same time, levels of NS5A, LC3B, p62, and LAMP2 decreased. These findings suggested that the interaction between these proteins and the D4-IL28A protein was significantly reduced due to dD4 sequence deletion. The D2 group gave the same results as the D0 group (Fig. 6j, right panel). These results suggest that the tetrameric structure of IL28A may be necessary for its role in promoting autophagolysosome formation and NS5A degradation. They also imply that the first α-helix of IL28A is a critical domain for the interactions between A and B, A and C, and B and D chains associated with the formation and stability of IL28A homotetramers.
IL28A has the same effect on the other HCV proteins
To verify IL28A protein effect on the other HCV proteins, we examined the HCV NS3, CORE, and NS5A proteins (as the representative of full HCV proteins) and autophagy flux-related proteins, LC3B, p62, and LAMP2 using the full HCV virion (J6/JFH/JC) infected Huh7.5 cells. The results show that IL28A overexpression caused significant decrease of HCV NS3, CORE, and NS5A proteins along with an unimpeded autophagy flux. Meanwhile, IL28A homotetramer appeared dominant compared with its monomer. IL28A downregulation by morpholino oligoes (MOs) blocked autophagy flux and elevated obviously or moderately the levels of the HCV proteins compared with the HCV virion group (Fig. 7). These results suggest that IL28A has the same inhibition on the other HCV proteins as on NS5A expression alone.
Discussion
Previous studies reported that HCV NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B proteins formed a complex to mediate the replication of the HCV genomic RNA37. The HCV NS5A protein is an important component of the HCV RNA replication complex and directs the replication complex docking to autophagosome membranes37. The N-terminal 30 amino acids of NS5A have been predicted to form a highly conserved amphipathic α-helix that is both necessary and sufficient for mediating the association of NS5A with the ER membrane/autophagopore membrane, which facilitates the adherence and replication of the HCV replication complex there42. These studies suggested that autophagy can benefit HCV replication. Our studies indicated that HCV NS5A indeed enhanced autophagosome formation by activating the proteins ATG3, ATG5, ATG7, and ATG10 of the ubiquitin-like system. These ubiquitin-like proteins can facilitate the transformation of LC3B-I to LC3B-II and the increase of the autophagosomes. The immunofluorescence assays reported here that HCV NS5A protein became associated with LC3B and p62, but not with LAMP2, meaning that NS5A promoted autophagosome formation to recruit the intracellular membranes for the HCV replication complex resided but inhibited fusion of autophagosomes to lysosome to avoid lysosomal degradation of the HCV products. Thus, HCV NS5A can exploit host autophagy machinery to help HCV replication.
However, many studies have described the synergistic action of interferons (mainly, type I interferons) with autophagy and other host factors in fighting viruses15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22. But few reports have been published on the synergistic effects of type III interferons with autophagy against viruses. In our previous studies, we found that IL28A inhibited the replication of the HCV sub-genome by promoting autolysosome formation in vitro39,40. In this study, we found that IL28A can degrade NS5A through the promotion of autolysosome formation and lysosomal degradation, which is supported by Yoo et al.43. Furthermore, we researched the direct interaction between NS5A and IL28A. The ISDR of NS5A was reported previously to function as the domain for recognizing and binding type I interferon, by which NS5A inhibits the interferon signaling pathway to facilitate HCV replication44. Here, we demonstrate that IL28A can also interact with HCV NS5A through the ISDR domain. We speculate that high expression of IL28A may degrade HCV NS5A; and high level of HCV NS5A may suppress the action of IL28A. The details in the combat process remain unclear, but the result of combat between IL28A and HCV NS5A will significantly affect the HCV replication. Thus, activation of IL28A expression may be a new strategy for the HCV antiviral therapy.
Until now, research on the molecular mechanism of interferons’ action including IL28A, has focused largely on their downstream signaling pathways, receptors and the activation of immunity-related genes. There is no study on the correlation of structure with function in IL28A. Respecting that protein conformation is closely related to its function, we modeled the three-dimensional conformation of IL28A on the previously described structure of IL28B (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/icn3d/full.html?&mmdbid=75484&bu=0&showanno=1), the sequence of IL28B is 96% similar to that of IL28A. The structural modeling showed that IL28A is likely to be in a homotetrameric form and that the first α-helix in each molecule is situated at the interfaces among three pairs of the four chains, such as A–B, A–C, and B–D chains, to contribute to conjugation of IL28A homotetramer. The results of experiments with IL28A deletion mutants demonstrated that HCV NS5A degradation was positively correlated with levels of the IL28A tetramer, rather than its monomer (Fig. 6j). The first α-helical sequence of IL28A was found to be a key domain for the conformation of the homotetramer and for the interaction of IL28A with the autophagic proteins LC3B, p62, and particularly LAMP2. Furthermore, we found that NS5A was degraded by autolysosomes, mediated by the IL28A tetramer. In contrast, when the first α-helix of IL28A was missing, the tetramer disappeared or reduced, and this was followed by the elevation of NS5A levels. We propose that the IL28A homotetramer is an essential structure needed for the direct or indirect association with NS5A, autophagosomes, and lysosomes together; and that the first α-helix of IL28A is required for this protein homotetrameric conformation (Fig. 6). This result has been confirmed via the experiment of the full HCV virion infection (Fig. 7). Our work here presents the first experimentally supported correlation of the IL28A tetramer conformation with its functions (Fig. 8).
In summary, though virus can acitivate an incomplete autophagy pathway to support its survival, upregulation of host defense system such as IL28A can eliminate the virus at the final step of autophagy pathway via promoting autolysosome formation and lysosomal degradation. For the first time, we have demonstrated that IL28A is directly bound to NS5A and that IL28A homotetramer is a key structure for IL28A function in degrading HCV proteins by promoting autolysosome formation. The first helix of IL28A has a pivotal function in maintaining the IL28A homotetramer conformation.
Materials and methods
Reagents and antibodies
Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent was purchased from Invitrogen (Cat# 1667501, Carlsbad, CA, America). Protein extracting reagent RIPA lysis buffer (Cat# C1053), non-denaturing lysis buffer (Cat# C1050) and protease inhibitor (cocktail, 50×, Cat# P1265-1) were purchased from Applygen Technologies, Inc (Beijing, China). For Western blotting, anti-NS5A antibody (Cat# ab13833), anti-NS3 antibody (Cat# ab13830), anti-core antibody (Cat# ab2740), anti-IL28A antibody (Cat# ab38570), and anti-DDDDK tag antibody (Cat# ab1162) were purchased from Abcam (Cambs, UK); anti-p62 (Cat# PM045), anti-LC3B (Cat# M186-3) were purchased from MBL (Japan). Antibodies against ATG3 (Cat# AP1807b), ATG5 (Cat# AP1812a) and ATG10 (Cat# A9356) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (America). Anti-ATG7 (Cat# sc-33211) and anti-LAMP2 (Cat# sc-18822) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (America). Anti-GAPDH (Cat# TA-08) and horseradish peroxidase-(HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgGs (Cat# ZB2305) and goat anti-rabbit IgGs (Cat# ZB2301) were purchased from ZSGB-BIO Co. (Beijing, China). For immunoprecipitation, anti-LC3B (Cat# PM036) and anti-p62 (Cat# PM045) were purchased from MBL (Japan), anti-NS5A (Cat# ab20342) and anti-DDDDK tag antibody (Cat# ab1162) from Abcam (America), and anti-LAMP2 (Cat# sc-18822) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (America). Rabbit IgG (Cat# 58802 S) and mouse IgG (Cat# 93702 S) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST, Danvers, MA, America); protein A/G plus-agarose (Cat# sc-2003) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (America). For cellular immunofluorescence and co-localization experiments, anti-NS5A antibody (Cat# ab12833), Human IL-28A antibody (Cat# ab191426), anti-LAMP2 (Cat# ab13524), anti-DDDDK tag antibody (Cat# ab1162) and anti-p62 antibody (Cat# ab56416) were purchased from Abcam (Cambs, UK). Anti-LC3B (Cat# PM036) and anti-p62 (Cat# PM045) were purchased from MBL (Japan). The TRITC (tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocynate) labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Cat# ZF-0316), FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (Cat# ZF-0312) and mounting medium with DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Cat# ZLI-9557) were purchased from ZSGB-BIO (Beijing, China).
Cell line and mock-transfected cells
HepG2 cells were purchased from the National Infrastructure of Cell Line Resource. Cells were cultured in MEM (Gibco, America) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. A mock group was obtained by pIRES2-EGFP transfection into HepG2 cell.
Plasmids
The complete coding sequence of HCV NS5A was subcloned from HCV J4L6S (1b) (stored in our lab) using PCR and inserted into pIRES2-EGFP vector to obtain the HCV NS5A overexpression construct pIRES2-NS5A. The NS5A-ISDR deletion mutant was constructed by overlap extension PCR in pIRES2-EGFP vector as pIRES2-NS5A-ISDR. The IL28A deletion mutants were designed based on the prediction of human IL28A protein secondary structure online (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/databases/cgi-bin/pdbsum/GetPage.pl?pdbcode=3hhc&template=protein.html&r=wiring&l=1&chain=A) and shown in Fig. 3a, b. The internal deletion mutants IL28A-D4, IL28A-D5, IL28A-D6, IL28A-D7, IL28A-D8 and IL28A-D9 in pIRES2-EGFP were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co. (Shanghai, China). The 5′ and 3′ flanking region mutants IL28A-D0, IL28A-D1, IL28A-D2 and IL28A-D3 in pIRES2-EGFP vector were constructed using PCR with specific primers at the designed sequence sites. All the expression constructs of IL28A-derived gene mutants and the wild type were Flag-tagged at their N-terminals and identified by sequencing.
Overexpression of IL28A-derived gene mutant constructs in cells expressing NS5A
Transient transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First, HepG2 cells were transfected with pIRES2-NS5A and cultivated for 12 h, then re-transfected with each IL28A-derived mutant plasmid, respectively, for 48 h culture and collected for subsequent experiments.
Downregulation of IL28A by morpholinos in cells overexpressing NS5A
The IL-28A morpholino oligomer sequences are 5′-TTCATTCCT GATCTCTGGTCTTTGT-3′ (MO1), and 5′-AAACACTCTGAGGCTGTCACCCAGG-3′ (MO2) bought from Gene Tools, LLC. (MO1 covers the start codon ATG, and MO2 is located at the ribosomal binding site and is 29 bases apart from the start codon ATG) which can downregulate the human IL28A protein in target cells. IL28A knockdown was carried out by the morpholino transfection at concentrations of 100 pM for each well in cells expressing NS5A. Then, the cells were cultured for 48 h and collected for the succeeding detection using both Co-IP and cell immunofluorescence methods.
Influence of autophagy inhibitors on IL28A function in autophagy flux in cells overexpressing NS5A and IL28A
HepG2 cells were transfected with HCV NS5A and cultured for 12 h, then re-transfected with IL28A for 24 h. The cells were then exposed to 3-MA (1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) or CQ (50 μM, Sigma-Aldrich) for another 24 h. The cells were collected and broken, and the cell supernatants were examined for changes in the levels of HCV NS5A, LAMP2, p62, and LC3BII/I using western blots.
Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation
Proteins were extracted with RIPA lysis buffer from cells treated as described above and separated on the SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane by blotting. The membranes were incubated separately with anti-NS5A, anti-p62, anti-LC3B, anti-LAMP2, anti-IL28A, anti-Flag and anti-GAPDH at a dilution range of 1:1000 to 1:2000 in TBST (mixture of tris-buffered saline and Tween 20) at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were then washed and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit IgGs (1:2000 dilutions) for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were detected using the chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore) with Tanon-5200 FC Imaging System (Tanon Science & Technology Co. Ltd., China). The optical intensities were quantified by Gel-Pro analyzer.
For immunoprecipitation, cells were harvested and lysed with nondenaturing lysis buffer and protease inhibitor cocktails. After pre-binding with protein A/G agarose-plus beads for 1 h at 4 °C, whole-cell lysates were used for immunoprecipitation with the indicated antibodies. Generally, the 1–2 μg designated antibody was added to cell lysates and incubated at 4 °C overnight. Then the mixtures were added to protein A/G plus agarose beads for 2 h, the immunoprecipitates extensively washed 5 times with PBS and eluted with SDS loading buffer by boiling for 5 min (minutes). The co-precipitates were examined by running SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with suitable antibodies.
Cell Immunofluorescence experiments
The experimental procedure, in general, followed our previous procedure39. Cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. After washing three times with PBS, cells were permeabilized with 3% Triton X-100 for 10 min, then probed with anti-p62, anti-LC3B, anti-LAMP2, anti-Flag, anti-NS5A or anti-IL28A antibodies at 4 °C overnight. After 3 washes with PBS, the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies labeled with TRITC or FITC (1:100 dilutions) for 1 h. Next, the cells were counterstained with DAPI dye in mounting medium and observed under a DeltaVision Imaging System (GE Healthcare).
For the study of comparison between HCV-NS5A and HCV-NS5A-ISDR (Fig. 5a) human IL28A antibody was used to detect co-localization of IL28A with HCV-NS5A proteins. The anti-flag antibody was used to avoid the IL28A mutation disturbance on the interaction between the IL28A mutants (the IL28A proteins labeled with flag) and HCV-NS5A-ISDR (Fig. 5e, f).
HCV virion infection
HCV virion infection was performed as previously described39. Huh7.5 cells were transfected with designed concentrations of IL28A, IL28A-MO1, and IL28A-MO2 using Lipofectamine 2000. After 12 h, the culture supernatants were replaced with fresh complete cultural media, and the transfected cells were then infected with HCV virion (J6/JFH/JC, 45 IU/cell) for 72 h. Total proteins and RNAs were extracted and detected with WB and qRT-PCR, repectively45.
Data and statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software. Data shown are mean ± SD; the means and standard deviations in histograms and scatter diagrams are derived from three independent experiments. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for all data sets and P-values <0.05 were considered as significant.
References
Esposito, I., Trinks, J. & Soriano, V. Hepatitis C virus resistance to the new direct-acting antivirals. Expert Opin. drug Metab. Toxicol. 12, 1197–1209 (2016).
Premoli, C. & Aghemo, A. Directly acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus: mechanisms of action and impact of resistant associated variants. Minerva Gastroenterol. Dietol. 62, 76–87 (2016).
Pawlotsky, J. M. NS5A inhibitors in the treatment of hepatitis C. J. Hepatol. 59, 375–382 (2013).
Kwon, H. J. et al. Direct binding of ledipasvir to HCV NS5A: mechanism of resistance to an HCV antiviral agent. PLoS ONE 10, e0122844 (2015).
Nakamoto, S., Kanda, T., Wu, S., Shirasawa, H. & Yokosuka, O. Hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitors and drug resistance mutations. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 2902–2912 (2014).
Lin, F. C. & Young, H. A. Interferons: success in anti-viral immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 25, 369–376 (2014).
Kotenko, S. V. I. F. N.-lambdas Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23, 583–590 (2011).
Buti, M. et al. Randomized trial of peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 48 or 72 weeks in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and slow virologic response. Hepatology 52, 1201–1207 (2010).
Wack, A., Terczynska-Dyla, E. & Hartmann, R. Guarding the frontiers: the biology of type III interferons. Nat. Immunol. 16, 802–809 (2015).
Davidson, S. et al. IFNlambda is a potent anti-influenza therapeutic without the inflammatory side effects of IFNalpha treatment. EMBO Mol. Med. 8, 1099–1112 (2016).
Galani, I. E., Koltsida, O. & Andreakos, E. Type III interferons (IFNs): emerging master regulators of immunity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 850, 1–15 (2015).
Robek, M. D., Boyd, B. S. & Chisari, F. V. Lambda interferon inhibits hepatitis B and C virus replication. J. Virol. 79, 3851–3854 (2005).
Ohsumi, Y. Molecular dissection of autophagy: two ubiquitin-like systems. Nat. Rev. Mol. cell Biol. 2, 211–216, https://doi.org/10.1038/35056522 (2001).
Jo, Y. K. et al. Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1-mediated down-regulation of ATG10 facilitates metastasis of colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 385, 21–27 (2017).
Deretic, V. et al. Autophagy in immunity against mycobacterium tuberculosis: a model system to dissect immunological roles of autophagy. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 335, 169–188 (2009).
Kuo, S. M. et al. Inhibition of avian influenza A virus replication in human cells by host restriction factor TUFM is correlated with autophagy. mBio 8, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00481-17 (2017).
Nardacci, R. et al. Role of autophagy in HIV infection and pathogenesis. J. Intern. Med. 281, 422–432, https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12596 (2017).
Pokharel, S. M., Shil, N. K. & Bose, S. Autophagy, TGF-beta, and SMAD-2/3 signaling regulates interferon-beta response in respiratory syncytial virus Infected macrophages. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 6, 174 (2016).
Pleet, M. L. et al. Autophagy, EVs, and infections: a perfect question for a perfect time. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8, 362 (2018).
Saitoh, T. & Akira, S. Regulation of innate immune responses by autophagy-related proteins. J. Cell Biol. 189, 925–935 (2010).
Deretic, V. & Levine, B. Autophagy balances inflammation in innate immunity. Autophagy 14, 243–251 (2018).
Mandell, M. A. et al. TRIM proteins regulate autophagy and can target autophagic substrates by direct recognition. Dev. Cell 30, 394–409 (2014).
Mizushima, N. Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev. 21, 2861–2873 (2007).
Levine, B. & Kroemer, G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell 132, 27–42 (2008).
White, E. The role for autophagy in cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 125, 42–46 (2015).
Mizushima, N., Levine, B., Cuervo, A. M. & Klionsky, D. J. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 451, 1069–1075 (2008).
Wang, L. & Ou, J. H. Hepatitis C virus and autophagy. Biol. Chem. 396, 1215–1222 (2015).
Sir, D. et al. Induction of incomplete autophagic response by hepatitis C virus via the unfolded protein response. Hepatology 48, 1054–1061 (2008).
Shi, Y. et al. Coxsackievirus A16 elicits incomplete autophagy involving the mTOR and ERK pathways. PLoS ONE 10, e0122109 (2015).
Taguwa, S. et al. Dysfunction of autophagy participates in vacuole formation and cell death in cells replicating hepatitis C virus. J. Virol. 85, 13185–13194 (2011).
Zhang, L., Qin, Y. & Chen, M. Viral strategies for triggering and manipulating mitophagy. Autophagy 14, 1665–1673 (2018).
Santana, S., Bullido, M. J., Recuero, M., Valdivieso, F. & Aldudo, J. Herpes simplex virus type I induces an incomplete autophagic response in human neuroblastoma cells. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 30, 815–831 (2012).
Hughes, M., Griffin, S. & Harris, M. Domain III of NS5A contributes to both RNA replication and assembly of hepatitis C virus particles. J. Gen. Virol. 90, 1329–1334 (2009).
Shanmugam, S., Nichols, A. K., Saravanabalaji, D., Welsch, C. & Yi, M. HCV NS5A dimer interface residues regulate HCV replication by controlling its self-interaction, hyperphosphorylation, subcellular localization and interaction with cyclophilin A. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007177 (2018).
Cevik, R. E. et al. Hepatitis C Virus NS5A targets nucleosome assembly protein NAP1L1 to control the innate cellular response. J. Virol. 91, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00880-17 (2017).
Kim, J. Y., Wang, L., Lee, J. & Ou, J. J. Hepatitis C virus induces the localization of lipid rafts to autophagosomes for Its RNA replication. J. Virol. 91, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00541-17 (2017).
Sir, D. et al. Replication of hepatitis C virus RNA on autophagosomal membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 18036–18043 (2012).
Kumthip, K. et al. Correlation between mutations in the core and NS5A genes of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1a, 1b, 3a, 3b, 6f and the response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. J. Viral Hepat. 18, e117–e125 (2011).
Zhao, Q. et al. Dual roles of two isoforms of autophagy-related gene ATG10 in HCV-subgenomic replicon mediated autophagy flux and innate immunity. Sci. Rep. 7, 11250 (2017).
Zhang, M. Q., Li, J. R., Peng, Z. G. & Zhang, J. P. Differential effects of autophagy-related 10 protein on HCV replication and autophagy flux are mediated by its cysteine(44) and cysteine(135). Front. Immunol. 9, 2176 (2018).
Madej, T. et al. MMDB and VAST+: tracking structural similarities between macromolecular complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D297–D303 (2014).
Brass, V. et al. An amino-terminal amphipathic alpha-helix mediates membrane association of the hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 8130–8139 (2002).
Kim, N. et al. Interferon-inducible protein SCOTIN interferes with HCV replication through the autolysosomal degradation of NS5A. Nat. Commun. 7, 10631 (2016).
Kohashi, T. et al. Site-specific mutation of the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) modulates hepatitis C virus replication. J. Viral Hepat. 13, 582–590 (2006).
Peng, Z. G. et al. Small molecular compounds that inhibit hepatitis C virus replication through destabilizing heat shock cognate 70 messenger RNA. Hepatology 52, 845–853 (2010).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81373453), the Chinese National Key Technology R&D Program (2015BAK45B01), and Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81621064). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.P.Z. conceived and designed the project. Y.Y.M. performed most of the experiments and treated data. Y.Y.M. and J.P.Z. analyzed the results and data, and wrote the paper. Z.G.P. provided the HCV virion, Huh7.5 cell strain and the method for HCV infection. J.R.L. performed the experiment of the HCV virion infection.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by G.M. Fimia
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Yy., Li, Jr., Peng, Zg. et al. IL28A protein homotetramer structure is required for autolysosomal degradation of HCV-NS5A in vitro. Cell Death Dis 11, 200 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2400-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2400-9
- Springer Nature Limited