Abstract
Plastic pollution poses a pervasive threat to ecosystems worldwide, jeopardizing marine life, contaminating water sources, and perpetuating a global environmental crisis. Spatial and temporal distribution of beach debris was quantitatively assessed on three recreational beaches in Gujarat State, India. A total of six debris categories were recorded with a mean of 0.9 items/m2 in number and 3.62 g/m2 in weight. A total of Mean debris concentrations and weight per debris item did not vary significantly between study sites. Highest debris concentrations were observed in October 2021 at all sites. Around 90% was macro-debris (2.5–100 cm), with white and transparent colours most frequently encountered. Based on Clean Coast Index findings, all sites were categorized as "dirty". Plastic Abundance Index revealed that all sites had a very high abundance of plastics compared to other beach debris. Recreational activities on beaches, tourism, and extensive fishing can be the possible source of marine debris on Gujarat State. The findings of the current investigation is vital to understanding its pervasive environmental impact, encompassing threats to biodiversity, water quality, and ecosystems, while guiding effective policies to mitigate these repercussions on a global scale. It can be helpful to establish mitigation strategies urgently required to reduce marine debris pollution along the Gujarat Coast. It is recomanded to implement urgently needed mitigation strategies to diminish marine debris pollution along the Gujarat Coast.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In 2021, global plastic production exceeded 390 million metric tons [1]. Inadequate waste disposal practices and the persistent nature of plastic waste pose significant environmental risks [2, 3], contributing to unprecedented threats to ecosystems, including marine habitats [4,5,6,7]. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) marine debris protocol, these materials are divided into six categories: plastic, metal, glass, rubber, processed lumbar (no natural wood), and cloth or fabric [8]. Categorizing beach debris according to their dimensions, they are classified as follows: mega debris (exceeding 100 cm), macro debris (ranging from 2.5 to 100 cm), meso debris (measuring 0.5 to 2.5 cm), micro debris (no larger than 5 mm), and nano debris (smaller than 100 nm).
A plethora of studies have reported debris accumulating on the sea floor in oceanic gyres and coastal regions globally [9,10,11,12]. Quantification and spatial prevalence of marine debris have been assessed in marine beaches of the Moroccan Mediterranean coast [13], Takalar Regency, South Sulawesi [14], Armac¸a˜o dos Bu´zios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [15], coastline of Cádiz, Spain [16] and central California [17].
Research on beach debris is comparatively poor in India. The prevalence of beach debris has been assessed in different maritime states and Union Territories (UTs) [18], Marina Beach, Chennai [19], Mangaluru, Karnataka [20], Thondi coast, Palk Bay, Southeast coast of India [21], islands of the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago, India [22] and Mumbai, India [23]. According to Kumar et al., the predominant source of debris information in India is derived from beach clean-up activities [19]. Beach clean-up activities in India offer valuable insights into the debris issue. However, they primarily lack a quantitative assessment of each debris type, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the scale and nature of the problem. The presence of beach debris poses a threat to marine organisms as it can lead to unintended ingestion and integration into the food chain [24,25,26,27]. Organisms facing debris ingestion are at risk of compromised survival, experiencing internal lacerations, prolonged hunger, and eventual mortality [28].
Gujarat's beaches play a pivotal role in supporting various socio-cultural activities, tourism, fishing, pilgrimage, and recreation [29, 30]. However, this multiplicity of engagements may be linked to the rising prevalence of debris in the marine environment [31,32,33]. Microplastic prevalence has been reported on sandy and muddy beaches of Gujarat [3, 34, 35]. A preliminary investigation of beach debris along a single beach (Mandvi, Gujarat) has previously identified land-based and recreational activity as a source of debris on Mandvi Beach [36]. Thus, a detailed investigation of the distribution, concentration, and composition of beach debris on the Gujarat coast is imperative to help inform future mitigation strategies. The objectives of this study were to assess (a) temporal variation in abundance of beach debris between three recreational beaches (Mandvi, Dwarka, and Veraval) of Gujarat state, India, and (b) different types of beach debris according to the NOAA protocol. This baseline information can help quantify beach debris and subsequent management and mitigation across the coastline state.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study area
Three recreational beaches on the Gujarat coast, viz. Mandvi (22° 23′ N, 68° 96′E), Dwarka (22° 23′ N, 68° 96′ E), and Veraval (20° 90′ N, 70° 35′ E) were selected to quantify the abundance of beach debris (Fig. 1). Mandvi Beach is known for tourism and fishing activities with a rich diversity of marine biota [36]. Dwarka serves as a notable fishing harbor and holds significant reverence in Hindu mythology, drawing over a million tourists each year. Veraval, the largest fishing harbor in Gujarat, sustains a multitude of seafood industries and processing facilities.
2.2 Sample collection
Monthly sampling was conducted on three recreational beaches (Mandvi, Dwarka, and Veraval) in Gujarat from October 2021 to March 2022. Sampling was conducted at the high tide line mark where beach debris tends to accumulate following NOAA marine debris protocols [8]. Five quadrats (10 m × 10 m) were plotted randomly, 50 m apart from each other in the upper intertidal region parallel to the shoreline on each beach. GPS coordinates were recorded during the first sampling month, and care was taken to repeat the same stretch during subsequent sampling. All visible beach debris from each quadrat was collected in a labeled bag and brought to the laboratory for analysis (Figs. 2 and 3).
2.3 Laboratory analysis
The beach debris was rinsed with tap water to eliminate any added soil. According to the NOAA protocol, debris was counted and separated into different categories [8]. The size of beach debris was categorized into meso-debris (5 mm–2.5 cm), macro-debris (2.5–100 cm), or mega-debris (> 100 cm). All the debris was categorized into nine different colors: white, black, transparent, red, blue, green, yellow, orange, and brown. Debris was dried under sunlight, and weight of each sorted item was recorded in g/m2 using a digital weighing balance (Sartorius, precision = 0.1 mg). Debris was classified into land-based and sea-based categories [21]. Debris from commercial shipping, fishing, boating, and fish market sites found on the shore is considered sea-based debris. Debris resulting from recreational activities, public littering, agricultural practices, and sewage classified as land-based waste.
2.4 Data analysis
Mean abundance of beach debris for each study site was calculated to analyze abundance of beach debris along three sampling sites. As the data followed a normal distribution, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to analyze variation of mean abundance and mean weight between beach debris items using PAST software (4.03 version). The clean coast index (CCI) was used to evaluate the cleanliness of selected beaches. CCI is a measuring tool to classify beaches into different categories, for example, very clean, clean, moderate, dirty, and extremely dirty. Beach cleanness status can be useful to increase public awareness and policy-making for beach management [21, 37].
2.4.1 Concentration of beach debris
Beach debris concentration per quadrate (items/m2) was calculated as follows:
In this context, the concentration (Ci) of beach debris items is computed as the count of items per square meter (m2), with ni representing the total number of beach debris items per transect. The variables ai and bi denote the length (10 m) and width (10 m) of the quadrate, respectively, while 'i' signifies the specific beach where surveys were carried out.
2.4.2 Clean coast index
CCI was used to measure the cleanness of the beach and was calculated as follows:
where K is a constant (K = 20). To make the numerical value of the CCI comprehensible, K is a constant. On the basis of the number of debris on the coast, the beaches were classified as ‘clean’ to ‘extremely dirty’ [21] (Table 1).
2.4.3 Plastic abundance index
The plastic abundance index (PAI) was calculated to measure the amount of plastics with reference to the total amount of beach debris [38, 39].
Using the PAI values as a reference, the study sites were categorized into five groups: low abundance, low abundance, moderate abundance, high abundance, and very high abundance (Table 1).
3 Result and discussion
3.1 Abundance in terms of debris numbers and weight
A total of 8105 pieces of beach debris were collected from three sampling sites (mean = 0.9 items/m2). The highest number of debris was collected from Mandvi (n = 3155), followed by Veraval (n = 3120) and Dwarka (n = 1830).. Figure 4 presents the heatmap distribution of debris (items/m2) at the Dwarka, Mandvi, and Veraval Beaches. A total of 28 different items of beach debris were found on Mandvi Beach, with straws being the most abundant, followed by balloons, gutkha pouches, and other debris items (Table 2).The mean abundance of different beach debris items did not vary significantly from each other in Mandvi (ANOVA, F = 1.29; P = 0.26). At Dwarka Beach, a total of 31 different items of beach debris were found, with plastic fragments being the most abundant, followed by plastic rope/small net pieces, buoys and floats, and other debris items (Table 2). Mean abundance of different beach debris items varied significantly from each other in Dwarka (ANOVA, F = 2.74; P < 0.05). At Veraval Beach, a total of 31 different types of beach debris were found, with clothing and shoes being the most abundant, followed by plastic fragments, plastic bags, and other debris items (Table 2). Mean abundance of different beach debris items did not vary significantly from each other in Veraval (ANOVA, F = 1.58; P = 0.16).
The total estimated weight of beach debris was 32,598.31 g, with a mean of 3.62 g/m2 from three sampling sites. In case of total weight of beach debris, the maximum weight of debris was recorded from Veraval (14,380.59 g), followed by Dwarka (9910 g) and Mandvi (8307 g). Beverage bottles (glass) were the most abundant debris item by mean weight at Mandvi Beach, followed by medicine wrappers and other debris items (Table 2). Mean weight of debris items did not vary significantly among each other in Mandvi Beach (ANOVA, F = 1.58; P = 0.16). Rubber fragments were the most abundant debris item by mean weight at Dwarka Beach, followed by flip-flops and other debris items (Table 2). Mean weight of debris items did not vary significantly among each other in Dwarka Beach (ANOVA, F = 0.57; P = 0.71). Clothing and shoes were the most abundant debris items by mean weight at Veraval Beach, followed by paper, cardboard, and other debris items (Table 2). Mean weight of different debris items did not vary significantly from each other in Veraval (ANOVA, F = 0.30; P = 0.91). Mean abundance and weight of different debris items collected from different sites did not vary significantly between the sampling months (Tables S1–S3). Similarly, other studies recorded different beach debris abundance and weights to understand debris composition, which can be helpful in predicting the debris source in the environment [20, 40, 41]. For example, fishing-related plastic debris is attributed to local shipping activities on beaches [40]. Plastic debris, such as straws, food packaging, and plastic bags, can be attributed to tourism [41].
3.2 Monthly variation in debris accumulation
At Mandvi Beach, mean abundance and weight of beach debris were recorded in November and December (2021), respectively, while the minimum was recorded in January (2022). Mean abundance and weight of beach debris did not vary significantly between months (ANOVA, F = 1.31; P = 0.14) (Fig. 5). At Dwarka Beach, the highest mean abundance and weight of beach debris were recorded in March (2022) and October (2021), respectively, while the minimum was recorded in November (2021), respectively. It was found that the number and weight of beach debris did not vary significantly in Dwarka beach among different months (ANOVA, F = 1.31; P = 0.13) (Fig. 5). While, at Veraval beach, the highest mean abundance and weight of beach debris were recorded in October (2021), respectively, while the minimum was recorded in the month of February (2022), respectively. The number and weight of beach debris varied significantly in Veraval beach among different months (ANOVA, F = 2.30; P < 0.05) (Fig. 5). Temporal variation of beach debris between different months was recorded in other studies [23, 41]. The abundance of different debris items can be influenced by beach activities of different months [23]. There was a clear and systematic variation in the number and weight of the beach debris reported along three recreation beaches each month. Mandvi recorded higher debris accumulation during November and December, probably because of the tent city program in November and a favorable destination for tourism in December. The uneven distribution of beach debris along Mandvi Beach can be linked to the utilization of straws for beverages by beachgoers and the discarding of empty gutkha pouches, often left behind by visitors. Dwarka experienced higher debris accumulation in March and October, most likely due to the Holi-Dhuleti Festival (Hindu’s festival of colours) in March and an increase in devotees visiting the Shree Krishna temple due to Navaratri (a 9-day Hindu festival) in October. Veraval recorded a higher abundance of beach debris in October and March, probably due to fishing activities.
3.3 Size class and colour of debris
Size-wise classification revealed that macro-beach debris was dominant compared to meso and mega debris in all sites (Fig. 6). Macro size class comprises polythene bags (water pouches), plastic spoons, straws, cigarette packets, parts of fishing gear, bottle/container caps, and many other categories that indicate prevailing fishing, tourism, and other land-based activities in the coastal area. Many studies have reported occurance of different size classes of beach debris [19, 23, 42]. A total of 6872 macro debris items falling into 46 categories were recorded from the marine beach of Chennai [19]. It could reflect higher levels of anthropogenic activity near coastlines, leading to more intermediate-sized debris accumulation. Environmental factors like coastal currents might selectively deposit macro debris, amplifying its presence. It was found that the abundance of different-sized debris can vary according to the beach activities of the study sites [42].
This study recorded beach debris of nine different colours from each study site. Among them, white and transparent beach debris were found predominantly at all the study sites compared to other colours of beach debris (Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, and 3). Similarly, white-colored beach debris was found dominantly on the urban beaches of Mumbai [23]. White and transparent colours were found dominantly in the study sites, possibly due to the material used in food packaging at beach stalls being mainly transparent or white, which can be the source of such debris.
3.4 Source, clean-coast index (CCI), and coastal health status
Two major categories of sources were identified to contribute to beach debris at study sites. Among all three study sites, land-based sources (94%, 86%, and 85% in Mandvi, Dwarka, and Veraval, respectively) contributed to a major amount of debris generated (Fig. 6). Source-based analysis of beach debris suggests that land-based debris contributes to a more significant number of debris on the Gujarat coast. Similar findings have been reported on the west coast of Qatar [43] and the Thondi coast, India [21], which identified that land-based sources generated 45.3% and 62.45% of beach debris, respectively. Recreational activity on beaches and tourism might be the possible sources of plastic fragments, food wrappers, beverage bottles, bags, containers, medical trash, and other land based beach debris in the studied beaches of Gujarat. While extensive fishing activities can be possible source of fishings ropes, nets, line, buoys, and floats in the studied beaches.
Beach debris concentrations at Mandvi and Veraval beaches were 1 item/m2 with CCI values of 20, which was classified as “dirty”. Similarly, Dwarka Beach had concentrations of 0.6 items/m2 with CCI values of 12, also classified as “dirty”. The CCI identified all three beaches as dirty. Similarly, the beaches of southwestern Luzon, Philippines, and Salvador, Brazil, were also recorded as dirty beaches by Paler et al. [44] and Fernandino et al. [45], respectively. According to CCI results, Dwarka falls into the initial stage of dirty categories that can be changed from dirty to moderate by better management and regular cleaning of the beach. While Mandvi and Veraval fall into post-stage dirty categories, they can become “extremely dirty” if no policy-making or quick action is taken for beach conservation. Research on debris surveys in marine ecosystems suggests a high figure to understand fresh and accumulated litter prevalence across coastal zones, which has been reported to have a harmful effect on marine biota. The PAI values of all three sites highlighted a very high abundance of plastic compared to other beach debris (PAI > 8). Similarly, Perumal et al. found that PAI 4.37 indicates a high abundance of plastic concerning other beach debris [39]. The study uncovered that plastic debris prevailed predominantly across all the study sites, underscoring its prevalence in comparison to other forms of beach debris. This trend aligns with findings from similar studies emphasizing the dominance of plastic debris [23, 46, 47]. The prolonged resilience and widespread accessibility of plastics contribute significantly to their extensive usage in various consumer and household-related products across different countries [23]. Improper waste management leads to the eventual introduction of a substantial amount of plastic waste into the marine environment.
This study revealed that anthropogenic activities like fishing and tourism might be responsible for debris accumulation on studied beaches. Several studies have observed that coastal urbanization, sewage, tourism, fishing activities, and religious festivals are believed to play a significant role in debris concentration in the ocean [18, 19, 23, 48]. Furthermore, Barnes established a compelling correlation between debris abundance and the human population residing in coastal regions [49]. This connection implies that human-related activities significantly contribute to the accumulation of debris in marine ecosystems.
3.5 Compared with previous studies on plastic debris on beaches in India and across the globe
Comparison of marine debris (items/m2) with different studies across the world is given in Table 3. This study revealed that beach debris abundance on Gujarat beaches was lower than from beaches of other Indian states such as Maharashtra (68.8 items/m2) [23] and West Bengal (0.98 items/m2) [41]. In contrast, a higher abundance of beach debris was recorded in the beaches of Gujrat as compared to the Atlantic Ocean, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (0.13 items/m2) [15], East China Sea, Northern Taiwan (0.15 items/m2) [50], and Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh (0.27 items/m2) [6]. Beaches with fishing activities, tourism, and improper solid waste management were more susceptible to contributing to beach litter in marine environments [20].
4 Conclusion
This baseline study reports the quantitative analysis of beach debris pollution on recreational beaches of Gujarat that provides insight into the pollution status of the coastline. Beach debris was mainly derived from fishing activities and tourism. This study provides baseline data that can help create awareness of regular beach clean-ups, proper waste management, recycling, and reuse of debris materials, including plastic, in the marine environment. Future marine debris monitoring needs to be implemented to identify the impact and trends of beach debris on the Indian coast, which would allow results to be compared at local and global levels. There is also a need for a long-term study on debris prevalence to understand the effect of beach debris on human and marine biota on the Gujarat coast.
4.1 Limitations of the study
While this study offers valuable insights into beach debris pollution along the Gujarat coastline, it is important to acknowledge some limitations and considerations in the methodology. The study was conducted over a relatively short period from October 2021 to March 2022, which may not fully capture seasonal variations in debris accumulation and composition. Long-term monitoring efforts would provide a more comprehensive understanding of beach debris dynamics. Additionally, this study did not delve into the patterns of coastal currents or conduct seasonal surveys to assess their impact on marine debris accumulation. As a result, the dynamic nature of debris accumulation over time and its interaction with seasonal variations remain relatively unexplored. Moreover, all visible surface debris within each quadrat was meticulously collected, aiming to minimize the potential error associated with overlooking very small, unseen debris. Despite these limitations, this study lays the groundwork for further research and underscores the importance of addressing beach debris pollution through targeted management and conservation efforts.
4.2 Future directions and recommendation
The current study provided the preliminary understanding of beach debris acumuation in three recreational beaches of Gujarat. However, future research on beach debris pollution along the Gujarat coastline should focus. Continued monitoring and data collection are essential to understand the long-term trends and impacts of beach debris on both the marine ecosystem and human activities. This can help in identifying hotspots of debris accumulation, seasonal variations, and changes over time. Additionally, research efforts should be directed towards investigating the sources and pathways of beach debris, including contributions from land-based activities, fishing, tourism, and improper waste management practices. Understanding these factors can inform targeted interventions and policies aimed at reducing debris input into the marine environment. Furthermore, collaborative efforts involving government agencies, local communities, NGOs, and other stakeholders are crucial for implementing effective waste management strategies, promoting beach clean-up initiatives, and raising awareness about the importance of reducing, reusing, and recycling debris materials. Moreover, future studies should explore the ecological and socio-economic impacts of beach debris pollution to develop comprehensive management approaches that safeguard both marine ecosystems and coastal communities.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
PlasticsEurope (2022) Plastics–the Facts (2022). An analysis of European plastics production, demand, conversion and end-of-life management. PlasticsEurope.
Walker TR, McGuinty E, Hickman D. Marine debris database development using international best practices: a case study in Vietnam. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112948.
Rabari V, Patel H, Patel K, et al. Quantitative assessment of microplastic contamination in muddy shores of Gulf of Khambhat, India. Mar Pollut Bull. 2023;192:115131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115131.
Laglbauer BJL, Franco-Santos RM, Andreu-Cazenave M, et al. Macrodebris and microplastics from beaches in Slovenia. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.09.036.
Aragaw TA. The macro-debris pollution in the shorelines of Lake Tana: first report on abundance, assessment, constituents, and potential sources. Sci Total Environ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149235.
Rakib MRJ, Ertaş A, Walker TR, et al. Macro marine litter survey of sandy beaches along the Cox’s Bazar Coast of Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh: land-based sources of solid litter pollution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113246.
Shinde R, Rabari V, Duggal R, et al. An assessment of microplastic contamination in beach sediment of Maharashtra State, India, with special reference to anthropogenic activities. Water Environ Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.11033.
Lippiatt S, Sarah O, Courtney A. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Marine Debris Monitoring and Assessment: Recommendations for Monitoring Debris Trends in the Marine Environment. NOAA Tech Memo. 2013. p. 1–88.
Kusui T, Noda M. International survey on the distribution of stranded and buried litter on beaches along the Sea of Japan. Mar Pollut Bull. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00478-2.
Bravo M, de los Ángeles Gallardo M, Luna-Jorquera G, et al. Anthropogenic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): results from a national survey supported by volunteers. Mar Pollut Bull. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.06.017.
Goodman AJ, Walker TR, Brown CJ, et al. Benthic marine debris in the Bay of Fundy, eastern Canada: spatial distribution and categorization using seafloor video footage. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110722.
Al Nahian S, Rakib MRJ, Haider SMB, et al. Baseline marine litter abundance and distribution on Saint Martin Island, Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114091.
Mghili B, Analla M, Aksissou M, Aissa C. Marine debris in Moroccan Mediterranean beaches: an assessment of their abundance, composition and sources. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111692.
Faizal A, Werorilangi S, Samad W, et al. Abundance and spatial distribution of marine debris on the beach of Takalar Regency, South Sulawesi. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021.
Oigman-Pszczol SS, Creed JC. Quantification and classification of marine litter on beaches along Armação dos Búzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Coast Res. 2007. https://doi.org/10.2112/1551-5036(2007)23[421:QACOML]2.0.CO;2.
Williams AT, Randerson P, Di Giacomo C, et al. Distribution of beach litter along the coastline of Cádiz, Spain. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.015.
Rosevelt C, Los Huertos M, Garza C, Nevins HM. Marine debris in central California: quantifying type and abundance of beach litter in Monterey Bay, CA. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.01.015.
Kaladharan P, Vijayakumaran K, Singh VV, et al. Prevalence of marine litter along the Indian beaches: a preliminary account on its status and composition. J Mar Biol Assoc India. 2017;59:19–24. https://doi.org/10.6024/jmbai.2017.59.1.1953-03.
Kumar AA, Sivakumar R, Reddy YSR, et al. Preliminary study on marine debris pollution along Marina beach, Chennai, India. Reg Stud Mar Sci. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2016.01.002.
Sulochanan B, Veena S, Ratheesh L, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of beach litter in Mangaluru, India. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110541.
Perumal K, Boopathi V, Chellaiyan S, et al. Sources, spatial distribution, and abundance of marine debris on Thondi coast, Palk Bay, Southeast coast of India. Environ Sci Eur. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00576-x.
Krishnakumar S, Anbalagan S, Kasilingam K, et al. Assessment of plastic debris in remote islands of the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago, India. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110841.
Jayasiri HB, Purushothaman CS, Vennila A. Quantitative analysis of plastic debris on recreational beaches in Mumbai, India. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;77:107–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.024.
Adimey NM, Hudak CA, Powell JR, et al. Fishery gear interactions from stranded bottlenose dolphins, Florida manatees and sea turtles in Florida, U.S.A. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.008.
Karbalaei S, Hanachi P, Rafiee G, et al. Toxicity of polystyrene microplastics on juvenile Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout) after individual and combined exposure with chlorpyrifos. J Hazard Mater. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123980.
Rabari V, Rakib MRJ, Trivedi J, et al. Microplastics occurrence in commercial crab (Portunus segnis) from the western coast of India and pollution indices: first investigation and evidence. Sci Total Environ. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167500.
Rabari V, Patel H, Ali D, et al. Ingestion and polymeric risk assessment of microplastic contamination in commercially important brachyuran crab Portunus sanguinolentus. Front Mar Sci. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1286782.
Kumar R, Manna C, Padha S, et al. Micro(nano)plastics pollution and human health: how plastics can induce carcinogenesis to humans? Chemosphere. 2022;298:134267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134267.
Joshi K, Rabari V, Patel H, et al. Microplastic contamination in filter-feeding oyster Saccostrea cuccullata: novel insights in a marine ecosystem. Mar Pollut Bull. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116326.
Rabari V, Rakib MRJ, Patel H, et al. Microplastic prevalence in epipelagic layer: evidence from epipelagic inhabiting prawns of north-west Arabian Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116137.
Prusty K, Rabari V, Patel K, et al. An Assessment of microplastic contamination in a commercially important marine fish, Harpadon nehereus (Hamilton, 1822). Fishes. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8090432.
Doshi M, Rabari V, Patel A, et al. A systematic review on microplastic contamination in marine Crustacea and Mollusca of Asia: current scenario, concentration, characterization, polymeric risk assessment, and future prospectives. Water Environ Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.11029.
Oza J, Rabari V, Yadav VK, et al. A systematic review on microplastic contamination in fishes of asia: polymeric risk assessment and future prospectives. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5821.
Rabari V, Patel K, Patel H, Trivedi J. Quantitative assessment of microplastic in sandy beaches of Gujarat state, India. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022;181:113925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113925.
Patel M, Rabari V, Acharya CA, Trivedi JN. A Comparative study on microplastic contamination in four brachyuran crabs along the Bhavnagar Coast. In: Proceedings of National Seminar on Emerging Trends in Life Sciences. 2024.
Behera DP, Kolandhasamy P, Sigamani S, et al. A preliminary investigation of marine litter pollution along Mandvi beach, Kachchh, Gujarat. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112100.
Alkalay R, Pasternak G, Zask A. Clean-coast index—a new approach for beach cleanliness assessment. Ocean Coast Manag. 2007;50:352–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.10.002.
Rangel-Buitrago N, Barría-Herrera J, Vergara-Cortés H, et al. A snapshot of the litter problem along the Viña del Mar-Concón coastal strip, Valparaíso region, Chile. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111524.
Perumal K, Muthuramalingam S, Chellaiyan S. Marine litter on the beaches of the Kanyakumari, Southern India: an assessment of their abundance and pollution indices. Mar Pollut Bull. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114443.
Arun Kumar A, Sivakumar R, Sai Rutwik Y, et al. Marine debris in India: quantifying type and abundance of beach litter along Chennai, east coast of India. In: Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering. 2019.
Mugilarasan M, Karthik R, Purvaja R, et al. Spatiotemporal variations in anthropogenic marine litter pollution along the northeast beaches of India. Environ Pollut. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116954.
Jeyasanta KI, Sathish N, Patterson J, Edward JKP. Macro-, meso- and microplastic debris in the beaches of Tuticorin district, Southeast coast of India. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111055.
Veerasingam S, Al-Khayat JA, Aboobacker VM, et al. Sources, spatial distribution and characteristics of marine litter along the west coast of Qatar. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111478.
Paler MKO, Malenab MCT, Maralit JR, Nacorda HM. Plastic waste occurrence on a beach off southwestern Luzon, Philippines. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.006.
Fernandino G, Elliff CI, Silva IR, et al. Plastic fragments as a major component of marine litter: a case study in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. J Integr Coast Zone Manag. 2016. https://doi.org/10.5894/rgci649.
Ganesapand S, Manikandan S, Kumaraguru AK. Marine litter in the northern part of Gulf of Mannar, southeast coast of India. Res J Environ Sci. 2011. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjes.2011.471.478.
Golik A, Gertner Y. Litter on the israeli coastline. Mar Environ Res. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1136(92)90002-4.
Gregory MR. The hazards of persistent marine pollution: drift plastics and conservation islands. J R Soc N Z. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.1991.10431398.
Barnes DKA, Galgani F, Thompson RC, Barlaz M. Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0205.
Kuo FJ, Huang HW. Strategy for mitigation of marine debris: analysis of sources and composition of marine debris in northern Taiwan. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.04.019.
Slavin C, Grage A, Campbell ML. Linking social drivers of marine debris with actual marine debris on beaches. Mar Pollut Bull. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.05.018.
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to the Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan-384265 Gujarat, India.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ketankumar Yogi and Vasantkumar Rabari: investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft; Heris Patel and Krupal Patel: conceptualization, resources, writing—review and editing, supervision; Jigneshkumar N. Trivedi: validation, conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing; Md Refat Jahan Rakib: data curation, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft; Rakesh Kumar: data curation, methodology, visualization, writing—review and editing; Ram Proshad: writing—review and editing; Tony R. Walker: writing—review and editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yogi, K., Rabari, V., Patel, K. et al. Gujarat’s plastic plight: unveiling characterization, abundance, and pollution index of beachside plastic pollution. Discov Oceans 1, 8 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44289-024-00008-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44289-024-00008-7