Abstract
Coexistence has been widely studied in small mammals and frequently is assumed to be facilitated by habitat segregation. Using live trapping and spool-and-line experiments, we analyzed habitat selection and segregation across multiples scales for Peromyscus leucopus and Ochrotomys nuttalli. At the habitat scale of a forest stand (~1-100s ha) P. leucopus co-occurred at all sites where O. nuttalli was found, and we did not detect evidence of positive or negative associations or habitat segregation. However, O. nuttalli was restricted to early successional forests, and P. leucopus had significantly lower abundances in early successional forests than in other habitats. We found similar patterns at the mesohabitat scale of the study site (400 m2). O. nuttalli abundance increased with increasing shrub and tree densities, while increases in P. leucopus abundance were associated with open understories. At the microhabitat scale of the individual movement trail, we found vertical segregation. Movement trails for O. nuttalli were at significantly higher elevation (mean height = 142.93 ± 37.10 cm) than P. leucopus trails (mean height = 15.4 ± 4.98 cm; F-value = 35.29, p < 0.001). We concluded that microhabitat segregation was driven by differential use of vertical space for movement and foraging. We suggest O. nuttalli is superior to P. leucopus in its ability to acquire food especially in shrubby subcanopies where few acorns are available. However, P. leucopus is superior in its ability to forage and avoid predators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, A.H., 1985. Habitat selection and species interactions: an experimental analysis with small mammal populations. Oikos 45, 380–390.
Barrett, G.W., 2008. The golden mouse: a levels-of-organization perspective. In: Barrett, G.W., Feldhamer, G.A. (Eds.), The Golden Mouse: Ecology and Conservation. Springer, New York, USA, pp. 3–19.
Barrett, G.W., Feldhamer, G.A., 2008. The Golden Mouse: Ecology and Conservation. Springer, New York, USA.
Chesson, P., 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366.
Christopher, C.C., Barrett, G.W., 2006. Coexistence ofwhite-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and Golden Mice (Ochrotomys nuttalli) in a southeastern forest. J. Mammal. 87, 102–107.
Christopher, C.C., Barrett, G.W., 2007. Double captures of Peromyscus leucopus (white-footed mouse) and Ochrotomys nuttalli (golden mouse). Southeast. Nat. 6, 407–412.
Dooley, J.L., Dueser, R.D., 1990. An experimental examination of nest-site segregation by two Peromyscus species. Ecology 71, 788–796.
Dueser, R.D., Hallett, J.G., 1980. Competition and habitat selection in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Oikos 35, 293–297.
Dueser, R.D., Shugart, H.H., 1978. Microhabitats in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Ecology 59, 89–98.
Dueser, R.D., Shugart, H.H., 1979. Niche pattern in a forest-floor small-mammal fauna. Ecology 60, 108–118.
Etheredge, D.R., Engstrom, M.D., Stone, R.C., 1989. Habitat discrimination between sympatric populations of Peromyscus attwateri and Peromyscus pectoralis in west-central Texas. J. Mammal. 70, 300–307.
Feldhamer, G.A., Lesmeister, B.D., Devine, J.C., Stetson, D.I., 2012. Golden mice (Ochrotomys nuttalli) co-occurrence with Peromyscus and the abundant-center hypothesis. J. Mammal. 93, 1042–1050.
Feldhamer, G.A., Maycroft, K.A., 1992. Unequal capture response of sympatric golden mice and white-footed mice. Am. Midl. Nat. 128, 407–410.
Feldhamer, G.A., Morzillo, A.T., 2008. Relative abundance and conservation: is the golden mouse a rare species? In: Barrett, G.W., Feldhamer, G.A. (Eds.), The Golden Mouse: Ecology and Conservation. Springer, New York, USA, pp. 117–134.
Gibbes, LA., Barrett, G.W., 2011. Diet resource partitioning between the golden mouse (Ochrotomys nuttalli) and the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus). Am. Midl. Nat. 166, 139–146.
Heske, E.J., Brown, J.H., Mistry, S., 1994. Long-term experimental study of a Chi-huahuan Desert rodent community: 13 years of competition. Ecology 75, 438–445.
Holbrook, S.J., 1979. Habitat utilization, competitive interactions, and coexistence of three species of cricetine rodents in east-central Arizona. Ecology 60, 758–769.
Hubbell, S.P., 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Kalcounis-Rüppel, M.C., Millar, J.S., 2002. Partitioning of space, food and time by synoptic Peromyscus boylii and P. californicus. J. Mammal. 83, 614–625.
Kelt, D.A., Taper, M.L., Meserve, P.L., 1995. Assessing the impact of competition on community assembly: a case study using small mammals. Ecology 76, 1283–1296.
Knuth, B.A., Barrett, G.W., 1984. A comparative study of resource partitioning between Ochrotomys nuttalli and Peromyscus leucopus. J. Mammal. 65, 576–583.
Leiner, N.O., Dickman, C.R., Silva, W.R., 2010. Multiscale habitat selection by slender opossum (Marmosops spp.) in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. J. Mammal. 91, 561–565.
Linzey, D.W., 1967. An ecological study of the golden mouse, Ochrotomys nuttalli, in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Am. Midl. Nat. 79,320-345.
Linzey, D.W., Packard, R.L., 1977. Ochrotomys nuttalli. Mammal. Species 75,1-6.
MacArthur, R., 1972. Geographical Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
McPeek, M.A., 1996. Trade-offs, food web structure, and the coexistence of habitat specialists and generalists. Am. Nat. 148,124-138.
McShea, W.J., Francq, E.N., 1984. Microhabitat selection by Peromyscus leucopus.J. Mammal. 65, 675–678.
McShea, W.J., Gilles, A.B., 1992. A comparison of traps and fluorescent power to describe foraging for mast by Peromyscus leucopus.J. Mammal. 73, 218–222.
Morris, D.A., 1996. Coexistence of specialist and generalist rodents via habitat selection. Ecology 77, 2352–2364.
Moura, M.C., Caparelli, A.C., Freitas, S.R., Vieira, M.V., 2005. Scale-dependent habitat selection in three didelphid marsupials using the spool-and-line technique in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 21,337-342.
Mullican, T.R., Baccus, J.T., 1990. Horizontal and vertical movements of the white-ankled mouse (Peromyscus pectoralis) in central Texas. J. Mammal. 71, 378–381.
Packer, W.C., 1991. Foraging site preferences and relative arboreality of small rodents in Florida. Am. Midl. Nat. 125,187-194.
Porter, J.H., Dueser, R.D., 1982. Niche overlap and competition in an insular small mammal fauna: a test of the niche overlap hypothesis. Oikos 39, 228–236.
Prevedello, J.A., Rodrigues, R.G., Monteiro-Filho, E.Ld.A., 2009. Habitat selection by two species of small mammals in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil: comparing results from live trapping and spool-and-line tracking. Mammal. Biol. 75,106-114.
Seagle, S.W., 1985. Patterns of small mammal microhabitat utilization in cedarglade and deciduous forest habitats. J. Mammal. 66, 22–35.
Sikes, R.S., Gannon, W.L., the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists, 2011. Guidelines ofthe American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 92, 235–253.
Songer, M.A., Lomolino, M.V., Perault, D.R., 1997. Niche dynamics of deer mice in a fragmented old-growth-forest landscape. J. Mammal. 78,1027-1039.
Vieira, Iob, E.M.G., Briani, D.C., Palma, A.R.T., 2005. Microhabitat selection and daily movements of two rodents (Necromys lasiurus and Oryzomys scotti) in Braziliam Cerrado, as revealed by a spool-and-line device. Mammal. Biol. 70, 359–365.
Wells, K., Pfeiffer, M., Lakim, M.B., Kalko, R.K.V., 2006. Movement trajectories and habitat partitioning of small mammals in logged and unlogged rainforests of Borneo. J. Anim. Ecol. 75,1212–1223.
Wolff, J.O., 1996. Coexistence of white-footed mice and deer mice may be mediated by fluctuating environmental conditions. Oecologica 108,529–533.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leimgruber, P., McShea, W.J. & Songer, M. Vertical habitat segregation as a mechanism for coexistence in sympatric rodents. Mamm Biol 79, 313–317 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.04.002
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.04.002