Skip to main content
Log in

Operating Room Personnel Determine Efficiency of Pediatric Spinal Fusions for Scoliosis

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective chart review.

Objectives

To investigate the effect of different surgeons, anesthesiologists, and cRNAs individually and in teams on various perioperative and operative time intervals in a large, high-volume children’s hospital.

Summary of Background Data

Along with individual factors, studies have indicated that team factors play a role in efficiency, with larger teams leading to increased procedure times. An operating room (OR) staff dedicated to orthopedics has been reported to decrease turnover time; however, the characteristics and behaviors of surgical team members, to our knowledge, have not been analyzed as possible factors contributing to pediatric OR efficiency, and limited research has been conducted in the field of orthopedic personnel.

Methods

Chart review identified consecutive pediatric and adolescent patients who had primary posterior spinal fusion (PSF) of ≥7 levels for correction of spinal deformity. Time intervals and delays were recorded based on previous studies looking at OR efficiency and adjusted to the specific time points available in our perioperative nursing records.

Results

Adjusted for etiology, osteotomy, fusion levels, distance from hospital, staff switch, and body mass index, there was a significant difference in patient wait time among anesthesiologists, surgeon-anesthesiologist, and anesthesiologist-certified registered nurse anesthetist (cRNA) teams; in surgery prep time and total prep among surgeons and SA teams; and in surgery time and total room time among surgeons. There were no significant differences among cRNAs, individually, in any time interval.

Conclusions

Anesthesiologists have a significant effect before and surgeons have a significant effect after entry into the OR. Identification of this variability provides an opportunity to study the differences in habits and processes of high- and low-efficiency teams, which can then be applied to all teams with the goal of improving performance of all surgical teams.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archer T, Macario A. The drive for operating room efficiency will increase quality of patient care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006;19:171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Denton B, Viapiano J, Vogl A. Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty. Health Care Manag Sci 2007;10:13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiss AJ, Barrett ML, Steiner CA. Trends and Projections in Inpatient Hospital Costs and Utilization, 2003–2013. HCUP Statistical Brief #175. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Web site. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb175-Hospital-Cost-Utilization-Projections–2013.pdf. Accessed September 10, 2017.

  4. Armour Forse R, Bramble JD, McQuillan R. Team training can improved operating room performance. Surgery 2011;150:771–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brusalis CM, Shah AS, Luan X, et al. A dedicated orthopaedic trauma operating room improves efficiency at a pediatric center. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017;99:42–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Runner R, Moore Jr T, Reisman W. Value of a dedicated Saturday orthopaedic trauma operating room. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30:e24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kadhim M, Gans I, Baldwin K, et al. Do surgical times and efficiency differ between inpatient and ambulatory surgery centers that are both hospital owned? J Pediatr Orthop 2016;36:423–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenberg RE, Ardalan K, Wong W, et al. Postoperative spinal fusion care in pediatric patients: co-management decreases length of stay. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2014;72:197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deldar R, Soleimani T, Harmon C, et al. Improving first case start times using LEAN in an academic medical center. Am J Surg 2016;213:991–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Phieffer L, Hefner JL, Rahmanian A, et al. Improving operating room efficiency: first case on-time start project. J Healthc Qual 2016;39: e70–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Strum DP, Sampson AR, May JH, et al. Surgeon and type of anesthesia predict variability in surgical procedure times. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1454–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright JG, Roche A, Khoury AE. Improving on-time surgical starts in an operating room. Can J Surg 2010;53:167–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Avery 3rd DM, Matullo KS. The efficiency of a dedicated staff on operating room turnover time in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2014;39:108–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins VJ, Bryant MJ, Villaneuva EV, et al. Managing and avoiding delay in operating theatres: a qualitative, observational study. J Eval Clin Pract 2013;19:162–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cassera MA, Zheng B, Martinec DV, et al. Surgical time independently affected by surgical team size. Am J Surg 2009; 198: 216–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He W, Ni S, Chen G, et al. The composition of surgical teams in the operating room and its impact on surgical team performance in China. Surg Endosc 2014;28:1473–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Attarian DE, Wahl JE, Wellman SS, et al. Developing a high-efficiency operating room for total joint arthroplasty in an academic setting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:1832–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beaulé PE, Frombach AA, Ryu JJ. Working toward benchmarks in orthopedic OR efficiency for joint replacement surgery in an academic centre. Can J Surg 2015;58:408–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rymaruk S, Buch K. How is time used within the orthopaedic trauma theatre? J Perioper Pract 2015;25:188–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wasaterlain AS, Tran AA, Trang C, et al. Can we improve workflows in the OR? A comparison of quality perceptions and preoperative efficiency across institutions in spine surgery. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2015;73:46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maruthappu M, Duclos A, Zhou CD, et al. The impact of team familiarity and surgical experience on operative efficiency: a retrospective analysis. J R Soc Med 2016;109:147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiegmann DA, El Bardissi AW, Dearani JA, et al. Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery 2007;142:658–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cima RR, Brown MJ, Hebl JR, et al. Use of LEAN and Six Sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in a high volume tertiarycare academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 2011;213:83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Collar RM, Shuman AG, Feiner S, et al. LEAN management in academic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:928–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. GottschalkMB, Hinds RM, Muppavarapu RC, et al. Factors affecting hand surgeon operating room turnover time. Hand (N Y) 2016;11: 489–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. Sawyer MD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: JH (none), VN (none), DMK (personal fees from Elsevier and Medtronic, outside the submitted work), BWS (none), DDS (personal fees from Elsevier, from null, outside the submitted work), LP (none), WCW (personal fees from Elsevier, outside the submitted work), JRS (personal fees from DePuy, NuVasive, Elsevier, and Wolters Kluwer, outside the submitted work).

IRB approval was not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartline, J., Nolan, V., Kelly, D.M. et al. Operating Room Personnel Determine Efficiency of Pediatric Spinal Fusions for Scoliosis. Spine Deform 7, 702–708 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2019.02.003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2019.02.003

Keywords

Navigation