Abstract
Study Design
Retrospective, chart review.
Objectives
The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of using two surgeons for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with AIS with large-magnitude curves (greater than 70°).
Summary of Background Data
Previous studies have shown that intraoperative risk factors can be reduced by having two surgeons operate simultaneously.
Methods
A retrospective chart review identified 47 patients between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, who underwent a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with AIS with large-magnitude curves (greater than 70°). Patients with large-magnitude curves due to neuromuscular diseases or any defined pathology other than idiopathic scoliosis were excluded, as well as patients with kyphotic or kyphoscoliotic curves.
Results
There was no statistical difference between the total operative time, anesthesia time, estimated blood loss (EBL), %EBL, and blood transfusion units. Total operative time for the two-surgeon group and single-surgeon group was 212.11 and 238.07 minutes, respectively (p =.078). The two-surgeon group averaged 0.26 blood transfusion units versus 0.39 units for the single-surgeon group (p = .50). Average hospital length of stay was decreased in the two-surgeon group (5.16 vs. 6.82 days, p =.002).
Conclusions
The use of two surgeons for PSF for AIS has previously been shown to decrease operative time and blood loss, factors that are correlated with prolonged hospital stay and increased risk of both neurologic and nonneurologic complications. However, in this study, the technique of having two experienced orthopedic spine surgeons work simultaneously to perform pedicle screw–only posterior spinal fusion on large-magnitude AIS curves greater than 70° did not improve blood loss or operative time. Further study needs to continue to identify ways to minimize complications for patients who undergo spinal fusion.
Level of Evidence
Level III, retrospective
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lonstein JE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 1994;344:1407–12.
Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2013;7:3–9.
Pehrsson K, Larsson S, Oden A, Nachemson A. Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis. A study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:1091–6.
Barois A. Respiratory problems in severe scoliosis. Bull Acad Natl Med 1999;183:721–30.
Danielsson AJ. Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a tool for guidance in decision of surgery of curves above 50 degrees. J Child Orthop 2013;7:37–41.
Pehrsson K, Bake B, Larsson S, et al. Lung function in adult idiopathic scoliosis: a 20 year follow up. Thorax 1991;46:474–8.
Lykissas MG, Crawford AH, Jain VV. Complications of surgical treatment of pediatric spinal deformities. Orthop Clin North Am 2013;44:357–70. ix.
Ialenti MN, Lonner BS, Verma K, et al. Predicting operative blood loss during spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2013;33:372–6.
Tsirikos AI, Mains E. Surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy using pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012;25:401–8.
Tsirikos AI, Chang WN, Dabney KW, et al. Life expectancy in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy and neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:677–82.
Blam OG, Vaccaro AR, Vanichkachorn JS, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection in the patient with spinal injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:1475–80.
Gurtner GC, Robertson CS, Chung SC, Li AK. Two-team synchronous oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1994;81:1620–2.
Saithna A, Arbuthnot J, Carey-Smith R, Spalding T. Simultaneous bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a safe option. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:1071–4.
Ames CP, Barry JJ, Keshavarzi S, et al. Perioperative outcomes and complications of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in cases with single versus two attending surgeons. Spine Deform 2013;1:51–8.
Halanski MA, Elfman CM, Cassidy JA, et al. Comparing results of posterior spine fusion in patients with AIS: are two surgeons better than one? J Orthop 2013;10:54–8.
Nugent M, Tarrant R, Queally J, et al. Influence of curve magnitude and other variables on operative time, blood loss and transfusion requirements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Ir J Med Sci 2016;185:513–20.
Arriaga AF, Gawanda AA, Raemer DB, et al. Pilot testing of a model for insurer-driver, large-scale multicenter simulation training for operating room teams. Ann Surg 2014;259:403–10.
Beard JD, Marriot J, Purdie H, Crossley J. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology. Health Technol Assess 2011;15. i–xxi, 1–162.
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, et al. Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ 2006;40:1098–104.
Spanager L, Konge L, Dieckmann P, et al. Assessing trainee surgeons’ nontechnical skills: five cases are sufficient for reliable assessments. J Surg Educ 2015;72:16–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author disclosures: None.
IRB Statement: This retrospective study was approved by the Phoenix Children’s institutional IRB.
Financial Disclosure: No financial support was provided for this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bosch, L., Boan, C., Falk, M. et al. The Effect of Two Attending Surgeons on Patients With Large-Curve Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion. Spine Deform 5, 392–395 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.04.007
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.04.007