Skip to main content
Log in

Plasma Cell Disorders

A randomized study of melphalan 200 mg/m2 vs 280 mg/m2 as a preparative regimen for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing auto-SCT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bone Marrow Transplantation Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to examine whether doses of melphalan higher than 200 mg/m2 improve response rates when used as conditioning before autologous transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients with MM, n=131, were randomized to 200 mg/m2 (mel200) vs 280 mg/m2 (mel280) using amifostine pretreatment. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving near complete response (⩾nCR). No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. Responses following ASCT were for mel200 vs mel280, respectively, ⩾nCR 22 vs 39%, P=0.03, ⩾PR 57 vs 74%, P=0.04. The hazard of mortality was not statistically significantly different between groups (mel200 vs mel280; hazard ratio (HR)=1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62–2.13, P=0.66)) nor was the rate of progression/mortality (HR=0.81 (0.52–1.27, P=0.36)). The estimated PFS at 1 and 3 years were 83 and 46%, respectively, for mel200 and 78 and 54%, respectively, for mel280. Amifostine and mel280 were well tolerated, with no grade 4 regimen-related toxicities and only one grade 3 mucositis (none with mel200) and three grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (two in mel200). Hospitalization rates were more frequent in the mel280 group (59 vs 43%, P=0.08). Mel280 resulted in a higher major response rate (CR+nCR) and should be evaluated in larger studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attal M, Harousseau J-L, Stoppa A-M, Sotto J-J, Fuzibet J-G, Rossi J-F et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 91–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blade J, Rosinol L, Sureda A, Ribera JM, Diaz-Mediavilla J, Garcia-Larana J et al. High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA. Blood 2005; 106: 3755–3759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1875–1883.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, Greipp PR, Lazarus HM, Hurd DD et al. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. [erratum appears in J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 10;24(17):2687]. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 929–936.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fermand J-P, Ravaud P, Chevret S, Divine M, Leblond V, Belanger C et al. High-dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: up-front or rescue treatment? Results of a multicenter sequential randomized clinical trial. Blood 1998; 92: 3131–3136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Samuels BL, Bitran JD . High-dose intravenous melphalan: a review (Review). J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 1786–1799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreau P, Facon T, Attal M, Hulin C, Michallet M, Maloisel F et al. Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome 9502 randomized trial. Blood 2002; 99: 731–735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spencer A, Horvath N, Gibson J, Prince HM, Herrmann R, Bashford J et al. Prospective randomised trial of amifostine cytoprotection in myeloma patients undergoing high-dose melphalan conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 971–977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thieblemont C, Dumontet C, Saad H, Roch N, Bouafia F, Arnaud P et al. Amifostine reduces mucosal damage after high-dose melphalan conditioning and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 769–775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Philllips GL, Meisenberg B, Reece DE, Adams VR, Badros A, Brunner J et al. Amifostine and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support of escalating-dose melphalan: a phase I study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2004; 10: 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reece DE, Vesole D, Flomenberg N, Badros A, Filicko J, Herzig R et al. Intensive therapy with high-dose melphalan (MEL) 280 mg/m2 plus amifostine cytoprotection and ASCT as part of initial therapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2002; 100: 1672.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bladé J, Samson D, Reece D, Apperley J, Björkstrand B, Gahrton G et al. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Br J Haematol 1998; 102: 1115–1123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lilleby K, Garcia P, Gooley T, McDonnell P, Taber R, Holmberg L et al. A prospective, randomized study of cryotherapy during administration of high-dose melphalan to decrease the severity and duration of oral mucositis in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 37: 1031–1035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faber EAJ, Loberiza FR Jr ., Akhtari M, Bierman P, Bociek RG, Maness L et al. A retrospective analysis comparingBEAM versus melphalan prior to first autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplant in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2011; 118: 2040.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, Grande C, de la Rubia J, Rosinol L et al. Busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimens for autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients included in the PETHEMA/GEM2000 study. Haematologica 2010; 95: 1913–1920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Clark AD, Douglas KW, Mitchell LD, McQuaker IG, Parker AN, Tansey PJ et al. Dose escalation therapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma following Z-Dex induction treatment. [Erratum appears in Br J Haematol 2002 Sep.118(4):1201]. Br J Haematol 2002; 117: 605–612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roussel M, Moreau P, Huynh A, Mary JY, Danho C, Caillot D et al. Bortezomib and high-dose melphalan as conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with de novo multiple myeloma: a phase 2 study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM). Blood 2010; 115: 32–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lonial S, Kaufman J, Tighiouart M, Nooka A, Langston AA, Heffner LT et al. A phase I/II trial combining high-dose melphalan and autologous transplant with bortezomib for multiple myeloma: a dose- and schedule-finding study. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16: 5079–5086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T, Guilhot F, Doyen C, Fuzibet JG et al. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2495–2502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cavo M, Tosi P, Zamagni E, Cellini C, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F et al. Prospective, randomized study of single compared with double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Bologna 96 clinical study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 2434–2441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vistica DT . Cytotoxicity as an indicator for transport mechanism: evidence that melphalan is transported by two leucine-preferring carrier systems in the L1210 murine leukemia cell. Biochim Biophys Acta 1979; 550: 309–317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, Marit G, Caillot D, Mohty M et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4621–4629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blijlevens N, Schwenkglenks M, Bacon P, D'Addio A, Einsele H, Maertens J et al. Prospective oral mucositis audit: oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose melphalan or BEAM conditioning chemotherapy—European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Mucositis Advisory Group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 1519–1525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grazziutti ML, Dong L, Miceli MH, Krishna SG, Kiwan E, Syed N et al. Oral mucositis in myeloma patients undergoing melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplantation: incidence, risk factors and a severity predictive model. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38: 501–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by research funds supplied by Astra-Zeneca, R21 CA155911-01, and by P01 CA18029-28 both from NIH/NCI. Previously published at the 2012 ASH Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA December 2012. This study was supported in part by resources of the VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W I Bensinger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

WB received research funding for this trial from Astra-Zeneca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bensinger, W., Becker, P., Gooley, T. et al. A randomized study of melphalan 200 mg/m2 vs 280 mg/m2 as a preparative regimen for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing auto-SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 51, 67–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.211

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation