Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Helping general dental practitioners use the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need: an assessment of available educational apps

  • Research
  • Published:
British Dental Journal Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) defines who receives treatment on the NHS. The British Orthodontic Society developed the 'Easy IOTN' app to help the dental team use IOTN more effectively.

Aim This study aims to investigate the quality of the 'Easy IOTN' app and any alternative mobile apps developed to aid a dentist's ability to use IOTN.

Materials and methods The App Store and Google Play were searched to identify available apps which provide an educational resource for IOTN. Any app identified was assessed using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and the Royal College of Physicians' health informatics unit checklist. The 'Easy IOTN' app continuous professional development (CPD) section was assessed for accuracy using a focus group.

Results Only the 'Easy IOTN' app was identified. It has a mean MARS score of 3.6. Significant inaccuracies were found within the CPD component of the 'Easy IOTN' app.

Discussion A mean MARS score of 3.6 is deemed average and is comparable to the quality of other orthodontic apps which exist. Errors contained within the CPD component could confuse users and have a negative impact on IOTN skill development.

Conclusions The educational component of the 'Easy IOTN' app is of an acceptable standard, but the CPD section is flawed.

Key points

  • Highlights available educational resources for the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need.

  • Details problems with the continuing professional development section of the easy Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need app.

  • Assesses the quality of the easy Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need app, which is the first study of its kind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jawad Z, Bates C, Hodge T. Who needs orthodontic treatment? Who gets it? And who wants it? Br Dent J 2015; 218: 99-103.

  2. Brook P H, Shaw W C. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 309-320.

  3. Mandall N A, Wright J, Conboy F, Kay E, Harvey L, O'Brien K D. Index of orthodontic treatment need as a predictor of orthodontic treatment uptake. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 703-707.

  4. British Orthodontic Society. Guidelines for Referrals for Orthodontic Treatment. 2019. Available at https://www.bos.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/British-Orthodontic-Society-Referrals-November-2019.pdf (accessed September 2022).

  5. British Orthodontic Society. Managing the Developing Occlusion: A guide for dental practitioners. 2010. Available at https://heeoe.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/1314291006_qfmp_managing_the_developing_occlusion.pdf (accessed September 2022).

  6. Borrie F, Bonetti D, Bearn D. What influences the implementation of interceptive orthodontics in primary care? Br Dent J 2014; 216: 687-691.

  7. Fleming P S, Dowling P A. A survey of undergraduate orthodontic training and orthodontic practices by general dental practitioners. J Ir Dent Assoc 2005; 51: 68-72.

  8. Jackson O A, Cunningham S J, Moles D R, Clark J R. Orthodontic referral behaviour of West Sussex dentists. Br Dent J 2009; DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.979.

  9. Ho-A-Yun, J, Crawford, F, Clarkson J. The Use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need in Dental Primary Care. Br Dent J 2009; DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.310.

  10. Puri A, Ho-A-Yun J, McGuiness N J. Use and knowledge of IOTN among GDPs in Scotland. Br Dent J 2015; 218: 399-404.

  11. Jawad Z, Bates C, Hodge T. Can Dental Registrants Use the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need Accurately? Part 2. Factors influencing knowledge of IOTN among dental registrants. Br Dent J 2016; 220: 591-595.

  12. Stoyanov S R, Hides L, Kavanagh D J, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015; 3: 27.

  13. Wyatt J C, Thimbleby H, Rastall P, Hoogewerf J, Wooldridge D, Williams J. What makes a good clinical app? Introducing the RCP Health Informatics Unit checklist. Clin Med (Lond) 2015; 15: 519-521.

  14. Jawad, Z, Bates, C, Hodge T. Can dental registrants use the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need accurately? Part 1. Knowledge of IOTN among dental registrants. Br Dent J 2016; 220: 527-532.

  15. Foster-Thomas E, Curtis J, Eckhardt C, Atkin P. Welsh dental trainees' confidence and competence in completing orthodontic assessments and referrals. J Orthod 2021, 48: 383-391.

  16. Siddiqui N R, Hodges S J, Sharif M O. Orthodontic apps: an assessment of quality (using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)) and behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Prog Orthod 2021; 22: 25.

  17. Mandall N A, O'Brien K D, Brady J, Worthington H V, Harvey L. Teledentistry for screening new patient orthodontic referrals. Part 1: A randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 659-662.

  18. Veenema A C, Katsaros C, Boxum S C, Bronkhorst E M, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M. Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 281-286.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank member of the Orthodontic Department at Dundee Dental Hospital for their time and support in forming the focus group to assess the CPD component of the app.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

David Murray: study design, investigation, statistical analysis and authorship of initial draft. Gautham Sivamurthy and Peter Mossey: study design, review and contribution to all subsequent drafts of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Murray.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

As this study was confined to the evaluation of a tool without utilising patients or confidential data, and the focus group was voluntarily assembled without patient or public involvement, no ethical approval was required for this study.

The focus group participants, made up of colleagues, consented to participate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

G. Murray, D., Sivamurthy, G. & Mossey, P. Helping general dental practitioners use the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need: an assessment of available educational apps. Br Dent J (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6445-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6445-x

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation