Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of temporary closure of a national park on leopard movement and behaviour in tropical Asia

  • Original investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Across Asia protected areas serve as refuges for carnivores inside human-dominated landscapes. How-ever, the creation of hard edges around reserve boundaries where conflicts with humans arise and disturbance from human activities inside the reserves may affect carnivore behaviour and ecology. Thailand’s largest protected area, Kaeng Krachan National Park (2915km2) receives >100, 000 visitors annually while maintaining an intact assemblage of prey species for large carnivores, making it a poten-tially important site for population recovery of leopards (Panthera pardus), tigers (Panthera tigris) and dholes (Cuon alpinus). We assessed the abundance of leopards and their prey base, and their response to changes in levels of human activity after an unexpected flooding event that resulted in the park being closed to visitors for >6months. Using camera-traps, we identified 6 individual leopards and used spa-tially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) methods, incorporating humans and prey as covariates, to test for factors affecting the detection probability of leopards before and after the park closure. Leopard den-sity was unchanged between the two periods, however the movement and activity patterns were clearly different. In the absence of tourist activity, leopards tended to move more frequently, leopard detection rates increased by 70% and activity shifted towards being more diurnal. The consequences of these changes in behaviour may include improved health, reproduction and survival. A management strategy involving seasonal closure of parks may serve to alleviate pressure on leopards and other carnivores. We recommend using information on abundance of large carnivores and their prey species, and human disturbance as the key indicators for long-term monitoring and management of protected areas in Southeast Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H., 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov, B.N., Caski, F. (Eds.), International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest, Hungary, pp. 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstrup, S.C., McDonald, T.L., Manly, B.F.J., 2005. Handbook of Capture-Recapture Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azlan, J.M., Sharma, D.S.K., 2006. The diversity and activity patterns of wild felids in a secondary forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Oryx 40, 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borah, J., Sharma, T., Das, D., Rabha, N., Kakati, N., Basumatary, A., Ahmed, M.F., Vattakaven, J., 2014. Abundance and density estimates for common leopard Panthera pardus and clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa in Manas National Park Assam, India. Oryx 48, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchers, D.L., Efford, M.G., 2008. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 64, 377–385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P., Overton, W.S., 1978. Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65, 625–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, C, Christie, S., Conforti, K., Coulson, T., Franklin, N., Ginsberg, J.R., Griffiths, M., Holden, J., Kawanishi, K., Kinnaird, M.F., Laidlaw, R.K., Lynam, A.J., Macdonald, D.W., Martyr, D., McDougal, C., Nath, L., O’Brien, T., Seidensticker, J., Smith, D.J.L., Sunquist, M.E., Tilson, R., Wan Shahruddin, W.N., 2001. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Anim. Conserv. 4, 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., 1989. Estimating population size for sparse data in capture-recapture experiments. Biometrics 45, 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efford, M.G., Mowat, G., 2014. Compensatory heterogeneity in spatially explicit capture-recapture data. Ecology 95, 1341–1348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Efford, M.G., Borchers, D.L., Byrom, A.E., 2009. Density estimation by spatially explicit capture-recapture: likelihood-based methods. In: Thomson, D.L., Cooch, E.G., Conroy, M.J. (Eds.), Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3. Springer, Boston, USA, pp. 255–269, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78151-811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efford, M.G., 2004. Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106, 598–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efford, M.G., 2011. secr: Spatially Explicit Capture-recapture Models. R Package Version 2.0.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R.J., Harmsen, B.J., Doncaster, C.P., 2010. Habitat use by sympatric jaguars and pumas across agradient of human disturbance in Belize. Biotropica 42, 724–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoddousi, A., Hamidi, A.Kh., Ghadirian, T., Ashayeri, D., Khorozyan, I., 2010. The status of the endangered Persian leopard Panthera pardus saxicolor in Bamu National Park, Iran. Oryx 44, 551–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman, J.L., Harvey, P.H., 1982. Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10, 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, J.M., Barger, J., 1994. Winter recreation and hibernating black bears (Ursus americanus). Biol. Conserv. 67, 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granados, A., Crowther, K., Brodie, J.F., Bernard, H., 2016. Persistence of mammals in a selectively logged forest in Malaysian Borneo. Mamm. Biol. 81, 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassman, L.I., 1999. Ecology and behaviorofthe Indochinese leopard in Kaeng Krachan National Park, Thailand. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 47, 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, T.N.E., Phan, C., 2011. Habitat preferences and activity patterns ofthe larger mammal community in Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia. Raffles B. Zool. 59, 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, T.N.E., Prum, S., 2012. Leopard density in post-conflict landscape, Cambodia: evidence from spatially explicit capture-recapture. J. Wildl. Manage. 76, 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., van Schaik, C.P., 1993. The impact of human traffic on the abundance and activity period of Sumatran rainforest wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 7, 623–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, B.J., Foster, R.J., Silver, S., Ostro, L., Doncaster, C.P., 2010. Differential use of trails by forest mammals and implications for camera-trap studies: a case study from Belize. Biotropica 42, 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M.W., Henschel, P., O’Brien, J., Hofmeyr, M., Balme, G., Kerley, G.I.H., 2006. Prey preferences ofthe leopard (Panthera pardus). J. Zool. 270, 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L., Lam, W.Y., Campos-Arceiz, A., Rayan, D.M., Laurance, W.F., Latham, C.J., Saaban, S., Clements, G.R., 2015. Melanistic leopards reveal theirspots: infrared camera traps provide a population density estimate of leopards in Malaysia. J. Wildl. Manage. 79, 846–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, L., Young, T.P., 1992. Human presence reduces predation in a free-ranging vervet monkey population in Kenya. Am. J. Primatol. 7, 623–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, A.P., Gerngross, P., Lemeris Jr., J.R., Schoonover, R.F., Anco, C., Breitenmoser-Wursten, C., Durant, S.M., Farhadinia, M.S., Henschel, P., Kamler, J.F., Laguardia, A., Rostro-Garcia, S., Stein, A.B., Dollar, L., 2016. Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range. Peer J 4, e1974 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., Vongkhamheng, C., Hedemark, M., Saithongdam, T., 2006. Effects of human-carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. Anim. Conserv. 9, 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalle, R., Ramesh, T., Qureshi, Q., Sankar, K., 2011. Density of tiger and leopard in a tropical deciduous forest of Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, southern India, as estimated using photographic capture-recapture sampling. Acta. Theriol. 56, 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamler, J.F., Songsasen, N., Jenks, K., Srivathsa, A., Sheng, L., Kunkel, K., 2015. Cuon alpinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015, e.T5953A72477893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D., 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 97, 2852–2862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K.U., Sunquist, M.E., 1995. Prey selectionby tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K.U., Kumar, N.S., Nichols, J.D., 2002. Field surveys for estimating absolute densities of tigers using capture-recapture sampling. In: Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D. (Eds.), Monitoring Tigers and Their Prey: A Manual for Researchers, Managers and Conservationists in Tropical Asia. Center for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India, pp. 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D., Kumar, N.S., Link, W.A., Hines, J.E., 2004. Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. PNAS 101, 4854–4858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kawanishi, K., Sunquist, M.E., 2004. Conservation status of tigers in a primary rainforest of Peninsular Malaysia. Biol. Conserv. 120, 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerley, L.L., Goodrich, J.M., Miquelle, D.G., Smirnov, E.N., Quigley, H.B., Hornocker, M.G., 2002. Effects of roads and human disturbance on Amur tigers. Conserv. Biol. 16, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R.R., Eberhardt, L.L., 1985. Population dynamics of yellowstone grizzly bears. Ecology 66, 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manville, A.M., 1983. Human impact on the black bear in Michigan’s lower peninsula. Int. Conf. Bear Res. Manage. 5, 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marker, L.L., Dickman, A.J., 2005. Factors affecting leopard (Panthera pardus) spatial ecology with particular reference to Namibian farmlands. S. Afr.J. Wildl. Res. 35, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Basille, M., Moorter, B.V., Kindberg, J., Allaineí, D., Swenson, J.E., 2010. Coping with human disturbance: spatial and temporal tactics ofthe brown bear (Ursus arctos). Can. J. Zool. 88, 875–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, M., Ridout, M., 2016. Overlap: Estimates of Coefficient of Overlapping for Animal Activity Patterns. R Package Version 0.2.6. https://doi.org/CRAN.R-project.org/package=overlap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miquelle, D.G., Stephens, P.A., Smirnov, E.N., Goodrich, J.M., Zaumyslava, O.J., Myslenkov, A.E., 2005. Competitive exclusion, functional redundancy, and conservation implications: tigers and wolves in the Russian Far East. In: Ray, J., Berger, J., Redford, K., Steneck, R. (Eds.), Large Carnivores and the Conservation of Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington D.C., USA, pp. 179–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngoprasert, D., Lynam, A.J., Gale, G.A., 2007. Human disturbance affects habitat use and behaviour of Asiatic leopard Panthera pardus in Kaeng Krachan National Park, Thailand. Oryx 41, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, T.G., Kinnaird, M.F., Wibisono, H.T., 2003. Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Anim. Conserv. 6, 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter, R.R., Yates, T.L., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Dunnun, J.L., Franklin, A.B., Friggens, M.T., Lubow, B.C., Miller, M., Olson, G.S., Parmenter, C.A., Pollard, J., Rextad, E., Shenk, T.M., Stanley, T.R., White, G.C., 2003. Small-mammal density estimation: a field comparison of grid-based vs. web-based density estimators. Ecol. Monogr. 73, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineiro, A., Barja, I., Silván, G., Illera, J.C., 2012. Effects oftourist pressure and reproduction on physiological stress response in wildcats: management implications for species conservation. Wildl. Res. 39, 532–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K.H., Nichols, J.D., Brownie, C., Hines, J.E., 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildl. Monogr. 107, 3–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primm, S.A., 1996. A pragmatic approach to grizzly bear conservation. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1026–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, J., Shi, Q., Wang, G., Li, Z., Sun, Q., Hua, Y., Jiang, G., 2015. Spatial distribution drivers of Amur leopard density in northeast China. Biol. Conserv. 191, 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, A., 1989. The density and behaviorof large cats in a dry tropical forest mosaic in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 37, 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridout, M.S., Linkie, M., 2009. Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data.J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 14, 322–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, D., Leader-Williams, N., Dalal-Clayton, D.B., 1997. Take Only Photographs, Leave Only Footprints: The Environmental Impacts of Wildlife Tourism. Environmental Planning Group, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostro-Garcia, S., Kamler, J.F., Ash, E., Clements, G.R., Gibson, L., Lynam, A.J., McEwing, R., Naing, H., Paglia, S., 2016. Endangered leopards: range collapse of the Indochinese leopard (Panthera pardus delacouri) in Southeast Asia. Biol. Conserv. 201, 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovero, F., Marshall, A.R., 2009. Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 1011–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, F., Schmidt, A., 2006. Nonparametric estimation of the coefficient of overlapping-theory and empirical application. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 50, 1583–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simcharoen, A., Savini, T., Gale, G.A., Simcharoen, S., Duangchantrasiri, S., Pakpien, S., Smith, J.L.D., 2014. Female tiger Panthera tigris home range size and prey abundance: important metrics for management. Oryx 48, 370–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simcharoen, S., 2008. Ecology of the Leopard (Panthera pardus Linn.) in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary. Ph.D. Dissertation. Kasetsart University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.A., Wang, Y., Wilmers, C.C., 2015. Top carnivores increase their kill rates on prey as a response to human-induced fear. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollmann, R., Furtado, M.M., Gardner, B., Hofer, H., Jácomo, A.T.A., Tôrres, N.M., Silveira, L., 2011. Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: accounting forsex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture-recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 144, 1017–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A.B., Athreya, V., Gerngross, P., Balme, G., Henschel, P., Karanth, U., Miquelle, D., Rostro, S., Kamler, J.F., Laguardia, A., 2016. Panthera pardus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016, e.T15954A50659089.

  • Steinmetz, R., Seuaturien, N., Srirattanaporn, S., Poonnil, B., 2014. Research and Conservation of Tigers and Their Prey in Kuiburi National Park. Final Report to Department of National Parks, Wildlife, and Plant Conservation, WWF Thailand and Kuiburi National Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dyke, F.G., Brocke, R.H., Shaw, H.G., 1986. Reactions of mountain lions to logging and human activity. J. Wildl. Manage. 50, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walston, J., Robinson, J.G., Bennett, E.L., Breitenmoser, U., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Goodrich, J., Gumal, M., Hunter, L., Johnson, A., Karanth, K.U., Leader-Williams, N., MacKinnon, K., Miquelle, D., Pattanavibool, A., Poole, C., Rabinowitz, A., Smith, J.L.D., Stokes, E.J., Stuart, S.N., Vongkhamheng, C., Wibisono, H., 2010. Bringing the tiger back from the brink-the six percent solution. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000485, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.W., Macdonald, D.W., 2009. The use of camera traps for estimating tiger and leopard populations in the high altitude mountains of Bhutan. Biol. Conserv. 142, 606–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K.R., Anderson, D.R., 1985. Evaluation of two density estimators of small mammal populationsize. J. Mammal. 66, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R.G., 1992. Wildlife Research and Management in the National Parks. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antony J. Lynam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ngoprasert, D., Lynam, A.J. & Gale, G.A. Effects of temporary closure of a national park on leopard movement and behaviour in tropical Asia. Mamm Biol 82, 65–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2016.11.004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2016.11.004

Keywords

Navigation