Abstract
Melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) plays a key role in regulation of appetite activated by its main ligand α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) in both central and peripheral targets. α-MSH also binds to circulating immunoglobulins (Igs) but the functional significance of such immune complexes (ICs) in MC4R signaling in normal and pathological conditions of altered appetite has remained unknown. To address this question, we analyzed plasma levels, affinity kinetics, and binding epitopes of α-MSH-reactive IgG extracted from plasma samples of female patients with hyperphagic obesity, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and healthy controls. Ability of α-MSH/IgG IC to bind and activate human MC4R were studied in vitro and to influence feeding behavior in vivo in rodents. We found that α-MSH-reactive IgG were low in obese but increased in anorectic and bulimic patients and displayed different epitope and kinetics of IC formation. Importantly, while α-MSH/IgG IC from all subjects were binding and activating MC4R, the receptor binding affinity was decreased in obesity. Additionally, α-MSH/IgG IC had lower MC4R-mediated cAMP activation threshold as compared with α-MSH alone in all but not obese subjects. Furthermore, the cellular internalization rate of α-MSH/IgG IC by MC4R-expressing cells was decreased in obese but increased in patients with anorexia nervosa. Moreover, IgG from obese patients prevented central anorexigenic effect of α-MSH. These findings reveal that MC4R is physiologically activated by IC formed by α-MSH/IgG and that different levels and molecular properties of α-MSH-reactive IgG underlie biological activity of such IC relevant to altered appetite in obesity and eating disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Molecular mechanisms underlying altered appetite in common obesity and in eating disorders (EDs) need further elucidation. Activation of the melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) by melanocortin peptides such as α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) is a critical molecular pathway regulating feeding behavior and energy balance by inducing satiety and increasing energy expenditure1,2,3,4. Indeed, inactivation of either α-MSH precursor proopiomelanocortin or of MC4R lead inevitably to hyperphagia, increased preference for fat food, and obesity in genetically modified rodents and may underlie about 2% of genetic causes of obesity in humans2,5,6,7,8. Target sites of MC4R signaling include both the central and peripheral nervous systems as well as the gut9,10,11. However, no clear genetic alterations, including of genes involved in MC4R signaling, have been detected in the major forms of obesity and ED12.
Immunoglobulins (Igs) reactive with α-MSH are ubiquitously present in humans and rodents and their production is linked to the presence of homologous antigens synthesized by gut bacteria13,14,15,16. Intriguingly, plasma levels of α-MSH-reactive IgG correlate with disease-characteristic psychopathological traits in ED patients, but the underlying molecular mechanisms have remained unknown17. The ubiquitous presence of α-MSH-reactive IgG in the circulation suggests that they may constitutively modulate α-MSH signaling by forming immune complexes (ICs), but whether this influences MC4R activation is unknown. A putative functional effect of α-MSH/IgG IC may contribute to the individual variability of α-MSH MC4R activation relevant to conditions of altered feeding behavior in ED and in hyperphagic obesity. Such IgG-modulatory mechanism may complement other non-genetic mechanisms affecting α-MSH signaling through MC4R, including α-MSH degradation by prolylcarboxypeptidase, functional antagonisms by agouti-related protein (AgRP), cholesterol-dependent MC4R endocytosis, etc18,19,20,21.
In the present study, we addressed the question of the possible functional role of α-MSH-reactive IgG in MC4R signaling and further analyzed whether this role is altered in patients with hyperphagic obesity or ED, including anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED). For this purpose, we analyzed the affinity kinetics of α-MSH/IgG IC formation in patients and controls (Ctrl), screened the epitopes, and determined whether α-MSH/IgG IC may activate human MC4R in vitro (receptor binding and internalization and cellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production). Finally, we evaluated in rats the effects of central administration of α-MSH/IgG IC on feeding behavior as well as the relevance of plasmatic Ig to α-MSH anorexigenic effects in transgenic Ig-deficient mice.
Patients, materials, and methods
Plasma samples from patients and controls
Plasma samples were obtained from obese (OB) female patients all reporting hyperphagia without BED (body mass index [BMI], mean ± standard deviation, 37.51 ± 5.0 kg/m−2, age 47.2 ± 16.3 years, n = 17), from female patients with restrictive AN (BMI, 15.01 ± 1.99 kg/m−2, age 18.6 ± 4.9 years, n = 28), BN (BMI, 21.71 ± 3.67 kg/m−2, age 22.4 ± 6.8 years, n = 34), and BED (BMI 33.34 ± 8.16 kg/m−2, age 30.6 ± 11.6 years, n = 14). Plasma samples from healthy female participants were used as controls (BMI, 22.60 ± 3.77 kg/ m−2, age 25.8 ± 8.7 years, n = 65). ED were diagnosed by a psychiatrist and a clinical psychologist according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder IV22. Sample sizes were selected based on previous experiments on analyzing IgG properties in OB and AN patients23. Venous blood samples were taken in the morning before breakfast and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C to collect plasma. Samples were conserved at −80 °C. The studies were approved by the Institutional Ethical Committees and all patients gave their informed consent for study participation. It is of note that plasma samples from OB patients were obtained in Rouen University clinic (France) while plasma samples of ED patient and controls were from Tartu University clinic (Estonia). While some differences in plasma sampling procedure may be present, their potential influence on the results were minimized by studying IgG extracted from all plasma samples using the same protocol in the same laboratory. We cannot exclude whether differences in patient’s geographic location and age as well as potential comorbidities may have influenced the data.
Total IgG and α-MSH-reactive IgG purification
Total IgG were purified from plasma using the MelonGel® Purification Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as described in supplementary methods. The same stock solution of IgG from each patient and control was used throughout the study. Based on affinity kinetics analysis, we selected IgG for pooling from each study group (OB, n = 10; AN, n = 10; BN, n = 8; BED, n = 7, and controls n = 10), with most differences from the mean values of small kd in the controls. Pooled total IgG were further purified using α-MSH-linked UltraLink® Biosupport (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as described in supplementary methods. α-MSH peptide for this and other experiments was purchased from Bachem AG (Bubendorf, Switzerland). Purified IgG were lyophilized, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and conserved at −30 °C.
Affinity kinetics of IgG for α-MSH and of α-MSH/anti-α-MSH IgG IC for the MC4R
Affinity kinetics of plasma-extracted IgG for α-MSH and of α-MSH/IgG IC for MC4R were analyzed by biospecific interaction assay based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) using BIAcore 1000 instrument (GE Healthcare), with coating of α-MSH peptide on the biosensor surface according to previously published studies and a protocol15,23,24. A cell line of human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably expressing human MC4R (hMC4R) with green fluorescent protein (GFP) in its promoter region was purchased from AMS Biotechnology (Abingdon, UK). Cells were coated on the biosensor surface as described in supplementary methods. Affinity kinetic data were analyzed using the BiaEvaluation 4.1.1 program (GE Healthcare) and fitted with the Langmuir’s 1:1 model after blank value subtraction.
Confocal microscopy
MC4R-expressing HEK 293 cells (AMS Biotechnology, Abingdon, UK) were cultured in glass bottom Petri dishes (MatTek, ≈250,000 cells/dish). Purified anti-α-MSH IgG of each patient and control groups (2 mg/mL in PBS) were conjugated with DyLight® 550 using the Lightning-Link® Rapid Conjugation Kit (Innova Biosciences, Cambridge, UK) and then incubated with 200 mM of α-MSH peptide overnight at 4 °C. After incubation for 30 min at 37 °C, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and observed on an inverted confocal laser scanning microscope TCS SP2 AOBS-DMIRE2 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Pictures were acquired with ×45 and ×60 oil-immersion objectives at the optical planes where cell nuclei were the most voluminous. Data were analyzed using the Leica Confocal Software (Leica) and red DyLight® 550 spots in GFP+ cells were quantified (n = 50 for each condition).
In vitro cAMP assay
cAMP production by MC4R-expressing HEK 293 cells was measured using the bioluminescence assay cAMP-GloTM Max Assay Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as previously described25. α-MSH peptide was preincubated overnight at 4 °C before the experiment with pooled purified IgG diluted in PBS. To confirm the specificity of MC4R-dependent cAMP release, MC4R + HEK 293 cells were preincubated with the MC4R reverse agonist AgRP (100 nM, Bachem). To confirm the specificity of α-MSH-reactive IgG effects on MC4R signaling, α-MSH was preincubated overnight at 4 °C with IgG depleted from α-MSH-reactive IgG (n = 3/group) or with affinity-purified α-MSH-reactive IgG (n = 6/group). For details, see supplementary methods.
α-MSH-reactive IgG epitope mapping
α-MSH IgG autoAbs epitope mapping was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay following adsorption of IgG by tetrapeptide fragments spanning the α-MSH sequence as described in supplementary methods.
Brain injections of α-MSH IgG IC in rats
Animal care and experimentation were in accordance with guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health, French and European Community regulations (Official Journal of the European Community L 358, 18/12/1986) and the study was approved by a Regional Ethical Committee (Rouen, France). Sample sizes were selected based on previous experiments26. Non-randomized male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized by ketamine (75 mg/kg, Virbac, Carros, France)/xylazine (5 mg/kg, Bayer, Leverkusen, France) solution (3:1 vol., 0.1 mL/100 g, intraperitoneal (IP)) and were stereotaxically implanted with a 9-mm guide cannula (PlasticsOne, Roanoke, VA, USA) into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). Upon awakening, rats were individually maintained in metabolic cages (Techniplast, Louviers, France) for 5–6 days. At day 6, 12-h fasted rats were injected at the beginning of the dark phase with 2 µL of α-MSH peptide (2.5 mg/mL) alone (n = 11) or preincubated with 0.82 mg/mL of IgG from AN (n = 5), BN (n = 5), BED (n = 6), OB (n = 6), or Ctrl (n = 4) subjects in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF; Phymep, Paris, France). A control group (n = 5) was injected with 2 µL of aCSF. Food intake was measured 30 min and 2 h after injection.
IP administration of α-MSH in immunodeficient Rag−/− mice
Rag−/− mice (n = 6), bred in a specific-pathogen-free area, were generously provided by Professor Olivier Boyer and Mrs Laetitia Jean, Inserm 1234, Rouen. Rag−/− and C57Bl/6 male mice were individually housed in BioDaq® cages (Research Diets Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA) for 7 days, and the basal food intake of each animal was measured during the first 4 h of the dark phase. At day 8, IP injections of α-MSH (100 µg/kg, Bachem) were performed at the beginning of the dark phase. Individual food intake after injection was compared to the basal food intake of the pretreatment period.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed and graphs plotted using GraphPad Prism 5.02 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). All results were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (s.e.m.), unless specified; for all tests, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
α-MSH-reactive IgG form IC with different affinity kinetics in OB and ED patients
To determine whether IgG from OB or ED patients or healthy controls might display different affinity kinetics of α-MSH binding and IC formation, plasma-extracted total IgG were analyzed using SPR (Fig. 1a–h)24. We found that the α-MSH affinity (KD) of IgG from all samples was in the micromolar range (Fig. 1a), without significant differences among the groups. However, both association and dissociation rates were decreased in OB patients (Fig. 1b, c). In contrast, dissociation rates were increased in the BN and BED groups (Fig. 1c). A similar tendency was also observed in AN patients (Mann–Whitney test, AN vs. controls, p < 0.01).
We also analyzed whether altered α-MSH affinity kinetics of total plasma IgG may exist in animal models of obesity and anorexia. Similar to OB patients, decreased dissociation rates of α-MSH-reactive IgG were found in mice with high-fat-diet (HFD)-induced obesity and in OB Zucker rats (Supplementary Fig. 1). Different from OB patients, IgG from OB ob/ob mice and Zucker rats displayed higher affinity (KD) for α-MSH, but this parameter was not affected in HFD-fed OB nor in mice with chronic food restriction or activity-based anorexia (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Plasma concentrations of α-MSH-reactive IgG are different in OB and ED patients
Plasma concentrations of affinity-purified α-MSH-reactive IgG were analyzed revealing their decrease in OB but increase in BN patients as compared to controls (Fig. 1i). A strong tendency of increased α-MSH-reactive IgG level was also present in the AN group (Mann–Whitney test AN vs. controls, p < 0.01).
α-MSH/IgG IC bind MC4R and is internalized by MC4R-expressing cells differently in OB and ED patients
To determine whether α-MSH-reactive IgG forming IC with α-MSH may bind to the hMC4R in vitro, we used affinity-purified α-MSH-reactive IgG from both patients and controls labeled by DyLight® 550 fluorophore. The binding and uptake by MC4R-expressing cells of IC was analyzed by confocal microscopy. We found that the IC were present both at the cell plasma membrane and within the cytoplasm, likely inside endosomes (Fig. 2a), as previously shown for MC4R internalization upon agonist binding27,28. This distribution pattern was specific for α-MSH/IgG IC, as IgG not exposed to α-MSH, but applied alone, displayed only occasional cell membrane association and little or no intracellular uptake (Fig. 2a, most right, illustrated by IgG from the control group). Application of α-MSH/IgG IC to control HEK 293 cells did not result in binding or cellular uptake (data not shown). Further, by quantifying the distribution of IC from patients vs. controls, we found that, while IC based on IgG from controls displayed the strongest cell membrane staining pattern, IC based on IgG from OB patients showed both low cell membrane and the weakest intracellular signals (Fig. 2b, c), indicating reduced binding and uptake of IC. Decreased cell membrane, but not cytoplasmic localization, of IC was also found in all three groups of ED patients as compared to controls (Fig. 2b, c). Within the ED groups, IC from BN had higher membrane location as compared to AN (Fig. 2b), while IC from BED patients had the lowest intracellular uptake (Fig. 2c).
The internalization of the MC4R and its recycling is necessary for the maintenance of receptor functionality20. To measure the internalization rate of α-MSH/IgG IC, we analyzed ratios between the intracellular and membrane IgG signals in each individual cell. Opposite changes in such ratios were found for IgG from the OB and AN groups, being lower and higher as compared to controls, respectively (Fig. 2d). An increased ratio of cytosolic uptake was also present in the BN group. In contrast, the low membrane binding and severely reduced internalization of α-MSH IC from OB IgG indicate both their decreased affinity for the MC4R and inhibition of its internalization, which is characteristic for an antagonist binding27. In spite of decreased membrane binding of α-MSH/IgG IC in the BED group, no differences in the internalization rate was observed between BED patients and controls (Fig. 2d).
OB patients display lower affinity of α-MSH/IgG IC binding to MC4R
To further study whether patients display altered α-MSH/IgG IC affinity toward MC4R, we used SPR on hMC4R-expressing HEK 293 cells. We found that, indeed, α-MSH in IC with IgG from OB patients displayed about 10 times lower affinity to MC4R than in IC with IgG from controls (Fig. 2e), which was mainly due to lower association rates (Fig. 2f). No significant differences in affinity kinetics of α-MSH/IgG IC to MC4R were found in the groups of ED patients vs. controls (Fig. 2e–g). Thus α-MSH/IgG IC formed with α-MSH-reactive IgG autoantibodies from OB patients have reduced capacity to bind MC4R.
α-MSH/IgG IC lower the threshold of MC4R-mediated cAMP activation: a deficient function in OB patients
Next, we determined whether α-MSH/IgG IC may differentially activate MC4R by monitoring cellular cAMP production29. Because OB and ED patients had different plasma levels of α-MSH-reactive IgG (Fig. 1i), we studied their effect on MC4R after adjusting total IgG concentrations to normalize the levels of α-MSH-reactive IgG subset relative to the control group. Total IgG were preincubated overnight with α-MSH to form IC and then were applied to hMC4R-expressing HEK 293 cells, and cAMP levels were measured after 15 min. We found a left shift of the cAMP release curve by IC formed by α-MSH and IgG from controls and ED patients with a similar (about 50%) decrease of the EC50, as compared to free α-MSH (Fig. 3a, b). However, there was no such potentiation of MC4R signaling by IC formed with IgG from OB patients (Fig. 3a, b). Further, a lower maximal cAMP release was observed with IC formed by IgG from BED patients vs. controls (Fig. 3c). Together, these results show that IC formed by α-MSH-reactive IgG in obesity are associated with reduced MC4R activation, which is in line with decreased MC4R binding and internalization, and low MC4R affinity (Fig. 2).
As negative controls, we did not observe cAMP production after stimulation with the N-terminal tetrapeptide of α-MSH, which does not contain the MC4R pharmacophore (Fig. 3d), nor after applying α-MSH on control HEK 293 cells lacking MC4R (Fig. 3d). Application of IgG alone on either MC4R-expressing or control HEK 293 cells did not result in cAMP stimulation. Further, we observed that IC formation between IgG and α-MSH was necessary for potentiation of MC4R signaling, because the left shift was not present after adding α-MSH and IgG to the cells without the preincubation step (Fig. 3e).
To verify whether α-MSH/IgG IC stimulated cAMP production specifically via MC4R, the MC4R-expressing HEK 293 cells were preincubated with AgRP, a selective MC4R reverse agonist19. We found that AgRP antagonized both α-MSH- and α-MSH/IgG IC-induced cAMP production (Fig. 3f, g) confirming MC4R as the receptor responsible for the observed cAMP signal.
Next, to verify whether the MC4R activation threshold-lowering ability of α-MSH/IgG IC was mediated specifically by the α-MSH-reactive IgG, we reproduced the cAMP stimulation experiment after depleting total plasma IgG of the α-MSH-reactive subset by affinity chromatography. We found that, indeed, the mixture of α-MSH with the remaining total IgG, did not produce any left shift of the cAMP release curve (Fig. 3h). In contrast, the use of the affinity-purified α-MSH-reactive IgG fraction preincubated with α-MSH led to a lower threshold of cAMP production (Fig. 3i, j). Moreover, such potentiation of cAMP production was attenuated in the group with α-MSH-reactive IgG from OB patients (Fig. 3i, j), in agreement with the data obtained using total IgG (Fig. 3a, b).
α-MSH/IgG IC can influence feeding behavior in rodents
To explore whether α-MSH/IgG IC may influence α-MSH-induced anorexigenic effects in vivo, IgG pools from the patient and control groups were preincubated overnight with α-MSH and injected into the brain of overnight food-deprived rats via preimplanted cannulas targeting the hypothalamic PVN (Fig. 4a), one of the principal central cites of MC4R-mediated anorexigenic action9. A significant anorexigenic effect of α-MSH was observed at both 30 and 120 min during refeeding and was not significantly affected by IgG from any group at 30 min, but it was reduced by IgG from OB patients at 120 min (Fig. 4b). The central effect of α-MSH/IgG IC was studied here as an experimental model to reveal potential differences between the IC formed by patients’ and control’ IgG; we recognise that, although α-MSH-reactive IgG have been detected in the CSF of humans30, their transport and functional role in the brain needs further studies.
To analyze the peripheral effects of IgG to modulate α-MSH anorexigenic effect, we used transgenic mice lacking Igs due to inactivation of recombination-activating genes (Rag). Rag−/− and wild-type mice were injected IP with α-MSH and their 4-h food intake was measured. We found that α-MSH significantly reduced food intake in wild-type but not in Rag−/− mice (Fig. 4c, d), pointing to the importance of IgG for the physiological anorexigenic effects of peripheral α-MSH. We cannot, however, exclude that lack of other Ig classes in Rag−/− mice may also be involved in the absence of a significant anorexigenic effect of α-MSH.
α-MSH-reactive IgG display distinct epitope-binding profile in patients with obesity and ED
Finally, to get an insight into the functional differences of α-MSH/IgG IC as described above, we analyzed whether α-MSH-reactive IgG from patients and controls might have different α-MSH-binding epitopes. We found that the main IgG epitope in all groups was localized in the central part (amino acids (a.a.) 7–10) of the α-MSH sequence overlapping with the α-MSH pharmacophore31 (Fig. 5a, b). However, several alternative epitopes were also present in OB patient IgG, overlapping with the C-terminal (a.a. 9–12 and 10–13, Fig. 5a–c) and with the pharmacophore (a.a. 5–8 and 6–9, Fig. 5a–d). In contrast, reduced binding of the central α-MSH part (a.a. 5–8) was present in IgG from ED patients (Fig. 5a–d). These differences in epitope binding are in line with altered affinity kinetics of IgG as revealed by SPR showing a decrease of dissociation rates in OB and an increase in ED patients (Fig. 1c). No significant differences in IgG binding to the N-terminal of α-MSH were found (Fig. 5a–e). The complete epitope screening data are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2 and are summarized in Fig. 5f. These data suggest that α-MSH-reactive IgG in healthy subjects bind and transport α-MSH mainly through the central part of peptide, making the N- and/or C-terminals available for receptor recognition.
Discussion
Circulating α-MSH is mainly involved in long-term regulation of appetite and body weight by activation of MC4R and MC3R in the brain and peripheral targets, and plasma levels of α-MSH are inversely associated with BMI32. Although not considered as a satiety hormone such as cholecystokinin or peptide YY, both released from the gut upon a meal33, postprandial increases in plasma levels of α-MSH have also been reported34. The main sources of circulating α-MSH are the brain, pituitary, and the skin35.
The present results regarding the affinity kinetics of α-MSH-reactive IgG are consistent with properties of natural autoantibodies in human plasma36 and suggest that secreted α-MSH should saturate available α-MSH-reactive IgG and, hence, circulate as an IC. Indeed, α-MSH produced at physiological concentrations and non-protected by a carrier molecule has little chance to reach its biological targets due to rapid degradation by plasma peptidases. No specific α-MSH carrier has been described so far. Our study shows that IC formed by α-MSH and IgG bind and activate MC4R with a lower threshold than α-MSH alone, supporting a role of α-MSH-reactive IgG not only as a natural α-MSH peptide carrier but also as a constitutive allosteric modulator of MC4R binding and internalization.
Such a phenomenon involving an IC with a peptide hormone to regulate receptor signaling has not been yet described for any other peptide. Our results, hence, reveal a novel mechanism that may be of functional significance to peptide signaling in general. In fact, plasma levels of IgG reactive with other peptide hormones, such as corticotropin, oxytocin, and ghrelin, correlate with behavioral modalities, including aggression, anxiety, and depression in humans37,38,39. Whether IC formed by these peptide hormones may similarly regulate signaling by their corresponding receptors remains to be determined.
In this study, we show that both plasma levels and binding properties of α-MSH-reactive IgG are different in OB and ED patients. In particular, lower plasma levels and decreased dissociation rate of α-MSH-reactive IgG found in obesity were associated with reduced binding and internalization of α-MSH/IgG IC and increased threshold for MC4R activation, revealing a molecular mechanism that may contribute to hyperphagia and positive energy balance in OB patients. In contrast, increased internalization rate of α-MSH/IgG IC found in AN and BN patients appears as a distinct feature of these two forms of ED pointing to enhanced activation of the MC4R-mediated satiety signaling possibly via cAMP-independent intracellular pathways. In fact, G-protein-independent signaling by the MC4R has been described and involves the potassium channel Kir 7.140. Other MCR subtypes such a MC3R may also mediate α-MSH/IgG IC central and peripheral actions relevant to the regulation of feeding behavior and underlie complex behavioral and somatic alterations in ED patients41. MC3R is involved in regulation of appetite via activation of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area42, and it is also abundantly expressed by orexigenic neuropeptide Y neurons of the arcuate nucleus43, i.e., directly accessible to circulating macromolecules, including IgG via the fenestrated capillaries of the median eminence44.
Further research should also clarify the origin of different plasma levels and properties of α-MSH-reactive autoantibodies in OB and ED patients with a particular attention to gut microbiota known to play a role in the regulation of humoral immunity as well as in control of appetite45,46,47. In fact, caseinolytic protease B (ClpB) produced by Enterobacteriaceae was recently identified as an antigen-mimetic of α-MSH15. ClpB relevance to ED was further supported by increased plasma concentrations of this bacterial protein correlating with α-MSH-reactive IgG levels in ED patients16. However, ClpB was also present in plasma of healthy humans, suggesting that this bacterial protein itself does not have a pathogenic role. Similarities of α-MSH-reactive IgG affinity kinetics between OB patients and rodent models of obesity further support a functional link between α-MSH-reactive IgG and the OB phenotype.
Based on these results, we propose a hypothetical model implicating α-MSH-reactive IgG in MC4R signaling depending on the availability of the C-terminal for receptor recognition (Fig. 6). In fact, the role of both the N- and C-terminals of α-MSH in binding to different MCR subtypes has been shown, with the C-terminal being essential for MC4R recognition48. Thus hiding of the C-terminal by IgG in OB patients appears as a negative modulator of α-MSH/IgG IC activation of MC4R. Interestingly, IgG autoantibodies reactive with a.a. 12–13 of the α-MSH C-terminal have also been detected in narcoleptic patients carrying an increased risk of obesity49. In contrast to IgG from OB, BN, and BED, IgG from AN patients displayed no binding to the C-terminal, which may facilitate MC4R recognition of α-MSH/IgG IC in AN. The IgG-transporting properties of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), another melanocortin peptide, have also been recently reported50. Of relevance to the present study, the IgG binding to the central part of the ACTH peptide preserved its functional activity to stimulate cortisol secretion.
In conclusion, deficient activation of MC4R by α-MSH/IgG IC may contribute to the pathophysiology of hyperphagic obesity as a result of low level and altered binding properties of α-MSH-reactive IgG in OB patients. In contrast, increased plasma levels of α-MSH-reactive IgG in AN and BN patients combined with altered properties of IC, inducing fast MC4R internalization, may contribute to the behavioral phenotype in these two main forms of ED by enhancing baseline satiety/reduced hunger perception. Thus these data should shed light on the molecular mechanisms of altered appetite in obesity and ED.
References
Harris, J. I. & Lerner, A. B. Amino-acid sequence of the alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone. Nature 179, 1346–1347 (1957).
Anderson, E. J. P. et al. 60 Years of POMC: regulation of feeding and energy homeostasis by α-MSH. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 56, T157–T174 (2016).
Vergoni, A. V., Schiöth, H. B. & Bertolini, A. Melanocortins and feeding behavior. Biomed. Pharmacother. 54, 129–134 (2000).
Fan, W., Boston, B. A., Kesterson, R. A., Hruby, V. J. & Cone, R. D. Role of melanocortinergic neurons in feeding and the agouti obesity syndrome. Nature 385, 165–168 (1997).
Yaswen, L., Diehl, N., Brennan, M. B. & Hochgeschwender, U. Obesity in the mouse model of pro-opiomelanocortin deficiency responds to peripheral melanocortin. Nat. Med. 5, 1066–1070 (1999).
Huszar, D. et al. Targeted disruption of the melanocortin-4 receptor results in obesity in mice. Cell 88, 131–141 (1997).
Farooqi, I. S. et al. Clinical spectrum of obesity and mutations in the melanocortin 4 receptor gene. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1085–1095 (2003).
van der Klaauw, A. A. et al. Divergent effects of central melanocortin signalling on fat and sucrose preference in humans. Nat. Commun. 7, 13055 (2016).
Garfield, A. S. et al. A neural basis for melanocortin-4 receptor-regulated appetite. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 863–871 (2015).
Panaro Brandon, L. et al. The melanocortin-4 receptor is expressed in enteroendocrine L cells and regulates the release of peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide 1 in vivo. Cell Metab. 20, 1018–1029 (2014).
Berglund, E. D. et al. Melanocortin 4 receptors in autonomic neurons regulate thermogenesis and glycemia. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 911–913 (2014).
Yilmaz, Z., Hardaway, J. A. & Bulik, C. M. Genetics and epigenetics of eating disorders. Adv. Genomics Genet. 5, 131–150 (2015).
Fetissov, S. O. et al. Autoantibodies against a-MSH, ACTH, and LHRH in anorexia and bulimia nervosa patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 17155–17160 (2002).
Fetissov, S. O. et al. Autoantibodies against appetite-regulating peptide hormones and neuropeptides: putative modulation by gut microflora. Nutrition 24, 348–359 (2008).
Tennoune, N. et al. Bacterial ClpB heat-shock protein, an antigen-mimetic of the anorexigenic peptide [alpha]-MSH, at the origin of eating disorders. Transl. Psychiatry 4, e458 (2014).
Breton, J. et al. Elevated plasma concentrations of bacterial ClpB protein in patients with eating disorders. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 49, 805–808 (2016).
Fetissov, S. O. et al. Autoantibodies against neuropeptides are associated with psychological traits in eating disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14865–14870 (2005).
Diano, S. New aspects of melanocortin signaling: a role for PRCP in α-MSH degradation. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 32, 70–83 (2011).
Ollmann, M. M. et al. Antagonism of central melanocortin receptors in vitro and in vivo by agouti-related protein. Science 278, 135–138 (1997).
McDaniel, F. K. et al. Constitutive cholesterol-dependent endocytosis of melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) is essential to maintain receptor responsiveness to α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH). J. Biol. Chem. 287, 21873–21890 (2012).
Krashes, M. J., Lowell, B. B. & Garfield, A. S. Melanocortin-4 receptor-regulated energy homeostasis. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 206–219 (2016).
DSM-IV. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edn (Am. Psychiatric Assoc., Washington, DC, 1994).
Takagi, K. et al. Anti-ghrelin immunoglobulins modulate ghrelin stability and its orexigenic effect in obese mice and humans. Nat. Commun. 4, 2685 (2013).
Legrand R., Takagi K., Fetissov S. O. Immunoglobulin G preparation from plasma samples and analysis of its affinity kinetic binding to peptide hormones. Protoc. Exch. https://doi.org/10.1038/protex.2014.004 (2014).
Lucas, N. et al. Effects of rabbit anti-a-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (a-MSH) immunoglobulins on a-MSH signaling related to food intake control. Neuropeptides 48, 21–27 (2014).
Legrand, R., Lucas, N., Breton, J., Déchelotte, P. & Fetissov, S. O. Dopamine release in the lateral hypothalamus is stimulated by α-MSH in both the anticipatory and consummatory phases of feeding. Psychoneuroendocrinology 56, 79–87 (2015).
Shinyama, H., Masuzaki, H., Fang, H. & Flier, J. S. Regulation of melanocortin-4 receptor signaling: agonist-mediated desensitization and internalization. Endocrinology 144, 1301–1314 (2003).
Gao, Z. et al. Agonist-dependent internalization of the human melanocortin-4 receptors in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 307, 870–877 (2003).
Gantz, I. et al. Molecular cloning, expression, and gene localization of a fourth melanocortin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15174–15179 (1993).
Costa, A. et al. Galanin and alpha-MSH autoantibodies in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroimmunol. 240-241, 114–120 (2011).
Hruby, V. J., Cai, M., Cain, J., Nyberg, J. & Trivedi, D. Design of novel melanocortin receptor ligands: multiple receptors, complex pharmacology, the challenge. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 660, 88–93 (2011).
Roth, C. L. et al. Changes of peripheral alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in childhood obesity. Metabolism 59, 186–194 (2010).
Gerspach, A. C., Steinert, R. E., Schönenberger, L., Graber-Maier, A. & Beglinger, C. The role of the gut sweet taste receptor in regulating GLP-1, PYY, and CCK release in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 301, E317–E325 (2011).
Galusca, B. et al. Neuropeptide Y and α-MSH circadian levels in two populations with low body weight: anorexia nervosa and constitutional thinness. PLoS ONE 10, e0122040 (2015).
Bohm, M. et al. Detection of functionally active melanocortin receptors and evidence for an immunoregulatory activity of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in human dermal papilla cells. Endocrinology 146, 4635–4646 (2005).
Lacroix-Desmazes, S. et al. Self-reactive antibodies (natural autoantibodies) in healthy individuals. J. Immunol. Methods 216, 117–137 (1998).
Fetissov, S. O. et al. Aggressive behavior linked to corticotropin-reactive autoantibodies. Biol. Psychiatry 60, 799–802 (2006).
Garcia, F. D. et al. Autoantibodies reacting with vasopressin and oxytocin in relation to cortisol secretion in mild and moderate depression. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 35, 118–125 (2011).
François, M. et al. Ghrelin-reactive immunoglobulins and anxiety, depression and stress-induced cortisol response in adolescents. The TRAILS study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 59, 1–7 (2015).
Ghamari-Langroudi, M. et al. G-protein-independent coupling of MC4R to Kir7.1 in hypothalamic neurons. Nature 520, 94–98 (2015).
Begriche, K. et al. Genetic dissection of the functions of the melanocortin-3 receptor, a seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptor, suggests roles for central and peripheral receptors in energy homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 40771–40781 (2011).
Pandit, R. et al. Melanocortin 3 receptor signaling in midbrain dopamine neurons increases the motivation for food reward. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 2241 (2016).
Mounien, L., Bizet, P., Boutelet, I., Vaudry, H. & Jégou, S. Expression of melanocortin MC3 and MC4 receptor mRNAs by neuropeptide Y neurons in the rat arcuate nucleus. Neuroendocrinology 82, 164–170 (2005).
Broadwell, R. D. & Sofroniew, M. V. Serum proteins bypass the blood-brain fluid barriers for extracellular entry to the central nervous system. Exp. Neurol. 120, 245–263 (1993).
Lindner, C. et al. Diversification of memory B cells drives the continuous adaptation of secretory antibodies to gut microbiota. Nat. Immunol. 16, 880–888 (2015).
Fetissov, S. O. Role of the gut microbiota in host appetite control: bacterial growth to animal feeding behaviour. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 13, 11–25 (2017).
Lam, Y., Maguire, S., Palacios, T. & Caterson, I. Are the gut bacteria telling us to eat or not to eat? Reviewing the role of gut microbiota in the etiology, disease progression and treatment of eating disorders. Nutrients 9, 602 (2017).
Schiöth, H. B., Mutulis, F., Muceniece, R., Prusis, P. & Wikberg, J. E. S. Selective properties of C- and N-terminals and core residues of the melanocyte-stimulating hormone on binding to the human melanocortin receptor subtypes. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 349, 359–366 (1998).
Bergman, P., et al. Narcolepsy patients have antibodies that stain distinct cell populations in rat brain and influence sleep patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3735–E3744 (2014).
Værøy, H. et al. Autoantibodies reactive to adrenocorticotropic hormone can alter cortisol secretion in both aggressive and nonaggressive humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6576–E6584 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The study received financial support, including a PhD stipend for N.L., from Nutriset, France. J.H. and K.A. received support from EMES IUT20–40. S.F. is supported by TMP of Inserm, France. Authors thank Magalie Benard and Ludovic Galas, PRIMACEN platform, Rouen University for help with confocal microscopy; Olivier Boyer and Laetitia Jean, Inserm for providing Rag−/− mice; and Ebba Brakenhielm, Inserm for critical reading.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.O.F. conceived and designed the study, proposed the model (Fig. 6), and wrote the manuscript together with N.L., who contributed to the study design, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and made the figures. R.L., C.B.-F., and J.B. helped with experiments. M.C., K.A., A.J., J.H., and P.D. analyzed patients and provided plasma samples. All authors have approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
S.O.F. is a co-founder and consultant of TargEDys, SA. N.L. and R.L. were employees of TargEDys, SA. P.D. is a co-founder of TargEDys, SA and a member of its board and has received research grants from Nestlé and Fresenius Kabi and honoraria for speeches and consulting from Nestlé, Fresenius-Kabi, and Aguettant. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lucas, N., Legrand, R., Bôle-Feysot, C. et al. Immunoglobulin G modulation of the melanocortin 4 receptor signaling in obesity and eating disorders. Transl Psychiatry 9, 87 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0422-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0422-9
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Anorexia nervosa and microbiota: systematic review and critical appraisal
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity (2023)
-
Expression of salivary immunoglobulins and their association with analgesic neuropeptide opiorphin in anorexia nervosa during adolescence
Journal of Eating Disorders (2022)
-
Shedding light on biological sex differences and microbiota–gut–brain axis: a comprehensive review of its roles in neuropsychiatric disorders
Biology of Sex Differences (2022)
-
A critical analysis of eating disorders and the gut microbiome
Journal of Eating Disorders (2022)
-
From gut microbiota to host appetite: gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key regulators
Microbiome (2021)