Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of hard inserts in sports mouthguards: a systematic review

  • Research
  • Published:
British Dental Journal Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives To improve the protective capacity of conventional ethylene-vinyl acetate mouthguards, some authors have suggested reinforcement with a hard material to distribute impact energy more widely. The research question for this systematic review was: 'does the inclusion of a hard insert in mouthguards improve the protection of anterior teeth from a direct blow?'

Data sources Three bibliographic databases (PubMed/Medline, Ovid/Embase and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases) were searched up to 20 February 2021. Additional searches included hand searching of key articles and journals.

Data selection A systematic search of the literature included studies where the intervention was the incorporation of hard material into sports mouthguards and where the comparator was conventional mouthguard material. Eligibility required the use of anatomical specimens or anatomical analogues which included or represented anterior maxillary teeth. Twelve eligible publications were identified.

Data extraction Data extraction was first carried out independently by two reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion.

Data synthesis Results of individual studies were conflicting and methodological diversity created difficulty in making a synthesis of results. All studies employed low-energy impacts that did not represent the potentially high-energy impacts encountered in sport.

Conclusion The efficacy of hard inserts in sports mouthguards has not been demonstrated.

Key points

  • Efficacy of hard inserts in sports mouthguards is not demonstrated by research.

  • Results of studies are conflicting and in some studies, protection is reduced by the incorporation of hard inserts.

  • It is possible that some hard inserts may cause additional tissue damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oliveira Werlich M, Honnef L R, Silva Bett J V et al. Prevalence of dentofacial injuries in contact sports players: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Traumatol 2020; 36: 477-488.

  2. Knapik J J, Marshall S W, Lee R B et al. Mouthguards in sport activities: history, physical properties and injury prevention effectiveness. Sports Med 2007; 37: 117-144.

  3. Parker K, Marlow B, Patel N, Gill D S. A review of mouthguards: effectiveness, types, characteristics and indications for use. Br Dent J 2017; 222: 629-633.

  4. Bochnig M S, Oh M-J, Nagel T, Ziegler F, Jost-Brinkmann P G. Comparison of the shock absorption capacities of different mouthguards. Dent Traumatol 2017; 33: 205-213.

  5. Kataoka S H, Setzer F C, Gondim Jr E, Caldeira C L. Impact absorption and force dissipation of protective mouth guards with or without titanium reinforcement. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 956-959.

  6. Handa J, Takeda T, Kurokawa K, Ozawa T, Nakajima K, Ishigami K. Influence of pre-laminated material on shock absorption ability in specially designed mouthguard with hard insert and space. J Prosthodont Res 2011; 55: 214-220.

  7. Takeda T, Ishigami K, Handa J et al. Does hard insertion and space improve shock absorption ability of mouthguard? Dent Traumatol 2006; 22: 77-82.

  8. Bemelmanns P, Pfeiffer P. Shock absorption capacities of mouthguards in different types and thicknesses. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 149-153.

  9. Balas E A, Austin S M, Ewigman B G, Brown G D, Mitchell J A. Methods of randomized controlled clinical trials in health services research. Med Care 1995; 33: 687-699.

  10. de Wet F A, Heyns M, Pretorius J. Shock absorption potential of different mouth guard materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 301-306.

  11. Greasley A, Imlach G, Karet B. Application of a standard test to the in vitro performance of mouthguards. Br J Sports Med 1998; 32: 17-19.

  12. Matsuda Y, Nakajima K, Saitou M et al. The effect of light-cured resin with a glass fibre net as an intermediate material for Hard & Space mouthguard. Dent Traumatol 2020; 36: 654-661.

  13. Oikarinen K S, Salonen M A, Korhonen J. Comparison of the guarding capacities of mouth protectors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993; 9: 115-119.

  14. Sarac R, Helbig J, Dräger J, Jost-Brinkmann P-G. A Comparative Study of Shock Absorption Capacities of Custom Fabricated Mouthguards using a Triangulation Sensor. Materials (Basel) 2019; DOI: 10.3390/ma12213535.

  15. Verissimo C, Santos-Filho P C F, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares C J. Modifying the biomechanical response of mouthguards with hard inserts: A finite element study. Am J Dent 2015; 28: 116-120.

  16. Watermeyer G J, Thomas C J, Jooste C H. The protective potential of mouthguards. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1985; 40: 173-177.

  17. Hache A. A Cool Sport Full of Physics. Phys Teach 2008; 46: 398-402.

  18. Rattai J, Levin L. Oral injuries related to Ice Hockey in the province of Alberta, Canada: Trends over the last 15 years. Dent Traumatol 2018; 34: 107-113.

  19. Boffano P, Boffano M, Gallesio C, Roccia F, Cignetti R, Piana R. Rugby athletes' awareness and compliance in the use of mouthguards in the North West of Italy. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28: 210-213.

  20. Higgins J P T, Thomas J, Chandler J et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

  21. Sterne J A C, Savović J, Page M J et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.

  22. Whiting P F, Rutjes A W, Westwood M E et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529-536.

  23. Thacker S B, Gilchrist J, Stroup D F, Kimsey C D. The prevention of shin splints in sports: a systematic review of literature. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 32-40.

  24. Thacker S B, Stroup D F, Branche C M, Gilchrist J, Goodman R A, Weitman E A. The prevention of ankle sprains in sports. A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 753-760.

  25. Hickey J C, Morris A L, Carlson L D, Seward T E. The relation of mouth protectors to cranial pressure and deformation. J Am Dent Assoc 1967; 74: 735-740.

  26. Johnston T, Messer L B. An in vitro study of the efficacy of mouthguard protection for dentoalveolar injuries in deciduous and mixed dentitions. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996; 12: 277-285.

  27. Petrone N, Candiotto G, Marzella E et al. Feasibility of using a novel instrumented human head surrogate to measure helmet, head and brain kinematics and intracranial pressure during multidirectional impact tests. J Sci Med Sport 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.05.015.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Mr Ryan Finnerty, Head Coach and General Manager of Manchester Storm Ice Hockey Team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Andrew Shelley, Keith Winwood, Thomas Allen and Keith Horner were involved in all stages of producing this systematic review, including planning, study selection, analysis and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Shelley.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shelley, A., Winwood, K., Allen, T. et al. Effectiveness of hard inserts in sports mouthguards: a systematic review. Br Dent J (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4089-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4089-x

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation