Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In search of the optimal platform for Post-Allogeneic SCT immunotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Bone Marrow Transplantation Submit manuscript

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has the potential to induce sustained remissions in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Currently, allo-SCT is primarily performed in high-risk MM patients, most often in the setting of early relapse after first-line therapy with autologous SCT. However, the implementation of allo-SCT for MM is jeopardized by high treatment-related mortality (TRM) rates as well as high relapse rates. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify a safe allo-SCT strategy that has optimal 1-year results regarding mortality, relapse and severe GvHD, creating opportunities for post-transplantation strategies to maintain remissions in the high-risk group of relapsed MM patients. Eleven studies were included. Median PFS ranged from 5.2 to 36.8 months and OS was 13.0 to 63.0 months. The relapse related mortality at 1 year varied between 0 and 50% and TRM between 8 and 40%. Lowest GvHD incidences were reported for conditioning regimens with T-cell depletion using ATG or graft CD34+ selection. Similar strategies could lay the foundation for a post-transplant immune platform, this should be further evaluated in prospective clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laubach JP, Schlossman RL, Mitsiades CS, Anderson KC, Richardson PG . Thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib in the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol 2011; 4: 51–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Rhee F, Dhodapkar M, Shaughnessy JD, Anaissie E, Siegel D, Hoering A et al. First thalidomide clinical trial in multiple myeloma: a decade. Blood 2008; 112: 1035–1038.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McBride A, Klaus JO, Stockerl-Goldstein K . Carfilzomib: a second-generation proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2015; 72: 353–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lacy MQ, McCurdy AR . Pomalidomide. Blood 2013; 112: 2305–2309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, Nahi H, Gimsing P, Hansson M et al. Targeting CD38 with daratumumab monotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1207–1219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, Morgan G, Richardson PG, Crowley J et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia 2011; 26: 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bensinger WI . Role of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in myeloma. Leukemia 2009; 23: 442–448.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harousseau JL . The allogeneic dilemma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40: 1123–1128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gahrton G, Krishnan A . Allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol 2014; 7: 79–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crawley C, Iacobelli S, Björkstrand B, Apperley JF, Niederwieser D, Gahrton G . Reduced-intensity conditioning for myeloma: lower nonrelapse mortality but higher relapse rates compared with myeloablative conditioning. Blood 2007; 109: 3588–3594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kröger N, Einsele H, Wolff D, Casper J, Freund M, Derigs G et al. Myeloablative intensified conditioning regimen with in vivo T-cell depletion (ATG) followed by allografting in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. A phase I/II study of the German Study-group Multiple Myeloma (DSMM). Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 973–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lokhorst H, Einsele H, Vesole D, Bruno B, San Miguel J, Pérez-Simon JA et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement regarding the current status of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2010 p 4521–4530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van Dorp S, Meijer E, van de Donk NW, Dekker AW, Nieuwenhuis K, Minnema MC et al. Single-centre experience with nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: prolonged remissions induced. Neth J Med 2007; 65: 178–184.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobh M, Michallet M, Gahrton G, Iacobelli S, Biezen aVan, Schönland S et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in Europe: trends and outcomes over 25 years. A study by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party. Leukemia 2016; 30: 2047–2054.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Minnema MC, van der Veer MS, Aarts T, Emmelot M, Mutis T, Lokhorst HM . Lenalidomide alone or in combination with dexamethasone is highly effective in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma following allogeneic stem cell transplantation and increases the frequency of CD4 þ Foxp3 þ T-cells. Leukemia 2009; 23: 605–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolb HJ, Schattenberg A, Goldman JM, Hertenstein B, Jacobsen N, Arcese W et al. Graft-versus-leukemia effect of donor lymphocyte transfusions in marrow grafted patients. Blood 1995; 86: 2041–2050.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kröger N . Mini-Midi-Maxi? How to harness the graft-versus-myeloma effect and target molecular remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2007; 21: 1851–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salama M, Nevill T, Marcellus D, Parker P, Johnson M, Kirk A et al. Donor leukocyte infusions for multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 1179–1184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoyos V, Borrello I . The immunotherapy era of myeloma: monoclonal antibodies, vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies. Blood 2016; 128: 1679–1687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 1628–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karlin B, Chevret S, Ades L, Robin M, De Latour RP, Malphettes M et al. Tandem autologous non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after a first high dose therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 250–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Einsele H, Schäfer H-J, Hebart H, Bader P, Meisner C, Plasswilm L et al. Follow-up of patients with progressive multiple myeloma undergoing allografts after reduced-intensity conditioning. Br J Haematol 2003; 121: 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith E, Devlin SM, Kosuri S, Orlando E, Landau H, Lesokhin AM et al. CD34-selected allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed, high-risk multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22: 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Minnema MC, van Dorp S, van de Donk NWCJ, Schouten F, Kersten MJ, Coenen JLLM et al. Prognostic factors and outcome in relapsed multiple myeloma after nonmyeloablative allo-SCT: a single center experience. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 244–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kröger N, Shimoni A, Schilling G, Schwerdtfeger R, Bornhäuser M, Nagler A et al. Unrelated stem cell transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning for patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after autologous transplantation. Br J Haematol 2010; 148: 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Osman K, Elliott B, Mandeli J, Scigliano E, Malone A, Isola L et al. Non-myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 2010; 85: 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruutu T, van Biezen A, Hertenstein B, Henseler A, Garderet L, Passweg J et al. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD after allogeneic haematopoietic SCT: a survey of centre strategies by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 1459–1464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Donato ML, Siegel DS, Vesole DH, McKiernan P, Nyirenda T, Pecora AL et al. The graft-versus-myeloma effect: chronic graft-versus-host disease but not acute graft-versus-host disease prolongs survival in patients with multiple myeloma receiving allogeneic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplantation 2014; 20: 1211–1216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lokhorst HM, Wu K, Verdonck LF, Laterveer LL, NWCJ VanDeDonk, Van Oers MHJ et al. The occurrence of graft-versus-host disease is the major predictive factor for response to donor lymphocyte infusions in multiple myeloma. Blood 2004; 103: 4362–4364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Passera R, Pollichieni S, Brunello L, Patriarca F, Bonifazi F, Montefusco V et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated donors in multiple myeloma: study from the italian bone marrow donor registry. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19: 940–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Efebera YA, Qureshi SR, Cole SM, Saliba R, Pelosini M, Patel RM et al. Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 1122–1129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. De Lavallade H, El-Cheikh J, Faucher C, Fürst S, Stoppa A-M, Coso D et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic SCT as salvage treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008; 41: 953–960.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldman JM, Gale RP, Horowitz MM, Biggs JC, Champlin RE, Gluckman E et al. Bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. Increased risk for relapse associated with T-cell depletion. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 806–814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bicigalupo A, Lamparelli T, Gualandi F, Bregante S, Raiola A, di Grazia C, Dominietto A . Increased risk of leukemia relapse with high-dose cyclosporine A after allogeneic marrow transplantation for acute leukemia. Blood 2001; 98: 3174–3175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Admiraal R, van Kesteren C, Jol-van der Zijde CM, Lankester AC, Bierings MB, Egberts TCG et al. Association between anti-thymocyte globulin exposure and CD4+ immune reconstitution in paediatric haemopoietic cell transplantation: a multicentre, retrospective pharmacodynamic cohort analysis. Lancet Haematol 2015; 2: e194–e203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Patriarca F, Einsele H, Spina F, Bruno B, Isola M, Nozzoli C et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma relapsed after autograft: A multicenter retrospective study based on donor availability. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 617–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Fuchs EJ . Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for tolerance induction in HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation. Semin Oncol 2012 p 683–693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kneppers E, Van Der Holt B, Kersten MJ, Zweegman S, Meijer E, Huls G et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma is not feasible: results of the HOVON 76 Trial. Blood 2011; 118: 2413–2419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wolschke C, Stübig T, Hegenbart U, Schönland S, Heinzelmann M, Hildebrandt Y et al. Postallograft lenalidomide induces strong NK cell-mediated antimyeloma activity and risk for T-cell-mediated GvHD: results from a phase I/II dose-finding study. Exp Hematol 2013; 41: 134–142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kröger N, Zabelina T, Klyuchnikov E, Kropff M, Pflüger K-H, Burchert A et al. Toxicity-reduced, myeloablative allograft followed by lenalidomide maintenance as salvage therapy for refractory/relapsed myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Caballero-Velázquez T, López-Corral L, Encinas C, Castilla-Llorente C, Martino R, Rosiñol L et al. Phase II clinical trial for the evaluation of bortezomib within the reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) and post-allogeneic transplantation for high-risk myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 2013; 162: 474–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Qazilbash MH, Saliba R, De Lima M, Hosing C, Couriel D, Aleman A et al. Second autologous or allogeneic transplantation after the failure of first autograft in patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer 2006; 106: 1084–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schmidt-Hieber M, Blau IW, Trenschel R, Andreesen R, Stuhler G, Einsele H et al. Reduced-toxicity conditioning with fludarabine and treosulfan prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 39: 389–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M C Minnema.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oostvogels, R., Uniken Venema, S., de Witte, M. et al. In search of the optimal platform for Post-Allogeneic SCT immunotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma: a systematic review. Bone Marrow Transplant 52, 1233–1240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2017.141

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2017.141

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation