Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of serious illness conversation guide training for residents in the surgical intensive care unit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Goals of care conversations are essential for physicians treating critically ill patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). However, many providers feel uncomfortable having these conversations. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of implementing training in the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) for residents in our institution’s SICU.

Methods

All residents rotating through our institution’s SICU during the 2021–2022 academic year completed SICG training. Training consisted of a 1.5-h pre-recorded lecture, pre-course reading, and quiz followed by a 1-h group session for participants to practice the SICG with standardized patients. Validated surveys were administered before, after, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-training to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of the training.

Results

Training significantly increased residents’ mean confidence levels in conducting serious illness conversations (4.3 ± 0.4 vs. 5.4 ± 0.1, p < 0.001). Post-training, 92% of residents agreed or strongly agreed that the teaching methods were effective, 88% agreed or strongly agreed that the training positively impacted their attitude towards communicating with seriously ill patients, 88% agreed or strongly agreed that they could apply what they learned to their clinical practice, and 92% agreed or strongly agreed that they would recommend this training to others.

Conclusions

Training in the use of the SICG is feasible, acceptable, and effective for SICU residents at our institution. Residents reported an overall increase in confidence levels in conducting serious illness conversations and found the training applicable to their clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright AA. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300(14):1665. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.14.1665.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mack JW, Weeks JC, Wright AA, Block SD, Prigerson HG. End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1203–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4672.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340(mar 23 1):c1345–c1345. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernacki R, Paladino J, Neville BA, et al. Effect of the serious illness care program in outpatient oncology: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):751. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0077.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernacki RE, Block SD. Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1994. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heyland DK, Allan DE, Rocker G, et al. Discussing prognosis with patients and their families near the end of life: impact on satisfaction with end-of-life care. Open Med Peer-Rev Indep Open-Access J. 2009;3(2):e101-110.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Rogers SO, et al. Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer. 2010;116(4):998–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Teno JM. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.1.88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singer AE, Meeker D, Teno JM, Lynn J, Lunney JR, Lorenz KA. Symptom trends in the last year of life from 1998 to 2010: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(3):175–83. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Teno JM, Gozalo PL, Bynum JPW, et al. Change in end-of-life care for medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009. JAMA. 2013;309(5):470. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.207624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright AA, Keating NL, Ayanian JZ, et al. Family perspectives on aggressive cancer care near the end of life. JAMA. 2016;315(3):284. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.18604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright AA, Keating NL, Balboni TA, Matulonis UA, Block SD, Prigerson HG. Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers’ mental health. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(29):4457–64. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanson LC, Danis M, Garrett J. What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(11):1339–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02933.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinhauser KE. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2476. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.19.2476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mack JW, Cronin A, Taback N, et al. End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(3):204. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Curtisa JR, Patrick DL, Caldwell E, Greenlee H, Collier AC. The quality of patient-doctor communication about end-of-life care: a study of patients with advanced AIDS and their primary care clinicians. AIDS. 1999;13(9):1123–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-199906180-00017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schroder C, Heyland D, Jiang X, Rocker G, Dodek P. Educating medical residents in end-of-life care: insights from a multicenter survey. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(5):459–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2008.0280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Block SD. Medical education in end-of-life care: the status of reform. J Palliat Med. 2002;5(2):243–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/109662102753641214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. You JJ, Downar J, Fowler RA, et al. Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):549. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Curtis JR. Why don’t patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care?: Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(11):1690–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.11.1690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chandar M, Brockstein B, Zunamon A, et al. Perspectives of health-care providers toward advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer and congestive heart failure. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2017;34(5):423–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909116636614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin JA, Im CJ, O’Sullivan P, Kirkwood KS, Cook AC. The surgical resident experience in serious illness communication: a qualitative needs assessment with proposed solutions. Am J Surg. 2021;222(6):1126–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lakin JR, Koritsanszky LA, Cunningham R, et al. A systematic intervention to improve serious illness communication in primary care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(7):1258–64. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paladino J, Bernacki R, Neville BA, et al. Evaluating an intervention to improve communication between oncology clinicians and patients with life-limiting cancer: a cluster randomized clinical trial of the serious illness care program. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(6):801. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paladino J, Koritsanszky L, Nisotel L, et al. Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: a descriptive analysis. Cancer Med. 2020;9(13):4550–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernacki R, Paladino J, Lamas D, et al. Delivering more, earlier, and better goals-of-care conversations to seriously ill oncology patients. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29_suppl):39–39. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.29_suppl.39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paladino J, Bernacki R, Hutchings M, et al. Effect of conversations about values and goals on anxiety in patients. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29_suppl):9–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.29_suppl.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernacki R, Hutchings M, Vick J, et al. Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10): e009032. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009032.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95: 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bernard C, Tan A, Slaven M, Elston D, Heyland DK, Howard M. Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01167-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Boston Medical Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E. Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA

    Ariana Y. Nodoushani & Sabrina E. Sanchez

  2. Boston Medical Center, 840 Harrison Ave, Dowling 2 South, Boston, MA, 02118, USA

    Mollie A. O’Brien, Alexandra Dobie & Sabrina E. Sanchez

Authors
  1. Ariana Y. Nodoushani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mollie A. O’Brien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexandra Dobie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabrina E. Sanchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina E. Sanchez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nodoushani, A.Y., O’Brien, M.A., Dobie, A. et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of serious illness conversation guide training for residents in the surgical intensive care unit. Global Surg Educ 3, 24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-023-00225-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-023-00225-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation