Skip to main content
Log in

The deployable tectonic: mechanization and mobility in architecture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Architecture, Structures and Construction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Movable elements in architecture are not new, but are gaining in popularity, as evidenced in recent works of architecture such as The Shed at Hudson Yards. This type of architecture, termed “kinetic” shifts the relationship of the public to the space they inhabit. People are no longer moving bodies through the space; the space transforms around them. Further, the design process for success in these types of projects is highly layered and complex. If structural advances drive this trend, we are at a unique juncture in the history of architecture, similar to the flying buttress or standardized fabrication wherein technology is leading architectural aesthetics. From the user’s perspective, a piece of architecture becomes active; it awakens from the static. These elements bring the architectural design to the forefront of a visitor’s attention. Often the technology of mechanized architecture can be simplified into simple diagrams. Indeed there has been in recent years a small flurry around these moves, studied in small models and diagrammatic vignettes. However, in implementation, these structures are quite sophisticated. Their engineering requires a keen understanding of how forces trace through a structure in multiple scenarios of deployment. Looking at the case study of The Shed at Hudson Yards, of which the authors have first-hand project experience, it can be seen that kinetic projects possess what is posited to be called “hyper-collaboration,” as every decision has impacts upon as well as is informed by the allied disciplines within a design and construction team. Thus, a linear model wherein an architectural solution is envisioned then subsequently handed off to be implemented dissolves, and a new, more networked approach emerges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arroyo SP (2003) Structure. In: Gausa M, Muller W, Guallart V (ed) The Metapolis Dictionary of Advanced Architecture: City, Technology and Society in the Information Age. Actar

  2. Asefi M (2010) Transformable and kinetic architectural structures : design, evaluation and application to intelligent architecture. VDM Verlag Dr Müller, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asefi M (2010) Design management model for transformable architectural structure, Symposium of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (50th. 2009. Valencia). Evolution and Trends in Design, Analysis and Construction of Shell and Spatial Structures : Proceedings. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, pp 2366–2379 http://hdl.handle.net/10251/7283

  4. Asefi M and Forouzandeh A (2011) Nature and Kinetic Architecture: The Development of a New Type of Transformable Structure for Temporary Applications. J Civil Eng Arch 5(6). https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2011.06.005

  5. Bernard S (2012) The dynamics of nature In: Schumacher, M, Schaeffer, O, and Vogt (ed) MOVE: Architecture in Motion - Dynamic Components and Elements. Birkhäuser

  6. Brown G (2003) Freedom and Transience of Space (Techno-nomads and transformers). In: Kronenburg R (ed) Transportable environments 2. Spon Press, New York

  7. Davidson, C. (2016) Moving Parts: A Conversation with Elizabeth Diller. Log 48–59

  8. Del Grosso A (2012) Deployable Structures. Adv Sci Technol 83:122–131. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.83.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diller E (2017) Scholl Lecture Series: Elizabeth Diller, Perez Art Musuem Miami, Apr 22, 2017 https://youtu.be/56q-eIGlcWE. Accessed 25 Feb 2022

  10. Fenci GE, Currie NGR (2017) Deployable structures classification: A review. Int J Space Struct 32(2):112–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266351117711290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fortmeyer RM, Linn CD (2014) Kinetic architecture : designs for active envelopes. Images Publishing Group, Mulgrave

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fox M (2003) Kinetic Architectural Systems Design. In: Kronenburg R (ed) Transportable environments 2. Spon Press, New York

  13. Fox M, Kemp M (2009) Interactive architecture, 1st edn. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gantes CJ (2001) Deployable structures : analysis and design. High performance structures and materials,; vol. 2; Variation: High performance structures and materials. Southampton: WIT Press. 352 pages

  15. Gonchar, J (2017) Continuing Education: Kinetic Buildings. Architectural Record, https://www.architecturalrecord.com/articles/11925-continuing-education-kinetic-buildings. Accessed 10 Dec 2021

  16. Gutai M (2015) Trans structures : fluid architecture and liquid engineering. S.l: Actar.

  17. Hanaor A, Levy R (2001) Evaluation of Deployable Structures for Space Enclosures. Int J Space Struct 16(4):211–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Korkmaz KAC (2004) An analytical study of the design potentials in kinetic architecture. Dissertation: Doctoral, İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir. Available from: http://library.iyte.edu.tr/tezler/doktora/mimarlik/T000485.doc

  19. Latour B and Yaneva A (2008) Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move: An ANT’s View of Architecture. Ardeth 1

  20. Megahed NA (2017) Understanding kinetic architecture: typology, classification, and design strategy. Architect Eng Des Manag 13:130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2016.1203676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pellegrino S (2001) Deployable structures, In: CISM courses and lectures. Springer, New York https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2584-7

  22. Rivas-Adrover E (2015) Deployable Structures. Laurence King Publishing

  23. Rodriguez C (2011) Morphological Principles of Current Kinetic Architectural Structures. Conference paper: Adaptive Architecture pp. 1–12

  24. Schumacher M, Schaeffer O, Vogt MM (2012) MOVE: Architecture in Motion - Dynamic Components and Elements. Birkhäuser, Basel

  25. Temmerman N et al (2012) Transformable structures in architectural engineering. WIT Trans Built Environ 124:457–468. https://doi.org/10.2495/HPSM120411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vincent JFV (2001) Deployable Structures in Nature and Stealing ideas from nature In: Pellegrino S (ed) Deployable structures In: CISM courses and lectures. pp. 37–58 Springer, New York https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2584-7

  27. Zuk W, Clark RH (1970) Kinetic architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina McCoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCoy, C., Duffy, T.A. The deployable tectonic: mechanization and mobility in architecture. Archit. Struct. Constr. 2, 613–628 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-022-00045-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-022-00045-w

Keywords

Navigation