Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term recall accuracy for mobile phone calls in young Japanese people: A follow-up validation study using software-modified phones

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined changes in recall accuracy for mobile phone calls over a long period. Japanese students’ actual call statuses were monitored for 1 month using software-modified phones (SMPs). Three face-to-face interviews were conducted to obtain information regarding self-reported call status during the monitoring period: first interview: immediately after the monitoring period; second interview: after 10–12 months; third interview: after 48–55 months. Using the SMP records as the “gold standard”, phone call recall accuracy was assessed for each interview. Data for 94 participants were analyzed. The number of calls made was underestimated considerably and the duration of calls was overestimated slightly in all interviews. Agreement between self-report and SMP records regarding the number of calls, duration of calls and laterality (i.e., use of the dominant ear while making calls) gradually deteriorated with the increase in the interval following the monitoring period (number of calls: first interview: Pearson’s r=0.641, third interview: 0.396; duration of calls: first interview: Pearson’s r=0.763, third interview: 0.356; laterality: first interview: weighted-κ=0.677, third interview: 0.448). Thus, recall accuracy for mobile phone calls would be consistently imperfect over a long period, and the results of related epidemiological studies should be interpreted carefully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Telecommunication Union ICT STATISTICS Home Page. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx. Accessed on 1 June 2016.

  2. Muscat JE, Malkin MG, Thompson S, Shore RE, Stellman SD, McRee D et al. Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. JAMA 2000; 284: 3001–3007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Inskip PD, Tarone RE, Hatch EE, Wilcosky TC, Shapiro WR, Selker RG et al. Cellular-telephone use and brain tumors. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 79–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K . Case-control study of the association between the use of cellular and cordless telephones and malignant brain tumors diagnosed during 2000–2003. Environ Res 2006; 100: 232–241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K . Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997–2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006; 79: 630–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Interphone Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39: 675–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Interphone Study Group. Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study.. Cancer Epidemiol 2011; 35: 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Hall P, Feychting M . Mobile phone use and the risk of acoustic neuroma. Epidemiology 2004; 15: 653–659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Ahlbom A, Auvinen A, Blaasaas KG, Cardis E et al. Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of the interphone case-control study in five North European countries. Br J Cancer 2005; 93: 842–848.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hepworth SJ, Schoemaker MJ, Muir KR, Swerdlow AJ, van Tongeren MJ, McKinney PA . Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in adults: case-control study. BMJ 2006; 332: 883–887.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lahkola A, Auvinen A, Raitanen J, Schoemaker MJ, Christensen HC, Feychting M et al. Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries. Int J Cancer 2007; 120: 1769–1775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadetzki S, Chetrit A, Jarus-Hakak A, Cardis E, Deutch Y, Duvdevani S et al. Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors—a nationwide case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 167: 457–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aydin D, Feychting M, Schüz J, Tynes T, Andersen TV, Schmidt LS et al. Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1264–1276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadetzki S, Langer CE, Bruchim R, Kundi M, Merletti F, Vermeulen R et al. The MOBI-Kids Study Protocol: challenges in assessing childhood and adolescent exposure to electromagnetic fields from wireless telecommunication technologies and possible association with brain tumor risk. Front Public Health 2014; 2: 124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Goedhart G, Vrijheid M, Wiart J, Hours M, Kromhout H, Cardis E et al. Using software-modified smartphones to validate self-reported mobile phone use in young people: a pilot study. Bioelectromagnetics 2015; 36: 538–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goedhart G, Kromhout H, Wiart J, Vermeulen R . Validating self-reported mobile phone use in adults using a newly developed smartphone application. Occup Environ Med 2015; 72: 812–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aydin D, Feychting M, Schüz J, Andersen TV, Poulsen AH, Prochazka M et al. Impact of random and systematic recall errors and selection bias in case-control studies on mobile phone use and brain tumors in adolescents (CEFALO study). Bioelectromagnetics 2011; 32: 396–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shum M, Kelsh MA, Sheppard AR, Zhao K . An evaluation of self-reported mobile phone use compared to billing records among a group of engineers and scientists. Bioelectromagnetics 2011; 32: 37–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inyang I, Benke G, McKenzie R, Wolfe R, Abramson MJ . A new method to determine laterality of mobile telephone use in adolescents. Occup Environ Med 2010; 67: 507–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Inyang I, Benke G, Morrissey J, McKenzie R, Abramson M . How well do adolescents recall use of mobile telephones? Results of a validation study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9: 36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tokola K, Kurttio P, Salminen T, Auvinen A . Reducing overestimation in reported mobile phone use associated with epidemiological studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2008; 29: 559–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Armstrong BK, Auvinen A, Berg G, Blaasaas KG et al. Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study. Occup Environ Med 2006; 63: 237–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Berg G, Schüz J, Samkange-Zeeb F, Blettner M . Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German validation study of the international case-control study of cancers of the brain—INTERPHONE Study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2005; 15: 217–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Samkange-Zeeb F, Berg G, Blettner M . Validation of self-reported cellular phone use. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004; 14: 245–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parslow RC, Hepworth SJ, McKinney PA . Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2003; 106: 233–240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heinävaara S, Tokola K, Kurttio P, Auvinen A . Validation of exposure assessment and assessment of recruitment methods for a prospective cohort study of mobile phone users (COSMOS) in Finland: a pilot study. Environ Health 2011; 10: 14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiyohara K, Wake K, Watanabe S, Arima T, Sato Y, Kojimahara N et al. Recall accuracy of mobile phone calls among Japanese young people. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2015; 26: 566–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wake K, Arima T, Watanabe S, Taki M . Evaluation of exposure and laterality of mobile phone use for epidemiological studies. 10th International Congress of the European Bioelectromagnetics Association (EBEA): Rome, Italy. 2011. www.ebea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ebea2011ProgramBooklet.pdf. Accessed on 1 June 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bland JM, Altman DG . Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346: 1085–1087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bland JM, Altman DG . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vrijheid M, Armstrong BK, Bédard D, Brown J, Deltour I, Iavarone I et al. Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2009; 19: 369–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Inyang I, Benke G, McKenzie R, Abramson M . Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: implications for exposure assessment. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2008; 18: 134–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Prohaska V, Brown NR, Belli RF . Forward telescoping: the question matters. Memory 1998; 6: 455–465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Voice Communication Usage in Japan 2014. http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000388441.pdf. Accessed on 1 June 2016.

  35. Drews CD, Kraus JF, Greenland S . Recall bias in a case-control study of sudden infant death syndrome. Int J Epidemiol 1990; 19: 405–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Infante-Rivard C, Jacques L . Empirical study of parental recall bias. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 480–486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schüz J . Lost in laterality: interpreting ''preferred side of the head during mobile phone use and risk of brain tumour'' associations. Scand J Public Health 2009; 37: 664–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vrijheid M, Deltour I, Krewski D, Sanchez M, Cardis E . The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2006; 16: 371–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. We wish to express our sincere thanks to Atsushi Goto, Motoki Endo, Noritoshi Fukushima, Daisuke Furushima, Yuko Asano and Yuri Sunaya for data collection and manuscript construction; Kaoru Esaki for data processing; and Paul Matychuk for language support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kosuke Kiyohara.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiyohara, K., Wake, K., Watanabe, S. et al. Long-term recall accuracy for mobile phone calls in young Japanese people: A follow-up validation study using software-modified phones. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 28, 166–172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.73

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.73

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Keywords

This article is cited by

Navigation