Skip to main content
Log in

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bach, K. (1994): ‘Conversational Impliciture’, Mind and Language 9, 124–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. (1989): ‘Situations and Small Worlds’, in The Situation in Logic, pp. 79–92, Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J. (1987): The Liar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983): Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. I. (1997): ‘Presupposition’, in van Bentham and ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 939–1008, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1979): ‘Semantical Paradox’, Journal of Philosophy 76, 169–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (1988): ‘Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics’, in Kempson (ed.), Mental Representation: The Interface Between Language and Reality, pp. 155–181, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990): Meaning and Grammar, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chihara, C. (1979): ‘The Semantic Paradoxes: A Diagnostic Investigation’, Philosophical Review 88: 590–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (1981): Meaning, Quantification, Necessity, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (1976): ‘What is a Theory of Meaning? (II)’, in Evans and McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning, pp. 67–137, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijck, J. and Kamp, H. (1997): ‘Representing Discourse in Context’, in van Bentham and ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 179–237, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S. (1991): ‘Reflecting on Incompleteness’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 56: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. and Sheard, M. (1987): ‘An Axiomatic Approach to Self-Referential Truth’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 33: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaifman, H. (1988): ‘Operational Pointer Semantics: Solution to the Self-Referential Puzzles I’, in Vardi (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, pp. 43–60, Los Angeles: Morgan Kauffman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauker, C. (1998): ‘What Is a Context of Utterance?'Philosophical Studies 91, 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1991): ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeneveld, W. (1994): ‘Dynamic Semantics and Circular Propositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23, 269–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1988): The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. (1984): ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in Groenendijk, Janssen and Stokhof(eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information, pp. 1–41, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (1989): ‘Demonstratives’, in Almog, Perry and Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481–563, Oxford: Oxford University Press. This is the first publication of a widely-circulated manuscript dated 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koons, R.C. (1992): Paradoxes of Belief and Strategic Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1989): ‘An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1975): ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986): On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, V. (1989): ‘Applying Kripke's Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 86, 530–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, V. (1991): Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R., van Bentham, J. and Visser, A. (1997): ‘Dynamics’, in van Bentham and ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 587–648, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C. (1974): ‘Content and Context: The Liar Paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 381–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumfitt, I. (1993): ‘The Paratactic Theory Revisited and Revised',Mind 102, 429–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, K. (1993): Universality and the Liar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. (1987): ‘Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content’, Philosophical Topics 15, 47–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1974): ‘Pragmatic Presuppositions’, in Munitz and Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, pp. 197–230, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1978): ‘Assertion’, in Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol 9: Pragmatics, pp. 315–332, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1984): Inquiry, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1983): ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in Corcoran (ed.), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd ed., pp. 152–278, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. English translation by J.H. Woodger of ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalizierten Sprachen’, Studia Philosophica 1 (1935). Department of Linguistics and Philosophy MIT Cambridge, MA 02139 USA E-mail: glanzber@mit.edu

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glanzberg, M. The Liar in Context. Philosophical Studies 103, 217–251 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010314719817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010314719817

Navigation