Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preventing Instrumentation Failure in Three-Column Spinal Osteotomy: Biomechanical Analysis of Rod Configuration

  • Biomechanics
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Biomechanical analysis.

Objectives

To show the role of additional rods and long-term fatigue strength to prevent the instrumentation failure on three-column osteotomies.

Summary of Background Data

Three-column osteotomy such as pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column resections are surgical correction options for fixed spinal deformity. Posterior fixation for the PSO involves pedicle screweand rod-based instrumentation, with the rods being contoured to accommodate the accentuated lordosis. Pseudarthrosis and instrumentation failure are known complications of PSO.

Methods

Unilateral pedicle screw and rod constructs were mounted in ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene blocks using a vertebrectomy model with the rods contoured to simulate posterior fixation of a PSO. Each construct was cycled under a 200 N load at 5 Hz in simulated flexion and extension to rod failure. Three configurations (n 5 5) of titanium alloy rods were tested: single rod (control), double rod, and bridging rod. Outcomes were total cycles to failure and location of rod failure.

Results

Double-rod and bridging-rod constructs had a significantly higher number of cycles to failure compared with the single-rod construct (p <.05). Single-rod constructs failed at or near the rod bend apex, whereas the majority of double-rod and bridging-rod constructs failed at the screwerod or rodeconnector junction.

Conclusions

Double-rod and bridging-rod constructs are more resistant to fatigue failure compared with single-rod constructs in PSO instrumentation and could be considered to mitigate the risk of instrumentation failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim WJ, Kang JW, Kang SI, et al. Factors affecting clinical results after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis. Asian Spine J 2010;4:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Spine 2007;32:2189–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hyun SJ, Rhim SC. Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients: a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010;47:95–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph Jr SA, Moreno AP, Brandoff J, et al. Sagittal plane deformity in the adult patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009;17:378–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Potter BK, Lenke LG, Kuklo TR. Prevention and management of iatrogenic flatback deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:1793–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. La Grone MO. Loss of lumbar lordosis. A complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988;19:383–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:454–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Rinella A, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A(suppl 1):44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gill JB, Levin A, Burd T, Longley M. Corrective osteotomies in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2509–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Edwards C, et al. Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 2003;28:2093–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:721–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mok JM, Cloyd JM, Bradford DS, et al. Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing. Spine 2009;34:832–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Deviren V, et al. Biomechanical analysis of revision strategies for rod fracture in pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery 2011;69:164–72; discussion 172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith JS, Sansur CA, Donaldson 3rd WF, et al. Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine 2011;36:958–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang BP, Ondra SL, Chen LA, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;5:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:2232–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindsey C, Deviren V, Xu Z, et al. The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength. Spine 2006;31:1680–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang JA, Leasure JM, Smith JS, et al. Effect of severity of rod contour on posterior rod failure in the setting of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a biomechanical study. Neurosurgery 2013;72:276–82; discussion 283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, et al. Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies. Spine 2014;39:1899–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM. Standard test methods for spinal implant constructs in a ver-tebrectomy model. Designation F1717-011-16.

  21. Nguyen TQ, Buckley JM, Ames C, Deviren V. The fatigue life of contoured cobalt chrome posterior spinal fusion rods. Proc Inst Mech EngH 2011;225:194–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 1999;24:1712–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ikenaga M, Shikata J, Takemoto M, Tanaka C. Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;6:330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang KW, Cheng CW, Chen HC, et al. Closing-opening wedge osteotomy for the treatment of sagittal imbalance. Spine 2008;33:1470–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cho KJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 2005;30:2030–7; discussion 2038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University, School of Medicine, 11406 Loma Linda Dr, Suite 213, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA

    Zachary S. Jager MD, Serkan İnceoğlu PhD, Daniel Palmer BS, Yusuf T. Akpolat MD & Wayne K. Cheng MD

Authors
  1. Zachary S. Jager MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Serkan İnceoğlu PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Palmer BS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yusuf T. Akpolat MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wayne K. Cheng MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne K. Cheng MD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: ZSJ (none); Sİ (none); DP (none); YTA (none); WKC (none).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jager, Z.S., İnceoğlu, S., Palmer, D. et al. Preventing Instrumentation Failure in Three-Column Spinal Osteotomy: Biomechanical Analysis of Rod Configuration. Spine Deform 4, 3–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.06.005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.06.005

Keywords

Search

Navigation