Abstract
Several factors influence the structure of parasite communities, which are important components of the biodiversity of various ecosystems. Some of these factors may be related to the environment and/or to the host. The present study evaluated the influence of host size and season on the structure of the metazoan parasite community of the brown-spotted grouper, Epinephelus chlorostigma. One hundred thirty-two fish were collected between March 2018 to February 2019 from the Red Sea, Saudi coast, Southern Saudi Arabia. Eight parasite species were recorded: one copepod (Sarcotaces sp.), one isopod (Argathona rhinoceros), two monogeneans (Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli and Megalocotyloides epinepheli), three digeneans (Prosorhynchus epinepheli, Helicometrina nimia, and Erilepturus hamati), and one nematode (Cucullanus epinepheli). The overall prevalence was 43.2% Digeneans were the most frequent parasite species and represented (50.55%) followed by monogeneans (45.05%), crustacean (3.42%), and nematode (0.98%) of the total individual parasites collected from 57 infected fish. Parasite community structure and species composition varied significantly among host size. Positive associations were found between infection parameters of parasite species and host size. Our results suggest that parasite infection parameters were affected by host size and season. Further long-term research is required to conclude the factors determining the structuring of the parasite community of E. chlorostigma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In tropical fish, several factors influence the structure of parasite communities, which are important components of the biodiversity of various ecosystems. Some of these factors may be related to the environment and/or to the host (e.g., feeding, behavior, physiology, sex) [4, 31, 46].
Temporal and spatial structural changes in marine parasite communities have been associated with seasonal and local variations in biotic and abiotic environmental factors. Variations in parasite species composition and infection levels over time can be attributed also to these factors [20, 44, 45, 47]. In the tropics, structural changes in parasite communities have always been associated with host traits such as age, body size, feeding behavior, host density, and vagility. These can promote high colonisation and exposure rates by new species of parasite and have been associated with parasite communities of high diversity and species richness [26, 39, 42, 46, 47].
In tropical regions conducted studies on temporal variation in fish populations [15, 44, 45, 47] revealed that temporal variation in species richness and parasite community structure was affected by biotic and abiotic factors, such as water temperature and oxygen levels, availability of intermediate hosts, as well as human impacts. Even though, there is still little evidence that parasite communities vary over time [15, 20, 25, 46].
Temporal structural changes that related to seasonal and/or local variations in several biotic and abiotic environmental factors can be experienced in metazoan parasite communities. Few studies have addressed this issue in tropical regions, where changes in water temperature are less extreme than in temperate regions, so the factors or processes that can generate variations in these parasite communities are as yet unclear [25, 39, 46].
E. chlorostigma (Valenciennes) (Pisces: Serranidae), is a widely distributed species in the red sea and one of the most important commercial marine fish in Saudi Arabia [1, 12, 32]. The habitat recorded for E. chlorostigma was a deep-sea fish because the specimen was caught on the outer slope of the barrier reef, but may be encountered in shallow waters [12, 14]. Unexpectedly there is no current studies regarding the parasite community of brown-spotted grouper, E. chlorostigma (Valenciennes 1828) (Perciformes: Serranidae); studies have been focused solely on taxonomy of parasites and species catalogue [1, 2, 5, 21, 22, 35]. Therefore, the parasite community dynamics from this fish should be better investigated. In this sense, the present study aimed to evaluate the influence of host size and season on the metazoan parasite community structure of E. chlorostigma.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study area, sampling of hosts and parasites
This study was carried out in Al Qunfudhah (19° 7′ 35″ N, 41° 4′ 44″ E), in the Tihamah region on the Red Sea coast. It is located at 290 km to the south from the holy city, Mecca, and 340 km away from Jeddah. Its average monthly weather is shown in Table 1. The high rainfall was recorded in Al Qunfudhah during April, May, November, December, and January. The high temperatures were recorded in May, June, July, August, and September (mostly summer months) (Table 1).
One hundred thirty-two E. chlorostigma were examined for parasitological study from March 2018 to February 2019. Fish were bought from local fishermen operating landing trawlers along the Al Qunfudhah coast. The length ranged from 400 to 850 mm (all samples were mature according to [12]. Samples were kept fresh or were deep-frozen in individual plastic bags at − 10 °C, until further examination in the laboratory. Thirty-three fish were collected per season in one month at the one time (March for spring, July for summer, September for autumn and January for winter).
External organs of fish (skin, fins, nasal pits, eyes, and buccal cavities) and internal organs (stomach, pyloric caeca, intestines, heart, liver, spleen, gall bladder, and gonads) were thoroughly examined for the presence of ectoparasites and endoparasites. Gill arches, placed in Petri dishes filled with sea water, were separated and examined for the presence of parasites. Internal organs (e.g., stomach, pyloric caeca, intestines, heart, liver, spleen, gall bladder, and gonads) were separated and examined for the presence of parasites. Collected parasites were counted, and preserved in 70% ethanol and then specimens were cleared in lactic acid for further examination and species identification. Parasites were identified according to Gibson et al., [16], Al-Mathal [1], Al-Mathal [2], Justine and Henry [21], Justine et al., [22], Bray and Justine [5], and [35]. Host length (host size) was classified into three groups (class 1, ≤ 500 mm, class 2, < 500 to > 700 mm, and class 3 ≥ 700 mm (all samples were mature according to Craig et al. [12].
2.2 Data and statistical analysis
Infection levels for each parasite species were described according to Bush et al. [7]. Parasites infecting several host species were considered generalist parasites while specialist parasites, those infecting only one or two host species [18].
Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software (Version 22.00). Testing of effects of both individual and interacted factors (host size and season) on species richness of metazoan parasite species was analyzed using the General Linear Interactive Model (GLIM) after normalization of the data by log 10 (x + 1) transformation [13, 50]. Possible differences in parasite prevalence among host size categories of fish, as well as season were evaluated using a Chi-square test. Possible differences in abundance and intensity among host size and season were tested by Kruskal Wallis. Correlations between host size categories and both prevalence, abundance, and intensity were tested by using the non-parametric, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rs). The diversity of parasite species was measured using the Simpson diversity index.
3 Results
Eight parasite species (6 helminth species and 2 Crustacea) were identified from 132 Epinephelus chlorostigma collected from the Red Sea, Saudi coast, Saudi Arabia. The parasite species were one copepod (Sarcotaces sp.), one isopod (Argathona rhinoceros), two monogeneans (Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli and Megalocotyloides epinepheli), three digeneans (Prosorhynchus epinepheli, Helicometrina nimia and Erilepturus hamati) and one nematode (Cucullanus epinepheli) (Table 2). The overall prevalence of Sarcotaces sp., A. rhinoceros, Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli, Megalocotyloides epinepheli, Prosorhynchus epinepheli, H. nimia, E. hamati and C. epinepheli was 8.33%, 9.1%, 33.3%, 26.5%, 32.6%, 32.6%, 19.7%, and 6.1 respectively.
Species richness was the highest among the digeneans parasite species and represented (50.55%) followed by monogeneans (45.05%), crustacean (3.42%), and nematode (0.98%) of the total individual parasites recorded (819) from 57 infected fish. Out of 132 examined fish, 57 (43.2%) fish were found to be infected. The most prevalent parasite species was Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli (33.3%), while the least one was C. epinepheli (6.1%) (Table 2). The overall mean species richness varies significantly by host size (Fig. 1, χ2 = 107.10, P < 0.001). The large-sized fish group (class 3) has the highest mean species richness (Fig. 1, 3.77). Also, fluctuation in species richness per season was found. The highest species richness was recorded in summer (2.58) and the lowest one in winter (Fig. 2, 0.61). There was no significant difference in species richness per season (χ2 = 4.48, P = 0.17). Analysis of the data with GLIM revealed that host size played a significant role in determining parasite species richness and that there was no interaction between host size and season (Table 3). A positive correlation was found between species richness and host size (length) (r2 = 0.65, P < 0.001). The Simpson diversity index of the parasite community was 0.79.
The prevalence, mean abundance, and mean intensity of infection (parasite infection parameters) showed a clear tendency per host size. Generally, the observed trend is that parasite infection parameters increase with the host size (host length) of fish; the larger fish harbouring relatively heavy infections (Table 4). Class 3 fish had the highest levels of infection for prevalence and mean abundance across all parasite species. Mean intensity, however, was only highest for three parasite species in the largest fish. The largest host size <)500 to > 700 mm) has the highest prevalence in Sarcotaces sp. (25%), A. rhinoceros (15.91%), Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli (72.73%), M. epinepheli (68.18%), Prosorhynchus epinepheli (79.54%), H. nimia (68.18%), E. hamati (59.09%), and C. epinepheli (15.91%) when compared to low size class groups (Table 4). There were significant differences in overall prevalence per host size groups (χ2 = 42.95, P > 0.001) and prevalence of all parasite species except A. rhinoceros (χ2 = 4.65, P = 0.09) (Table 4). Higher mean abundance was observed in higher host size group (largest host size) in Sarcotaces sp. (0.25 ± 0.07), A. rhinoceros (0.27 ± 0.10), Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli (3.29 ± 0.36), M. epinepheli (3 ± 0.37), Prosorhynchus epinepheli (3.84 ± 0.35), H. nimia (2.70 ± 0.32), E. hamati (0.38 ± 0.099) and C. epinepheli (0.16 ± 0.056) when compared to other low-class groups (Table 4). Mean abundance varied significantly in overall mean abundance (χ2 = 51.81, P > 0.001) and all parasite species except A. rhinoceros (χ2 = 4.97, P = 0.08) per host size groups (Table 4). The largest host size has the highest intensity in Sarcotaces sp. (1 ± 0.00), A. rhinoceros (1.71 ± 0.29), and E. hamate (1.21 ± 0.15) when compared to other class groups (Table 4). The overall mean intensity of infection varied significantly (χ2 = 18.33, P > 0.001) and there was only one parasite species, Prosorhynchus epinepheli among host size groups (χ2 = 6.54, P = 0.038) (Table 4). The value of the correlation coefficient also indicated a positive correlation between overall prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection from one side and host size groups from the other side (Table 4).
The prevalence, and mean abundance of parasite species, fluctuated seasonally (Table 5). No infection was found during the winter season with Sarcotaces sp. (0.00%) and A. rhinoceros (0.00%). In general, the infection rate in winter months is low in most of the parasite species and overall infection prevalence was (3.8%). Prevalence was also low during autumn for most the parasite species (A. rhinoceros (6.06%), Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli (21.21%), M. epinepheli (15.15%), Prosorhynchus epinepheli (21.21%), H. nimia (18.18%), E. hamate (24.24%), but relatively high in case of nematode parasite, C. epinepheli (12.12%) (Table 5). Prevalence was relatively high during spring and summer (Table 5). Infection prevalence differed significantly per season in overall prevalence (χ2 = 22.41, P > 0.001) and in Sarcotaces sp. (χ2 = 13.68, P = 0.003), Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli (χ2 = 18.68, P > 0.001), M. epinepheli (χ2 = 18.95, P > 0.001), Prosorhynchus epinepheli (χ2 = 16.81, P = 0.001) and H. nimia (χ2 = 17.631, P = 0.001) (Table 5). Generally, the overall mean abundance was relatively high in summer (11.27 ± 1.65) and spring (8.48 ± 1.64) when compared to autumn (3.15 ± 1.04) and winter (1.90 ± 0.86) (Table 5). A significant difference was found among seasons and mean abundance in overall mean abundance (χ2 = 26.588, P > 0.001), and in mean abundance of Sarcotaces sp. (χ2 = 13.681, P = 0.003), Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli (χ2 = 25.130, P > 0.001), M. epinepheli (χ2 = 25.521, P > 0.001), Prosorhynchus epinepheli (χ2 = 18.297, P > 0.001), H. nimia (χ2 = 22.299, P > 0.001) and E. hamati (χ2 = 3.332, P = 0.039) (Table 5).
Overall mean intensity showed a similar trend as mean abundance, and high values were recorded during the summer (16.90 ± 1.29) and spring (13.33 ± 1.89) and low values during autumn (9.45 ± 2.10) and winter (12.60 ± 2.22). Also, there was a seasonal variation among seasons in most parasite species (Table 5). There was no significant difference per season in mean intensity in overall mean intensity (χ2 = 5.827, P = 0.120), and in all parasite species (Table 5).
4 Discussion
In the present study, eight metazoan parasite species (6 helminth species and 2 Crustacea), were recorded from one hundred thirty-two E. chlorostigma. The parasite species were one copepod (Sarcotaces sp.), one isopod (A. rhinoceros), two monogeneans (Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli and M. epinepheli), three digeneans (Prosorhynchus epinepheli, H. nimia, and E. hamati), and one nematode (C. epinepheli). The recorded species were previously reported by other studies that focused solely on the taxonomy of parasites [1, 2, 5, 21, 22, 29, 35, 43]. Digeneans parasite species numerically dominated the parasite community, representing 50.55% and the most diverse group of parasites followed by monogeneans represented 45.05% of the total individual parasites reported. This is in agreement with Villalba-Vasquez et al. [45], Violante‐Gonzalez et al. [47], Violante‐Gonzalez et al. [48] and Villalba-Vasquez et al. [46].
The overall mean species richness varies significantly by host size; large-sized fish have the highest mean species richness (3.77). Also, fluctuation in species richness per season was found. The highest species richness was recorded in summer (2.58) and the lowest one in winter (0.61). A positive correlation was found between species richness and host size (length). The current study results are consistent with Poulin and Rohde [37] and Villalba-Vasquez et al. [46].
Ectoparasites (monogeneans, copepods, and isopods) and endoparasites (digeneans, cestodes, acanthocephalans, and nematodes) make up the parasite community in marine fish. Ectoparasites are usually transmitted by contact between hosts, but endoparasites are transmitted via trophic pathways [8, 28]. The parasite species richness varies substantially between the different hosts of each of these groups [15, 37, 42, 45, 46]. Schooling fish are more likely to have abundant ectoparasites than solitary species [26, 36] since a transmission stage (e.g., eggs, larvae) is more likely to contact a host when there is a greater density of hosts. This has been recorded in several species of Caligus copepods [36, 46].
The current study results indicated that the prevalence of Sarcotaces sp. was higher (8.33%) when compared to that reported by Osman et al. [35] where the infestation rate was 6.74%.
One isopod parasite was identified in this study, namely, A. rhinoceros. It was previously reported from Tetraodon leopardus, E. chlorostigma, Epinephelus tauvina, Epinephelus malabaricus, Plectropomus leopardus, Epinephelus coioides, and Epinephelus cyanopodus [22, 40]. The Red Sea is a new geographical record for A. rhinoceros. The prevalence of A. rhinoceros was 9.1% (12/132) higher when compared to infestation rate of A. rhinoceros in E. coioides (7.41%) [40].
Two monogenean parasite species were identified namely; Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli and M. epinepheli. Al-Mathal [2] identified the same monogenean species from E. chlorostigma and reported that the intensity of M. epinepheli from 1–6 per fish where the intensity of Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli was over 100 worms per fish.
Prosorhynchus epinepheli reported from E. chlorostigma [24, 43], Epinephelus areolatus [23, 30]. Nahhas et al. [30] and Kardousha [24] reported that the infection rate of P. epinepheli was 43 and 25% in E. areolatus and E. chlorostigma respectively.
H. nimia is first described by Linton (1910) from marine and has been reported from numerous marine fishes along the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of the Americas and other areas such as India and Arabian Gulf, H. nimia is found in fishes belonging to at least 9 families [1, 3, 34]. Al-Mathal [1] reported that H. nimia is one of six digenetic trematodes infecting the hamour fish (E. chlorostigma) in the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia. In the present study, the infection rate of H. nimia was 32.6% (43/132). González et al. [18] reported that the prevalence of H. nimia in Labrisomus philippii, Paralabrax humeralis Acanthistius pictus was 57.5, 10.2, and 7.3% respectively. The intensity of the parasite species was 10.1, 5.4, and 8.6 in Labrisomus philippii, Paralabrax humeralis, Acanthistius pictus respectively. Roumbedakis et al. [41] reported that H. nimia infection rate was 19.49%,the mean abundance was 1.19 ± 4.02, and the mean intensity was 6.13 ± 7.33.
The infection rate of E. hamati was 19.7%. Al-Mathal [1] reported that E. hamati is one of six digenetic trematodes infecting the hamour fish (E. chlorostigma) in the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia. Also, Maghrabi and Gharabawi [27] described E. hamati from stomach of Epinephelus tauvina from the Jeddah coast (Saudi Arabia, Red Sea). Also, this specimen was described from the stomach of Lutjanus carponotatus by Bray et al. [6].
Host body size was one of the factors that determine the structure of the parasite community of E. chlorostigma. There was a clear tendency in infection parameters (prevalence, mean abundance, and mean intensity) per host size. Generally, the observed trend was that parasite parameters increase with the host size (host length) of fish; the larger fish harbouring heavy infection parameters. The value of the correlation coefficient also indicated a positive correlation between overall prevalence, mean abundance, and mean intensity of infection from one side and host size groups from the other side (Table 4). In marine fish, some studies reported that body size on the main predictor of the presence of a particular species, of total abundance, and species richness [26, 44, 46]. According to Poulin [38], large host size, can enhance parasite colonization because larger individuals eat more food and hence have had more time to accumulate parasites than smaller ones. There were positive correlations between host body size and the abundance of the helminths Sarcotaces sp., Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli, M. epinepheli, P. epinepheli, H. nimia, E. hamate, and C. epinepheli. Osman et al. [35] reported that Sarcotaces sp. infest only old and large fishes. The fish size was reported to be correlated with parasite abundance [37].
On the other hand, Villalba-Vasquez et al. [45] showed that small body size was linked with greater structuring of parasite infracommunities Parapsettus panamensis. They also found a negative correlation between host body size and the abundance of the helminths Multitestis inconstans and Anisakis sp., and the copepods Parapetalus sp. and Lernanthropus giganteus. Furthermore, smaller fish had higher abundances of these species. This pattern was attributed to the fact that a stronger infracommunity structure occurs in smaller fish due to the differences in parasite accumulation and infection times, rather than differences in host species.
In this study, we detected seasonal variation dynamics of the parasite community structure and most of the parasite species exhibited significant seasonal variation in infection parameters (i.e., prevalence and mean abundance). Infection prevalence and mean abundance differed significantly per season in overall prevalence and Sarcotaces sp., Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli, M. epinepheli, P. epinepheli and H. nimia. This pattern also reported for other parasite species in wild fish populations [20, 37, 45, 46, 48]. Previous studies reported a relationship between host abundance and the abundance of digeneans, both were influenced by temperature [37, 48]. Poulin and Rohde [37] reported that the overall water temperature was correlated positively with both parasite species richness and abundance [37]. Our results are in agreement with Poulin and Rohde [37]. Moreover, environmental variations, vegetation cover, and seasonal variations relating to the dietary behavior of the host may also influence the seasonal infection patterns of metacercariae. These host fishes, the brown-spotted grouper, (E. chlorostigma) is piscivorous feeding on small fishes and crustaceans (mainly stomatopods and crabs) [19]. The high rainfall was recorded in Al Qunfudhah during April, May, November, December, and January. The high temperatures were recorded in May, June, July, August, and September (mostly summer months) (Table 1). Maghrabi and Gharabawi [27] noticed that the incidence of infection with digenetic trematodes was seen to be high during spring and autumn seasons, with a slight decrease during summer and winter. They attributed this to the differences in the temperature, extensive feeding of fishes, and the availability of the intermediate hosts of these parasites during such seasons.
Monogenoidean species reflected seasonal changes in parasite populations, the ectoparasites are directly affected by their external environment. The size of monogenoidean population can be significantly affected by seasonal variations in environmental temperature, which directly impacts the reproduction, survival time, and behavior of these ectoparasites, as well as the behavior, density, and infection levels of their hosts. Therefore, some of them prefer a higher water temperature for reproduction, while others prefer a cooler temperature for reproduction [17]. In E. chlorostigma, there was infection by the monogenoideans Pseudorhabdosynochus epinepheli, and M. epinepheli during four seasons, but higher levels occurred during summer season. Therefore, these results indicate that reproduction among these two monogenoideans follow a defined pattern, i.e., with prevalence and abundance throughout the year and specifically with the highest peak of prevalence and abundance during the summer season. Chubb [10] reported seasonal differences between or within different genera of monogenoideans to be related to their direct life cycles. Furthermore, his results demonstrate that monogenodeans have developed their life strategy to take advantage of the dry/rainy season cycle. On the other hand, the temperature t directly influences the reproduction of recorded monogenodeans.
Our results indicated that the prevalence of Sarcotaces sp. was higher in warm seasons, spring and summer with prevalence 21.21 and 12.12% respectively. Our results are consistent with Osman et al. [35] who reported that the prevalence of Sarcotaces sp. was higher in warm seasons, and recorded that prevalence was 17.85% and 3.84% in summer and spring respectively. Cirolanidae isopods (Argathona sp.) are typically marine and usually inhabit the warmer seas [9]. The same trend was recorded by the present study in the prevalence of A. rhinoceros per season.
In contrast, nematode parasite, C. epinepheli, recorded a high prevalence in the rainy season (autumn) and represented a new geographical record. This result is in agreement with Vital et al. [49], and Neves et al. [33], in fish hosts of Astronotus ocellatus and Pygocentrus nattereri Kner, 1858 where they reported that there were higher levels of infection by nematodes during the rainy season (autumn), due to the seasonal dietary composition of these hosts, which includes microcrustaceans that are intermediate hosts of nematodes [11].
In conclusion, the present study is considered the first one for the parasite community of E. chlorostigma. Our results suggest that parasite community structure and species composition may vary per host size and season. Study results also provide relevant “baseline” data for the parasite community of E. chlorostigma and further long-term research is needed to conclude the factors determining the structuring of the parasite community of E. chlorostigma.
Data availability
The manuscript has no associated data.
References
Al-Mathal EM (2001) Six digenetic trematodes infecting the hamour fish (Epinephelus chlorostigma) in the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 31(3):953–960
Al-Mathal EM (2002) Identification of some monogenetic treamatodes from some Arabian Gulf fish in Saudi Arabia. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 32(3):959–967
Al-Yamani FY, Nahhas FN (1981) Digenetic trematodes of marine fishes from the Kuwait Coast of the Arabian Gulf. Kuwait bulletin of marine science 3:1–22
Blasco-Costa I, Rouco C, Poulin R (2014) Biogeography of parasitism in freshwater fish: spatial patterns in hot spots of infection. Ecography 37:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01020
Bray RA, Justine J (2013) Bucephalidae (Digenea) from epinephelines (Serranidae: Perciformes) from the waters off New Caledonia, including Neidhartia lochepintade n. sp. Parasite 20:56. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2013055
Bray RA, Cribb TH, Barker SC (1993) Hemiuridae (Digenea) from marine fishes of the great barrier reef, Queensland, Australia. Syst Parasitol 25:37–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017000
Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al., revisited. J Parasitol 83:575–583
Bush AO, Fernandez J, Esch G, Seed JR (2001) Parasitism: the diversity and ecology of animal parasites, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 566
Chelladurai G, Mohanraj J, Jayanthi GR (2017) First occurrence of Argathona macronema (Bleeker, 1857) (Isopoda: Cirolanidae) on coral reef fishes along the Tuticorin coastal water, Gulf of Mannar. J Parasit Dis 41(1):206–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-016-0779-0
Chubb JC (1977) Seasonal occurrence of helminths in freshwater fishes Part I Monogenea. Adv Parasitol 15:133–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60528-X
Chubb JC (1980) Seasonal occurrence of helminths in freshwater fishes. Part III. Larval Cestoda and Nematoda. Adv Parasitol 18:1–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60398-X
Craig MT, de Mitcheson Sadovy YJ, Heemstra PC (2012) Groupers of the world: A field and market guide. NISC Ltd
Crawley MT (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Scientific Press, Oxford
Fricke R, Kulbicki M (2007) Checklist of the shore fishes of New Caledonia. In: Payri CE, Richer de Forges B (eds) Compendium of marine species of New Caledonia. IRD Noumea, pp 357–402
Gallegos-Navarro Y, Violante-Gonzalez J, Monks S, Garcia-Ibañez S, Rojas-Herrera AA, Pulido-Flores G, Rosas-Acevedo JL (2018) Factors linked to temporal and spatial variation in the metazoan parasite communities of green jack Caranx caballus (Günther 1868) (Pisces: Carangidae) from the Pacific coast of Mexico. J Nat Hist 52:2573–2590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1546914
Gibson DI, Jones A, Bray RA (eds) (2002) Keys to the Trematoda, vol 1. CAB International, Wallingford, p 521
Gonçalves RA, Oliveira MSB, Neves LR, Tavares-Dias M (2016) Seasonal pattern in parasite infracommunities of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus and Hoplias malabaricus (Actinopterygii: Erythrinidae) from the Brazilian Amazon. Acta Parasitol 61(1):119–129. https://doi.org/10.1515/ap-2016-0016
González MT, Henríquez V, López Z (2013) Variations in the fecundity and body size of digenean (Opecoelidae) species parasitizing fishes from Northern Chile. Revista de Biologia Marina y Oceanografia 48:421–429. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-19572013000300002
Hassan AA (2013) Anatomy and histology of the digestive system of the carnivorous fish, the brown-spotted grouper, Epinephelus chlorostigma (Pisces; Serranidae) from the Red Sea. Life Science Journal 10(2):2149–2164
Hoshino EM, Tavares-Dias M (2019) Temporal and seasonal variations in parasites of Metynnis lippincottianus (Characiformes: Characidae), a host from the eastern Amazon (Brazil). J Nat Hist 53:43–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-019-00057-5
Justine JL, Henry E (2010) Monogeneans from Epinephelus chlorostigma (Val.) (Perciformes: Serranidae) off New Caledonia, with the description of three new species of diplectanids. Syst Parasitol 77(2):81–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-010-9263-x
Justine J, Beveridge I, Boxshall G, Bray R, Moravec F, Trilles J, Whittington I (2010) An annotated list of parasites (Isopoda, Copepoda, Monogenea, Digenea, Cestoda and Nematoda) collected in groupers (Serranidae, Epinephelinae) in New Caledonia emphasizes parasite biodiversity in coral reef fish. Folia Parasitol 57(4):237–262. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2010.032
Kardousha MM (2003) Redescription of ten species of digenetic trematodes from marine fishes of the Emirati Coasts of the Arabian Gulf. Arab Gulf J Sci Res 21(4):217–226
Kardousha MM (2016) Fish parasites of Qatari waters of the Arabian gulf: current status with an annotated checklist. Int J Recent Sci Res 7:12388–12393
Leiva NV, Muñoz G, González MT (2020) Geographic and ontogenetic variations in parasite communities of intertidal fish species from the south-eastern Pacific coast. J Helminthol 7(94):e124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X20000061
Luque JL, Mouillot D, Poulin R (2004) Parasite biodiversity and its determinants in coastal marine teleost fishes of Brazil. Parasitology 128:671–682. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004005050
Maghrabi OAM, Gharabawi WY (2014) Studies on some digenetic trematodes paraisitising some groupers fish in Jeddah area (Red Sea Coast, Saudi Arabia). Int J Dev 3(2):45–58
Marcogliese DJ (2002) Food webs and the transmission of parasites to marine fish. Parasitology 124:S83–S99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118200200149X
Moravec F, Justine J (2017) Two new species of nematode parasites, Cucullanus epinepheli sp. n. (Cucullanidae) and Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) sinespinis sp. n. (Camallanidae), from marine serranid and haemulid fishes off New Caledonia. Folia Parasitol 64:011. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2017.011
Nahhas FM, Sey O, Nakahara G (2006) Digenetic trematodes of marine fishes from the Arabian Gulf off the coast of Kuwait. Family Bucephalidae Poche, 1907, and the description of a new species. Helminthologia 43(3):147–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-006-0028-7
Negreiros LP, Pereira FB, Tavares-Dias M, Tavares LER (2018) Community structure of metazoan parasites from Pimelodus blochii in two rivers of the western Brazilian Amazon: same seasonal traits, but different anthropogenic impacts. Parasitol Res 117:3791–3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6082-5
Nelson JS, Grande T, Wilson MVH (2016) Fishes of the World, 5th edn. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken
Neves LR, Pereira FB, Tavares-Dias M, Luque JL (2013) Seasonal influence on the parasite fauna of a wild population of Astronotus ocellatus (Perciformes: Cichlidae) from the Brazilian Amazon. J Parasitol 99:718–721. https://doi.org/10.1645/12-84.1
Oliva ME, Valdivia IM, Chavez RA, Molina H, Cárdenas L (2015) Molecular and morphological evidence demonstrating two species of Helicometrina Linton 1910 (Digenea: Opecoelidae) in Northern Chile. J Parasitol 100(6):694–700. https://doi.org/10.1645/14-523
Osman HAM, Hassan MA, El-Refaey AME (2014) Studies on Sarcotaces sp. (Copepoda, Philichthyidae) Infestation (Black Bag Disease) among some marine fish species of Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia. World Appl Sci J 32(9):1780–1788. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.32.09.86186
Palacios-Fuentes P, Landaeta MF, González MT, Plaza G, Ojeda FP, Muñoz G (2015) Is ectoparasite burden related to host density? Evidence from nearshore fish larvae off the coast of central Chile. Aquat Ecol 49:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-015-9507-6
Poulin R, Rohde K (1997) Comparing the richness of metazoan ectoparasite communities of marine fishes: controlling for host phylogeny. Oecologia 110:278–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050160
Poulin R (1998) Comparison of three estimators of species richness in parasite component communities. J Parasitol 84(3):485–490
Poulin R (2021) The rise of ecological parasitology: twelve landmark advances that changed its history. Int J Parasitol 51:1073–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.07.001
Purivirojkul W, Songsuk A (2020) New records of fish parasitic isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Gulf of Thailand. Animals (Basel) 10(12):2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122298
Roumbedakis K, Marchiori NC, Garcia P, Pereira JJ, Castro LAS, Martins ML (2014) Helicometrina nimia Linton, 1910 (Digenea: Opecoelidae) in dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) (Teleostei: Serranidae) from southeastern Brazil. Braz J Biol 74(2):472–479. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.12612
Santos-Bustos NG, Violante-Gonzalez J, Monks S, Rojas-Herrera AA, Garcia-Ibañez S, Flores-Rodriguez P, Almazan-Nuñez RC, Moreno-Diaz G (2018) Species richness and similarity of metazoan parasite communities in three species of leatherjacket (Oligoplites: Pisces: Carangidae) from the Pacific coast of Mexico. Invertebr Biol 137:205–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12220
Saoud MFA, Ramadan MM, Al Kawari KSR (1988) Helminth parasites of fishes from the Arabian Gulf. 6. On three species of digenetic trematodes: Prosorhynchus epinepheli Yamaguti, 1939; Paraproctotrema qatarensis n. sp. and Prosorchis breviformis Srivastava, 1936. Riv Parassitol 5(49):79–85
Vidal-Martínez VM, Poulin R (2003) Spatial and temporal repeatability in parasite community structure of tropical fish hosts. Parasitology 127(4):387–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182003003792
Villalba-Vasquez PJ, Violante-Gonzalez J, Monks S, Marino-Romero JU, Garcia-Ibañez S, Rojas-Herrera AA, Flores-Garza R, Rosas-Guerrero V (2018) Temporal and spatial variations in the metazoan parasite communities of the Panama spadefish, Parapsettus panamensis (Pisces: Ephippidae), from the Pacific coast of Mexico. Invertebr Biol 137:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12232
Villalba-Vasquez PJ, Violante-González J, Pulido-Flores G, Monks S, Rojas-Herrera AA, Flores-Rodríguez P, Cayetano CV, Rosas-Acevedo JL, Santos-Bustos NG (2022) Metazoan parasite communities of the Pacificred snapper, Lutjanus peru (Perciformes: Lutjanidae): interannual variations in parasite communities. J Helminthol 96(e44):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X22000335
Violante-González J, Monks S, Gallegos-Navarro Y, Santos-Bustos NG, Villalba-Vasquez PJ, Miranda-Delgado JE, Carpio-Hernández DI (2019) Metazoan parasite communities of the Pacific jack Caranx caninus (Pisces: Carangidae): exploring the variability of their parasite communities. J Nat Hist 53(19–20):1131–1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2019.1634773
Violante-González J, Monks S, Gallegos-Navarro Y, Santos-Bustos NG, Villalba-Vasquez PJ, Padilla-Serrato JG, Pulido-Flores G (2020) Interannual variation in the metazoan parasite communities of bigeye trevally Caranx sexfasciatus (Pisces, Carangidae). Parasite 27:6. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2020001
Vital JF, Varella AMB, Porto DB, Malta JCO (2011) Seasonality of the metazoan fauna of Pygocentrus nattereri (Kner, 1858) in Piranha Lake, (Amazonas, Brazil), and evaluation of its potential as an indicator of environmental health. Biota Neotrop 11:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032011000100021
Wilson K, Grenfell BT (1997) Generalized linear modelling for parasitologists. Parasitol Today 13:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4758(96)40009-6
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by MMI and TSA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MMI and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
No approval of research ethics committees was required to accomplish the goals of this study because experimental work was conducted with an unregulated invertebrate species.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ibrahim, M.M., Alghamdi, T.S. Factors determining community structure of metazoan parasites from brown-spotted grouper, Epinephelus chlorostigma (Valenciennes, 1828) in Southern Saudi Arabia. J.Umm Al-Qura Univ. Appll. Sci. 9, 67–76 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-022-00019-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-022-00019-0