Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial and temporal habitat use and selection by red deer: The use of direct and indirect methods

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the importance of red deer Cervus elaphus for hunting and conservation purposes, understanding the interactions between this species and its habitats in the Mediterranean region is a crucial step for the sustainable management of this species. Aiming to compare pellet group counts and direct observations methods to study the habitat use and selection by red deer, the results obtained by both methods were compared, and their advantages and disadvantages were discussed. To understand the temporal patterns of habitat use and selection, the survey was conducted at three different seasons, birth period, rut season and winter. The habitat use and selection were studied in relation to land cover, watercourse, roads, ecotone zones and other topographic features (altitude, slope and aspect), using generalized linear models and selection ratios. The similarity of the results provided by pellet group counts and direct observations indicate that both methods may constitute useful tools to study the habitat use and selection by red deer. Globally, red deer seemed to select habitats that provide simultaneously food and some cover, as shown by its preference for shrublands, independently of the sampling season. The positive selection of ecotone zones embodies the need for open spaces. Males and females showed a similar use of shrubland, but selected patches with different characteristics therein. The spatial and temporal patterns exhibited by our results suggest that red deer balance their habitat requirements in respect to each phase of their reproductive cycle. Pellet group counts and direct observations seem to be useful methods to analyze habitat use and selection, and may provide helpful knowledge to the management and conservation of red deer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, P., Ferreres, J., Jaroso, R., Durán, M., Escudero, M.A., Marco, J., Gortázar, C, 2010. Estimating roe deer abundance from pellet group counts in Spain: An assessment of methods suitable for Mediterranean woodlands. Ecol. Indic. 10, 1226–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adrados, C, Baltzinger, C. Janeau, G., Pépin, D., 2008. Red deer Cervus elaphus resting place characteristics obtained from differential GPS data in a forest habitat. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 54, 487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H., 1974. New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC 19, 716–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A.M., Månsson, J., Jarnemo, A., Bunnefeld, N., 2014. The impacts of landscape structure on the winter movements and habitat selection of female red deer. Eur. J. Wildl. Res..

  • Alves, J., Alves da Silva, A., Soares, A.M.V.M., Fonseca, C, 2013a. Pellet group count methods to estimate red deer densities: precision, potential accuracy and efficiency. Mamm. Biol. 78, 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, J., Alves da Silva, A., Soares, A.M.V.M., Fonseca, C, 2013b. Sexual segregation in red deer: is social behaviour more important than habitat preferences? Anim. Behav. 85, 501–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ament, R., Clevenger, A., Yu, O., Hardy, A., 2008. An assessment of road impacts on wildlife populations in U.S. National Parks. Environ. Manage. 42, 480–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.W., Nielsen, C.K., Hester, CM., Hubbard, R.D., Stroud, J.K., Schauber, E.M., 2013. Comparison of indirect and direct methods of distance sampling for estimating density of white-tailed deer. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37, 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D.R., 2001. The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 29, 1294–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apollonio, M., Ciuti, S., Luccarini, S., 2005. Long-term influence of human presence on spatial sexual segregation in fallow deer (Dama dama). J. Mammal. 86, 937–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apollonio, M., Andersen, R., Putman, R., 2011. European Ungulates and their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press.

  • Archibold, O.W., 1995. Ecology of World Vegetation. Chapman & Hall, London.

  • Bailey, D.W., Gross, J.E., Laca, E.A., Rittenhouse, L.R., Coughenour, M.B., Swift, D.M., Sims, P.L., 1996. Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. J. Range Manage. 49, 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C.H., Thuiller, W., 2012. Selecting pseudoabsences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, P.S., Bowyer, R.T., 2000. Sexual segregation in dimorphic deer: a new gastrocentric hypothesis. J. Mammal. 81, 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, P.S., Bowyer, R.T., 2001. Seasonality of sexual segregation in dimorphic deer: extending the gastrocentric model. Alces 37, 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-David, S., Saltz, D., Dayan, T., Shkedy, Y., 2008. Using spatially expanding populations as a tool for evaluating landscape planning: the reintroduced Persian fallow deer as a case study. J. Nat. Conserv. 16, 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartos, L., Vankova, D., Miller, K.V., Siler, J., 2002. Interspecific competition between white-tailed, fallow, red, and roe deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 66, 522–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L.J., English, P.F., McCain, R., 1940. A study of deer populations by use of pellet-group counts. J. Wildl. Manage. 4, 398–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, W.M., Brennan, L.A., 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology. In: Power, D. (Ed.), theory and applications, Current Ornithology, Springer Verlag, pp. 35–91.

  • Bobek, B., Boyce, M.S., Kosobucka, M., 1984. Factors affecting red deer (Cervus elaphus) population density in Southeastern Poland. J. Appl. Ecol. 21, 881–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonenfant, C, Gaillard, J.M., Klein, F., Hamann, J.L., 2005. Can we use the young: female ratio to infer ungulate population dynamics? An empirical test using red deer Cervus elaphus as a model. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, G., Klein, F., 1991. Le cerf. Hatier Éditions S. A. Paris.

  • Borkowski, J., 2004. Distribution and habitat use by red and roe deer following a large forest fire in South-western Poland. For. Ecol. Manage. 201, 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J., Ukalska, J., 2008. Winter habitat use by red and roe deer in pine-dominated forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 255, 468–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, T.J., Person, D.K., Smith, W., Chapin, F.S., McCoy, K., Leonawicz, M., Hun-dertmark, K.J., 2013. Using DNA to test the utility of pellet-group counts as an index of deer counts. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37, 444–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugalho, M.N., Milne, J.A., 2003. The composition of the diet of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Mediterranean environment: a case of summer nutritional constraint? For. Ecol. Manage. 181, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approac, 2nd ed. Springer, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carranza, J., Hidalgo de Trucios, S.J., Medina, R., Valencia, J., Delgado, J., 1991. Space use by red deer in a Mediterranean ecosystem as determined by radio-tracking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 30, 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T.H., Guinness, F.E., Albon, S.D., 1982. Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, W., Marcum, C, 1989. Determining elk distribution with pellet-group and telemetry techniques. J. Wildl. Manage. 53, 621–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D.M., Barker, R.J., Morriss, G., Scroggie, M.P., 2007. Modeling the relationship between fecal pellet indices and deer density. J. Wildl. Manage. 71, 964–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T.K., 1991. Do pellet counts index white-tailed deer numbers and population-change. J. Wildl. Manage. 55, 393–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T.K., 1992. Do pellet counts index white-tailed deer numbers and population-change: a reply. J. Wildl. Manage. 56,613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, J.M., Hebblewhite, M., Loison, A., Fuller, M., Powell, R., Basille, M., Van Moorter, B., 2010. Habitat-performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 365, 2255–2265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garín, I., 2000. El ciervo (Cervus elaphus) en la Reserva de Caza de la Garcipollera (Huesca). Consejo de la Protección de la Naturaleza de Aragón Zaragoza.

  • Gill, R., 1990. Monitoring the status of European and North American Cervids. Global Environment Monitoring System Information Series 8, United Nations Environment programme, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godvik, I.M.R., Loe, L.E., Vik, J.O., Veiberg, V., Langvatn, R., Mysterud, A., 2009. Temporal scales, trade-offs and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. Ecology 90, 699–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, R.L., 1985. Habitat selection by nonbreeding, migratory land birds. In: Cody, N. (Ed.), Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 455–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, J.A.G., Bowman, J., Brennan, J., Fahrig, L., Bert, D., Bouchard, J., Charbonneau, N., Frank, K., Gruber, B., von Toschanowitz, K.T., 2005. Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: an interactive model of road avoidance behavior. Ecol. Model. 185,329-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarnemo, A., 2008. Seasonal migration of male red deer (Cervus elaphus) in southern Sweden and consequences for management. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 54,327-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, G.S., Zhang, M.H., Ma, J.Z., 2008. Habitat use and separation between red deer Cervus elaphus xanthopygus and roe deer Capreolus pygargus bedfordi in relation to human disturbance in the Wandashan Mountains, northeastern China. Wildl. Biol. 14, 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B.K., Kern, J.W., Wisdom, M.J., Findholt, S.L., Kie, J.G., 2000. Resource selection and spatial separation of mule deer and elk during spring. J. Wildl. Manage. 64, 685–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.H., 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61,65-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., 2001. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk 118, 557–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lele, S.R., 2009. Anew method for estimation of resource selection probability function. J. Wildl. Manage. 73,122-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licoppe, A., 2006. The diurnal habitat used by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the Haute Ardenne. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 52,164-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licoppe, A.M., De Crombrugghe, S.A., 2003. Assessment of spring habitat selection of red deer(Cervus elapbus L.) based on census data. Z. Jagdwiss. 49, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G., Zhang, T., 2007. Loglinear residual tests of Moran’s I autocorrelation and their applications to Kentucky breast cancer data. Geogr. Anal. 39, 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnell, J.D.C., Nijhuis, P., Teurlings, I., Andersen, R., 1999. Selection of bed-sites by roe deer Capreolus capreolus fawns in a boreal forest landscape. Wildl. Biol. 5, 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loe, L.E., Bonenfant, C, Meisingset, E.L., Mysterud, A., 2012. Effects of spatial scale and sample size in GPS-based species distribution models: are the best models trivial for red deer management? Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 58, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loft, E., Kie, J., 1988. Comparison of pellet-group and radio triangulation methods for assessing deer habitat use. J. Wildl. Manage. 52, 524–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovari, S., Cuccus, P., Murgia, A., Murgia, C, Soi, F., Plantamura, G., 2007. Space use, habitat selection and browsing effects of red deer in Sardinia. Ital. J. Zool. 74, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macarthur, R.H., Pianka, E.R., 1966. On Optimal use of a Patchy Environment. Am. Nat. 100, 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M.B., du Toit, J., 2005. Sex differences in reproductive strategies affect habitat choice in ungulates. In: Ruckstuhl, K.E., Neuhaus, P. (Eds.), Sexual Segregation in Vertebrates: Ecology of the Two Sexes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 148–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B.F.J., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L., Erickson, W.P., 2002. Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

  • Månsson, J., Andrén, H., Sand, H., 2011. Can pellet counts be used to accurately describe winter habitat selection by moose Alces alces? Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 57, 1017–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayle, B.A., Peace, A.J., Gill, R.M.A., 1999. How Many Deer? A Field Guide to Estimating Deer Population Size. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.

  • McDonald, L.L., Alldredge, J.R., Boyce, M.S., Erickson, W.P., 2005. Measuring availability and vertebrate use of terrestrial habitats and foods. In: Braun, C.E. (Ed.), Techniques for Wildlife Investigations and Management., 6th ed. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 465–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisingset, E.L., Loe, L.E., Brekkum, Ø., Van Moorter, B., Mysterud, A., 2013. Red deer habitat selection and movements in relation to roads. J. Wildl. Manage. 77, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P., 1950. A test for the serial independence of residuals. Biometrika 37, 178–181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morellet, N., Guibert, B., Klein, F., Demolis, C, 1997. Utilisation de l’habitat forestier par le cerf (Cervus elaphus) dans le massif d’Is-sur-Tille (Côte-d’Or). Ingénieries - EAT 9, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud, A., Larsen, P.K., Ims, R.A., Ostbye, E., 1999. Habitat selection by roe deer and sheep: Does habitat ranking reflect resource availability? Can. J. Zool. 77, 776–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, D.J., 1968. The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census and distribution: a review. J. Wildl. Manage. 32, 597–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pépin, D., Adrados, C, Janeau, G., Joachim, J., Mann, C, 2008. Individual variation in migratory and exploratory movements and habitat use by adult red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in a mountainous temperate forest. Ecol. Res. 23,1005-1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pépin, D., Morellet, N., Goulard, M., 2009. Seasonal and daily walking activity patterns of free-ranging adult red deer (Cervus elaphus) at the individual level. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 55, 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preisler, H.K., Ager, A.A., Wisdom, M.J., 2006. Statistical methods for analysing responses of wildlife to human disturbance. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puddu, G., Maiorano, L, Falcucci, A., Corsi, F., Boitani, L, 2009. Spatial-explicit assessment of current and future conservation options for the endangered Corsican Red Deer (Cervus elaphus corsicanus) in Sardinia. Biodivers. Conserv. 18, 2001–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putman, R.J., 1984. Facts from faeces. Mamm. Rev. 14, 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putmam, R.J., 1997. Deer and road traffic accidents: options for management. J. Environ. Manage. 51, 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.

  • Ramos, J.A., Bugalho, M.N., Cortez, P., Iason, G.R., 2006. Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 222, 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, T.P., 2001. Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective. Forestry 74, 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San José, C, Braza, F., Aragón, S., Delibes, J., 1997. Habitat use by roe and red deer in Southern Spain. Misc. Zool., 20.

  • Serrouya, R., D’Eon, R.G., 2008. The influence of forest cover on mule deer habitat selection, diet and nutrition during winter in a deep-snow ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manage. 256, 452–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarin, A., 2009. Habitat use by semi-domesticated reindeer, estimated with pellet-group counts. Rangifer27, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriguer, R.C., Fandos, P., Bernaldez, E., Delibes, J.R., 1994. El ciervo en Andalucia. Junta de Andalucia. Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca, Sevilla.

  • Spaeth, D.F., Bowyer, R.T., Stephenson, T.R., Barboza, P.S., 2004. Sexual segregation in moose Alces alces: an experimental manipulation of foraging behaviour. Wildl. Biol. 10, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage, A.R., Salas, C, 2007. Interactions of elevation, aspect, and slope in models of forest species composition and productivity. For. Sci. 53, 486–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K.M., Bowyer, R.T., Kie, J.G., Hurley, M.A., 2010. Spatial distributions of mule deer and North American elk: resource partitioning in a sage-steppe environment. Am. Midl. Nat. 163, 400–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W.J., 2006. Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Theuerkauf, J., Rouys, S., 2008. Habitat selection by ungulates in relation to predation risk by wolves and humans in the Bialowieza Forest, Poland. For. Ecol. Manage. 256, 1325–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D.L., Taylor, E.J., 2006. Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability II. J. Wildl. Manage. 70, 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wecker, S.C., 1964. Habitat selection. Sci. Am. 211, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G.C., 1992. Do pellet counts index white-tailed deer numbers and population-change - a comment. J. Wildl. Manage. 56, 611–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Elphick, C.S., 2009. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Joana Alves & António Alves da Silva

    Present address: IMAR-CMA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Portugal

    Joana Alves, António Alves da Silva, Amadeu M. V. M. Soares & Carlos Fonseca

  2. IMAR-CMA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Largo Marquês de Pombal, 3004-517, Coimbra, Portugal

    Joana Alves

Authors
  1. Joana Alves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. António Alves da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amadeu M. V. M. Soares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Fonseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Alves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alves, J., da Silva, A.A., Soares, A.M.V.M. et al. Spatial and temporal habitat use and selection by red deer: The use of direct and indirect methods. Mamm Biol 79, 338–348 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.05.007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.05.007

Keywords

Search

Navigation