Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Obesity Is Associated With Increased Thoracic Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients and Nonscoliotic Adolescents

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

Objective

To compare radiographic parameters between adolescents with a greater body mass index (BMI) percentile to underweight individuals.

Summary of Background Data

Increased BMI percentile has been associated with increased complications after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, association between BMI percentile and preoperative sagittal plane alignment has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of BMI percentile on sagittal alignment in AIS patients compared with nonscoliotic adolescents.

Methods

Posterior-anterior and lateral spinal radiographs of 1,551 AIS patients with a thoracic major curve (Lenke 1–4) and 70 nonscoliotic adolescent patients were compared. BMI percentile was determined based on age and sex, and patients were divided into four categories: underweight (<5th percentile), normal-weight (5th–85th percentile), overweight (85th–95th percentile), and obese (≥95th percentile).

Results

Coronal plane deformity magnitude was not significantly different between the 4 categories of AIS patients (p = .51). Increased BMI percentile was associated with increased thoracic kyphosis globally (T2–T12: p < .005) as well as segmentally (T2–T5: p < .001; T5–T12: p < .001) in patients with AIS. This was also true in obese adolescents without spinal deformity (p < .04). Lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt were not significantly different between AIS patients in the four BMI percentile categories (p > .07). Pelvic incidence was significantly greater in AIS patients compared with nonscoliotic adolescents (54 ± 13 vs. 46 ± 11; p = .01).

Conclusion

Increased BMI percentile is associated with increased thoracic kyphosis in AIS patients and nonscoliotic adolescents. Excess weight may reduce anterior vertebral growth. AIS patients have an increased pelvic incidence compared with nonscoliotic adolescents; however, this variable is not influenced by body mass. These relationships should be taken into account when planning sagittal plane deformity correction or considering neuro axis disorders (also associated with increased kyphosis) in patients with scoliosis.

Level of Evidence

Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, et al. Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988–1994 through 2013–2014. JAMA 2016;315:2292–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Facts and figures on childhood obesity. [WHO Facts and figures on childhood obesity Web site]. 2014. Available at: http://www.who.int/end-childhood-obesity/facts/en/. Accessed June 15, 2018.

  3. Wills M. Orthopedic complications of childhood obesity. Pediatr Phys Ther 2004;16:230–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Neill PJ, Karol LA, Shindle MK, et al. Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1069–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardesty CK, Poe-Kochert C, Son-Hing JP, et al. Obesity negatively affects spinal surgery in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:1230–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basques BA, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, et al. Patient factors are associated with poor short-term outcomes after posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:286–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, et al. Incidence and risk factors for early wound complications after spinal arthrodesis in children. Spine 2014;39:1463–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Y, Binkowski L, Grzywna A, et al. Is obesity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis associated with larger curves and worse surgical outcomes? Spine 2016;42:156–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Upasani VV, Caltoum C, Petcharaporn M, et al. Does obesity affect surgical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2008;33:295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barlow SE; the Expert Committee. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics 2007;120:sl64–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1169–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fotiadis E, Kenanidis E, Samoladas E, et al. Scheuermann’s disease: focus on weight and height role. Eur Spine J 2008;5:673–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pizones J, Sanchez-Mariscal F, Zuniga L, et al. Ponte osteotomies to treat major thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves allow more effective corrective maneuvers. Eur Spine J 2015;24:1540–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gene C, Lenke L, Padberg A, et al. Loss of spinal cord monitoring signals in children during thoracic kyphosis correction with spinal osteotomy: why does it occur and what should you do? Spine 2008;10:1093–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998;7:99–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Charlebois M, et al. Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to the coronal curve type. Spine 2003;28:1404–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Upasani VV, Tis J, Bastrom T, et al. Analysis of sagittal alignment in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how do these two curve types differ? Spine 2007;32:1355–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Labelle H, Aubin CE, Jackson R, et al. Seeing the spine in 3D: how will it change what we do? J Pediatr Orthop 2011;31:S37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidyadhar V. Upasani MD.

Additional information

This study was conducted at Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA.

Author disclosures: AGV (none), TPB (a Surgical Department grant from Rady Children’s Specialists of San Diego; research grants to the Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation from DePuy Synthes Spine, EOS imaging, K2M, Medtronic, NuVasive, and Zimmer Biomet., during the conduct of the study), FGR (none), MC (grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, during the conduct of the study), CEB (grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, during the conduct of the study), SAS (grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from DePuy Synthes Spine, NuVasive, and K2M, outside the submitted work), BY (grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from K2M, DePuy Synthes Spine, and NuVasive; personal fees from Medtronic, Orthopediatrics, Stryker, and Globus; grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation; personal fees from Biogen and Ethicon, outside the submitted work; in addition, BY has a patent K2M with royalties paid), PON (grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, during the conduct of the study; grants and other from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation and Scoliosis Research Society; other from Rady Children’s Specialists; grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from DePuy Synthes Spine; grants from EOS Imaging and from NuVasive; other from Electrocore; personal fees from Cubist and Thieme Publishing; other from International Pediatric Orthopedic Think Tank, grants, nonfinancial support, and other from Orthopediatrics; grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from K2M; grants and nonfinancial support from Alphatech; grants from Mazor Robotics, outside the submitted work; in addition, PON has a patent “Anchoring Systems and Methods for Correcting Spinal Deformities” (8540754) with royalties paid to DePuy Synthes Spine, a patent “Low Profile Spinal Tethering Systems” (8123749) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., a patent “Screw Placement Guide” (7981117) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., a patent “Compressor for Use in Minimally Invasive Surgery” (7189244) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., and a patent “Posterior Spinal Fixation” pending to K2M), VVU (personal fees from Orthopediatrics and DePuy Synthes Spine, outside the submitted work). We gratefully acknowledge research support from grants from the following: a Surgical Department grant from Rady Children’s Specialists of San Diego; (2) research grants to the Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation from DePuy Synthes Spine, EOS imaging, K2M, Medtronic, NuVasive, and Zimmer Biomet. Harms Study Group Investigators: Aaron Buckland, MD, New York University; Amer Samdani, MD, Shriner’s Hospital for Children—Philadelphia; Amit Jain, MD, Johns Hopkins Hospital; Baron Lonner, MD, Scoliosis and Spine Associates; Benjamin Roye, MD, Columbia University; Burt Yaszay, MD, Rady Children’s Hospital; Chris Reilly, MD, BC Children’s Hospital; Daniel Hedequitst, MD, Boston Children’s Hospital; Daniel Sucato, MD, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital; David Clements, MD, Cooper Bone & Joint Institute New Jersey; Firoz Miyanji, MD, BC Children’s Hospital; Harry Shufflebarger, MD, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital; Jack Flynn, MD, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia; Jahangir Asghar, MD, Cantor Spine Institute; Jean Marc Mac Thiong, MD, CHU Sainte-Justine; Joshua Pahys, MD, Shriner’s Hospital for Children–Philadelphia; Juergen Harms, MD, Klinikum Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, Karlsbad; Keith Bachmann, MD, University of Virginia; Larry Lenke, MD, Columbia University; Mark Abel, MD, University of Virginia; Michael Glotzbecker, MD, Boston Children’s Hospital; Michael Kelly, MD, Washington University; Michael Vitale, MD, Columbia University; Michelle Marks, PT, MA, Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation; Munish Gupta, MD, Washington University; Nicholas Fletcher, MD, Emory University; Patrick Cahill, MD, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia; Paul Sponseller, MD, Johns Hopkins Hospital; Peter Gabos, MD, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children; Peter Newton, MD, Rady Children’s Hospital; Peter Sturm, MD, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital; Randal Betz, MD, Institute for Spine & Scoliosis; Ron Lehman, MD, Columbia University; Stefan Parent, MD, CHU Sainte-Justine; Stephen George, MD, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital; Steven Hwang, MD, Shriner’s Hospital for Children–Philadelphia; Suken Shah, MD, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children; Tom Errico, MD, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital; Vidyadhar Upasani, MD, Rady Children’s Hospital.

IRB approval: IRB approval was obtained for this study from the University of California San Diego.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valdovino, A.G., Bastrom, T.P., Reighard, F.G. et al. Obesity Is Associated With Increased Thoracic Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients and Nonscoliotic Adolescents. Spine Deform 7, 865–869 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2019.03.010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2019.03.010

Keywords

Navigation