Abstract
Background
Infection prevention and control (IPC) implementation at referral hospitals (RHs) in Tanzania is still inadequate, regardless of ongoing IPC capacity-building initiatives. This continues to challenge the quality of healthcare service provision as poor IPC implementation fuels healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) problems. The study aimed to describe the implementation of IPC practices in 26 Regional RHs’ functional units in 2021.
Methods
The study involved secondary data from an assessment conducted using the National IPC Standard checklist for hospitals to all functional units at 26 regional RHs in 2021. Data were analysed in STATA version 15.0 to compute the weighted median with interquartile range (IQR) for each functional unit score.
Results
The overall weighted median IPC compliance with 26 regional RHs in 2021 was 50 (41–60), whereby the lowest and highest scores were 24 and 72%, respectively. The highest-performing unit was the intensive care unit (ICU) for adults 71.4% (46.4–78.6), and lowest performing functional units were the mortuary, Central Sterilization and Supply Department, and blood transfusion [47.4% (36.8–57.9), 47.4% (40–50), and 47.6% (38.1–61.9)], respectively.
Conclusion
Implementation of IPC practices in 26 RHs in Tanzania is inadequate. We recommend that RHs need to strengthen IPC practices implementation in each functional unit in order to reach the required target of at least 80% score. This will enhance the reduction of the burden of HAIs and AMR, and increase the energy and morale of healthcare workers in preparedness and response to emerging and remerging diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Background
The field of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) encompasses a systematic and evidence-based strategy aimed at reducing the occurrence of infections among healthcare professionals, patients, and the wider population. The implementation of this technique is mandated for all health facilities and healthcare practitioners [1]. The inadequate implementation of IPC measures contributes to the occurrence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) [1]. This, in turn, exacerbates the problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), leading to increased rates of mortality and morbidity and placing a financial burden on both governments and individuals in the healthcare sector [2]. Furthermore, inadequate execution of IPC measures has been demonstrated to make healthcare professionals more susceptible to the occurrence of newly developing and recurring diseases, such as the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) [3].
Compliance with IPC in hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been shown in various studies to be inadequate, for example, in Philippines [4], and in Nigeria [5]; calling for a tailored implementation focused on a particular LMICs context [6]. Over the course of the previous ten years, it has been observed that the implementation of IPC recommendations and standards in Tanzanian hospitals has been insufficient [7]. In 2018, the Ministry undertook a revision of the National IPC Guidelines, followed by a revision of the IPC standards in 2020. Presently, there are continuing nationwide endeavours to disseminate, train, and monitor the execution of these guidelines and standards across all levels [8]. However, there is a scarcity of information regarding the responses of hospitals towards ongoing efforts implemented by the Ministry of Health (MoH) on adherence of IPC core components to various functional units [9]. Each Regional Referral Hospital has about twenty functional units based on services provided namely; intensive care unit (ICU); dental unit; eye unit; care and treatment clinic (CTC); labour ward; medical wards; paediatric wards; laboratory; obstetrics and gynaecology (ObGy) wards; outpatient department (OPD); administration; radiology; casualty; pharmacy; surgical wards; laundry; operating theatre; health care waste management (HCWM); blood transfusion; central sterilization and supply department (CSSD); and mortuary. During COVID 19 pandemic every HCW and clients at each functional unit at Health facility were at risk of health care associated COVID 19 infections. Since COVID 19 patients were in need of intensive care services which were mostly available at referral hospitals in Tanzania, it was paramount that these referral hospitals should adhere to all IPC measures for safety of both HCWs and their clients. Therefore, objective of the study was to provide a comprehensive description of the implementation of IPC measures within the various functional units of 26 Regional Referral Hospitals.
2 Methodology
Tanzania has implemented the standards-based management and recognition strategy as part of its national initiatives and efforts to promote IPC in all regional referral hospitals. This strategy aims to enhance the quality and safety of services provided in these healthcare facilities. During COVID-19 pandemic, MoH took efforts to improve IPCpractices in Health facilities using the strategy in which assessment were conducted annually to track progess.The Annual IPC assessment utilized the National IPC standards tool for hospitals, which is one of the checklists available in the MoH Tanzania’s digitalized system known as the Afya Supportive Supervision System (AfyaSS) [10]. AfyaSS is a platform for supportive supervision where checklists for various country health interventions are configured including National IPC assessment tool. The structure of data captured are according to the individual checklist.This study was a retrospective analysis of secondary data from Tanzania IPC 2021 annual implementation report from Regional Referral Hospitals extracted from AfyaSS after seeking permision.
The national IPC assessment tool is composed of all minimum IPC standard precautions requirements to be adhered to by all healthcare workers in Hospital settings all the time such as hand hygiene, personal protective equipment utilization, instrument processing and decontamination, housekeeping, medical waste management, and handling of sharps. The tool was developed with verification criteria which need some IPC standard precautions to be measured by observation, interviews, and document review. The review of documents involved documents available at a functional unit such as the availability of guidelines, standards operating procedures, checklists, and bundles at the working site in order to evaluate the performance of health institutions across many functional units. There are 28 regional referral hospitals in 26 regions of Tanzania Mainland in which three of them are in Dar es Salaam Region [11]. Therefore, in 2021 an IPC assessment was conducted on 26 regional referral hospitals that were fully functioning. The remaining two were in construction and shifting to new buildings. In addition to that, the assessment involved all healthcare service delivery units available at the Hospital that were functional.
The AfyaSS computed the scores for each functional unit by dividing the total number of standards reached by that unit by the total number of standards that the functional unit was expected to meet and then multiplying the result by 100. The facility score was determined by dividing the total score of each functional unit by the total score required to be achieved at that facility level and then multiplying the result by 100. Tool range 0–59% as poor performance, (60–79)% as moderate performance, and (80–100)% as outstanding performance.
Extraction and cleaning of data were done followed by data analysis which was done using STATA version 15.0 in order to calculate the weighted median with interquartile range (IQR) for each functional unit score for the year 2021.
3 Results
Table 1 below displays the weighted median ratings for each functional unit in 26 regional referral hospitals in 2021. The overall weighted median IPC compliance for all 26 regional referral hospitals was 50% (41–60) N = 26, with the lowest score being 24% and the best score being 72%. IPC compliance was as follows in each functional unit across all 26 regional referral hospitals: The best-performing unit was the Adult ICU at 71.4% (46.4–78.6), with the highest hospital scoring at 85.7% and the lowest facility scoring 17.9%. Mortuary was the lowest-performing functional unit, scoring 47.4% (36.8–57.9) N = 24, with the lowest score of 5.3% and the greatest IPC compliance of 79%. CSSD scored 47.4% (40–50) N = 24, with the lowest score being 10.5% and the highest being 65%, making it another functional unit that performed poorly. In addition, the blood transfusion unit received a dismal score of 47.6% (38.1–61.9) out of a possible 19 points, with the lowest score being 9.5% and the best being 81%.
4 Discussion
4.1 Main findings in the context of previous research
The findings of this study indicate that there was a poor level of compliance with the weighted median IPC standards across all 26 regional referral hospitals. Additionally, the study assessed the performance of all functional units within these facilities. The ICU for adults demonstrated the highest level of performance across all units, whereas the mortuary, CSSD, and blood transfusion units showed the lowest levels of performance across all 26 regional referral hospitals. The relatively low level of adherence to IPC protocols seen at these referral hospitals continues to present a potential hazard to healthcare workers (HCWs) and patients seeking medical treatment at these establishments, particularly in light of the ongoing prevalence of newly developing and recurring diseases. The performance of HCWM may have also been contributed by previous quality improvement interventions in these hospitals such as the use of 5S-KAIZEN-TQM approach [12]. Also, some studies have reported inadequate HCWM handling in these hospitals [13, 14]. In Zambia, a study by Leonard and colleagues reported inadequate practices in HCWM handling [15].
The study presented findings on the outstanding performance of the ICU at the regional referral hospital in the domain of IPC for adult patients. These results stand in contrast to a previous study that highlighted the elevated risk of infection rates in ICUs located in developing nations [16]. The observed disparity may be attributed to insufficient monitoring measures implemented at the 26 regional referral hospitals, resulting in a lack of comprehensive data regarding the effectiveness of IPC policies. In Ethiopia, monthly training for HCWs, supportive supervision, and routine monitoring have been reported to contribute to improvement in HCWs’ compliance with IPC practices in neonatal ICUs in two hospitals [17].
In addition to that, the study reported that the lowest-performing units at 26 regional referral hospitals were mortuary, CSSD, and blood transfusion. The results of this study align with other prior investigations that have documented suboptimal interprofessional communication within hospital settings which limit skills and knowledge sharing among all HCWs in all functional units [18, 19]. Hence, it is also possible that inadequate space assigned to a certain functional unit to these regional referral hospitals especially CSSD, mortuaries limited its adherence to IPC standards. In addition to that, inadequate knowledge, and a lower level of awareness about the anticipation of risks, may account for this disparity of compliance to IPC in these functional units. Nevertheless, it could be due to the negligence of HCWs working in units not directly touching patients towards adhering to all IPC standards when compared to HCWs working in units that involve direct patient contact and the use of invasive devices.
4.2 Policy implications
The findings of our study have important policy implications for improving the quality and safety of services delivered in regional referral hospitals. The MoH needs to strengthen regular monitoring of the implementation of IPC practices in these hospitals, focusing on the various functional units. Secondly, the management teams of these hospitals need to strengthen the Work Improvement Teams, which are usuallyhealth quality champions in the functional units to perform their roles and regularly report quality initiatives implementation to the hospital's quality improvement team and the management team. Such team-based efforts will make IPC part of every health worker’s business on a daily basis in a way that will help to ensure hospital resilience to any future outbreaks and pandemics [20].
4.3 Study limitation and mitigation
A major limitation of this study is its design, which is a retrospective study using secondary data. Incompleteness of data and missing functional units in some hospitals were foreseen. This was due to the fact that the majority of regional referral hospitals had ongoing construction and renovation of buildings to expand the service delivery. To mitigate the problem, the study focused heavily on all available data after data cleaning, and regional referral hospitals with more than half of functional units were taken for analysis. For the Functional unit analysed,the results can be generalized to other hospitals with similar level. However, we recommend another prospective study to be conducted to come up with the actual situation of all functional units in all regional referral hospitals.
5 Conclusion and recomendations
The assessment of IPC practices in 26 regional referral hospitals using the National IPC checklist revealed that IPC performance is low in mortuary, CSSD, and blood transfusion units, but high in ICUs. We anticipate that the mentored HCWs and those who received comprehensive training will be able to further strengthen IPC practices in their units at all hospitals visited. In addition, the MoH will need to strengthen HAIs surveillance as well as IPC indicators monitoring and evaluation through protocol dissemination,training and ensure of utilization of digitals tools.. In addition, it is suggested that all hospital quality improvement leaders and healthcare workers at all hospital functional units [21, 22] make IPC a priority and have active IPC programs in order to implement IPC guidelines and conduct HAIs surveillance to improve patient safety at all functional units. Also, the leaders need to facilitate sharing among staff between the functional units in order to solve various challenges faced and improve facility compliance with IPC practices [23]. Lastly, In addressing the issue of missing data the MoH, should strengthens the data quality assessment to all Healthcare facilities [24].
Data availability
The corresponding author can provide the data upon request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Rasa K, Kilpatrick C. Implementation of world health organization guidelines in the prevention of surgical site infection in low- and middle-income countries: what we know and do not know. Surg Infect. 2020;21(7):592–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2020.163.
Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02724-0.
Hussen H, Aderaw AZ. Risk of COVID-19 infection and associated factors among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study at Eka Kotebe treatment center in Ethiopia. Int J General Med. 2021;14:1763–72. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s301518.
deClaro V, Bautista N, Torralba MR, Castro VV, Lucero MA, Molleno LJ, Stan L. Infection prevention and control in public hospitals and COVID-19 temporary treatment and monitoring facilities in the Philippines: results of a baseline survey. COVID. 2023;3(3):336–47. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3030025.
Aika IN, Enato E. Health care systems administrators perspectives on antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control programs across three healthcare levels: a qualitative study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11(1):157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01196-7.
Maki G, Zervos M. Health care-acquired infections in low- and middle-income countries and the role of infection prevention and control. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2021;35(3):827–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2021.04.014.
Hokororo J, Eliakimu E, Ngowi R, et al. Report of trend for compliance of infection prevention and control standards in Tanzania from 2010 to 2017 in Tanzania Mainland. Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3342/2639-9458.1118.
Hokororo JC, Fungo C, Mashili F, Mawazo A, Mbwele B, et al. Improving adherence of infection prevention standards in health facilities: the role of competition approach from four regions of Tanzania Mainland. Prev Med Epidemiol Public Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3103/pep.2021246.
Storr J, Twyman A, Zingg W, Damani N, Kilpatrick C, Reilly J, Price L, Egger M, Grayson ML, Kelley E, Allegranzi B. Core components for effective infection prevention and control programmes: new WHO evidence-based recommendations. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0149-9.
Ministry of health. Afya Supportive Supervision System Impact evaluation report, September, 2022. Available from: https://media.path.org/documents/AfyaSS_Impact_Evaluation_Report.pdf?_gl=1*1iab8hv*_ga*MTY0ODQxOTQ4Mi4xNzExMDk2Mjgy*_ga_YBSE7ZKDQM*MTcxMTA5NjI4Mi4xLjAuMTcxMTA5NjI4Ny41NS4wLjA.*_gcl_au*MTkzMjQ2NDE0Ni4xNzExMDk2Mjgx
Ishijima H, Suzuki S, Masaule F, Mlay V, John R. Measuring hospital performances of regional referral hospitals in Tanzania. J Hosp Adm. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v10n2p1.
Ishijima H, Miyamoto N, Masaule F, John R. Improvements to healthcare waste management at regional referral hospitals in Tanzania using the KAIZEN approach. TQM J. 2022;34(5):939–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2020-0254.
Anicetus H, Manyele S, Saria J, Habtu M, Saguti G, Yoti Z, Kiyunge A, Subi L. Performance of healthcare facilities of different levels towards safe healthcare waste management as linked to infection prevention and control standards in Tanzania. J Environ Prot. 2022;13(10):732–49. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2022.1310047.
Millanzi WC, Herman PZ, Mtangi SA. Knowledge, attitude, and perceived practice of sanitary workers on healthcare waste management: a descriptive cross-sectional study in Dodoma region, Tanzania. SAGE Open Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121231174735.
Leonard CM, Chunga CC, Nkaama JM, Banda K, Mibenge C, Chalwe V, Biemba G, Chilengi-Sakala S, Mwale FK. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of health care waste management among Zambian health care workers. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(6):e0000655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000655.
Tao L, Hu B, Rosenthal VD, Gao X, He L. Device-associated infection rates in 398 intensive care units in Shanghai, China: international nosocomial infection control consortium (INICC) findings. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15(11):e774-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2011.06.009.
Jones S, & Elizabeth Soda E. Ethiopian Hospitals Use Infection Prevention and Control Practices to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Safe Healthcare Blog. Posted on October 18, 2023. https://blogs.cdc.gov/safehealthcare/ethiopian-hospitals-use-ipc/ Accessed on 27th October 2023.
Kinyenje E, Hokororo J, Eliakimu E, Yahya T, Mbwele B, Mohamed M, et al. Status of infection prevention and control in Tanzanian primary health care facilities: learning from star rating assessment. Infect Prev Pract. 2020;2(3):100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100071.
Bahegwa RP, Hussein AK, Kishimba R, Hokororo J, German C, Ngowi R, et al. Factors affecting compliance with infection prevention and control standard precautions among healthcare workers in Songwe region, Tanzania. Infect Prev Pract. 2022;4(4):100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100236.
Wiig S, Lyng HB, Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Care in the future-reconciling health system and individual resilience. Int J Qual Health Care. 2023;35(4):082. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzad082.
Kacholi G, Kalolo A, Mahomed OH. Performance of quality improvement teams and associated factors in selected regional referral hospitals in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:223. https://doi.org/10.1160/pamj.2021.38.223.23767.
Kacholi G, Mahomed OH. Perceptions of hospital staff on the performance of Quality Improvement teams in the regional referral hospitals in Tanzania: a cross sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0246927. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246927.
Dramowski A, Bekker A, Anugulruengkitt S, Bayani O, Martins Gonçalves F, Naizgi M, et al. Keeping it real: infection prevention and control problems and solutions in low- and middle-income countries. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2022;41(3S):S36–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000003319.
Ministry of Health, Community development, Gender, elderly and children. National guidelines for health data quality assessment. November 2016. Available from: http://simiyurrh.go.tz/storage/app/uploads/public/5dd/07d/e12/5dd07de1292cc065110090.pdf
Acknowledgements
We express our profound appreciation to the organizations listed below for their invaluable assistance in facilitating the execution of the IPC initiatives: Management Science for Health (MSH) through Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical Services (MTaPS) Project, which is funded through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Global Fund, and Catholic Relief Services (CRS). Finally, we express our gratitude to the management teams, quality assurance units, and quality improvement teams of all Regional Referral Hospitals for their invaluable support and unwavering dedication to enhancing the execution of recommended infection prevention and control (IPC) measures.
Funding
The study did not receive direct funding. However, the implementation of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) in Tanzania during the assessment period was facilitated by Management Science for Health (MSH) through the Medicines, Technologies and Pharmaceutical Services (MTaPS) Project, which is financially supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Global Fund, and Catholic Relief Services (CRS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The individuals responsible for the conceptualization, analysis, and interpretation of the study were RPB, JCH, YM, RRN, CJG, LM, OAN, ESK, MMD JSM, DSL and ESE. The manuscript revision was conducted by RPB, JCH, CJG, and ESE. The work underwent many revisions and received input from all authors, who then provided their approval for the final version to be submitted for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This was retrospective study and data was obtained from MoH Tanzania activities implementation follow up. For this type of study, formal consent is not required, however, prior permission from the MoH was sought before using the dataset.
Competing interests
Authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bahegwa, R.P., Hokororo, J.C., Msigwa, Y.S. et al. Infection prevention and control compliance during COVID-19 pandemic era: assessment of 26 regional referral hospitals in Tanzania. Discov Health Systems 3, 21 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-024-00078-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-024-00078-6