Abstract
Study Design
Retrospective cohort.
Objective
Determine the effect of the ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) on intraoperative blood loss and surgical time.
Summary of Background Data
The UBS has shown beneficial effects in limiting blood loss in spinal surgery, but no study has examined its effect in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis.
Methods
Clinical records were reviewed for patients aged 9–18 who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery of five or more levels for scoliosis correction by the senior author from April 2013 until October 2016. Exclusion criteria included: vertebral column resections, previous spinal surgery, cell saver usage, cases complicated by signal loss on monitoring, and incomplete medical records. A total of 84 patients met the criteria and were included in data analysis. The UBS was routinely used for performing osteotomies and facetectomies for all cases operated after March 2015. These cases were compared to a control group who underwent surgery prior to this date in which the UBS was not used. The experimental and control groups were further divided into adolescent idiopathic (AIS) and neuromuscular (NMS) subgroups.
Results
EBL in AIS patients decreased from 1,211 mL in the control group to 771 mL in the UBS group for an average total reduction of 440 mL (95% CI 106, 774, p = .01). In NMS patients, EBL fell from 2,171 mL in controls to 1228 mL in the study group for an average total reduction of 943 mL (95% CI 288, 1598, p < .01). On controlling for weight and number of levels fused, blood loss decreased 26.2% in AIS patients and 46.2% in NMS patients.
Conclusions
The ultrasonic bone scalpel is effective in reducing blood loss in AIS and NMS deformity correction surgery. Surgical time is not adversely affected by its use.
Level of Evidence
Level II, cohort study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jain M, Njoku DB, Sponseller PD. Does patient diagnosis predict blood loss during posterior spinal fusion in children? Spine 2012;37:1683–7.
Guay J, Haig M, Lortie L, et al. Predicting blood loss in surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:775–81.
Thompson ME, Kohring JM, McFann K, et al. Predicting excessive hemorrhage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Spine J 2014;14:1392–8.
Dodd RY, Notari 4th EP, Stramer SL. Current prevalence and incidence of infectious disease markers and estimated window-period risk in the American Red Cross blood donor population. Transfusion 2002;42:975–9.
Gong MN, Thompson BT, Williams P, et al. Clinical predictors of and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome: potential role of red cell transfusion. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1191–8.
Hill GE, Frawley WH, Griffith KE, et al. Allogenic blood transfusion increases the risk of post-operative bacterial infection: a meta-analysis. J Trauma 2003;54:908–14.
Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Ozdemir O, et al. Effects of deamino-8-d-argininvasopressin on blood loss and coagulation factors in scoliosis surgery. A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Spine 1999;24:877–82.
Florentino-Pineda I, Thompson GH, Poe-Kochert, et al. The effect of Amicar on perioperative blood loss in idiopathic scoliosis: the results of a prospective, randomized double-blind study. Spine 2004;29:233–8.
Samama CM, Langeron O, Rosencher N, et al. Aprotinin versus placebo in major orthopedic surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging study. Anesth Analg 2002;95:287–93.
Neilipovitz DT, Murto K, Hall L, et al. A randomized trial of tranexamic acid to reduce blood transfusion for scoliosis surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;93:82–7.
Lennon RL, Hosking MP, Gray JR, et al. The effects of intraoperative blood salvage and induced hypotension on transfusion requirements during spinal surgical procedures. Mayo Clin Proc 1987;62:1090–4.
Lindop MJ. Complications and morbidity of controlled hypotension. Br J Anaesth 1975;47:799–803.
Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Use of an ultrasonic osteotome device in spine surgery: experience from the first 128 patients. Eur Spine J 2013;22:2845–9.
Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton PO. Blood loss reduction during surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis utilizing an ultrasonic bone scalpel. Spine Deform 2014;2:285–90.
Cakir B, Ulmar B, Schmidt R, et al. Efficacy and cost effectiveness of harmonic scalpel compared with electrocautery in posterior instrumentation of the spine. Eur Spine J 2006;15:48–54.
Jia R, Li N, Xu BY, et al. Incidence, influencing factors, and prognostic impact of intraoperative massive blood loss in adolescents with neuromuscular scoliosis: a STROBE-compliant retrospective observational analysis. Medicine 2017;96:e6292.
Sanborn MR, Balzer J, Gerszten PC, et al. Safety and efficacy of novel ultrasonic osteotome device in an ovine model. J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:1528–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author disclosures: SW (none), SN (none), PG (none).
The device(s)/drug(s) is/are FDA-approved or approved by corresponding national agency for this indication.
No funding sources to disclose.
IRB approval: This study was approved by the IRB committee at Loma Linda University Children’s Hospital, Loma Linda, CA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wahlquist, S., Nelson, S. & Glivar, P. Effect of the Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel on Blood Loss During Pediatric Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery. Spine Deform 7, 582–587 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.10.002
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.10.002