Abstract
Introduction Around one-third of the UK population are 'problem-orientated dental attenders', only seeking care when suffering with dental pain and often on a repeated basis to secondary care. Little is known about attendance in primary care. The aim here was to examine the period prevalence of repeat urgent care attenders and establish predictors of repeat attendance in primary care.
Methods Data on urgent and emergency dental care attendances in primary dental care in the North East and Cumbria were analysed from 2013-2019. Variables included: patient sex; ten-year age band; lower super output area; and Index of Multiple Deprivation. Period prevalence was calculated and data were considered year by year to identify trends in attendances. Analysis was with descriptive statistics and predictors of repeat attendance were identified using logistic regression modelling.
Results Over the six-year period, there were 601,432 attendances for urgent primary dental care, equating to a period prevalence of 2.76% for the geographic population studied. In total, 16.15% of attendances were repeat attendances (period prevalence 0.45%) and predictors included being a woman and residence in deprived and rural areas. All urgent care attendances decreased over the six-year period, with one-off attendances beginning to increase again in 2019, while repeat attendances stabilised.
Conclusion Interventions to encourage regular dental attendances should be targeted at patients from the most deprived and rural areas of the North East and Cumbria; however, a decrease in repeat attendance was noted in these areas.
Key points
-
Predictors of being a repeat attender for urgent and emergency dental care included being a woman and living in the most deprived and rural areas of the North East and Cumbria.
-
Over a six-year period (2013-2019), the number of one-off urgent and emergency dental care attenders to primary care in the North East and Cumbria decreased before beginning to increase.
-
Over the same period, the number of repeat urgent and emergency dental care attenders to primary care in the North East and Cumbria decreased before stabilising.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Just under 10% of the dentate population in England, Wales and Northern Ireland report experiencing acute dental pain1 which is known to have a significant impact on everyday life.2,3 Despite this, almost one-third of the UK population are so called 'problem-orientated attenders',1,4,5 only seeking care when they have acute dental pain or problems, often waiting over two months before doing so.6,7,8 As well as affecting their quality of life, this also puts them at risk of serious adverse events such as unintentional paracetamol overdose9,10,11,12,13,14 and life-threatening infections.15,16,17,18 As problem-orientated attenders only seek care when they have acute dental pain, they frequently use drop-in services in secondary care, often on a repeated basis and for the same problem,3,19 as well as presenting to other healthcare professionals including hospital (medical) emergency departments,20,21,22 general medical practitioners23,24 and other allied health professionals.25,26,27,28 They will also seek urgent or emergency dental treatment with primary care general dental practitioners; however, little is known about the rates or predictors of repeat attendance in primary care. It is important that research is carried out to understand problem-orientated dental attendance so that interventions can be developed to encourage regular dental attendance and part of this understanding must include where these patients attend, to ensure that any interventions are sited in the appropriate places.
The North East and Cumbria covers a population of just under three million people, with a slight predominance of women at 51%.29 The North East of England has a slightly different demographic to that of Cumbria, with Cumbria having a generally older population and more rural areas.30 Access to dental services also varies between the North East and Cumbria, with 2-4% of North East residents reporting being unable to access dental care, compared to 8% of Cumbria.31 A further 12% of those responding to the National GP Survey stated that they did not try to access care because they thought that they would not be able to get an appointment.31 In addition, previous commissioning reports have shown that Cumbria has higher utilisation rates of urgent dental care services than the North East.32
The aim of this study was to determine the period prevalence of repeat urgent and emergency care attendance in the North East and Cumbria and identify any sociodemographic predictors of repeat attendance to inform intervention development aimed at problem-orientated dental attendance.
Methods
A request was made to the NHS Business Service Authority for data available on Band 1 Urgent Course of Treatment FP17 claims during the period of April 2013 to April 2019 for Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear and Durham, Darlington and Teesside legacy area teams. Data requested included: patient sex; ten-year age band; lower layer super output area (LSOA); and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). To avoid disclosure of patient-identifiable information, the data were aggregated into the number of urgent care attendances before being made available to the authors for analysis. According to the UK's Human Research Authority's processes, the aggregated and anonymous data used within this paper did not mandate ethical review or approval.
IMD is the official measure of deprivation in the UK33 and considers deprivation being related to more than just poverty. IMD combines seven different domains: income; employment; health deprivation and disability; education, skills and training; crime; barriers to housing and services; and living environment. There are 32,844 LSOAs in England, with each being assigned a ranked IMD score, with 1 being the most deprived area and 32,844 being the least deprived. For the purposes of this study, IMD was considered in deciles and quintiles: quintile or decile 1 is the most deprived and quintile 5 or decile 10 the least deprived. IMD data were provided as part of the data request.
To take into account the variation in population sizes within the areas studied, the prevalence of urgent care attendances were calculated using freely available census data during the year of interest for the relevant population.29 The prevalence period was calculated as a percentage of the population registered on the census and therefore of all the population of interest who could theoretically access a dentist in that area. Population estimates were not used. LSOA was used for location-relevant outcomes including mapping the data to Office for National Statistics urban/rural definitions34 and also to middle layer super output area (MSOA) to allow mapping of the prevalence by area using the Public Health England Local Health Mapping Tool.35 A repeat urgent care user was defined as someone attending urgent care twice or more in one year, in order to capture data on frequent urgent care users and therefore most likely to represent problem-orientated dental attenders. Data were considered year by year to identify any changes in trends over the six-year period. These were analysed using descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariable logistic regression modelling with interaction and likelihood ratio analysis using STATA v15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). Logistic regression modelling was repeated with adjustments for any potential confounders and included in the final model where a larger than 10% change was observed.
Results
Over the six-year period there were 601,432 patient attendances for urgent and emergency dental care, which equates to an overall period prevalence of 2.76% for the North East and Cumbria population. When considered as a prevalence, the majority of these patients were women (population prevalence 3.3% women, 3.1% men), aged 30-39 years old and from most deprived areas of the North East (Table 1). Attendances increased in older age groups before decreasing from the seventh decade. The most common area for attendances was Copeland (Fig. 1). The majority of attendances were from rural locations (population prevalence 4.6% compared to 3.5% for non-rural locations). Attendances decreased from 2013-2017 and then began to increase again in 2018 (Fig. 2).
The majority of patients attended for one urgent or emergency care appointment over the six-year period (83.9%), the remainder attending for more than one urgent or emergency care appointment. Repeat attenders accounted for 97,155 (16.15%) patient attendances over the six-year period, equating to an overall period prevalence of 0.45%. Patients who were repeat attenders tended to be women (0.58% compared to 0.45% prevalence), from the most deprived areas of the North East and aged 30-39 years old (Table 1). The prevalence of repeat attenders by year are shown in Figure 2, with a decrease seen from 2013-2017, before stabilising in 2018. Repeat attendances tended to be from rural areas (0.78% compared to 0.56% prevalence). The location of repeat attenders are shown in Figure 1.
Given the difference in access to dental services between the North East and Cumbria, the prevalence between the two geographical areas was compared over time (Fig. 3). The prevalence of all and repeat patients attending for urgent dental care was consistently higher in Cumbria compared to the North East.
Using univariate logistic regression modelling repeat attenders were less likely to be men (OR 0.8, 95% CI: 0.80-0.82, p <0.0001) and from urban areas of the North East and Cumbria (OR 0.9, 95% CI: 0.90-0.95, p <0.0001). In addition, repeat attenders were more likely to be from more deprived areas (OR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.93-0.94, p <0.001) (Table 2). Within multivariable regression modelling, a significant interaction was found between being a repeat attender and IMD quintile and rurality (p <0.00001). The relationship between IMD quintile and rurality for repeat attenders is shown in Figure 4, whereby repeat attenders are less likely to be from the least deprived and urban areas of the North East (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.95, p <0.0001).
Considering IMD quintile over time, people from the most deprived areas of the North East remained the majority of repeat attenders. The overall number of repeat attenders in each quintile decreased from 2013-2017, however from 2017 the number of repeat attenders in quintiles 1-3 increased, while those in quintiles 4-5 continued to decrease (Fig. 5).
Discussion
Over a six-year period in the North East and Cumbria, the period prevalence of all urgent and emergency dental care attendances in primary dental care was 2.76%. In total, 16.5% of these attendances were repeat attendances, which equated to a 0.45% period prevalence. This is a lower repeat attendance rate than observed in secondary care where around one-third of attenders are repeat attenders.3,8 The majority of the patients attending were in their fourth decade and from the most deprived areas of the North East and Cumbria which is in keeping with the typical sociodemographic of patients attending secondary care urgent dental clinics3 and medical emergency departments20 in the same region, as well as nationally8 and internationally.6,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 However, in contrast to the demographic attending secondary urgent care services the majority of patients were women. This may be because female patients are more likely to attend for routine dental care4 and as such, be undergoing an active course of treatment at the practice, making access for urgent care easier in comparison to those who are not undergoing active treatment. Unfortunately, a limitation to this study is that it is unknown what proportion of the patients attending for urgent and emergency dental care were undergoing an active course of treatment and therefore may reflect those attending with complications associated with treatment, rather than from avoiding regular dental care.
Predictors of being a repeat attender reflected the typical sociodemographic of all attendees which included being a woman from rural and deprived areas. The odds of being a repeat attender varied in relation to deprivation depending on their urban or rural status, with those having the highest odds for repeat attendance living in the most deprived and rural areas. Patients from deprived areas may be more likely to seek repeat urgent and emergency care due to an increase in prevalence of dental disease and pain,1,51 fewer seeking regular preventive dental care4 and having poorer health literacy.52 Living in a rural area is also associated with a decreased likelihood of attending for regular preventive care53,54,55,56 which may be partly explained by patients reporting oral health as a low priority,56 in addition to dental access potentially being more challenging, which is known to be a problem in Cumbria compared to the North-East32 and may explain the difference in attendances between the two geographical areas observed.
Attending primary dental care services in a problem-orientated manner means that patients are more likely to continue to suffer with oral health problems1,57,58 and fail to receive standard preventive dental care.57 This continues to put them at risk of adverse health events as well as exert a direct and indirect economic impact on the patient and wider society. For this reason, it is imperative that interventions are developed to try and encourage regular preventive dental care over and above problem-orientated dental care. In primary dental care in the North East and Cumbria, these interventions should therefore be targeted to patients residing in the most deprived and rural areas to ensure those who would benefit the most receive them. Although the current literature has been used to provide some explanation as to why these particular patient groups may be repeat attenders, the data analysis cannot provide casual evidence for the reasons behind repeat attendance. This warrants further research exploring the specific barriers within these patient groups.
Changes in attendance patterns were noted over the time period studied, with a decrease in attendance noted from 2013-2017 and repeat attendance remaining stable into 2018, while one-off urgent care attendance began to increase. In addition, all and repeat urgent care attendances were consistently higher in Cumbria than the North East. This could indicate that either service improvements or interventions aimed at repeated urgent and emergency dental attendance in primary care may need to be prioritised in Cumbria. Whereas in the North East, interventions could be sited in other clinical settings where these patients are more likely to attend, such as secondary care urgent dental care clinics.3 The reasons why problem-orientated attenders chose to present repeatedly to secondary care rather than primary care are under-researched; however, could include cost of service and availability of immediate walk-in treatment. Changes in attendance patterns by IMD were also noted over the six-year period, with an increase in repeat attenders from the more deprived quintiles of the North East and a decrease from the least deprived quintiles, indicating a potential increase in oral health inequalities across the region.
It should be noted that the findings of this study are limited to attendees at urgent and emergency dental care before the COVID-19 pandemic, which has had a significant impact on dental care internationally. At the start of the pandemic in March 2020, all routine dental care ceased in the UK and patients were only able to access urgent and emergency dental care in dedicated hubs.59 As the pandemic progressed, access to dental care subsequently improved with individual practices offering urgent and emergency care before transitioning to offer a mix of urgent and more routine dental care. Therefore, the majority of the UK population will have changed their attendance habits. At this stage, it is uncertain what long-term impact there will be on engagement with routine dental care and as a result, the proportion of problem-orientated attenders could increase and this will warrant further future research. In addition, this study examines part of the UK where access to dental care in Cumbria is known to be an issue with an increase in urgent dental care attendance. Findings may therefore be affected by these access issues and may not be representative of the rest of the UK. Further work is required in other areas to establish if predictors of repeat urgent dental care attendance is comparable elsewhere. This dataset also covered NHS dental care only and therefore may not represent patients accessing private dental care.
Conclusion
In conclusion, across the North East and Cumbria during a six-year period, there were 601,432 patient attendances for urgent and emergency dental care, equating to an overall period prevalence of 2.76%. To put this another way, nearly 3 in every 100 people in the region need urgent care. Repeat attenders were more likely to be women and from the most deprived and rural areas; however, the prevalence of repeat attendance declined over the study period. Any interventions developed to promote regular dental care should therefore be targeted at patients residing in the most deprived and rural areas of the region.
References
The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Urgent Conditions - a report from the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009. 2011. Available at https://files.digital.nhs.uk/publicationimport/pub01xxx/pub01086/adul-dent-heal-surv-summ-them-the3-2009-rep5.pdf (accessed May 2020).
Chavers L S, Gilbert G H, Shelton B J. Two-year incidence of oral disadvantage, a measure of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 21-29.
Currie C C, Stone S J, Durham J. Pain and problems: a prospective cross-sectional study of the impact of dental emergencies. J Oral Rehabil 2015; 42: 883-889.
The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Service Considerations - a report from the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009. 2011. Available at https://files.digital.nhs.uk/publicationimport/pub01xxx/pub01086/adul-dent-heal-surv-summ-them-the6-2009-rep8.pdf (accessed May 2020).
The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Children's Dental Health Survey 2013. Report 1: Attitudes, Behaviours and Children's Dental Health. England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 2013. 2015. Available at https://files.digital.nhs.uk/publicationimport/pub17xxx/pub17137/cdhs2013-report1-attitudes-and-behaviours.pdf (accessed May 2020).
Cohen L A, Harris S L, Bonito A J et al. Coping with toothache pain: a qualitative study of low-income persons and minorities. J Public Health Dent. 2007; 67: 28-35.
Gibson G B, Blasberg B, Hill S J. A prospective survey of hospital ambulatory dental emergencies. Part 1: Patient and emergency characteristics. Spec Care Dentist 1993; 13: 61-65.
Scully C. The pattern of patient attendance for emergency care in a British dental teaching hospital. Community Dent Health 1995; 12: 151-154.
Clement C, Scala-Bertola J, Javot L et al. Misuse of acetaminophen in the management of dental pain. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011; 20: 996-1000.
Craig D G N, Bates C M, Davidson J S, Martin K G, Hayes P C, Simpson K J. Overdose pattern and outcome in paracetamol-induced acute severe hepatotoxicity. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 71: 273-282.
Daly F F, O'Malley G F, Heard K, Bogdan G M, Dart R C. Prospective evaluation of repeated supratherapeutic acetaminophen (paracetamol) ingestion. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 44: 393-398.
Heard K J, Ries N L, Dart R C, Bogdan G M, Zallen R D, Daly F. Overuse of non-prescription analgesics by dental clinic patients. BMC Oral Health 2008; 8: 33.
Siddique I, Mahmood H, Mohammed-Ali R. Paracetamol overdose secondary to dental pain: a case series. Br Dent J 2015; DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.706.
Vogel J, Heard K J, Carlson C, Lange C, Mitchell G. Dental pain as a risk factor for accidental acetaminophen overdose: a case-control study. Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29: 1125-1129.
Bowe C M, Gargan M L, Kearns G J, Stassen L F A. Does access to general dental treatment affect the number and complexity of patients presenting to the acute hospital service with severe dentofacial infections? J Ir Dent Assoc 2015; 61: 196-200.
Jundt J S, Gutta R. Characteristics and cost impact of severe odontogenic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: 558-566.
Seppanen L, Lemberg K K, Lauhio A, Lindqvist C, Rautemaa R. Is dental treatment of an infected tooth a risk factor for locally invasive spread of infection? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 986-993.
Thomas S J, Atkinson C, Hughes C, Revington P, Ness A R. Is there an epidemic of admissions for surgical treatment of dental abscesses in the UK? BMJ 2008; 336: 1219-1220.
McCartan B E, Harrison A, Daly P. Patient satisfaction in an emergency dental clinic. J Ir Dent Assoc 2000; 46: 98-102.
Currie C C, Stone S J, Connolly J, Durham J. Dental Pain in the medical emergency department: a cross-sectional study. J Oral Rehabil 2017; 44: 105-111.
Patel K K, Driscoll P. Dental knowledge of accident and emergency senior house officers. Emerg Med J 2002; 19: 539-541.
Pennycook A, Makower R, Brewer A, Moulton C, Crawford R. The management of dental problems presenting to an accident and emergency department. J R Soc Med 1993; 86: 702-703.
Anderson R, Richmond S, Thomas D W. Patient presentation at medical practices with dental problems: An analysis of the 1996 General Practice Morbidity Database for Wales. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 297-300.
Cope A L, Chestnutt I G, Wood F, Francis N A. Dental consultations in UK general practice and antibiotic prescribing rates: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2016; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684757.
Barnett T, Hoang H, Stuart J, Crocombe L. Non-dental primary care providers' views on challenges in providing oral health services and strategies to improve oral health in Australian rural and remote communities: A qualitative study. BMJ Open 2015; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009341.
Cohen L A. The role of non-dental health professionals in providing access to dental care for low-income and minority patients. Dent Clin North Am 2009; 53: 451-648.
Cohen L A, Bonito A J, Akin D R et al. Role of pharmacists in consulting with the underserved regarding toothache pain. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2009; 49: 38-42.
Cohen L A, Manski R J. Visits to non-dentist health care providers for dental problems. Fam Med 2006; 38: 556-564.
Office for National Statistics. Census. 2021. Available at https://www.ons.gov.uk/census (accessed October 2020).
Cumbria Observatory. Population. 2020. Available at https://www.cumbriaobservatory.org.uk/population/ (accessed Novmber 2020).
GP Patient Survey. Survey and Reports. 2018. Available at https://gp-patient.co.uk/surveysandreports2018 (accessed November 2020).
Landes D P. Modelling Urgent and Unscheduled Care Demand: County Durham and Tees Valley & Cumbria, Northumberland and Tyne & Wear. Public Health England, 2014.
UK Government. English indices of deprivation 2019. 2019. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2019 (accessed March 2020).
Office for National Statistics. 2011 rural/urban classification. 2016. Available at https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/geographicalproducts/ruralurbanclassifications/2011ruralurbanclassification (accessed February 2019).
Public Health England. Public Health England Local Health Mapping Tool. 2022. Available at https://www.localhealth.org.uk/#c=home (accessed January 2020).
Sun B C, Chi D L, Schwarz E et al. Emergency department visits for nontraumatic dental problems: A mixed-methods study. Am J Public Health 2015; 105: 947-955.
Elangovan S, Nalliah R, Allareddy V, Karimbux N Y, Allareddy V. Outcomes in patients visiting hospital emergency departments in the United States because of periodontal conditions. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 809-819.
Hong L, Ahmed A, McCunniff M, Liu Y, Cai J, Hoff G. Secular trends in hospital emergency department visits for dental care in Kansas City, Missouri, 2001-2006. Public Health Rep 2011; 126: 210-219.
Seu K, Hall K K. Emergency Department Visits for Dental-Related Conditions, 2009: Statistical Brief #143. In Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2012.
Allareddy V, Rampa S, Lee M K, Allareddy V, Nalliah R P. Hospital-based emergency department visits involving dental conditions: Profile and predictors of poor outcomes and resource utilization. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 331-337.
Walker A, Probst J C, Martin A B, Bellinger J D, Merchant A. Analysis of hospital-based emergency department visits for dental caries in the United States in 2008. J Public Health Dent 2014; 74: 188-194.
Darling B G, Singhal A, Kanellis M J. Emergency department visits and revisits for nontraumatic dental conditions in Iowa. J Public Health Dent 2016; 76: 122-128.
Lewis C, Lynch H, Johnston B. Dental complaints in emergency departments: a national perspective. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 42: 93-99.
Anderson L, Cherala S, Traore E, Martin N R. Utilization of Hospital Emergency Departments for non-traumatic dental care in New Hampshire, 2001-2008. J Community Health 2011; 36: 513-516.
Okunseri C, Okunseri E, Thorpe J M, Xiang Q, Szabo A. Patient characteristics and trends in nontraumatic dental condition visits to emergency departments in the United States. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2012; 4: 1-7.
Wall T. Recent trends in dental emergency department visits in the United States - 1997/1998 to 2007/2008. J Public Health Dent 2012; 72: 216-220.
Pajewski N M, Okunseri C. Patterns of dental service utilization following nontraumatic dental condition visits to the emergency department in Wisconsin Medicaid. J Public Health Dent 2014; 74: 34-41.
DeLia D, Lloyd K, Feldman C A, Cantor J C. Patterns of emergency department use for dental and oral health care: Implications for dental and medical care coordination. J Public Health Dent 2016; 76: 1-8.
Verma S, Chambers I. Dental emergencies presenting to a general hospital emergency department in Hobart, Australia. Aust Dent J 2014; 59: 329-333.
Bae J-H, Kim Y-K, Choi Y-H. Clinical characteristics of dental emergencies and prevalence of dental trauma at a university hospital emergency centre in Korea. Dent Traumatol 2011; 27: 374-378.
Vargas C M, Macek M D, Marcus S E. Sociodemographic correlates of tooth pain among adults: United states, 1989. Pain 2000; 85: 87-92.
Sørensen K, Pelikan J M, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Public Health 2015; 25: 1053-1058.
Vargas C M, Ronzio C R, Hayes K L. Oral health status of children and adolescents by rural residence, United States. J Rural Health 2003; 19: 260-268.
Khan A, Thapa J R, Zhang D. Preventive Dental Checkups and Their Association With Access to Usual Source of Care Among Rural and Urban Adult Residents. J Rural Health 2017; 33: 419-426.
Caldwell J T, Ford C L, Wallace S P, Wang M C, Takahashi L M. Intersection of Living in a Rural Versus Urban Area and Race/Ethnicity in Explaining Access to Health Care in the United States. Am J Public Health 2016; 106: 1463-1469.
Heaton L J, Smith T A, Raybould T P. Factors influencing use of dental services in rural and urban communities: considerations for practitioners in underserved areas. J Dent Educ 2004; 68: 1081-1089.
Hill K B, Chadwick B, Freeman R, O'Sullivan I, Murray J J. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009: relationships between dental attendance patterns, oral health behaviour and the current barriers to dental care. Br Dent J 2013; 214: 25-32.
Tramini P, Al Qadi Nassar B, Valcarcel J, Gibert P. Factors associated with the use of emergency dental care facilities in a French public hospital. Spec Care Dentist 2010; 30: 66-71.
Carter E, Currie C C, Asuni A et al. The first six weeks - setting up a UK urgent dental care centre during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br Dent J 2020; 228: 842-848.
Acknowledgements
The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Thanks to Stuart Youngman for his assistance with requesting and providing the data and to Zoe Freeman for her guidance on mapping. The mapping tool was obtained from www.localhealth.org.uk, Public Health England.
Funding
Charlotte Currie is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Research Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Charlotte Currie contributed to conception, design, data acquisition and interpretation, performed all statistical analyses and drafted and critically revised the manuscript. Justin Durham, David Landes, Mark Pearce and Simon Stone contributed to conception, design, data acquisition and interpretation and critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave their final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Rights and permissions
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.© The Author(s) 2022
About this article
Cite this article
Currie, C., Stone, S., Pearce, M. et al. Urgent dental care use in the North East and Cumbria: predicting repeat attendance. Br Dent J 232, 164–171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-3886-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-3886-6
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Paediatric urgent dental care
British Dental Journal (2022)