Abstract
The GRIA1 locus, encoding the GluA1 (also known as GluRA or GluR1) AMPA glutamate receptor subunit, shows genome-wide association to schizophrenia. As well as extending the evidence that glutamatergic abnormalities have a key role in the disorder, this finding draws attention to the behavioural phenotype of Gria1 knockout mice. These mice show deficits in short-term habituation. Importantly, under some conditions the attention being paid to a recently presented neutral stimulus can actually increase rather than decrease (sensitization). We propose that this mouse phenotype represents a cause of aberrant salience and, in turn, that aberrant salience (and the resulting positive symptoms) in schizophrenia may arise, at least in part, from a glutamatergic genetic predisposition and a deficit in short-term habituation. This proposal links an established risk gene with a psychological process central to psychosis and is supported by findings of comparable deficits in short-term habituation in mice lacking the NMDAR receptor subunit Grin2a (which also shows association to schizophrenia). As aberrant salience is primarily a dopaminergic phenomenon, the model supports the view that the dopaminergic abnormalities can be downstream of a glutamatergic aetiology. Finally, we suggest that, as illustrated here, the real value of genetically modified mice is not as ‘models of schizophrenia’ but as experimental tools that can link genomic discoveries with psychological processes and help elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
There is now strong evidence that hyper-dopaminergic activity underlies the positive psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia.1, 2, 3 Dopaminergic abnormalities have a similarly proximate role in aberrant salience,4,5 which Kapur and others have theorized is central to the genesis and understanding of positive psychotic symptoms.6, 7, 8, 9 However, the cause of this dopamine dysregulation is unspecified in Kapur’s model and has not yet been resolved.8,10 Indeed, while considerable effort has gone into investigating and describing the putative links between dopamine, aberrant salience and psychosis, comparatively little effort has been expended in identifying the possible causes of aberrant salience.
Howes and Kapur8 noted that although the dysregulated, hyperdopaminergic state could be the result of a primary abnormality in the mesolimbic dopamine system, it could also be a secondary consequence of some other brain disturbance (or disturbances) and thus represent a ‘final common pathway’ in schizophrenia. The glutamate system is a prime candidate for this upstream abnormality6,11, 12, 13, 14, 15 with diverse evidence for glutamatergic dysfunction, particularly NMDAR signalling, in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia,16,17 including data from postmortem,18,19 neuroimaging,20,21 and immunological22 studies of the disorder, as well as indirectly from pharmacological findings17 and animal models.23 An aetiological role for glutamate is now also likely based on recent genetic data. Initial evidence came from candidate gene association studies24,25 with observations that genes involved in glutamate synapses and NMDAR-mediated signalling are over-represented among schizophrenia genes.26, 27, 28, 29 These findings were subsequently supported by pathway analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and by de novo copy number variant data30,31 and exome sequencing.32
Extending these data, the Ripke et al.33 GWAS found that a locus upstream of GRIA1 showed significant association to schizophrenia.33 This association was confirmed by the recent larger GWAS study (P=1.06 × 10−10), which also identified genome-wide significant association to other glutamate receptor loci, discussed below.34 GRIA1 encodes the GluA1 (also known as GluRA or GluR1) subunit of the AMPA subtype of glutamate receptor. This association complements prior evidence that AMPARs, as well as NMDARs, are involved in the disorder.18,35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 Of particular relevance here is evidence that there are reductions of GluA1 mRNA36,37 and GluA1,35 as well as AMPAR binding sites,39 in the hippocampus in schizophrenia, and which do not appear to be secondary to antipsychotic medication.41, 42, 43, 44
In this review, we describe the behavioural phenotype of Gria1−/− mice and, in particular, a deficit whereby these mice fail to reduce the amount of attention that is paid to recently presented stimuli.45,46 This failure to habituate means that stimuli continue to be surprising and grab attention for longer than would be normal. In fact, under some circumstances, these mice actually display sensitization, whereby more attention is paid to a recently presented stimulus than to a non-recent stimulus.47 Thus for these mice the stimulus is treated as even more salient or intense the second time it is presented. Deficits in short-term habituation therefore represent a potential driver of aberrant salience. This provides a key, mechanistic component of our present hypothesis that GluA1 dysfunction contributes to aberrant salience in schizophrenia; we further suggest that this is mediated via enhanced dopamine signalling. This proposal provides a plausible causal link between a robust schizophrenia risk gene locus and a psychological process of central importance in psychosis. Moreover, it directly links the glutamate and dopamine components of the disorder.
Aberrant salience, dopamine and psychosis
Psychosis has been viewed as a disorder of aberrant salience,7 mediated via a hyper-dopaminergic state.6,7,9,48,49 For our purposes, salience can be defined as the ability of a stimulus to grab attention and to drive behaviour.5,7 Salience not only reflects the innate properties of the stimulus (for example, brightness, loudness) but can also reflect its potential motivational significance. Kapur7 suggested that, before experiencing psychosis, patients will develop an exaggerated release of dopamine, independent of, and out of synchrony with, the context. The cause is not specified in Kapur’s model, but the resulting hyperdopaminergic state will then lead to the persistent and inappropriate assignment of salience to stimuli.
This state of aberrant salience can lead to inappropriate associations being formed, potentially via abnormal prediction error signals in the ventral striatum and other brain regions.50, 51, 52, 53, 54 For example, Jensen et al.50 demonstrated aberrant learning and ventral striatal activation in schizophrenia using an aversive, Pavlovian discriminative fear conditioning paradigm. In this task, subjects were exposed to different visual stimuli. One stimulus (the conditioned stimulus; CS+) was paired with a loud noise (the unconditioned stimulus), whereas the other visual stimulus was not paired with the aversive event (CS−). Jensen and colleagues found inappropriately strong ventral striatal activation in response to the control stimulus (CS− cue), accompanied by abnormal learning, assessed both by self-report and galvanic skin responses (see also Holt et al.55). Similarly, Murray et al.52 found that first-episode patients with active positive symptoms responded faster to neutral stimuli than controls during a reward learning task (response latencies were not significantly different to rewarded stimuli) and that these subjects exhibited abnormal BOLD responses associated with reward prediction error in dopaminergic midbrain, striatum and limbic areas. Likewise, Roiser et al.56 have reported aberrant reward learning in symptomatic but not asymptomatic patients with schizophrenia, and in un-medicated individuals at ultra-high risk of developing the condition.57 This aberrant reward learning was correlated with the severity of delusion-like symptoms, as were ventral striatal BOLD responses to irrelevant stimuli.
Thus it has been widely argued that the psychotic symptoms associated with schizophrenia, such as delusions and hallucinations, are the result of this fundamental abnormality in learning7,54,58,59 and that their occurrence is correlated with aberrant salience.56 Kapur hypothesized that patients would begin by assigning significance or importance to an incidental, neutral stimulus and, over a period of time, build up a complex delusion as a way of explaining why this unimportant object or detail has taken on such great meaning. Delusions are therefore a ‘cognitive effort by the patient to make sense of these aberrantly salient experiences’7 and they reflect a maladaptive update of the patient’s world view.53 Similarly, hallucinations may be experiences that result from aberrant salience being applied to internally generated stimuli.
Kapur’s ideas build on the incentive or motivational salience hypothesis of dopamine’s actions put forward by Berridge and Robinson,60 Robbins and Everitt61 and others.62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 Kapur suggested that the mesolimbic dopamine system underlies motivational salience and so ‘mediates the conversion of the neural representation of an external stimulus from a neutral, cold bit of information into an attractive or aversive entity’ (that is, something that is of biological significance).7 In addition, dopamine can facilitate aspects of associative learning (for example, refs. 68,69,70,71). Therefore, the ability of a stimulus to grab attention, drive action and potentially form associations with other stimuli are all influenced by dopamine.
Dopamine and novelty
The hypothesis that dopamine underlies the incentive or motivational salience of stimuli (and hence provides a signal of biological significance) captures a key element of what dopamine is doing, but it may not be the whole story: dopamine release is also associated with novelty. Although burst firing of dopamine cells in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) is increased by unexpected rewards, and reduced if an expected reward is omitted, crucially dopamine neuronal activity is also triggered by novel stimuli that are not yet, and may never be, directly associated with reward or punishment and are affectively neutral. Human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have demonstrated that activation of the VTA/SNc can code for the absolute novelty of a stimulus and that this haemodynamic signal exhibits repetition suppression with repeated presentation of the stimulus.72 More directly, putative dopamine neurons in the VTA/SNc have been found to exhibit an increase in firing to novel, neutral stimuli.73, 74, 75 Furthermore, recent evidence using dopamine voltammetry directly shows increased dopamine release in ventral striatum in response to novel, neutral stimuli.69,76, 77, 78 The response to novelty may not be restricted to just the mesolimbic VTA-ventral striatal pathway but may also include activity in the SNc–dorsal striatal circuitry.72,79 Thus, dopamine release in the striatum is associated not only with incentive or motivational salience but also with novelty. As such, dopamine may signal not only stimuli of biological significance but also stimuli of ‘potential’ biological significance (as would be the case for any novel stimulus). Indeed, it has been argued that the coding of absolute novelty by dopamine may be treated like a signal that motivates exploration for potential reinforcers.72,80
A key point is that when stimuli are novel they grab the focus of attention and are perceived more intensely. Novel stimuli generate exploration,81 and they readily enter into associations with other stimuli.82 Therefore, novelty is important, both in terms of determining salience, as well as for the corresponding changes in dopamine activity.5 Glutamate receptors, and in particular GluA1-containing AMPARs, have a fundamental role in the response to novel stimuli and in the short-term habituation to such stimuli as a result of recent experience.45,46
Gria1 (GluA1) knockout mice: selective impairments in short-term habituation
The AMPAR is a hetero-oligomeric protein complex consisting of combinations of four subunits (GluA1–4, or GluRA–D), each encoded by a separate gene (GRIA1–4).83 Mice in which the gene encoding GluA1 is knocked out constitutively exhibit normal development, life expectancy and fine structure of neuronal dendrites and synapses (Gria1−/− mice84). However, there is a reduction in the number of functional AMPA receptors, and both somatic and synaptic glutamatergic currents are reduced.85, 86, 87 A number of studies have shown deficient long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices from Gria1−/− mice,84, 85, 86 although more recent studies have indicated that GluA1 subunits may contribute primarily to short-lasting forms of synaptic plasticity.87, 88, 89
Behaviourally, Gria1−/− mice are indistinguishable from wild-type littermates in their home cage environment. However, closer inspection in experimental settings reveals a specific but striking impairment in short-term habituation in these animals. Habituation is the decline in the tendency to respond to a stimulus that has become familiar due to prior exposure. This is likely to be an adaptive response to ensure that attentional resources are allocated to novel and potentially important stimuli. It has been argued that habituation can be fractionated into short- and long-term processes, with different underlying psychological and neural mechanisms.45,90, 91, 92 Gria1−/− mice exhibit a pronounced deficit in short-term habituation. For example, on the novel object recognition test, Gria1−/− mice are slower to habituate to a would-be familiar object (Figure 1). In this task, mice are first typically exposed to two identical copies of an object during a sample (‘Exposure’) phase and allowed to explore freely. When a wild-type animal is presented with novel objects, it will begin to explore them, but its exploratory activity gradually decreases or habituates as the objects become familiar. In a subsequent 'Test’ phase (usually conducted after a short delay), the mouse is exposed to a further copy of the original object (now familiar) and a novel object. Wild-type animals will preferentially choose to explore the novel alternative, reflecting their stimulus-specific habituation to the original object. In contrast, Gria1−/− mice display a deficit in short-term habituation:93 they fail to reduce the amount of attention that is paid to recently presented stimuli. Consequently, Gria1−/− mice show less preference than wild-type mice for a novel object compared with a familiar object that was presented recently93 (Figure 1a). Gria1−/− mice are also impaired on a recency-dependent version of the object recognition task93 (Figure 1b). However, Gria1−/− mice can recognize an object as familiar when it is consistently and repeatedly presented in a given, distinctive context (the object-in-context paradigm;93 Figure 1c). This reflects the fact that they can use the context or place to associatively retrieve or prime the memory of that object from long-term memory, such that it feels familiar (that is, long-term habituation is preserved). Importantly, this also shows that their deficit in short-term habituation is neither a basic perceptual problem nor a global memory deficit.
The short-term habituation deficit can also be demonstrated using a simple, spatial novelty preference task, during which animals spontaneously explore a Perspex Y-maze surrounded by extra-maze spatial cues (Figure 2; Sanderson et al.94,95). During the sample or ‘Exposure’ phase, the animals are allowed to explore two arms of the maze, while access to the third arm is blocked off. During the subsequent choice phase, all three arms of the maze are available to be explored. Wild-type mice avoid the recently visited, familiar arms and choose to explore the novel arm. In contrast, Gria1−/− mice fail to habituate to the recently visited spatial locations and therefore show no preference between the novel and familiar arms. This short-term spatial memory deficit is in marked contrast to the normal, or even enhanced, long-term associative spatial reference memory that Gria1−/− mice exhibit on tasks like the water maze or radial maze,84,94,96, 97, 98 again demonstrating that their short-term habituation deficit is not due to perceptual impairments or a global memory deficit.
Thus Gria1−/− mice are slower to habituate to both spatial and non-spatial stimuli and, as a consequence, treat stimuli as novel and salient for longer than wild-type mice. They are unable to filter out, and reduce attention to, recently experienced stimuli. This habituation deficit or attentional gating failure in Gria1−/− mice may also explain their deficit in prepulse inhibition, albeit the failure to habituate in the latter setting manifests over a different timescale.99
Gria1 knockout mice exhibit sensitization
Notably, under some circumstances, salience actually increases with repeated or continued exposure to a stimulus in Gria1−/− mice. This is called sensitization. For example, in a recent experiment we measured how much time mice spent looking at different light stimuli in an operant box, depending on their recent experience (Figure 3; Sanderson et al.47). Mice either received two exposures to the same light separated by 30 s (for example, flashing light followed by flashing light) or received a pairing consisting of two different light stimuli (for example, flashing light followed by a constant light), again separated by 30 s. In both wild-type and Gria1−/− mice, if the two light stimuli in the sequence were different then animals spent an equal amount of time looking at both lights. In contrast, if the two light stimuli were the same then wild-type mice spent less time looking at the light on its second presentation, reflecting short-term habituation to the light. However, when the same light was presented twice to Gria1−/− mice they actually spent more time attending to the light on its second exposure (relative to the first presentation of that light, and relative to the presentation of a different light that had not been presented recently). Therefore Gria1−/− mice do have a memory of the specific light stimulus that they have just experienced (their behaviour is altered by that recent prior exposure). However, they express that memory in a very different way, attending more to the recently presented light compared with a more novel light. Thus for Gria1−/− mice a recently presented stimulus can generate exaggerated (and hence aberrant) salience, in the absence of any evidence for its motivational significance.
Importantly, this attentional deficit in Gria1−/− mice is set against an intact ability to form associations between stimuli. Associative learning is not impaired in these animals in a variety of experimental settings, including both maze and operant tasks, and in both spatial and non-spatial paradigms.84,96,97,100 Indeed, in some situations Gria1−/− mice may actually form associations more readily than their wild-type controls.97,101,102 This potentially reflects the fact that Gria1−/− mice, by finding a given stimulus more salient, and by paying more attention to that stimulus, are more likely to associate other events or consequences (such as reward) with its presence, thus facilitating long-term memory formation.
Notably, we have also shown that Gria1−/− mice can exhibit long-term memory under conditions where there is no evidence of long-term memory in wild-type controls.94 Thus, in this instance Gria1−/− mice could be said to demonstrate ‘inappropriate’ learning (where ‘inappropriate’ learning is defined as learning that isn’t exhibited by control subjects). An extension of this is the prediction that these mice will also display abnormalities in credit assignment (that is, the forming of inappropriate associations between stimuli and events in a complex, temporally dynamic environment in which there are multiple cues competing for associative strength), leading to false inferences. This would provide a further demonstration of the kind of aberrant learning that might underlie psychotic symptoms such as delusions, and will be an important further test of our hypothesis in Gria1−/− mice.
Habituation, salience and schizophrenia
How relevant is this short-term habituation deficit in Gria1−/− mice to schizophrenia? In his original descriptions, Bleuler103 presciently noted that patients often experienced ‘an absence of the feeling of familiarity’. Subsequently, it has been well documented that patients with schizophrenia exhibit habituation deficits over a range of timescales,104 both behaviourally (for example, in terms of habituation of the startle response105, 106, 107, 108) and also physiologically (for example, the reduction in evoked responses to auditory stimuli with repeated presentations109). Impairments in prepulse inhibition could also be considered as a failure to reduce the attention paid to a stimulus (the startle stimulus) based on recent prior experience (the prepulse106,108,110). Therefore, the link between habituation deficits and schizophrenia has been made before. What is novel here is the link between deficits in short-term habituation that can lead to sensitization and the notion that patients may experience aberrant salience, with greater attention being paid to recently presented stimuli. Indeed, it is tempting to draw parallels between the exaggerated (aberrant) salience experienced by Gria1−/− mice and the attentional abnormalities reported in schizophrenia, including during the prodrome. Kapur7 noted that patients experience a stage of heightened sensory or perceptual awareness during the prodromal phase. Although accounts are usually anecdotal and/or post-hoc, they do suggest that everything the person experiences is intense, interesting, and highly salient. For example, patients report feelings, such as ‘I developed a greater awareness of…My senses were sharpened…I became fascinated by the little insignificant things around me…Sights and sounds possessed a keenness that he had never experienced before…It was as if part of my brain awoke which had been dormant…My senses seemed alive….Things seemed clearcut, I noticed things I had never noticed before…My capacities for aesthetic appreciation and heightened sensory receptiveness were very keen at this time. I had had the same intensity of experience at other times when I was normal, but such periods were not sustained for long…’ (taken from Kapur7).
In essence, people with schizophrenia appear to pay elevated levels of attention to certain stimuli in their environment, in much the same way that the Gria1−/− mice pay an increased amount of attention to the recently presented light stimulus in our operant experiment (see Figure 3; Sanderson et al.47). The fact that these feelings of heightened awareness and intensity of perceptual experience often emerge during the prodrome is consistent with the possibility that these attentional deficits may be a contributory cause of psychosis and could provide the trigger for subsequent positive symptoms.6,8,111 We suggest that sensitization in Gria1−/− mice is homologous to the heightened intensity of sensory stimulation experienced by patients during the prodromal phase of the disorder.
Psychological and neural mechanisms underlying short-term habituation and their alteration in schizophrenia
How do deficits in short-term habituation result in sensitization, and how might these attentional phenomena be represented in the brain? Short-term habituation reflects a component of short-term memory that results in less attention being paid to a recently experienced stimulus (the stimulus might be said to exist in a secondary or reduced state of attention). This is distinct from an active form of short-term memory that underlies human working memory performance (for example, on N-back or digit span tasks) in which the stimulus representation is actively maintained at the forefront of attention (the primary state of attention). These different short-term memory states therefore map onto different attentional states, reflecting the different amounts of attention being paid to a stimulus.
Wagner91 proposed a theoretical and computational model of stimulus processing that can explain the relationship between attention, habituation and learning (Figure 4). These ideas are of fundamental importance for understanding how deficits in short-term habituation could lead to aberrant salience and the genesis of psychosis. Wagner suggested that each stimulus is represented by a set of elements. Individual elements can exist in any one of three different activity or attentional states: an inactive state (I), the primary state of attention (A1), or the secondary state of attention (A2). Although proportions of elements for a given stimulus can be in different activity states, individual elements can only be in one state at any one time. When a stimulus is novel and surprising, it occupies the forefront of attention, is highly salient and generates strong levels of responding. This corresponds to the stimulus elements being in the A1 state. Also, associations can form between elements of different stimuli that are concurrently active in the A1 state. Conversely, when the stimulus is treated as familiar, less attention is paid to the stimulus, and it is less able to enter into associations with other stimuli (that is, associative memory formation will be weaker). This reflects the fact that the stimulus elements are in the secondary attentional (A2) state.
Wagner’s model posits that there are two distinct forms of habituation (short-term and long-term habituation), each supported by a separate psychological mechanism. For the purposes of this review, we will concentrate on short-term habituation, which reflects the recent presentation of the stimulus and which is dependent on the GluA1 subunit. When the stimulus is first presented, a proportion of elements go from being inactive (I state) and enter into the primary activity state (A1 state). Elements then rapidly decay from this A1 state into the A2 state, where they remain before gradually decaying back to the inactive I state. If elements are already in the A2 state when the stimulus is presented (for example, during the second presentation of the same stimulus after a short interval), these elements are unable to return directly to the A1 state. As a result, there are fewer stimulus elements available for activation into the A1 state, and consequently less responding to the stimulus (that is, there will be habituation). Thus habitation occurs to the degree to which the stimulus elements are in the A2 state. After sufficient passage of time, the stimulus elements decay back to the inactive state, and so are once again fully available for subsequent activation into the primary A1 state. Therefore habituation is now no longer evident (that is, it is short-lasting).
As described above, Gria1−/− mice demonstrate that short-term habituation is GluA1 dependent. In terms of Wagner’s model, Gria1 deletion retards the normal transition of a stimulus representation from A1 to A2 (Figure 4). Hence, in Gria1−/− mice stimuli stay at the forefront of attention (that is, in the A1 state) and remain salient for longer than in wild-type mice. In fact, as we have seen, in Gria1−/− mice the stimulus can actually be treated as increasingly salient with its repeated or continued presentation, as the elements that comprise the stimulus gradually accumulate in the forefront of attention and are less able to exit to the secondary attentional state.47 This therefore provides an account of how deficits in short-term habituation can lead to sensitization and gives us important clues as to possible underlying neural substrates.
What are the neural mechanisms that might underlie these changes in attention? We have suggested elsewhere that Wagner’s elements could correspond to the neurons that underlie the representation of the stimulus.46 When a stimulus is first presented and occupies the forefront of attention, a proportion of the neurons in the brain that represent that stimulus will fire and generate action potentials (this would correspond to the primary state of activity). Notably, only when the stimulus elements are in this A1 state can they form excitatory associations with elements of other stimuli, consistent with Hebb’s postulate that neurons that fire together wire together.112, 113, 114 In contrast, the secondary state of attention, which corresponds to habituation, presumably reflects the fact that the neurons that represent the stimulus are now less excitable and less likely to fire than when the stimulus was at the forefront of attention, and they are thus also less likely to form associations with neurons representing other stimuli. This transition from the primary to secondary state of attention likely reflects a short-term plasticity process, which depends on Gria1, although the precise neural circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved remain to be established (see Sandeson et al.46 for discussion).
Evidence for reduced neuronal activity with repeated presentation of the same stimulus can be found with the phenomenon of repetition suppression of the haemodynamic BOLD signal, which is often observed in human fMRI experiments and in a variety of different brain regions.72,115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 Repetition suppression occurs when a recently presented (and now familiar) stimulus is presented again.115 This reduction in the BOLD response likely reflects the tuning or modulation of neuronal representations such that familiar stimuli activate fewer neurons and evoke less neuronal firing. Consistent with this possibility, single cell recordings show that repetition suppression is associated with a decrease in neuronal firing, at least in some brain regions.118,120,121
Notably, Holt et al.104 showed that repetition suppression is impaired in schizophrenia. They showed that, in healthy individuals, medial temporal lobe activity (and in particular hippocampal activity) habituates rapidly with repeated presentations of fearful faces. In contrast, patients exhibited no suppression of BOLD activity, consistent with a failure to habituate. Crucially, there is also evidence suggestive of sensitization in patients. A positron emission tomography imaging study, conducted while subjects performed a passive viewing task,122 found repetition suppression of cerebral blood flow in the right hemisphere of normal individuals across presentations of the same visual image as expected, but in patients with schizophrenia the blood flow response to the visual stimulus actually increased across the session (the equivalent of repetition enhancement in fMRI115). Therefore patients with schizophrenia fail to reduce neuronal activity with repeated presentations of the same stimulus, consistent with their inability to reduce the amount of attention that is paid to a recently presented stimulus. In some situations, neuronal activity in patients may even increase with repeated presentations of the same stimulus,122 potentially consistent with sensitization to a given stimulus.
Dopamine as a mediating transmitter system
We have drawn attention to the parallels between the impaired short-term habituation seen in Gria1−/− mice and in people with schizophrenia and suggest that these impairments may lead to aberrant salience. We now consider how these processes are linked and the central role that dopamine has.
Given that (i) novelty evokes activity in the striatal dopamine system, coupled with (ii) the short-term habituation deficit and sensitization seen in Gria1−/− mice, this leads to the prediction of enhanced dopamine activity in these mice. It is important to point out that this hyper-dopaminergic response would likely be both stimulus-driven and stimulus-specific and therefore not necessarily reflected in baseline measures of the dopamine system. Indeed, tissue levels of striatal dopamine appear normal.123 However, Gria1−/− mice do exhibit a marked locomotor hyperactivity when placed in a novel environment, very reminiscent of the effects of low-dose amphetamine.99,124 In both cases, animals can exhibit levels of locomotor activity well in excess of the activity levels displayed by controls, consistent with the possibility of sensitization (for example, Wiedholz et al.99). Furthermore, this hyperactivity is blocked by the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol.99 Using high-speed chronoamperometric measurements of extracellular fluid dopamine levels in anaesthetized animals, Wiedholz et al.,99 found that the velocity of striatal dopamine clearance was slower in Gria1−/− mice. This would be predicted to lead to an increase in the magnitude and duration of striatal dopamine responses. Taken together, these results are consistent with a putative hyper-dopaminergic phenotype in Gria1−/− mice. To test this prediction explicitly, it will be important to assess dopamine transients in response to novel and recently presented stimuli in freely moving, behaving mice, using techniques like fast-scan cyclic voltammetry,77,125 to determine what role mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine pathways have in these attentional processes (for example, Totah et al.126), and, more specifically, whether changes in the novelty/familiarity of stimuli are reflected differently in dopamine signals in wild-type and Gria1−/− mice.
It is worth pointing out that current antipsychotic drugs appear to dampen all salience, not just aberrant salience7,58 (that is, their effects are not stimulus-specific), and they do not rescue deficits in habituation or its physiological correlates.104, 105, 106,109,122 Thus these drugs may effectively silence the problem without correcting the underlying impairment. The analogy might be with a broken radio that is giving out white noise. Turning down the volume will remove the immediate problem (and the distress which it causes) but will not fix the underlying malfunction. Therefore identifying the molecular, synaptic and circuit mechanisms that support short-term habituation may have important therapeutic implications by allowing more targeted suppression of aberrant salience.
GRIA1 and schizophrenia—the broader context
To summarize, studies in Gria1−/− mice show that the GluA1 AMPAR subunit has a key role in short-term habituation. Gria1−/− mice can pay even more attention to a recently experienced stimulus compared with a more novel stimulus. This phenotype may be of particular interest with regard to psychosis. First, because stimuli are perceived more intensely and/or remain at the forefront of attention for longer, we propose that this short-term habituation deficit can underlie aberrant salience, a process believed to be of central importance in the origin of positive psychotic symptoms. As a consequence, these stimuli are more likely to enter into inappropriate or aberrant associations, leading to the formation of delusions. Thus we suggest that changes in stimulus processing (and the allocation of attention) caused by GluA1 deletion are an upstream cause of deficits in prediction error learning that are seen in patients. Of course, these delusions are often sustained for long periods of time and are impervious to contradictory evidence. Corlett et al.54,127 have likened this tenacity of delusions to the formation of instrumental habits seen in learning experiments with over-training. In this respect, it is worth noting that Gria1−/− mice also display an increased propensity for habitual behaviour.128,129 Further experiments are required to determine whether this is related to the deficits in short-term habituation and its possible consequences for rates of associative learning, or whether it reflects a role for GluA1 in other neural circuits supporting goal-directed behaviour. Second, as the GRIA1 locus shows genetic association to schizophrenia, these considerations take on possible aetiological significance. They also support the widely held view that dopaminergic changes in schizophrenia are downstream of an abnormality in the glutamate system.8,10,12,14, 15, 16,24,26,29,130
With regard to the plausibility of these suggestions, several issues regarding the genetics and pathogenesis of schizophrenia are relevant. First, genetic evidence for GRIA1 involvement in the disorder is far from complete. The GWAS data show association to a locus that is upstream of the gene, and it remains to be proven whether risk single-nucleotide polymorphism(s) within the locus do in fact impact on the biology of GRIA1 (and not, for example, on another gene in the vicinity). It is not a trivial process to move from a genetic association signal to the identification of the molecular consequences of the risk variation,131, 132, 133 as illustrated by investigations of other psychosis genes.134, 135, 136 And, even assuming that GRIA1 is the target, the effect of the risk variation will likely be subtle, for example, by modulating transcriptional regulation, and possibly contributing to the modest reduction of hippocampal GluA1 expression seen in schizophrenia.35, 36, 37 In this context, the inherent limitations of a constitutive knockout (which models a null mutation or gene deletion) in mouse models relevant to schizophrenia are apparent137, 138, 139 and indicate the value of using additional genetic models of GRIA1. Indeed, it is already clear that it may not be necessary to remove all GluA1 subunits to produce the phenotype described here, as behavioural deficits indicative of impaired short-term habituation are also seen in mice in which Gria1 is knocked out selectively in the parvalbumin-positive (PV+) population of interneurons.140 Furthermore, mice in which NMDARs have been ablated selectively from PV+ cells, or mice in which PV+ cell output has been silenced, display arguably similar phenotypes.141, 142, 143, 144 Hippocampal PV+ interneurons may be particularly important for these behavioural phenotypes,145 in line with a key role for this brain region in regulating attentional processes like short-term habituation.72,146,147 Thus, parenthetically, this account is also potentially consistent with the central role of PV+ interneurons148, 149, 150 and the hippocampus151,152 in schizophrenia and its onset.130,153
A second important caveat when extrapolating from Gria1−/− mice to schizophrenia is that the GRIA1 locus is but one of many risk genes, each of which in isolation has a very small effect on disease risk. In this respect, it is notable that the recent GWAS study and meta-analysis also implicates other glutamatergic genes, including GRIN2A, which encodes the NMDA receptor GluN2A (NR2A) subunit.34 Grin2A−/− mice have a behavioural phenotype similar to that seen in Gria1−/− mice, albeit less extensively characterized, including a deficit in short-term habituation. For example, Grin2A−/− mice are unable to discriminate between a novel arm and recently experienced, familiar arm during the spatial novelty preference Y-maze test.154 This is set against an otherwise normal ability to perceive stimuli and to form long-term associations. These Grin2A data suggest that our proposal regarding GRIA1 and its role in short-term habituation and aberrant salience may generalize to at least some other glutamatergic genes that are involved in schizophrenia, reflecting their convergent effects on pathophysiological processes. As the genomics and genetic architecture of schizophrenia become clearer, it will be of interest to ascertain the identity and nature of the interplay between risk genes, and thence whether there is a functional convergence upon short-term habituation and salience. Such convergence is plausible, given that the underlying neural processes that support short-term habituation likely utilize fundamental synaptic plasticity mechanisms and pathways involving numerous molecular targets.26, 27, 28, 29,155, 156, 157, 158
Conclusions
We have drawn attention to the impaired short-term habituation phenotype of Gria1−/− mice and suggest that this impairment can generate sensitization and aberrant salience, potentially via enhanced dopaminergic signalling and defective hippocampal circuits. Impaired habituation, aberrant salience, hyperdopaminergia and the hippocampus are all central to current models of psychosis. The recent discovery that the GRIA1 locus shows genome-wide association to schizophrenia suggests that this phenotypic overlap between Gria1−/− mice and the clinical syndrome is more than coincidence and instead reflects a pathway of causal significance linking these phenomena in schizophrenia. Indeed, GRIA1 provides arguably the first clear link between a GWAS-positive finding in schizophrenia and a core psychological process at the heart of the disorder. Clearly, this remains a speculative notion and requires further critical evaluation using a range of approaches. The real value of rodent models in the next decade is surely in this domain: not as models of schizophrenia per se but as experimental tools159 that can help link genomic discoveries to psychological processes and elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms.
References
Howes OD, Kambeitz J, Kim E, Stahl D, Slifstein M, Abi-Dargham A et al. The nature of dopamine dysfunction in schizophrenia and what this means for treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69: 776–786.
Laruelle M . The second revision of the dopamine theory of schizophrenia: implications for treatment and drug development. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 74: 80–81.
Seeman P . Dopamine receptors and the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. Synapse 1987; 1: 133–152.
Heinz A, Schlagenhauf F . Dopaminergic dysfunction in schizophrenia: salience attribution revisited. Schizophr Bull 2010; 36: 472–485.
Winton-Brown TT, Fusar-Poli P, Ungless MA, Howes OD . Dopaminergic basis of salience dysregulation in psychosis. Trends Neurosci 2014; 37: 85–94.
Gray JA, Feldon J, Rawlins JNP, Hemsley DR, Smith AD . The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behav brain Sci 1991; 14: 1–84.
Kapur S . Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 13–23.
Howes OD, Kapur S . The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III—the final common pathway. Schizophr Bull 2009; 35: 549–562.
van Os J . 'Salience syndrome' replaces 'schizophrenia' in DSM-V and ICD-11: psychiatry's evidence-based entry into the 21st century? Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009; 120: 363–372.
Tost H, Alam T, Meyer-Lindenberg A . Dopamine and psychosis: theory, pathomechanisms and intermediate phenotypes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 34: 689–700.
Floresco SB, Todd CL, Grace AA . Glutamatergic afferents from the hippocampus to the nucleus accumbens regulate activity of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 4915–4922.
Lodge DJ, Grace AA . Hippocampal dysregulation of dopamine system function and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2011; 32: 507–513.
Lisman JE, Coyle JT, Green RW, Javitt DC, Benes FM, Heckers S et al. Circuit-based framework for understanding neurotransmitter and risk gene interactions in schizophrenia. Trends Neurosci 2008; 31: 234–242.
Weinberger DR . Implications of normal brain development for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987; 44: 660–669.
Egerton A, Fusar-Poli P, Stone JM . Glutamate and psychosis risk. Curr Pharm Des 2012; 18: 466–478.
Coyle JT . Glutamate and schizophrenia: beyond the dopamine hypothesis. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2006; 26: 365–384.
Moghaddam B, Javitt D . From revolution to evolution: the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia and its implication for treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012; 37: 4–15.
Rubio MD, Drummond JB, Meador-Woodruff JH . Glutamate receptor abnormalities in schizophrenia: implications for innovative treatments. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2012; 20: 1–18.
Weickert CS, Fung SJ, Catts VS, Schofield PR, Allen KM, Moore LT et al. Molecular evidence of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18: 1185–1192.
Poels EM, Kegeles LS, Kantrowitz JT, Slifstein M, Javitt DC, Lieberman JA et al. Imaging glutamate in schizophrenia: review of findings and implications for drug discovery. Mol Psychiatry 2014; 19: 20–29.
Marsman A, van den Heuvel MP, Klomp DW, Kahn RS, Luijten PR, Hulshoff Pol HE . Glutamate in schizophrenia: a focused review and meta-analysis of (1)H-MRS studies. Schizophr Bull 2013; 39: 120–129.
Deakin J, Lennox BR, Zandi MS . Antibodies to the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and other synaptic proteins in psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 2014; 75: 284–291.
Inta D, Monyer H, Sprengel R, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Gass P . Mice with genetically altered glutamate receptors as models of schizophrenia: a comprehensive review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 34: 285–294.
Collier DA, Li T . The genetics of schizophrenia: glutamate not dopamine? Eur J Pharmacol 2003; 480: 177–184.
Cherlyn SY, Woon PS, Liu JJ, Ong WY, Tsai GC, Sim K . Genetic association studies of glutamate, GABA and related genes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a decade of advance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 34: 958–977.
Harrison PJ, Owen MJ . Genes for schizophrenia? Recent findings and their pathophysiological implications. Lancet 2003; 361: 417–419.
Harrison PJ, West VA . Six degrees of separation: on the prior probability that schizophrenia susceptibility genes converge on synapses, glutamate and NMDA receptors. Mol Psychiatry 2006; 11: 981–983.
Moghaddam B . Bringing order to the glutamate chaos in schizophrenia. Neuron 2003; 40: 881–884.
Harrison PJ, Weinberger DR . Schizophrenia genes, gene expression, and neuropathology: on the matter of their convergence. Mol Psychiatry 2005; 10: 40–68, image 45.
Kirov G, Pocklington AJ, Holmans P, Ivanov D, Ikeda M, Ruderfer D et al. De novo CNV analysis implicates specific abnormalities of postsynaptic signalling complexes in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17: 142–153.
Lips ES, Cornelisse LN, Toonen RF, Min JL, Hultman CM, Holmans PA et al. Functional gene group analysis identifies synaptic gene groups as risk factor for schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17: 996–1006.
Timms AE, Dorschner MO, Wechsler J, Choi KY, Kirkwood R, Girirajan S et al. Support for the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction hypothesis of schizophrenia from exome sequencing in multiplex families. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70: 582–590.
Ripke S, O'Dushlaine C, Chambert K, Moran JL, Kahler AK, Akterin S et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies 13 new risk loci for schizophrenia. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1150–1159.
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 2014; 511: 421–427.
Eastwood SL, Kerwin RW, Harrison PJ . Immunoautoradiographic evidence for a loss of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate-preferring non-N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors within the medial temporal lobe in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 1997; 41: 636–643.
Eastwood SL, McDonald B, Burnet PW, Beckwith JP, Kerwin RW, Harrison PJ . Decreased expression of mRNAs encoding non-NMDA glutamate receptors GluR1 and GluR2 in medial temporal lobe neurons in schizophrenia. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 1995; 29: 211–223.
Harrison PJ, McLaughlin D, Kerwin RW . Decreased hippocampal expression of a glutamate receptor gene in schizophrenia. Lancet 1991; 337: 450–452.
Sokolov BP . Expression of NMDAR1, GluR1, GluR7, and KA1 glutamate receptor mRNAs is decreased in frontal cortex of ‘neuroleptic-free’ schizophrenics: evidence on reversible up-regulation by typical neuroleptics. J Neurochem 1998; 71: 2454–2464.
Kerwin R, Patel S, Meldrum B . Quantitative autoradiographic analysis of glutamate binding sites in the hippocampal formation in normal and schizophrenic brain post mortem. Neuroscience 1990; 39: 25–32.
Dracheva S, McGurk SR, Haroutunian V . mRNA expression of AMPA receptors and AMPA receptor binding proteins in the cerebral cortex of elderly schizophrenics. J Neurosci Res 2005; 79: 868–878.
Eastwood SL, Porter RH, Harrison PJ . The effect of chronic haloperidol treatment on glutamate receptor subunit (GluR1, GluR2, KA1, KA2, NR1) mRNAs and glutamate binding protein mRNA in rat forebrain. Neurosci Lett 1996; 212: 163–166.
Eastwood SL, Story P, Burnet PW, Heath P, Harrison PJ . Differential changes in glutamate receptor subunit messenger RNAs in rat brain after haloperidol treatment. J Psychopharmacol 1994; 8: 196–203.
Oretti RG, Spurlock G, Buckland PR, McGuffin P . Lack of effect of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs on glutamate receptor mRNA levels in rat brains. Neurosci Lett 1994; 177: 39–43.
Meador-Woodruff JH, King RE, Damask SP, Bovenkerk KA . Differential regulation of hippocampal AMPA and kainate receptor subunit expression by haloperidol and clozapine. Mol Psychiatry 1996; 1: 41–53.
Sanderson DJ, Bannerman DM . The role of habituation in hippocampus-dependent spatial working memory tasks: evidence from GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice. Hippocampus 2012; 22: 981–994.
Sanderson DJ, McHugh SB, Good MA, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH, Rawlins JN et al. Spatial working memory deficits in GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice reflect impaired short-term habituation: evidence for Wagner's dual-process memory model. Neuropsychologia 2010; 48: 2303–2315.
Sanderson DJ, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH, Bannerman DM . Deletion of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit alters the expression of short-term memory. Learn Mem 2011; 18: 128–131.
Howes OD, Montgomery AJ, Asselin MC, Murray RM, Valli I, Tabraham P et al. Elevated striatal dopamine function linked to prodromal signs of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66: 13–20.
Howes O, Bose S, Turkheimer F, Valli I, Egerton A, Stahl D et al. Progressive increase in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity as patients develop psychosis: a PET study. Mol Psychiatry 2011; 16: 885–886.
Jensen J, Willeit M, Zipursky RB, Savina I, Smith AJ, Menon M et al. The formation of abnormal associations in schizophrenia: neural and behavioral evidence. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33: 473–479.
Juckel G, Schlagenhauf F, Koslowski M, Wustenberg T, Villringer A, Knutson B et al. Dysfunction of ventral striatal reward prediction in schizophrenia. Neuroimage 2006; 29: 409–416.
Murray GK, Corlett PR, Clark L, Pessiglione M, Blackwell AD, Honey G et al. Substantia nigra/ventral tegmental reward prediction error disruption in psychosis. Mol Psychiatry 2008; 13239 267–276.
Corlett PR, Murray GK, Honey GD, Aitken MR, Shanks DR, Robbins TW et al. Disrupted prediction-error signal in psychosis: evidence for an associative account of delusions. Brain 2007; 130: 2387–2400.
Corlett PR, Taylor JR, Wang XJ, Fletcher PC, Krystal JH . Toward a neurobiology of delusions. Prog Neurobiol 2010; 92: 345–369.
Holt DJ, Lebron-Milad K, Milad MR, Rauch SL, Pitman RK, Orr SP et al. Extinction memory is impaired in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 65: 455–463.
Roiser JP, Stephan KE, den Ouden HE, Barnes TR, Friston KJ, Joyce EM . Do patients with schizophrenia exhibit aberrant salience? Psychol Med 2009; 39: 199–209.
Roiser JP, Howes OD, Chaddock CA, Joyce EM, McGuire P . Neural and behavioral correlates of aberrant salience in individuals at risk for psychosis. Schizophr Bull 2013; 39: 1328–1336.
Kapur S . How antipsychotics become anti-‘psychotic’—from dopamine to salience to psychosis. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004; 25: 402–406.
Kapur S, Mizrahi R, Li M . From dopamine to salience to psychosis—linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis. Schizophr Res 2005; 79: 59–68.
Berridge KC, Robinson TE . What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1998; 28: 309–369.
Robbins TW, Everitt BJ . Neurobehavioural mechanisms of reward and motivation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1996; 6: 228–236.
Horvitz JC . Mesolimbocortical and nigrostriatal dopamine responses to salient non-reward events. Neuroscience 2000; 96: 651–656.
Martin-Soelch C, Leenders KL, Chevalley AF, Missimer J, Kunig G, Magyar S et al. Reward mechanisms in the brain and their role in dependence: evidence from neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2001; 36: 139–149.
Di Chiara G . A motivational learning hypothesis of the role of mesolimbic dopamine in compulsive drug use. J Psychopharmacol 1998; 12: 54–67.
Bindra D . A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification. Psychol Rev 1974; 81: 199–213.
Fibiger HC, Phillips AG . Mesocorticolimbic dopamine systems and reward. Ann NY Acad Sci 1988; 537: 206–215.
Bindra D . How adaptive behavior is produced: a perceptual-motivational alternative to response reinforcements. Behav Brain Sci 1978; 1: 41–52.
Lisman JE, Grace AA . The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron 2005; 46: 703–713.
Flagel SB, Clark JJ, Robinson TE, Mayo L, Czuj A, Willuhn I et al. A selective role for dopamine in stimulus-reward learning. Nature 2011; 469: 53–57.
Dalley JW, Chudasama Y, Theobald DE, Pettifer CL, Fletcher CM, Robbins TW . Nucleus accumbens dopamine and discriminated approach learning: interactive effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions and systemic apomorphine administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002; 161: 425–433.
Steinberg EE, Keiflin R, Boivin JR, Witten IB, Deisseroth K, Janak PH . A causal link between prediction errors, dopamine neurons and learning. Nat Neurosci 2013; 16: 966–973.
Bunzeck N, Duzel E . Absolute coding of stimulus novelty in the human substantia nigra/VTA. Neuron 2006; 51: 369–379.
Horvitz JC, Stewart T, Jacobs BL . Burst activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons is elicited by sensory stimuli in the awake cat. Brain Res 1997; 759: 251–258.
Steinfels GF, Heym J, Strecker RE, Jacobs BL . Response of dopaminergic neurons in cat to auditory stimuli presented across the sleep-waking cycle. Brain Res 1983; 277: 150–154.
Ljungberg T, Apicella P, Schultz W . Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions. J Neurophysiol 1992; 67: 145–163.
Rebec GV, Christensen JR, Guerra C, Bardo MT . Regional and temporal differences in real-time dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens during free-choice novelty. Brain Res 1997; 776: 61–67.
Clark JJ, Sandberg SG, Wanat MJ, Gan JO, Horne EA, Hart AS et al. Chronic microsensors for longitudinal, subsecond dopamine detection in behaving animals. Nat Methods 2010; 7: 126–129.
Robinson DL, Wightman RM . Nomifensine amplifies subsecond dopamine signals in the ventral striatum of freely-moving rats. J Neurochem 2004; 90: 894–903.
Schiemann J, Schlaudraff F, Klose V, Bingmer M, Seino S, Magill PJ et al. K-ATP channels in dopamine substantia nigra neurons control bursting and novelty-induced exploration. Nat Neurosci 2012; 15: 1272–1280.
Kakade S, Dayan P . Dopamine: generalization and bonuses. Neural Netw 2002; 15: 549–559.
Berlyne DE . Novelty and curiosity as determinants of exploratory behaviour. Br J Psychol 1950; 41: 68–80.
Lubow RE, Moore AU . Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1959; 52: 415–419.
Keinanen K, Wisden W, Sommer B, Werner P, Herb A, Verdoorn TA et al. A family of AMPA-selective glutamate receptors. Science 1990; 249: 556–560.
Zamanillo D, Sprengel R, Hvalby O, Jensen V, Burnashev N, Rozov A et al. Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning. Science 1999; 284: 1805–1811.
Andrasfalvy BK, Smith MA, Borchardt T, Sprengel R, Magee JC . Impaired regulation of synaptic strength in hippocampal neurons from GluR1-deficient mice. J Physiol 2003; 552: 35–45.
Jensen V, Kaiser KM, Borchardt T, Adelmann G, Rozov A, Burnashev N et al. A juvenile form of postsynaptic hippocampal long-term potentiation in mice deficient for the AMPA receptor subunit GluR-A. J Physiol 2003; 553: 843–856.
Romberg C, Raffel J, Martin L, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH, Rawlins JN et al. Induction and expression of GluA1 (GluR-A)-independent LTP in the hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 2009; 29: 1141–1152.
Erickson MA, Maramara LA, Lisman J . A single brief burst induces GluR1-dependent associative short-term potentiation: a potential mechanism for short-term memory. J Cogn Neurosci 2010; 22: 2530–2540.
Hoffman DA, Sprengel R, Sakmann B . Molecular dissection of hippocampal theta-burst pairing potentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 7740–7745.
Sanderson DJ, Bannerman DM . Competitive short-term and long-term memory processes in spatial habituation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2011; 37: 189–199.
Wagner AR . SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In: Spear NE, Miller RR (eds). Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1981 pp 5–47.
Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, Siegelbaum SA, Hudspeth AJ . Princliples of Neural Science 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Medical: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
Sanderson DJ, Hindley E, Smeaton E, Denny N, Taylor A, Barkus C et al. Deletion of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit impairs recency-dependent object recognition memory. Learn Mem 2011; 18: 181–190.
Sanderson DJ, Good MA, Skelton K, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH, Rawlins JN et al. Enhanced long-term and impaired short-term spatial memory in GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice: evidence for a dual-process memory model. Learn Mem 2009; 16: 379–386.
Sanderson DJ, Gray A, Simon A, Taylor AM, Deacon RM, Seeburg PH et al. Deletion of glutamate receptor-A (GluR-A) AMPA receptor subunits impairs one-trial spatial memory. Behav Neurosci 2007; 121: 559–569.
Reisel D, Bannerman DM, Schmitt WB, Deacon RM, Flint J, Borchardt T et al. Spatial memory dissociations in mice lacking GluR1. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 868–873.
Schmitt WB, Deacon RM, Seeburg PH, Rawlins JN, Bannerman DM . A within-subjects, within-task demonstration of intact spatial reference memory and impaired spatial working memory in glutamate receptor-A-deficient mice. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 3953–3959.
Schmitt WB, Sprengel R, Mack V, Draft RW, Seeburg PH, Deacon RM et al. Restoration of spatial working memory by genetic rescue of GluR-A-deficient mice. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 270–272.
Wiedholz LM, Owens WA, Horton RE, Feyder M, Karlsson RM, Hefner K et al. Mice lacking the AMPA GluR1 receptor exhibit striatal hyperdopaminergia and 'schizophrenia-related' behaviors. Mol Psychiatry 2008; 13: 631–640.
Mead AN, Stephens DN . Selective disruption of stimulus-reward learning in glutamate receptor gria1 knock-out mice. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 1041–1048.
Barkus C, Feyder M, Graybeal C, Wright T, Wiedholz L, Izquierdo A et al. Do GluA1 knockout mice exhibit behavioral abnormalities relevant to the negative or cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder? Neuropharmacology 2012; 62: 1263–1272.
Taylor AM, Niewoehner B, Seeburg PH, Sprengel R, Rawlins JN, Bannerman DM et al. Dissociations within short-term memory in GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice. Behav Brain Res 2011; 224: 8–14.
Bleuler E . Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias. International Universities Press: New York, NY, USA, 1950.
Holt DJ, Weiss AP, Rauch SL, Wright CI, Zalesak M, Goff DC et al. Sustained activation of the hippocampus in response to fearful faces in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57: 1011–1019.
Akdag SJ, Nestor PG, O'Donnell BF, Niznikiewicz MA, Shenton ME, McCarley RW . The startle reflex in schizophrenia: habituation and personality correlates. Schizophr Res 2003; 64: 165–173.
Braff DL, Grillon C, Geyer MA . Gating and habituation of the startle reflex in schizophrenic patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49: 206–215.
Geyer MA, Braff DL . Habituation of the Blink reflex in normals and schizophrenic patients. Psychophysiology 1982; 19: 1–6.
Ludewig K, Geyer MA, Vollenweider FX . Deficits in prepulse inhibition and habituation in never-medicated, first-episode schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54: 121–128.
Freedman R, Adler LE, Myles-Worsley M, Nagamoto HT, Miller C, Kisley M et al. Inhibitory gating of an evoked response to repeated auditory stimuli in schizophrenic and normal subjects. Human recordings, computer simulation, and an animal model. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53: 1114–1121.
Braff D, Stone C, Callaway E, Geyer M, Glick I, Bali L . Prestimulus effects on human startle reflex in normals and schizophrenics. Psychophysiology 1978; 15: 339–343.
McGhie A, Chapman J . Disorders of attention and perception in early schizophrenia. Br J Med Psychol 1961; 34: 103–116.
Bliss TV, Lomo T . Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol 1973; 232: 331–356.
Hebb DO . The Organization of Behavior. Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1949.
Konorski J . Conditioned Reflexes and Neuron Organization. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1948.
Turk-Browne NB, Scholl BJ, Chun MM . Babies and brains: habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging. Front Hum Neurosci 2008; 2: 16.
Henson RN, Rugg MD . Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 263–270.
Ranganath C, Rainer G . Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4: 193–202.
Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A . Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci 2006; 10: 14–23.
Kumaran D, Maguire EA . An unexpected sequence of events: mismatch detection in the human hippocampus. PLoS Biol 2006; 4: e424.
Brown MW, Aggleton JP . Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 51–61.
Brown MW, Wilson FA, Riches IP . Neuronal evidence that inferomedial temporal cortex is more important than hippocampus in certain processes underlying recognition memory. Brain Res 1987; 409: 158–162.
Heckers S, Goff D, Weiss AP . Reversed hemispheric asymmetry during simple visual perception in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2002; 116: 25–32.
Fitzgerald PJ, Barkus C, Feyder M, Wiedholz LM, Chen YC, Karlsson RM et al. Does gene deletion of AMPA GluA1 phenocopy features of schizoaffective disorder? Neurobiol Dis 2010; 40: 608–621.
Bannerman DM, Deacon RM, Brady S, Bruce A, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH et al. A comparison of GluR-A-deficient and wild-type mice on a test battery assessing sensorimotor, affective, and cognitive behaviors. Behav Neurosci 2004; 118: 643–647.
Robinson DL, Venton BJ, Heien ML, Wightman RM . Detecting subsecond dopamine release with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in vivo. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 1763–1773.
Totah NK, Kim Y, Moghaddam B . Distinct prestimulus and poststimulus activation of VTA neurons correlates with stimulus detection. J Neurophysiol 2013; 110: 75–85.
Corlett PR, Krystal JH, Taylor JR, Fletcher PC . Why do delusions persist? Front Hum Neurosci 2009; 3: 12.
Johnson AW, Bannerman DM, Rawlins NP, Sprengel R, Good MA . Impaired outcome-specific devaluation of instrumental responding in mice with a targeted deletion of the AMPA receptor glutamate receptor 1 subunit. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 2359–2365.
Johnson AW, Bannerman D, Rawlins N, Sprengel R, Good MA . Targeted deletion of the GluR-1 AMPA receptor in mice dissociates general and outcome-specific influences of appetitive rewards on learning. Behav Neurosci 2007; 121: 1192–1202.
Schobel SA, Chaudhury NH, Khan UA, Paniagua B, Styner MA, Asllani I et al. Imaging patients with psychosis and a mouse model establishes a spreading pattern of hippocampal dysfunction and implicates glutamate as a driver. Neuron 2013; 78: 81–93.
Edwards SL, Beesley J, French JD, Dunning AM . Beyond GWASs: illuminating the dark road from association to function. Am J Hum Genet 2013; 93: 779–797.
Maurano MT, Humbert R, Rynes E, Thurman RE, Haugen E, Wang H et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 2012; 337: 1190–1195.
Mowry BJ, Gratten J . The emerging spectrum of allelic variation in schizophrenia: current evidence and strategies for the identification and functional characterization of common and rare variants. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18: 38–52.
Law AJ, Lipska BK, Weickert CS, Hyde TM, Straub RE, Hashimoto R et al. Neuregulin 1 transcripts are differentially expressed in schizophrenia and regulated by 5' SNPs associated with the disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 6747–6752.
Rueckert EH, Barker D, Ruderfer D, Bergen SE, O'Dushlaine C, Luce CJ et al. Cis-acting regulation of brain-specific ANK3 gene expression by a genetic variant associated with bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18: 922–929.
Tao R, Cousijn H, Jaffe AE, Burnet PWJ, Edwards F, Eastwood SL et al. Expression of ZNF804A in human brain and alterations in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression. A novel transcript fetally regulated by the psychosis risk variant rs1344706. JAMA Psychiatry (in press).
Harrison PJ, Pritchett D, Stumpenhorst K, Betts JF, Nissen W, Schweimer J et al. Genetic mouse models relevant to schizophrenia: taking stock and looking forward. Neuropharmacology 2012; 62: 1164–1167.
Lin CY, Sawa A, Jaaro-Peled H . Better understanding of mechanisms of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: from human gene expression profiles to mouse models. Neurobiol Dis 2012; 45: 48–56.
Kvajo M, McKellar H, Gogos JA . Avoiding mouse traps in schizophrenia genetics: lessons and promises from current and emerging mouse models. Neuroscience 2012; 211: 136–164.
Fuchs EC, Zivkovic AR, Cunningham MO, Middleton S, Lebeau FE, Bannerman DM et al. Recruitment of parvalbumin-positive interneurons determines hippocampal function and associated behavior. Neuron 2007; 53: 591–604.
Belforte JE, Zsiros V, Sklar ER, Jiang Z, Yu G, Li Y et al. Postnatal NMDA receptor ablation in corticolimbic interneurons confers schizophrenia-like phenotypes. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 76–83.
Carlen M, Meletis K, Siegle JH, Cardin JA, Futai K, Vierling-Claassen D et al. A critical role for NMDA receptors in parvalbumin interneurons for gamma rhythm induction and behavior. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17: 537–548.
Korotkova T, Fuchs EC, Ponomarenko A, von Engelhardt J, Monyer H . NMDA receptor ablation on parvalbumin-positive interneurons impairs hippocampal synchrony, spatial representations, and working memory. Neuron 2010; 68: 557–569.
Murray AJ, Sauer JF, Riedel G, McClure C, Ansel L, Cheyne L et al. Parvalbumin-positive CA1 interneurons are required for spatial working but not for reference memory. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14: 297–299.
Caputi A, Fuchs EC, Allen K, Le Magueresse C, Monyer H . Selective reduction of AMPA currents onto hippocampal interneurons impairs network oscillatory activity. PLoS One 2012; 7: e37318.
Honey RC, Good M . Associative components of recognition memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000; 10: 200–204.
Marshall VJ, McGregor A, Good M, Honey RC . Hippocampal lesions modulate both associative and nonassociative priming. Behav Neurosci 2004; 118: 377–382.
Konradi C, Yang CK, Zimmerman EI, Lohmann KM, Gresch P, Pantazopoulos H et al. Hippocampal interneurons are abnormal in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2011; 131: 165–173.
Lewis DA, Curley AA, Glausier JR, Volk DW . Cortical parvalbumin interneurons and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Trends Neurosci 2012; 35: 57–67.
Marin O . Interneuron dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012; 13: 107–120.
Harrison PJ . The hippocampus in schizophrenia: a review of the neuropathological evidence and its pathophysiological implications. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2004; 174: 151–162.
Tamminga CA, Stan AD, Wagner AD . The hippocampal formation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 1178–1193.
Stone JM, Howes OD, Egerton A, Kambeitz J, Allen P, Lythgoe DJ et al. Altered relationship between hippocampal glutamate levels and striatal dopamine function in subjects at ultra high risk of psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 68: 599–602.
Bannerman DM, Niewoehner B, Lyon L, Romberg C, Schmitt WB, Taylor A et al. NMDA receptor subunit NR2A is required for rapidly acquired spatial working memory but not incremental spatial reference memory. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 3623–3630.
Stephan KE, Friston KJ, Frith CD . Dysconnection in schizophrenia: from abnormal synaptic plasticity to failures of self-monitoring. Schizophr Bull 2009; 35: 509–527.
Frost DO, Tamminga CA, Medoff DR, Caviness V, Innocenti G, Carpenter WT . Neuroplasticity and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56: 540–543.
Daskalakis ZJ, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Chen R . Dysfunctional neural plasticity in patients with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65: 378–385.
Lewis DA, Gonzalez-Burgos G . Neuroplasticity of neocortical circuits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33: 141–165.
Nestler EJ, Hyman SE . Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 1161–1169.
Acknowledgements
MEW is a Wellcome Trust Career Development Fellow. DMB is a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellow. PJH’s research is supported by a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award and by the Medical Research Council. PJH and DMB are members of the Wellcome Trust-funded Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute at Oxford University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
DMB is a member of the Lilly Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Barkus, C., Sanderson, D., Rawlins, J. et al. What causes aberrant salience in schizophrenia? A role for impaired short-term habituation and the GRIA1 (GluA1) AMPA receptor subunit. Mol Psychiatry 19, 1060–1070 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.91
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.91
- Springer Nature Limited