Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Loss of the tumor suppressor, Tp53, enhances the androgen receptor-mediated oncogenic transformation and tumor development in the mouse prostate

  • Article
  • Published:
Oncogene Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent genome analysis of human prostate cancers demonstrated that both AR gene amplification and TP53 mutation are among the most frequently observed alterations in advanced prostate cancer. However, the biological role of these dual genetic alterations in prostate tumorigenesis is largely unknown. In addition, there are no biologically relevant models that can be used to assess the molecular mechanisms for these genetic abnormalities. Here, we report a novel mouse model, in which elevated transgenic AR expression and Trp53 deletion occur simultaneously in mouse prostatic epithelium to mimic human prostate cancer cells. These compound mice developed an earlier onset of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and accelerated prostate tumors in comparison with mice harboring only the AR transgene. Histological analysis showed prostatic sarcomatoid and basaloid carcinomas with massive squamous differentiation in the above compound mice. RNA-sequencing analyses identified a robust enrichment of the signature genes for human prostatic basal cell carcinomas in the above prostate tumors. Master regulator analysis revealed SOX2 as a transcriptional regulator in prostatic basal cell tumors. Elevated expression of SOX2 and its downstream target genes were detected in prostatic tumors of the compound mice. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses implicate a coregulatory role of AR and SOX2 in the expression of prostatic basal cell signature genes. Our data demonstrate a critical role of SOX2 in prostate tumorigenesis and provide mechanistic insight into prostate tumor aggressiveness and progression mediated by aberrant AR and p53 signaling pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kyprianou N, Isaacs JT. Activation of programmed cell death in the rat ventral prostate after castration. Endocrinology. 1988;122:552–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huggins C, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. 1941. J Urol. 2002;168:9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu C, Luong R, Zhuo M, Johnson DT, McKenney JK, Cunha GR, et al. Conditional expression of the androgen receptor induces oncogenic transformation of the mouse prostate. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:33478–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heinlein CA, Chang C. Androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:276–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson D, Van Allen EM, Wu YM, Schultz N, Lonigro RJ, Mosquera JM, et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell. 2015;161:1215–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quigley DA, Dang HX, Zhao SG, Lloyd P, Aggarwal R, Alumkal JJ, et al. Genomic hallmarks and structural variation in metastatic prostate cancer. Cell. 2018;174:758–69.e759.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koivisto P, Kononen J, Palmberg C, Tammela T, Hyytinen E, Isola J, et al. Androgen receptor gene amplification: a possible molecular mechanism for androgen deprivation therapy failure in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1997;57:314–319.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aggarwal R, Huang J, Alumkal JJ, Zhang L, Feng FY, Thomas GV, et al. Clinical and genomic characterization of treatment-emergent small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer: a multi-institutional prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2492–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CD, Welsbie DS, Tran C, Baek SH, Chen R, Vessella R, et al. Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Nat Med. 2004;10:33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Takeda DY, Spisak S, Seo JH, Bell C, O’Connor E, Korthauer K, et al. A somatically acquired enhancer of the androgen receptor is a noncoding driver in advanced prostate Cancer. Cell. 2018;174:422–32.e413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ko LJ, Prives C. p53: puzzle and paradigm. Genes Dev. 1996;10:1054–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bookstein R, MacGrogan D, Hilsenbeck SG, Sharkey F, Allred DC. p53 is mutated in a subset of advanced-stage prostate cancers. Cancer Res. 1993;53:3369–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleihues P, Schauble B, zur Hausen A, Esteve J, Ohgaki H. Tumors associated with p53 germline mutations: a synopsis of 91 families. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:1–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang S, Gao J, Lei Q, Rozengurt N, Pritchard C, Jiao J, et al. Prostate-specific deletion of the murine Pten tumor suppressor gene leads to metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:209–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou Z, Flesken-Nikitin A, Nikitin AY. Prostate cancer associated with p53 and Rb deficiency arises from the stem/progenitor cell–enriched proximal region of prostatic ducts. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5683–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Voeller HJ, Sugars LY, Pretlow T, Gelmann EP. p53 oncogene mutations in human prostate cancer specimens. J Urol. 1994;151:492–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith BA, Sokolov A, Uzunangelov V, Baertsch R, Newton Y, Graim K, et al. A basal stem cell signature identifies aggressive prostate cancer phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E6544–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grieshammer U, Agarwal P, Martin GR. A Cre transgene active in developing endodermal organs, heart, limb, and extra-ocular muscle. Genesis. 2008;46:69–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ittmann M, Huang J, Radaelli E, Martin P, Signoretti S, Sullivan R, et al. Animal models of human prostate cancer: the consensus report of the New York meeting of the Mouse Models of Human Cancers Consortium Prostate Pathology Committee. Cancer Res. 2013;73:2718–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou Z, Flesken-Nikitin A, Corney DC, Wang W, Goodrich DW, Roy-Burman P, et al. Synergy of p53 and Rb deficiency in a conditional mouse model for metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:7889–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Frohwitter G, Buerger H, VAND PJ, Korsching E, Kleinheinz J, Fillies T. Cytokeratin and protein expression patterns in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity provide evidence for two distinct pathogenetic pathways. Oncol Lett. 2016;12:107–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. You S, Knudsen BS, Erho N, Alshalalfa M, Takhar M, Al-Deen Ashab H, et al. Integrated classification of prostate cancer reveals a novel luminal subtype with poor outcome. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4948–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao SG, Chang SL, Erho N, Yu M, Lehrer J, Alshalalfa M, et al. Associations of luminal and basal subtyping of prostate cancer with prognosis and response to androgen deprivation therapy. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1663–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mollaoglu G, Jones A, Wait SJ, Mukhopadhyay A, Jeong S, Arya R, et al. The lineage-defining transcription factors SOX2 and NKX2-1 determine lung cancer cell fate and shape the tumor immune microenvironment. Immunity. 2018;49:764–79.e769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Y, Chi P, Rockowitz S, Iaquinta PJ, Shamu T, Shukla S, et al. ETS factors reprogram the androgen receptor cistrome and prime prostate tumorigenesis in response to PTEN loss. Nat Med. 2013;19:1023–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wyce A, Bai Y, Nagpal S, Thompson CC. Research Resource: The androgen receptor modulates expression of genes with critical roles in muscle development and function. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24:1665–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Matusik RJ, Jin RJ, Sun Q, Wang Y, Yu X, Gupta A, et al. Prostate epithelial cell fate. Differentiation. 2008;76:682–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mu P, Zhang Z, Benelli M, Karthaus WR, Hoover E, Chen CC, et al. SOX2 promotes lineage plasticity and antiandrogen resistance in TP53- and RB1-deficient prostate cancer. Science. 2017;355:84–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stoyanova T, Cooper AR, Drake JM, Liu X, Armstrong AJ, Pienta KJ, et al. Prostate cancer originating in basal cells progresses to adenocarcinoma propagated by luminal-like cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:20111–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarkar A, Hochedlinger K. The sox family of transcription factors: versatile regulators of stem and progenitor cell fate. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:15–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Esposito S, Russo MV, Airoldi I, Tupone MG, Sorrentino C, Barbarito G, et al. SNAI2/Slug gene is silenced in prostate cancer and regulates neuroendocrine differentiation, metastasis-suppressor and pluripotency gene expression. Oncotarget. 2015;6:17121–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnson DT, Luong R, Lee SH, Peng Y, Shaltouki A, Lee JT, et al. Deletion of leucine zipper tumor suppressor 2 (lzts2) increases susceptibility to tumor development. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:3727–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kwak MK, Johnson DT, Zhu C, Lee SH, Ye DW, Luong R, et al. Conditional deletion of the Pten gene in the mouse prostate induces prostatic intraepithelial neoplasms at early ages but a slow progression to prostate tumors. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e53476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee SH, Luong R, Johnson DT, Cunha GR, Rivina L, Gonzalgo ML, et al. Androgen signaling is a confounding factor for beta-catenin-mediated prostate tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2016;35:702–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee J, Beliakoff J, Sun Z. The novel PIAS-like protein hZimp10 is a transcriptional co-activator of the p53 tumor suppressor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:4523–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Kaller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chamarthy MR, Williams SC, Moadel RM. Radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: from the ‘magic bullets’ to ‘radioactive magic bullets’. Yale J Biol Med. 2011;84:391–407.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. You S, Yoo SA, Choi S, Kim JY, Park SJ, Ji JD, et al. Identification of key regulators for the migration and invasion of rheumatoid synoviocytes through a systems approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:550–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Storey JD. A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Stat Soc. 2002;64:478–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdottir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1:417–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang JH, Li JH, Jiang S, Zhou H, Qu LH. ChIPBase: a database for decoding the transcriptional regulation of long non-coding RNA and microRNA genes from ChIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D177–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Linhart C, Halperin Y, Shamir R. Transcription factor and microRNA motif discovery: the Amadeus platform and a compendium of metazoan target sets. Genome Res. 2008;18:1180–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen L, Wu G, Ji H. hmChIP: a database and web server for exploring publicly available human and mouse ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1447–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lachmann A, Xu H, Krishnan J, Berger SI, Mazloom AR, Ma’ayan A. ChEA: transcription factor regulation inferred from integrating genome-wide ChIP-X experiments. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2438–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Cahan P, Li H, Morris SA, Lummertz da Rocha E, Daley GQ, Collins JJ. CellNet: network biology applied to stem cell engineering. Cell. 2014;158:903–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, Thorvaldsdottir H, Tamayo P, Mesirov JP. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1739–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Public Health Service grants, R01CA070297, R01CA166894, R21CA190021, and R01DK104941.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zijie Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Y., Johnson, D.T., Yang, J.S. et al. Loss of the tumor suppressor, Tp53, enhances the androgen receptor-mediated oncogenic transformation and tumor development in the mouse prostate. Oncogene 38, 6507–6520 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0901-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0901-8

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation