Abstract
Movable elements in architecture are not new, but are gaining in popularity, as evidenced in recent works of architecture such as The Shed at Hudson Yards. This type of architecture, termed “kinetic” shifts the relationship of the public to the space they inhabit. People are no longer moving bodies through the space; the space transforms around them. Further, the design process for success in these types of projects is highly layered and complex. If structural advances drive this trend, we are at a unique juncture in the history of architecture, similar to the flying buttress or standardized fabrication wherein technology is leading architectural aesthetics. From the user’s perspective, a piece of architecture becomes active; it awakens from the static. These elements bring the architectural design to the forefront of a visitor’s attention. Often the technology of mechanized architecture can be simplified into simple diagrams. Indeed there has been in recent years a small flurry around these moves, studied in small models and diagrammatic vignettes. However, in implementation, these structures are quite sophisticated. Their engineering requires a keen understanding of how forces trace through a structure in multiple scenarios of deployment. Looking at the case study of The Shed at Hudson Yards, of which the authors have first-hand project experience, it can be seen that kinetic projects possess what is posited to be called “hyper-collaboration,” as every decision has impacts upon as well as is informed by the allied disciplines within a design and construction team. Thus, a linear model wherein an architectural solution is envisioned then subsequently handed off to be implemented dissolves, and a new, more networked approach emerges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arroyo SP (2003) Structure. In: Gausa M, Muller W, Guallart V (ed) The Metapolis Dictionary of Advanced Architecture: City, Technology and Society in the Information Age. Actar
Asefi M (2010) Transformable and kinetic architectural structures : design, evaluation and application to intelligent architecture. VDM Verlag Dr Müller, Saarbrücken
Asefi M (2010) Design management model for transformable architectural structure, Symposium of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (50th. 2009. Valencia). Evolution and Trends in Design, Analysis and Construction of Shell and Spatial Structures : Proceedings. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, pp 2366–2379 http://hdl.handle.net/10251/7283
Asefi M and Forouzandeh A (2011) Nature and Kinetic Architecture: The Development of a New Type of Transformable Structure for Temporary Applications. J Civil Eng Arch 5(6). https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2011.06.005
Bernard S (2012) The dynamics of nature In: Schumacher, M, Schaeffer, O, and Vogt (ed) MOVE: Architecture in Motion - Dynamic Components and Elements. Birkhäuser
Brown G (2003) Freedom and Transience of Space (Techno-nomads and transformers). In: Kronenburg R (ed) Transportable environments 2. Spon Press, New York
Davidson, C. (2016) Moving Parts: A Conversation with Elizabeth Diller. Log 48–59
Del Grosso A (2012) Deployable Structures. Adv Sci Technol 83:122–131. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.83.122
Diller E (2017) Scholl Lecture Series: Elizabeth Diller, Perez Art Musuem Miami, Apr 22, 2017 https://youtu.be/56q-eIGlcWE. Accessed 25 Feb 2022
Fenci GE, Currie NGR (2017) Deployable structures classification: A review. Int J Space Struct 32(2):112–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266351117711290
Fortmeyer RM, Linn CD (2014) Kinetic architecture : designs for active envelopes. Images Publishing Group, Mulgrave
Fox M (2003) Kinetic Architectural Systems Design. In: Kronenburg R (ed) Transportable environments 2. Spon Press, New York
Fox M, Kemp M (2009) Interactive architecture, 1st edn. Princeton Architectural Press, New York
Gantes CJ (2001) Deployable structures : analysis and design. High performance structures and materials,; vol. 2; Variation: High performance structures and materials. Southampton: WIT Press. 352 pages
Gonchar, J (2017) Continuing Education: Kinetic Buildings. Architectural Record, https://www.architecturalrecord.com/articles/11925-continuing-education-kinetic-buildings. Accessed 10 Dec 2021
Gutai M (2015) Trans structures : fluid architecture and liquid engineering. S.l: Actar.
Hanaor A, Levy R (2001) Evaluation of Deployable Structures for Space Enclosures. Int J Space Struct 16(4):211–229
Korkmaz KAC (2004) An analytical study of the design potentials in kinetic architecture. Dissertation: Doctoral, İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir. Available from: http://library.iyte.edu.tr/tezler/doktora/mimarlik/T000485.doc
Latour B and Yaneva A (2008) Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move: An ANT’s View of Architecture. Ardeth 1
Megahed NA (2017) Understanding kinetic architecture: typology, classification, and design strategy. Architect Eng Des Manag 13:130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2016.1203676
Pellegrino S (2001) Deployable structures, In: CISM courses and lectures. Springer, New York https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2584-7
Rivas-Adrover E (2015) Deployable Structures. Laurence King Publishing
Rodriguez C (2011) Morphological Principles of Current Kinetic Architectural Structures. Conference paper: Adaptive Architecture pp. 1–12
Schumacher M, Schaeffer O, Vogt MM (2012) MOVE: Architecture in Motion - Dynamic Components and Elements. Birkhäuser, Basel
Temmerman N et al (2012) Transformable structures in architectural engineering. WIT Trans Built Environ 124:457–468. https://doi.org/10.2495/HPSM120411
Vincent JFV (2001) Deployable Structures in Nature and Stealing ideas from nature In: Pellegrino S (ed) Deployable structures In: CISM courses and lectures. pp. 37–58 Springer, New York https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2584-7
Zuk W, Clark RH (1970) Kinetic architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCoy, C., Duffy, T.A. The deployable tectonic: mechanization and mobility in architecture. Archit. Struct. Constr. 2, 613–628 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-022-00045-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-022-00045-w