Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of architectural beauty to building energy performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Architecture, Structures and Construction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consideration of architectural beauty in the built environment is growing as the broader concept of sustainable design replaces the more narrowly defined concepts of high performance or green building. This work is a part of Beauty in Building (BiB) research conducted by a team of architects and engineers working to understand links between architectural beauty and building performance. This work presents the exploration findings on what impact architectural beauty may have on building energy performance. A sample of 35 case studies contrasting high performing buildings with architecturally beautiful and high performing buildings was evaluated using the developed BiB matrix. Features that distinguished the best performing buildings from the rest of the sample population were identified based on the results of the case study evaluation. Building energy models representing these building features were then developed for quantitative evaluation of energy performance through energy simulation. Relative importance to beauty and energy performance of each of the features was determined and presented as weighting factors. The results illustrate those features that exhibited density, a combination of multiple systems, in the designs offered better performance relative to both beauty and energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PatternMapping® institute (2012) Beauty in Building:Research:PatternMapping institute. Retrieved February 29, 2012, from PatternMapping® institute: http://www.patternmapping.com/PDF/BeautyinBuilding_white%20paper-29-02.pdf.

  2. Alexander C (1979) The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Living Building Institute (2010) Living building challenge 2.0: a visionary path to a restorative future. International Living Future Institute. Retrieved November 6, 2011, from https://ilbi.org/lbc/standard

  4. Office of Research and Development, U.S Environmental Protection Agency (1973) Aesthetics in Environmental Planning. EPA-600/5–73–009. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  5. Meyer EK (2008) Sustaining Beauty: The Performance of Appearance - A Manifesto in Three Parts. J Landsc Archit 3(1):6–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Botton A (2006) The Architecture of Happiness. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberger P (2009) Why Architecture Matters. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ipsos MORI/The Commission on Architecture and the Built Environment (2010) People and places: public attitudes to beauty. CABE Publications, National Archives, UK. Retrieved February 27, 2011, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118095356/, http://www.cabe.org.uk/publications/people-and-places

  9. Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M, Jacobson M, Fiksdahl-King I, Angel S (1977) A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Green Building Council (n.d.) LEED Projects & Case Studies Directory. U.S. Green Building Council: LEED. Retrieved August 2011, from http://www.usgbc.org/LEED/Project/CertifiedProjectList.aspx

  11. BuildingGreen.com (n.d.) Building green case studies. BuildingGreen.com. Retrieved August 2011, from http://www.buildinggreen.com/hpb/index.cfm

  12. The American Institute of Architects (n.d.) AIA/COTE Tope Ten Green Projects. Retrieved August 2011, from http://www.aiatopten.org/hpb/

  13. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy (2010) RefBldgMediumOfficeNew2004_v1.3_5.0_SI.xlsx. EERE: Building Technologies Program: Commercial Building Initiative: New Construction - Commercial Reference Buildings. Retrieved November 22, 2011, from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/commercial_initiative/new_construction.html

  14. Olsen EL, Chen Q (2003) Energy Consumption and Comfort Analysis for Different Low-Energy Cooling Systems in a Mild Climate. Energy Build 35(6):561–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (2004) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ASHRAE Standard 55–2004. New York

  16. Leaman A, Bordass B (1999) Productivity in Buildings: The “Killer” Variables. Build Res Inf 27(1):4–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamada S, Ohta T (2010) Seasonal Variations in the Cooling Effect of Urban Green Areas on Surrounding Urban Areas. Urban For Urban Green 9(1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pomerantz M, Akbari H, Chen A, Taha H, Rosenfeld AH (1997) Paving materials for heat island mitigation. Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, United States. Retrieved December 10, 2011, from https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/291033

  19. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (2004) Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. ASHRAE Standard 62.1–2004, New York

  20. Sailor DJ (2008) A Green Roof Model for Building Energy Simulation Programs. Energy Build 40(8):1466–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy (n.d.) EnergyPlus Example File Generator. EERE: Building Technologies Program: EnergyPlus Software. Retrieved November 2011, from. http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/cfm/inputs/

  22. Goodrum WM (2012) Beauty in Buildings: How Beauty and Inspiration Impact Building Energy Performance. M.S. Thesis. University of Colorado.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqiang John Zhai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

In addition to the composite weighting factors for energy use per building area included in Table 15, composite weighting factors for heating energy and cooling energy were also compiled, allowing consideration of the importance of building features for different climates or building applications that may be predominantly heating or predominantly cooling. The composite weighting factors for heating energy are included in Appendix Table 17 and the composite weighting factors for cooling energy are included in Appendix Table 18.

Table 17 Composite Weighting Factors – Heating Energy
Table 18 Composite Weighting Factors – Cooling Energy

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goodrum, W.M., Zhai, Z.J. & Robles, m. Impacts of architectural beauty to building energy performance. Archit. Struct. Constr. 3, 87–111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-023-00083-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-023-00083-y

Keywords

Navigation