Skip to main content
Log in

Learner reflections on a postgraduate emergency medicine simulation curriculum: a qualitative exploration based on focus group interviews

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To describe postgraduate emergency medicine (EM) residents’ perceptions of simulation-based curriculum immediately post-simulation training.

Methods

This interpretive qualitative study explores residents’ reflections on a city-wide, adult EM simulation-based curriculum. Focus group interviews gather residents’ insights immediately post-simulation. Postgraduate trainees from the University of Toronto EM residency program were eligible to participate. We explored participants' perceptions of how well learning objectives were addressed, helpful/challenging aspects of the simulations, feelings during sessions, debriefing/pre-briefing, simulation integration into the broader EM curriculum, and anticipated changes in practice after the session.

Results

Our findings indicate that EM residents’ learning goals for the simulation sessions evolve as they progress through residency training. Junior trainees report performance-oriented goals while senior trainees report learning-oriented goals. Differing motivations may affect residents’ perceptions of the quality of the simulation experience. Junior residents want to feel prepared for the scenario and primed with the appropriate knowledge to manage the case. Senior residents focus on developing teamwork competencies and on mastering new clinical skills in the simulation environment.

Conclusions

Junior and senior emergency medicine residents differ in their goal orientation during simulation-based training. Educators who develop simulation-based curricula should be mindful that junior residents may benefit from preparatory materials while senior residents prefer to be challenged. Resident reflections may significantly contribute to improvement of simulation-based curricula.

Résumé

Objectif

Décrire la perception du programme de formation par simulation des résidents en médecine d’urgence (MU) immédiatement après un entraînement par simulation.

Méthodes

Cette étude qualitative interprétative explore les réflexions des résidents au sujet d’un programme axé sur la simulation en MU pour adultes à travers la ville. Les entretiens des groupes de discussion recueillent les aperçus des résidents immédiatement après la simulation. Les stagiaires de troisième cycle du programme de résidence en MU de l’Université de Toronto étaient admissibles à participer. Nous avons examiné les perceptions des participants sur la manière dont les objectifs d’apprentissage étaient abordés, les aspects utiles / exigeants des simulations, les sentiments pendant les sessions, le débriefing / pré-briefing, l’intégration de la simulation dans le programme plus large de la MU et les changements anticipés dans la pratique après la session.

Résultats

Nos résultats indiquent que les objectifs d’apprentissage des résidents en MU pour les séances de simulation évoluent au fur et à mesure qu’ils progressent dans la formation en résidence. Les stagiaires juniors rapportent des objectifs axés sur la performance tandis que les stagiaires avec plus d’ancienneté rapportent des objectifs axés sur l’apprentissage. Des motivations différentes peuvent affecter la perception qu'ont les résidents de la qualité de l'expérience de simulation. Les résidents assistants veulent se sentir préparés pour le scénario et équipés des connaissances appropriées pour gérer le cas. Les résidents avec plus d’ancienneté se concentrent sur le développement des compétences de travail d’équipe et sur la maîtrise de nouvelles compétences cliniques dans l’environnement de simulation.

Conclusions

Les résidents assistants et ceux avec plus d’ancienneté en médecine d’urgence diffèrent dans leur orientation vers les objectifs au cours de la formation par simulation. Les éducateurs qui développent des programmes axés sur la simulation doivent être conscients que les résidents assistants peuvent bénéficier des matériels préparatoires tandis que les résidents avec plus d’ancienneté préfèrent être mis au défi. Les réflexions des résidents peuvent contribuer de manière significative à l’amélioration des programmes axés sur la simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James T, Nadel ES, Bhatia K, Walls RM. Incorporating simulation into a residency curriculum. CJEM. 2010;12(4):349–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McKendy KM, Posel N, Fleiszer DM, Vassiliou MC. Learner-created virtual patient curriculum for surgical residents successes and failures. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(4):559–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mathai SK, Miloslavsky EM, Contreras-Valdes FM, Milosh-Zinkus T, Hayden EM, Gordon JA, et al. How we implemented a resident-led medical simulation curriculum in a large internal medicine residency program. Med Teach. 2014;36(4):279–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brackenbury T. A qualitative examination of connections between learner-centered teaching and past significant learning experiences. JoSoTL. 2012;12(4):12–28.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nunninl L, Thompson A. Peer-assisted learning in scenario-based simulation. Med Ed. 2018;52(5):557–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):867–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mundell WC, Kennedy CC, Szostek JH, Cook DA. Simulation technology for resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2013;84(9):1174–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ. 2010;44(4):358–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stalmeijer RE, McNaughton N, Van Mook WN. Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Med teach. 2014;36(11):923–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Objectives of Training in the Specialty of Emergency Medicine. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schieman C, Ujiie H, Donahoe L, Hanna W, Malthaner R, Tumer S, et al. Developing a national simulation-based surgical skills boot camp in general thoracic surgery. J of Surg Educ. 2018;75(4):1106–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. VandWalle D, Cummings L. A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(3):390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sargeant J, Eva KW, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, et al. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Med Ed. 2011;45:636–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rudland JR, Clinton G, Wilkinson TJ. The stress paradox: how stress can be good for learning. Med Ed. 2020;54(1):40–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2(2):115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Kester-Greene.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kester-Greene, N., Filipowska, C., Heipel, H. et al. Learner reflections on a postgraduate emergency medicine simulation curriculum: a qualitative exploration based on focus group interviews. Can J Emerg Med 23, 374–382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00085-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00085-z

Keywords

Navigation