Abstract
Objective
Patient handover between paramedics and the trauma team is vulnerable to communication errors that may adversely affect patient care. This study assesses the feasibility of a handover tool, IMIST-AMBO (acronym of categories), implementation in the trauma bay and evaluates the degree to which it improves handover metrics.
Methods
This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted at Canada’s largest level-one trauma center. Feasibility of the tool implementation and improvement in handover metrics were assessed. Strategies for implementation included distribution of an educational video and posters, and point-of-care reminders in the trauma bay. Two reviewers independently assessed video recordings of handovers to evaluate handover metrics. Findings were compared to data obtained during a knowledge gap analysis conducted prior to the initiation of this study at the same institution.
Results
Over 13 weeks (August to November 2020), 140 videos were recorded, of which 80 used the IMIST-AMBO tool (compliance of 57%). Paramedic adherence to the handover structure occurred in 70.4% of cases, with greater adherence to the IMIST (82.2%) compared to the AMBO (47.1%) section. The mean (± standard deviation) handover duration was shorter (1 min:58 s ± 0:44 s during implementation vs. 2 min:47 s ± 1:14 s pre-implementation, [p < 0.001]). Frequency of parallel conversations and informal handovers improved (61% to 30% and 65% to 13%, [p < 0.001], respectively). Interruptions during the handover decreased from 3.05 (± 1.95) to 1.5 (± 1.7), p < 0.001. The tool was received favorably among study participants.
Conclusion
The IMIST-AMBO tool reduced the frequency of interruptions, parallel conversations, and informal handovers during paramedic–trauma team handovers at our institution. The quality and amount of information communicated per handover improved, all with a decrease in handover duration. The IMIST-AMBO tool may be applied to other trauma centers across Canada, or more broadly on an international scale.
Résumé
Objectifs
Le transfert des patients entre les ambulanciers paramédicaux et l’équipe de traumatologie est vulnérable aux erreurs de communication qui peuvent nuire aux soins aux patients. Cette étude évalue la faisabilité d’un outil de transfert, IMIST-AMBO (acronyme des catégories), mis en œuvre dans le service de traumatologie et évalue dans quelle mesure il améliore les paramètres de transfert.
Méthodes
Il s’agit d’une étude de cohorte observationnelle prospective menée dans le plus grand centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 du Canada. La faisabilité de la mise en œuvre de l’outil et l’amélioration des paramètres de transfert ont été évaluées. Les stratégies de mise en œuvre comprenaient la distribution d’une vidéo et d’affiches éducatives, ainsi que des rappels au point de service dans la salle de traumatologie. Deux examinateurs ont évalué indépendamment les enregistrements vidéo des transferts pour évaluer les paramètres de transfert. Les résultats ont été comparés aux données obtenues lors d’une analyse des lacunes en matière de connaissances réalisée avant le lancement de cette étude dans le même établissement.
Résultats
Sur 13 semaines (août à novembre 2020), 140 vidéos ont été enregistrées, dont 80 ont utilisé l'outil IMIST-AMBO (conformité de 57%). L’adhésion des ambulanciers paramédicaux à la structure de transfert s’est produite dans 70.4% des cas, avec une plus grande adhésion à l’IMIST (82.2%) que l’AMBO (47,1%). La durée moyenne (± écart-type) du transfert était plus courte (1 min: 58 s ± 0: 44 s pendant la mise en œuvre contre 2 min: 47 s ± 1: 14 s avant la mise en œuvre, p < 0.001). La fréquence des conversations parallèles et des transferts informels s'est améliorée (de 61% à 30% et de 65% à 13%, [p < 0.001], respectivement). Les interruptions pendant le transfert ont diminué de 3.05 (± 1.95) à 1.5 (± 1.7), p < 0.001. L’outil a été accueilli favorablement par les participants à l’étude.
Conclusion
L’outil IMIST-AMBO a réduit la fréquence des interruptions, des conversations parallèles et des transferts informels pendant les transferts de l'équipe paramédicale de traumatologie dans notre établissement. La qualité et la quantité d'informations communiquées par transfert se sont améliorées, tout en réduisant la durée du transfert. L'outil IMIST-AMBO peut être appliqué à d'autres centres de traumatologie à travers le Canada, ou plus largement à l’échelle internationale.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All study data is available upon request.
References
Nikouline A, Quirion A, Jung JJ, Nolan B. Errors in adult trauma resuscitation: a systematic review. CJEM. 2021;23(4):537–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00118-7.
Evans SM, Murray A, Patrick I, Fitzgerald M, Smith S, Cameron P. Clinical handover in the trauma setting: a qualitative study of paramedics and trauma team members. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e57. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.039073.
Thakore S, Morrison W. A survey of the perceived quality of patient handover by ambulance staff in the resuscitation room. Emerg Med J. 2001;18(4):293. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.4.293.
Jenkin A, Abelson-Mitchell N, Cooper S. Patient handover: time for a change? Emerg Nurse. 2007;15(3):141–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2007.04.004.
Gillespie B, Chaboyer W. Shared mental models enhance team performance. Nurs Crit Care. 2009;14(5):222–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00357.x.
Dusse F, Pütz J, Böhmer A, Schieren M, Joppich R, Wappler F. Completeness of the operating room to intensive care unit handover: a matter of time? BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01247-3.
Hovenkamp GT, Olgers TJ, Wortel RR, Noltes ME, Dercksen B, ter Maaten JC. The satisfaction regarding handovers between ambulance and emergency department nurses: an observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0545-7.
Philippon DJ, Marchildon GP, Ludlow K, Boyling C, Braithwaite J. The comparative performance of the Canadian and Australian health systems. Healthc Manage Forum. 2018;31(6):239–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470418788378.
Iedema R, Ball C, Daly B, Young J, Green T, Middleton PM, et al. Design and trial of a new ambulance-to-emergency department handover protocol: ‘IMIST-AMBO.’ BMJ Qual & Safety. 2012;21(8):627. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000766.
Javidan AP, Nathens AB, Tien H, da Luz LT. Clinical handover from emergency medical services to the trauma team: a gap analysis. Can J Emerg Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2019.438.
Shah Y, Alinier G, Pillay Y. Clinical handover between paramedics and emergency department staff: SBAR and IMIST-AMBO acronyms. Int J Clin Prac. 2016;6(2):37–44. https://doi.org/10.12968/ippr.2016.6.2.37.
Ye K, McD Taylor D, Knott JC, Dent A, MacBean CE. Handover in the emergency department: deficiencies and adverse effects. Emerg Med Australas. 2007;19(5):433–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00984.x.
Evans SM, Murray A, Patrick I, Fitzgerald M, Smith S, Andrianopoulos N, et al. Assessing clinical handover between paramedics and the trauma team. Injury. 2010;41(5):460–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.07.065.
Centre SHS. Tory Trauma Program 2021 [cited 2021 June 25 2021]. Available from: https://sunnybrook.ca/content/?page=tecc-about.
Maddry JK, Simon EM, Reeves LK, Mora AG, Clemons MA, Shults NM, et al. Impact of a standardized patient hand-off tool on communication between emergency medical services personnel and emergency separtment staff. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2020.1808745.
Nagaraj MB, Lowe JE, Marinica AL, Morshedi BB, Isaacs SM, Miller BL, et al. Using trauma video review to assess EMS handoff and trauma team non-technical skills. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2021.2000684.
Oakley E, Stocker S, Staubli G, Young S. Using video recording to identify management errors in pediatric trauma resuscitation. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):658–64. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1803.
Dumas RP, Chreiman KM, Seamon MJ, Cannon JW, Reilly PM, Christie JD, et al. Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy: using trauma video review to generate procedural norms. Injury. 2018;49(9):1687–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.010.
Santora TA, Trooskin SZ, Blank CA, Clarke JR, Schinco MA. Video assessment of trauma response: adherence to ATLS protocols. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14(6):564–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-6757(96)90100-x.
Chen YK, Arriaga A. Crisis checklists in emergency medicine: another step forward for cognitive aids. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30(9):689–93. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013203.
Thaeter L, Schröder H, Henze L, Butte J, Henn P, Rossaint R, et al. Handover training for medical students: a controlled educational trial of a pilot curriculum in Germany. BMJ Open. 2018;8(9):e021202. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021202.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge Taryn Johnston, Darren Gerson, and Sarah-Anne de Groot at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre for their contributions in providing statistical analysis support.
Funding
Financial support for this study was $5000.00 awarded from an internal research competition at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre called Quality Quest Competition on January 22, 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Ethics approval
Approved by the Research Ethics Board at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from individual participants (Trauma Team Leaders and Nurses) as required by the Research Ethics Board at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Elliott, C.G., Notario, L., Wong, B. et al. Implementing the IMIST-AMBO tool for paramedic to trauma team handovers: a video review analysis. Can J Emerg Med 25, 421–428 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-023-00503-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-023-00503-4
Keywords
- Patient handover
- Handover tool
- Quality improvement
- Trauma
- Injury
- Communication
- Team performance
- High performing teams