Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Referral pathways for chronic pain patients from Canadian emergency departments: emergency physicians’ practices, perspectives, and recommendations

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with chronic pain account for 12–20% of total emergency department (ED) and was the primary presenting concern among 37% of patients who visited the ED > 12 times per year. Despite this, emergency physicians receive little focused training managing these patients, and there is a paucity of effective referral pathways from EDs, despite strong evidence that chronic pain is best treated longitudinally in multidisciplinary clinics. This study sought to explore the practices, perspectives, and recommendations of current Canadians emergency physicians in better serving the chronic pain patient (CPP) population in the ED.

Methods

An electronic cross-sectional survey was administered to members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP), consisting of 16 multiple choice and numerical response questions. Responses were summarized descriptively as percentages and as the median and inter-quartile range (IQR) for quantitative variables.

Results

The study was completed by 169/1635 respondents for a response rate of 10%. The most common presentations respondents saw were neuropathic pain and centrally mediated disorders (23% each) and low back pain (19%). 86% of respondents felt that chronic pain patients did not get appropriate referrals from the ED, and 70% of respondents were unaware of where they could even refer chronic pain patients from the ED. 96% of respondents felt that their ED did not have an effective referral pathway for chronic pain patients. Rapid access clinics for common conditions, reduced pain clinic wait times, and clear ED referral pathways were the commonest recommendations by respondents.

Conclusion

There is a clear need to increase the accessibility to outpatient pain medicine clinics for chronic pain patients presenting to the ED. ED and pain medicine providers must collaborate to establish mutually beneficial referral pathways from EDs, and to advocate for increased funding for rapid access outpatient pain clinics.

Résumé

Contexte

Les patients souffrant de douleur chronique représentent de 12 à 20% de l’ensemble du service d’urgence (SU) et constituaient la principale préoccupation chez 37% des patients qui ont visité le SU > 12 fois par année. Malgré cela, les urgentologues reçoivent peu de formation ciblée sur la gestion de ces patients, et il y a peu de voies d’aiguillage efficaces de la part des urgences, malgré de solides preuves que la douleur chronique est mieux traitée longitudinalement dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires. Cette étude visait à explorer les pratiques, les perspectives et les recommandations des médecins d’urgence canadiens actuels pour mieux servir la population de patients souffrant de douleur chronique (RPC) à l’urgence.

Méthodes

Un sondage transversal électronique a été administré aux membres de l’Association canadienne des médecins d’urgence (ACMU), comprenant seize questions à choix multiples et réponses numériques. Les réponses ont été résumées de façon descriptive sous forme de pourcentages et de fourchette médiane et inter quartile (IQR) pour les variables quantitatives.

Résultats

: L’étude a été complétée par 169/1635 répondants pour un taux de réponse de 10%. Les présentations les plus courantes que les répondants ont vues étaient des douleurs neuropathiques et des troubles médiés centraux (23% chacun) et des douleurs lombaires (19%). 86% des répondants estimaient que les patients souffrant de douleur chronique n’obtenaient pas de références appropriées de la part de l’urgence, et 70% des répondants ne savaient même pas où ils pouvaient référer les patients souffrant de douleur chronique de l’urgence. 96% des répondants estimaient que leur DE n’avait pas de voie d’aiguillage efficace pour les patients souffrant de douleur chronique. Les cliniques d’accès rapide pour les affections courantes, la réduction des temps d’attente dans les cliniques de traitement de la douleur et des voies d’aiguillage claires vers le service d’urgence étaient les recommandations les plus courantes des répondants.

Conclusion

Il est clairement nécessaire d’accroître l’accessibilité aux cliniques de traitement de la douleur ambulatoire pour les patients souffrant de douleur chronique qui se présentent à l’urgence. Les fournisseurs de soins de l’urgence et de médicaments contre la douleur doivent collaborer pour établir des voies d’aiguillage mutuellement avantageuses à partir des urgences. et plaider en faveur d’un financement accru pour des cliniques de traitement de la douleur en consultation externe à accès rapide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl. 1986;3:S1-226.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Poulin PA, Nelli J, Tremblay S, Small R, Caluyong MB, Freeman J, et al. Chronic pain in the emergency department: a pilot mixed-methods cross-sectional study examining patient characteristics and reasons for presentations. Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:3092391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Shergill Y, Rice D, Smyth C, Tremblay S, Nelli J, Small R, et al. Characteristics of frequent users of the emergency department with chronic pain. CJEM. 2020;22(3):350–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiu YM, Dufour I, Courteau J, Vanasse A, Chouinard MC, Dubois MF, et al. Profiles of frequent emergency department users with chronic conditions: a latent class analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(9):e055297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Small RN, Shergill Y, Tremblay S, Nelli J, Rice D, Smyth C, et al. Understanding the impact of chronic pain in the emergency department: prevalence and characteristics of patients visiting the emergency department for chronic pain at an Urban Academic Health Sciences Centre. Can J Pain. 2023;3(1):106–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dépelteau A, Racine-Hemmings F, Lagueux É, Hudon C. Chronic pain and frequent use of emergency department: a systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(2):358–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Donovan E, Ranney ML, Reid AM, Baird J, Green TC. Chronic pain in the emergency department. R I Med J 2017;100(2):25–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Canada H. Canadian Pain Task Force Report: March 2021. 2021. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/about-health-canada/public-engagement/external-advisory-bodies/canadian-pain-task-force/report-2021.html

  10. Care AGD of H and A. Taskforce final report – Pain Management MBS items. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care; 2020. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/taskforce-final-report-pain-management-mbs-items?language=en

  11. Core Standards | Faculty of Pain Medicine. 2023. https://fpm.ac.uk/standards-guidelines/core-standards

  12. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(suppl 1):S80-9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olsen JC, Ogarek JL, Goldenberg EJ, Sulo S. Impact of a chronic pain protocol on emergency department utilization. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(4):424–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong CK, O’Rielly CM, Teitge BD, Sutherland RL, Farquharson S, Ghosh M, et al. The characteristics and effectiveness of interventions for frequent emergency department utilizing patients with chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(8):742–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Kiran L. Grant, Aidan L. McParland, Mario Francispragasam & Patrick Oxciano

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Mario Francispragasam & Patrick Oxciano

Authors
  1. Kiran L. Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aidan L. McParland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mario Francispragasam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick Oxciano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiran L. Grant.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grant, K.L., McParland, A.L., Francispragasam, M. et al. Referral pathways for chronic pain patients from Canadian emergency departments: emergency physicians’ practices, perspectives, and recommendations. Can J Emerg Med 25, 761–767 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-023-00566-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-023-00566-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation