Skip to main content
Log in

Apprehension affecting foraging patterns and landscape use of mule deer in arid environments

  • Original investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foraging animals make trade-offs between food and predation risk. To avoid predation, animals will seek out safe habitats for foraging, often at the sacrifice of food resources. Habitat structure and specific predators prey face determine the risk level of specific habitat types. In northern forested areas, forest edges have been shown to be high risk habitat for mule deer (Odocoileus hemionius) foraging under predation risk from pumas (Puma concolor). In more open habitats, e.g. deserts, a priori knowledge of what characteristics might contribute to predation risk levels for this species complex is lacking. Our objective was to evaluate the potential predation risk faced by mule deer from pumas under different habitat characteristics in the open habitat of the Chihuahuan Desert. We measured apprehension levels in mule deer with Giving Up Densities (GUDs) to evaluate predation risk levels of different habitat variables. We used supplemental (experimental) GUDs and natural GUDs: browse of candelilla (Euphorbia antisiphylitica). Supplemental GUDs were best modeled with macro-habitat variables: they were negatively associated variables, with the interaction between distance to hills and bush height being the strongest predictor, indicating possible predation risk by stalking pumas. Also natural GUDs (candelillas) indicated that mule deer perceived the proximity to hills as riskier. Identification of habitat characteristics that may contribute to predation risk in the Chihuahuan desert will enable further investigation into how habitat characteristics in the Chihuahuan Desert contribute to predator-prey dynamics of mule deer and pumas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altendorf, K.B., Laundré, J.W., López, C., Brown, J.S., 2001. Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer. J. Mammal 82, 430–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedoya-Perez, M.A., Carthey, A.J., Mella, V.S., McArthur, C., Banks, P.B., 2013. practical guide to avoid giving up on giving-up densities. Behav. Ecol. Socbiol. 67, 1541–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Laundre, J.W., Gurung, M., 1999. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J. Mammal 80, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M.J., 2007. The R Book. John Wiley & Sons West Sussex, England.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J.R., 2012. IDRISI Selva 17.1 Software. Clark University, Worcester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esparza-Carlos, J.P., Laundré, J.W., Sosa, V.J., 2011. Precipitation impacts on mule deer habitat use in the Chihuahuan Desert of Mexico. J. Arid Environ. 75, 1008–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guth, M.C.G.A., 1987. Hábitos Alimenticios del Venado Bura (Odocoileus Hemionus, Rafinesque 1817) en la Reservade la Biosfera de Mapimí, Dgo. BSc. Thesis. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, L., Delibes, M., 1994. The Bolsón de Mapimí, Southern Chihuhuan Desert, Mexico. Z. Saugetierkd Seasonal Food Habits of Coyotes Canis Latrans, 59, pp. 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, L., Laundré, J.W., 2005. Foraging in the landscape of fear and its implications for habitat use and diet quality of elk Cervus elaphus and bison Bison bison. Wildl. Biol. 11, 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, L., Barral, H., Halffter, G., Colon, S., 1999. A note on the behavior of feral cattle in the Chihuahuan Desert of Mexico. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63, 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, L., Laundré, J.W., Gurung, M., 2005. From the field: use of camera traps to measure predation risk in a puma-mule deer system. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 33, 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, J., Fortin, D., Bélanger, L., 2010. Fine-scale disturbances shape space-use patterns of a boreal forest herbivore. J. Mammal 91, 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B.R., Laundré, J.W., 2006. Use of open, edge and forest areas by pumas Puma concolor in winter: are pumas foraging optimally? Wildl. Biol. 12, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A.R., 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens. Environ. 25, 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren, C., Kotler, B.P., 2012. Foraging patterns of habitat use reveal landscape of fear of Nubian ibex Capra nubiana. Wildl. Biol. 18, 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, B.P., Gross, J.E., Mitchell, W.A., 1994. Applying patch use in Nubian ibex to measure resource assessment ability, diet selection, indirect interactions between food plants, and predatory risk. J. Wildl. Manage. 58, 300–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijper, D.P.J., de Kleine, C., Churski, M., van Hooft, P., Bubnicki, J., Jedrzejewska, B., 2013. Landscape of fear in Europe: wolves affect spatial patterns of ungulate browsing in Białowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. Ecography 36, 1263–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laundré, J.W., Hernández, L., 2003. Winter hunting habitat of pumas Puma concolor in northwestern Utah and southern Idaho, USA. Wildl. Biol. 9, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laundré, J.W., Hernández, L., Altendorf, K.B., 2001. Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the landscape of fear in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Can. J. Zool. 79, 1401–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laundré, J.W., Hernández, L., Arias-Del Razo, I., 2002. The landscape of fear and its implications to sheep reintroductions. Biennial Symposium Northern Wild Sheep and Goat Council 13, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laundré, J.W., 2010. Behavioral response races, predator-prey shell games, ecology of fear, and patch use of pumas and their ungulate prey. Ecology 91, 2995–3007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefcheck, J.S., 2015. Piecewise SEM Piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M., 1990. Behavioral decisions made underthe risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loft, E., Kie, J., 1988. Comparison of pellet-group and radio triangulation methods for assessing deer habitat use. J. Wildl. Manage. 52, 524–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Månsson, J., Andrén, H., Sand, H., 2011. Can pellet counts be used to accurately describe winter habitat selection by moose Alces alces? Eur J. Wildl. Res. 57, 1017–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montana, C., Bremier, R.F., 1988. Major vegetation and environments units. In: Montana, C. (Ed.), Estudio Integrado de los Recursos Vegetación, Suelo y Agua en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Mapimí. Instituto de Ecología A.C, México, pp. 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, O., Wiktander, U., Holmgren, N.M., Nilsson, S.G., 1999. Gaining ecological information about bayesian foragers through their behaviour: II. A field test with woodpeckers. Oikos 87, 264–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., R Core Team, 2015. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models R Package Version 3.1–122, URL: https://doi.org/CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (accessed 28.08.15).

  • RCore Team, 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Core Team, Vienna, Austria, URL https://doi.org/www.R-project.org//.

  • Rieucau, G., Vickery, W.L., Doucet, G.J., Laquerre, B., 2007. An innovative use of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) foraging behaviour in impact studies. Can. J. Zool. 85, 839–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinette, W., Gashwiler, J., Morris, O., 1959. Food habits of the cougar in Utah and Nevada. J. Wildl. Manage. 23, 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Rojas, G., Gallina, S., 2000. Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) density in a landscape element of the Chihuahuan Desert, Mexico. J. Arid Environ. 44, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Rojas, G., 2000. Conservación y manejo del venado bura en la reserva de la biosfera de Mapimi. In: Doctoral Dissertation. Instituto de Ecología AC, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, D., 2008. Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, A.M., Brown, J.S., Kerley, G.I.H., Kotler, B.P., 2008. Do free-ranging domestic goats show ‘landscapes of fear’? Patch use in response to habitat features and predator cues. J. Arid Environ. 72, 1811–1819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urness, P., 1981. Desert and chaparral habitats. Part 1. Food habits and nutrition. In: Wallmo, O.C. (Ed.), Mule and Black-Tailed Deer of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 347–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orsdol, K., 1984. Foraging behaviour and hunting success of lions in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda. Afr. J. Ecol. 22, 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables, W.N., Ripley, B.D., 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Villa-Castorena, M., Catalán-Valencia, E.A., Inzunza-Ibarra, M.A., González-López, M.L., Arreola-Ávila, J.G., 2010. Production of candelilla seedlings (Euphorbia antisiphyllitica Zucc.) by cuttings. Revista Chapingo Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 16, 37–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallmo, O., Jackson, A., Hailey, T., Carlisle, R., 1962. Influence of rain on the count of deer pellet groups. J. Wildl. Manage. 26, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Ignacio Íñiguez-Dávalos.

Additional information

L. Hernández passed away in October of 2013 after a battle with cancer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esparza-Carlos, J.P., Laundré, J.W., Hernández, L. et al. Apprehension affecting foraging patterns and landscape use of mule deer in arid environments. Mamm Biol 81, 543–550 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2016.07.006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2016.07.006

Keywords

Navigation