Introduction

Physical exercise training has been shown to be effective in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.1, 2, 3, 4 There is considerable evidence that the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in physiological adaptations induced by exercise. Studies suggest that the cardioprotective and antihypertensive mechanisms of exercise are associated with reductions in angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity and angiotensin (Ang) II levels.5, 6 In rats, swimming training increases Ang-(1–7) and Mas expression in the heart.7 In addition, oral treatment with Ang-(1–7) and exercise training produce similar cardiovascular effects in spontaneously hypertensive rats.8

ACE2 is an enzyme homologous to ACE that cleaves the peptide Ang II to generate Ang-(1–7). The ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis represents a significant protective system in pathological conditions as demonstrated in several studies.9, 10, 11, 12 Oral treatment with Ang-(1–7) reduces the risk and severity of cardiovascular diseases13, 14 and the absence of Mas, the Ang-(1–7) receptor, leads to cardiovascular and metabolic impairments in mice.15

Mice with disrupted ACE2 gene showed impaired cardiac contractility, increased Ang II levels and upregulated expression of hypoxia-induced genes in the heart.16 Furthermore, these mice presented adverse ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction by potentiation of Ang II effects through the AT1 receptor.17 We hypothesized that lack of ACE2 may also impair physiological adaptations due to physical exercise. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the effect of voluntary wheel running on the heart and skeletal muscle in ACE2−/y mice.

Methods

Experimental animals

The animals used in the study consisted of C57BL/6 male mice (ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y) separated into sedentary or trained groups (n=6–8 per group). Animals were 8 to 12 weeks of age and weighed between 26 and 30 g. They received food and water ad libitum and were kept in light/dark cycle of 12 h each with the temperature maintained between 22 and 25 °C and relative humidity between 60 and 65%. All experimental protocols were approved by the local Ethics Committee of the State of Berlin (LAGESO).

Aerobic training protocol

Exercise training (Exe) was performed with a voluntary activity wheel (11.5 cm diameter) placed inside the cage for 6 weeks (42 days). The activity wheel was connected to a computer (Tiny Tag, Gemini Data Loggers, Chichester, UK) to measure the number of rotations performed by the animals. Groups of sedentary animals (Sed) were used as controls. In all groups, only one animal was kept per cage.

After 6 weeks, all groups underwent an analysis of their body composition by nuclear magnetic resonance (LF90II; Bruker Optics Inc., Billerica, MA, USA).

Cardiac and skeletal muscle analysis

The running wheels were removed from the cages 48 h before the killing of the animals, to avoid acute effects of exercise. Blood was collected by cardiac puncture after anesthesia (ketamine 100 mg kg−1 and rompum 2 g per 10 g body weight). The heart was quickly removed, washed with saline (0.9% NaCl) and the cardiac structures were separated in the atrium, right ventricle and left ventricular+septum (LV). The effect of voluntary training on cardiac hypertrophy was assessed by the ratio cardiac mass/body weight.

The gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were dissected (right limb for gene expression analysis and left limb for morphological analysis). Skeletal muscles were fixed in paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer sections were produced, deparaffinized, rehydrated and stained with hematoxylin–eosin in saturated picric acid. Sections of skeletal muscle were photographed with a × 10 objective using a AVT-Horn Sony camera (Sony, Berlin, Germany) and Zeiss Axioplan-2 (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). 25 microscopic view fields were evaluated for each of the muscle types (gastrocnemius and soleus).

Gene expression

The left ventricle (LV) and gastrocnemius muscle were collected immediately on dry ice and stored at −80 °C to prevent degradation of RNA. Total RNA extraction was performed using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and purified using RNeasy columns (RNeasy Mini Kit, QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and DNAse I (Invitrogen) treatment to avoid genomic DNA contamination. RNA quantification and purity was assessed using a spectrophotometer (ND-1000 NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE, USA) and the 260/280 ratio was >1.8. The quantitative PCR analysis (AB7900, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA and GoTaq, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) used 40 ng of reverse-transcribed RNA (cDNA) and SYBR green. Standard curves were performed with serial dilutions for the analysis of the efficiency of the primers (Biotez, Berlin, Germany) and only primers were used with an efficiency of at least 90%. Dissociation curves (‘Melting Curve’) were also carried out to check for the formation of primer dimers.

Angiotensin plasma levels

Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture into Eppendorf tubes containing 50 μl of a protease inhibitor cocktail containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), pepstatin A, p-hydroxymercuribenzoic acid, phenanthroline and specific inhibitors for renin and aminopeptidases A and N to a final concentration of 5% v/v (Attoquant Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria) and centrifuged at 7000 r.p.m. for 8 min. The plasma samples were immediately frozen on dry ice and subsequently stored at −80 °C. The determination of plasma concentrations of angiotensins was performed by mass spectrometry using the RAS Fingerprint (Attoquant), which allows the simultaneous quantification of 10 angiotensin peptides in a sample of 1 ml plasma. Plasma of three animals was pooled for this measurement and four pools were analyzed per group.

Statistical analysis

Unpaired Student’s t-test was used for the comparison between the sedentary group and the trained group. Two-way analysis of variance was employed for repeated measures comparing the variables obtained before and after training. One-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis comparing training groups (ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y). In case of differences between groups, Tukey’s post-hoc test was used. The significance level for all experiments was set at P≤0.05 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Physical performance

The ACE2−/y Exe (n=6) showed a lower performance in the voluntary exercise wheel when compared with the ACE2+/y Exe group (n=6). The reduction in the physical performance was observed during the whole 6 weeks of the training period (Figure 1). ACE2−/y performance was ~30% lower than the one of ACE2+/y mice.

Figure 1
figure 1

Wheel running in ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y over 6 weeks (n=6 per group). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s post-hoc test.

Cardiac remodeling

The total mass of the heart and the weight of the LV were measured, to evaluate the effect of exercise on physiological cardiac hypertrophy. ACE2+/y Exe group presented a significantly higher heart mass (5.10±0.35 mg g−1) and LV weight (3.60±0.17 mg g−1) compared with the ACE2+/y Sed group (4.70±0.14 and 3.20±0.10 mg g−1, respectively). In contrast, voluntary exercise did not cause alterations in heart weight in ACE2−/y mice (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Total heart (a) and left ventricular weight (b) corrected by body weight (mg g−1) in sedentary (sed) and trained (exe) groups of ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y mice (n=5-6).

Body composition

Body composition (% fat, muscle and water) was analyzed before and after 6 weeks of training by magnetic resonance. No difference was observed in the body weight between groups, before or after the voluntary exercise training (Table 1). As expected, the ACE2+/y Exe group presented a lower percentage of fat and increased lean mass compared with the ACE2+/y Sed group (Table 1). This improvement in body composition was not observed in the ACE2−/y Exe group. Interestingly, the percentage of fat in the ACE2−/y Sed group was significantly lower (P<0.05) compared with the sedentary ACE2+/y group (Table 1).

Table 1 Body composition: body weight (g), fat and lean mass (%) in ACE2+/y sed, ACE2+/y exe, ACE2−/y sed and ACE2−/y exe mice.

Morphological changes in skeletal muscle

The morphological analysis of skeletal muscle in the ACE2+/y group indicated that voluntary exercise increased soleus diameter (Figure 3b), and the number of the nuclei in the gastrocnemius (Figure 3c) and the soleus muscle (Figure 3d). No morphological changes were observed in the skeletal muscles of ACE2−/y mice after exercise training.

Figure 3
figure 3

Morphological analysis of skeletal muscles (a,c; gastrocnemius; b,d; soleus) from sedentary (sed) and trained (exe) ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y mice. Muscle diameter (a,b) and number of nuclei (c,d) were quantified. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 (n=6–9 per group). Paired t-test, two tailed.

Gene expression of RAS components

Components of the RAS (ACE, ACE2, Mas, AT1 and AT2 receptors) were analyzed by quantitative PCR in the LV and gastrocnemius muscle. Mas expression increased only in the LV of the ACE2+/y Exe group (Figure 4a). AT2 gene expression was significantly lower in ACE2−/y subjected to voluntary exercise, compared with sedentary controls, and to the ACE2+/y Exe group (Figure 4c). No differences in the AT1 and ACE gene expression in the LV were observed between all groups (Figure 4b and d), whereas ACE2 was downregulated after exercise in the ACE2+/y mice (Figure 4e). However, analysis of gene expression in skeletal muscle showed an increase in Mas expression only in ACE2−/y Exe mice compared with sedentary controls (Figure 5a). Voluntary exercise did not alter the muscular expression of AT1 (Figure 5b) and AT2 receptors (Figure 5c), and ACE2 (Figure 5e). An increase in muscular ACE gene expression was observed in both trained groups (Figure 5d).

Figure 4
figure 4

RAS-related gene expression (a, Mas; b, AT1; c, AT2; d, ACE; e, ACE2) in the LV of sedentary (Sed, black bars) and trained (Exe, white bars) ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y mice. #P=0.06 and *P<0.05 (n=6–8 per group).

Figure 5
figure 5

RAS-related gene expression (a, Mas; b, AT1; c, AT2; d, ACE; e, ACE2) in skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) from sedentary (Sed, black bars) and trained groups (Exe, white bars) of ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y mice (n=6–8 per group). *P<0.05.

Angiotensin levels

We measured the plasma concentrations of Ang-(1–8), Ang-(3–8), Ang-(1–10), Ang-(2–7), Ang-(1–7), Ang-(3–7), Ang-(1–5), Ang-(1–9), Ang-(2–8) and Ang-(2–10). Ang-(2–7), Ang-(3–7) and Ang-(2–10) were not detectable. No significant differences were observed in Ang-(3–8), Ang-(2–8) (data not shown), Ang II (Figure 6b), Ang-(1–7) (Figure 6d), Ang-(1–5) (Figure 6e) and Ang-(1–8)/Ang-(1–7) levels (Figure 6f) between groups. The levels of Ang I (Figure 6a) were higher in the ACE2+/y Exe group and the ratio Ang II/Ang I (Figure 6c) was lower in the ACE2+/y Exe group compared with the ACE2+/y Sed group.

Figure 6
figure 6

Plasma levels of angiotensins (a, Ang I; b, Ang II; c, ratio Ang II/Ang I; d, Ang-(1-7); e, Ang-(1-5); f, ratio Ang-(1-7)/Ang II) in sedentary (Sed, black bars) and trained (Exe, white bars) groups of ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y mice (per group: four pools with three animals each). *P<0.05.

Discussion

The present study showed for the first time that ACE2 deficiency affects physical performance and leads to impaired physiological adaptations to exercise. At the end of the sixth week of training, ACE2−/y mice showed less rotations per day in comparison with ACE2+/y. The physiological remodeling of the heart and muscle, and the improvement of body composition induced by exercise were absent in ACE2 knockout mice

There are no studies in the literature that evaluate the effect of ACE2 deficiency on physical performance. However, the effect of bleomycin treatment on the performance was studied in ACE2-deficient and control mice.18 Bleomycin treatment is a model used in mice to induce acute respiratory distress syndrome. The deletion of the ACE2 gene worsened lung injury induced by bleomycin. A treadmill test showed that both groups (ACE2+/y and ACE2−/y) treated with bleomycin presented reduced exercise capacity; however, the reduction was greater in the ACE2−/y group. This result was interpreted as evidence that the deletion of the ACE2 gene worsens lung injury in this model. The physical performance of the ACE2−/y mice without bleomycin treatment was not evaluated in this study. Thus, it may well be that the reduced physical performance already at baseline in ACE2−/y mice, which we reveal in our study, confounded the results shown by Rey-Parra et al.18 Several physiological adaptations induced by physical training have been demonstrated in the heart and skeletal muscle.19, 20, 21 Cardiac hypertrophy can occur in different ways, with physiological remodeling resulting from physical training22 and pathological remodeling associated with contractile dysfunction and heart failure.23 In the present study, we only observed an increase of cardiac ventricular mass in trained ACE2+/y mice. The reduced volume of training (30% less than ACE+/y) in ACE2−/y mice may only partially explain the total absence of physiological cardiac hypertrophy in these animals. Guimarães et al.24 evaluated the effect of swimming training in Mas-knockout mice. These mice presented cardiac hypertrophy after training; however, this was associated with deleterious cardiac effects such as an increased deposition of extracellular matrix proteins. Voluntary running increased Mas expression in the LV of ACE2+/y (Figure 4a). This confirms data of Filho et al.,7 who first described that aerobic swimming training induces an increase in Ang-(1–7) associated with an increase in Mas (mRNA and protein) in the LV of trained spontaneously hypertensive rats. Subsequent studies confirmed the activation of the ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis induced by exercise in the heart and vessels.25, 26 Taken together, these data provide evidence that physiological cardiac hypertrophy is depending on an intact ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis.

The ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis may also be involved in the adaptation of skeletal muscle to exercise. The increase of Mas expression by exercise in the gastrocnemius muscle of ACE2−/y but not of ACE2+/y mice (Figure 5a) can be explained by the fact that Ang II has been shown to increase Mas expression in muscles.27 We did not measure the muscular levels of Ang II but Ang II plasma level were unchanged in ACE2−/y compared with ACE2+/y mice corroborating earlier data.28 Recent studies showed that Ang II induces skeletal muscle atrophy by activating the ubiquitin-proteasome system.29, 30 In addition, some pathological models of muscular atrophy (that is, Ang II and lipopolysaccharide treatment and muscular immobilization) induced an increased expression of Mas.27 Increased Mas expression is probably a compensatory effect, as we and others have shown that the ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis is protective in muscular atrophy models.28, 29, 30 The genetic deletion of Mas induced a highly deteriorated muscular architecture, increased fibrosis and diminished muscle strength in a mouse model of muscular dystrophy.30 In the present study, we have not investigated whether ACE2 deficiency leads to muscular fibrosis; however, Riquelme et al.31 showed that ACE2 overexpression in mdx mice reduces fibrosis and decreases infiltration of inflammatory cells. Moreover, muscular dystrophy models presented improvements in locomotor activity and muscle strength when treated with Ang-(1–7).32, 33, 34

There are no data in the literature regarding the effect of Ang-(1–7) administration on physical performance. However, an ongoing study in our laboratory shows that oral treatment with Ang-(1–7) decrease muscle damage and maintains the muscle strength after an eccentric exercise session. These data strongly indicate a relationship between Ang-(1–7) and physical performance.

The ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis seems to be also pivotal for muscular hypertrophy induced by physical exercise, as ACE2−/y mice did not show an increase in soleus diameter and in the number of nuclei in soleus and gastrocnemius muscles after running, in contrast to control mice (Figure 3). Furthermore, the increase in lean (muscle) mass and the reduction in fat mass observed in the body composition analysis of wild-type mice after running was absent in ACE2−/y animals (Table 1). These observations suggest that the absence of ACE2 affects skeletal muscle adaptations to physiological and pathological challenges, and these effects are mediated by the change in the relative concentrations of its substrate Ang II, which is deleterious, and its metabolite Ang-(1–7), which is protective for the muscle. We did not observe strong alterations in the plasma concentrations of angiotensin peptides in ACE2−/y mice. However, the most important effects of ACE2 on the peptide levels are expected to happen locally in the tissue, in close proximity to the relevant receptors, AT1 and Mas. One limitation of our study is that we did not measure the local angiotensin concentrations in the heart and skeletal muscle. However we would expect that local muscular Ang II levels are elevated, as it has been shown for the kidney and placenta of ACE2-deficient animals in the absence of changes in plasma levels.35

However, it cannot be excluded that the recently discovered effect of ACE2 on tryptophan uptake in the gut and the concentrations of this amino acid in the blood36 may also contribute to decreased muscle strength in ACE2−/y mice. Accordingly, tryptophan was recently shown to stimulate the expression of myogenic genes.37

The evidence presented in this study shows that absence of ACE2 impairs physiological adaptations to exercise in skeletal and cardiac muscle, probably due to the effects of ACE2 deficiency on the local RAS in muscular tissue.

Future studies including ACE2−/y mice performing exercise at the same level as the controls will be necessary to assess physiological adaptations in these conditions. Furthermore, due to the multiple substrates of ACE2 and various functions of this enzyme several other hormones, neuropeptides and neurotransmitters may be involved in the exercise phenotype of ACE2-/y mice. Moreover, the control of physical activity is very complex and not only related to various biochemical and physiological systems but also to brain reward pathways.38 Since ACE2 is expressed in the brain, a central contribution to the low running performance in ACE2-/y mice cannot be excluded.