Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Transdisciplinary research

Evaluation of adherence to a nutrition-screening programme over a 5-year period

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

Nutrition screening using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) was implemented for adult patients in 2006. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to the screening programme over a 5-year period after a targeted approach to training ward staff.

Subjects/Methods:

Following the implementation of MUST on 32 wards, regular audits were carried out. Data on completion rates at ward level were collected by nutrition link nurses and submitted electronically for collation.

Results:

Data on MUST were collected on a total of 17 876 patients during this period. Mean percentage of patients screened with a moderate or high risk of malnutrition was 19% in those screened within 24 h after admission and 28% in those screened at 7 days. Twenty percent of patients had an uncompleted MUST score at 24 h after admission and 15% were uncompleted after 7 inpatient days. After implementation, half the hospital population were being screened on admission. However, a number of wards were neither reporting the data nor completing the screening process. Following targeted training on wards, screening rates improved in 2009 and the number of patients screened improved as ward engagement increased.

Conclusion:

Audit has been fundamental in the implementation of MUST and has allowed training, additional time and educational resources to be allocated to specific wards to facilitate improvements in screening. Lead nurse support and monitoring has improved adherence rates and facilitated an increase in the identification of patients at moderate and high risk of malnutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lennard-Jones J . A Positive Approach to Nutrition as Treatment. Kings Fund Centre:London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Council of Europe. Food and Nutritional Care in Hospitals: How to Prevent Undernutrition. Strasbourg, France, 2003.

  3. National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care. Nutrition Support in Adults: Oral Nutrition Support, Enteral Tube Feeding and Parenteral Nutrition NICE Clinical Guideline 32. London, UK, 2006.

  4. National Patient Safety Agency. Patient Environment Action Team Assessment. London, UK, 2010.

  5. Department of Health. Essence of Care Benchmarking for Food and Drink. Norwich, UK, 2010.

  6. Care Quality Commission. Dignity and nutrition inspection programme: national overview, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2011.

  7. Westergren A, Wann-Hansson C, Bergh Börgdal E, Sjölander J, Strömblad R, Klevsgård R et al. Malnutrition prevalence and precision in nutritional care differed in relation to hospital volume – a cross-sectional survey. Nutr J 2009; 8: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell CA, Elia M, Nutrition Screening Week survey and audit. Published on website by BAPEN 2012. http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/nsw/nsw-2011-report.pdf.

  9. Elia M Ed.The ‘MUST’ report. Nutritional screening for adults: a multidisciplinary responsibility. Development and use of the ‘Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool’ (‘MUST’) for adults. A report by the Malnutrition Advisory Group of the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2003.

  10. Elia M, Russell C . Combating malnutrition: recommendations for action. Report from the advisory group on malnutrition led by BAPEN 2009.

  11. Stratton R, Green CJ, Elia M . Disease-Related Malnutrition: An Evidence-Based Approach. CABI Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Correia M, Waitzberg D . The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr 2003; 22: 235–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiesser M, Kirchhoff P, Muller MK, Schafer M, Clavien P . The correlation of nutrition risk index, nutrition risk score, and bioimpedance analysis with postoperative complications in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Surgery 2009; 145: 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwegler I, von Holzen A, Gutzwiller JP, Schlumpf R, Muhlebach S, Stanga Z . Nutritional risk is a clinical predictor of postoperative mortality and morbidity in surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 92–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Agarwal E, Ferguson M, Banks M, Batterham M, Bauer J, Capra S et al. Malnutrition and poor food intake are associated with prolonged hospital stay, frequent readmissions, and greater in-hospital mortality: results from the Nutrition Care Day Survey 2010. Clin Nutr 2013; 32: 737–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kruizenga HM, Van Tulder MW, Seidell JC, Thijs A, Ader HJ, Van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA . Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of early screening and treatment of malnourished patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82: 1082–1089.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kondrup J, Johansen N, Plum LM, Bak L, Larsen IH, Martinsen A et al. Incidence of nutritional risk and causes of inadequate nutritional care in hospitals. Clin Nutr 2002; 21: 461–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beazley A, EA, Friend J, Walters E, Stroud M . Implementing MUST – not as easy as it should be. Proc Nutr Soc 2008; 67: E134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brugler LJ, DiPrinzio MJ, Bernstein L . The five-year evolution of a malnutrition treatment program in a community hospital. J Qual Improv 1999; 25: 191–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rypkema G, Adang E, Dicke H, Naber T, de Swart B, Disselhorst L et al. Cost-effectiveness of an interdisciplinary intervention in geriatric inpatients to prevent malnutrition. J Nutr Health Aging 2003; 8: 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  21. O’Flynn J, Peake H, Hickson M, Foster D, Frost G . The prevalence of malnutrition in hospitals can be reduced: results from three consecutive cross-sectional studies. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 1078–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weekes CE, Spiro A, Baldwin C, Whelan K, Thomas JE, Parkin D, Emery PW . A review of the evidence for the impact of improving nutritional care on nutritional and clinical outcomes and cost. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009; 22: 324–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burden ST, Bodey S, Bradburn YJ . Testing the reliability and validity of a nutrition screening tool. J Hum Nutr Diet 2001; 14: 269–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Burden ST, Brierley ER . Implementing the malnutrition universal screening tool in a teaching hospital. Proc Nutr Soc 2008; 67: E126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal E, Ferguson M, Banks M, Batterham M, Bauer J, Capra S et al. Nutrition care practices in hospital wards: results from the Nutrition Care Day Survey 2010. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 995–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Geiker NRW, Hørup Larsen SM, Stender S, Astrup A . Poor performance of mandatory nutritional screening of in-hospital patients. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 862–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farrer K, Donaldson E, Blackett B, Lloyd H, Forde C, Melia D et al. Nutritional screening of elderly patients: a health improvement approach to practice. J Hum Nutr Diet 2013; 27: 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Green SM, James EP . Barriers and facilitators to undertaking nutritional screening of patients: a systematic review. J Hum Nutr Diet 2013; 26: 211–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cooper CA, Brierley E, Burden ST . What happens with MUST scores. Proc Nutr Soc 2010; 69: E202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jefferies D, Johnson M, Ravens J . Nurturing and nourishing: the nurses’ role in nutritional care. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20: 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the nutrition link nurses for collecting the data, the Department of Dietetics and the Clinical Audit Department at Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

Author Contributions

STB prepared the manuscript and assisted with the audit programme and ERB was responsible for data collection, assisted with the content of the manuscripts and data presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    S T Burden

  2. Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    E R Brierley

Authors
  1. S T Burden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E R Brierley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S T Burden.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burden, S., Brierley, E. Evaluation of adherence to a nutrition-screening programme over a 5-year period. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 847–852 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.95

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.95

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation