Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reimagining Sustainable Community Sports Fields of the Future: a Framework for Convergent Science-Stakeholder Decision-Making

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Circular Economy and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community-level sports fields are public spaces that provide numerous physical, mental, and societal benefits. These fields are often governed, constructed, managed, and used by various interacting groups who have different value systems and preferences that impact their decisions. While sports fields offer an opportunity for community engagement and physical activity to residents of communities, poor field quality or lack of access from misinformed decisions can increase health issues and decrease physical activity participation, especially among youth. That is in addition to decisions made regarding water and energy resources required to maintain these fields. Those who have decision-making authority should consider input from the entire community and other relevant stakeholders; however, there is a lack of convergence and breakdown in communication among stakeholders’ needs and priorities. Additionally, decision-makers often lack effective tools and proper knowledge to select and manage fields to meet demand in a sustainable and just manner. The objective of this white paper is to propose an innovative framework for research that could lead to the development of a common platform for multi-stakeholder dialogue about issues related to improving the social, economic, and environmental sustainability of community-level sports fields. The framework can be implemented by innovatively bringing together physical and social scientists to (1) map and assemble pertinent stakeholders and visualize the stakeholder network, (2) measure leverage points within the stakeholder network that optimize sustainable and inclusive communication and decision-making, (3) identify perspectives surrounding decisions at the community level (through prioritizing different social, economic, and environmental indicators, with particular focus on health outcomes), and (4) develop a decision support tool to evaluate the trade-offs associated with different options. Subsequently, findings should promote and catalyze dialogue between diverse stakeholders to assist with making the complex decisions for these important public spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Aspen Institute (2019) State of play 2019: trends and developments in youth sports. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/state-of-play-2019-trends-and-developments/. Accessed 11 January 2021

  2. National Federation of State High School Associations (2019) 2018-19 high school athletics participation survey. https://www.nfhs.org/media/1020412/2018-19_participation_survey.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2021

  3. Koester MC (2000) Youth sports: A pediatrician’s perspective on coaching and injury prevention. J Athl Train 35(4):466–470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallal PC, Victora CG, Azevedo MR, Wells JC (2006) Adolescent physical activity and health. Sports Med 36(12):1019–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Federation of State High School Associations (2020) The case for high school activities. https://www.nfhs.org/articles/the-case-for-high-school-activities/. Accessed 11 January 2021

  6. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Kolody B, Lewis M, Marshall S, Rosengard P (1999) Effects of health-related physical education on academic achievement: Project SPARK. Res Q Exerc Sport 70(2):127–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Escobedo LG, Marcus SE, Holtzman D, Giovino GA (1993) Sports participation, age at smoking initiation, and the risk of smoking among US high school students. J Am Med Assoc 269(11):1391–1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kulig K, Brener ND, McManus T (2003) Sexual activity and substance use among adolescents by category of physical activity plus team sports participation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157(9):905–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coalter F (2005) The social benefits of sports: an overview to inform the community planning process. SportScotland, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kay T, Bradbury S (2009) Youth sport volunteering: developing social capital? Sport Educ Soc 14(1):121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyman M (2012) The most expensive game in town: the rising cost of youth sports and the toll on today's families. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hawkins D, Metheny J (2001) Overuse injuries in youth sports: biomechanical considerations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33(10):1701–1707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stracciolini A, Sugimoto D, Howell DR (2017) Injury prevention in youth sports. Pediatr Ann 46(3):e99–e105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kucera KL, Marshall SW, Kirkendall DT, Marchak PM, Garrett WE (2005) Injury history as a risk factor for incident injury in youth soccer. Br J Sports Med 39(7):462–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Finch C, Owen N, Price R (2001) Current injury or disability as a barrier to being more physically active. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33(5):778–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Gougoulias N, Loppini M, Denaro V (2010) Long-term health outcomes of youth sports injuries. Br J Sports Med 44(1):21–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuller C, Drawer S (2004) The application of risk management in sport. Sports Med 34(6):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Micheli LJ, Glassman R, Klein M (2000) The prevention of sports injuries in children. Clin Sports Med 19(4):821–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stiles VH, James IT, Dixon SJ, Guisasola IN (2009) Natural turf surfaces. Sports Med 39(1):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Straw CM, Samson CO, Henry GM, Brown CN (2020) A review of turfgrass sports field variability and its implications on athlete–surface interactions. Agron J 112:2401–2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams C, Leavitt S (2018) ‘It’s just girls’ hockey’: troubling progress narratives in girls’ and women’s sport. Int Rev Sociol Sport 53(2):152–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Powell LM, Slater S, Chaloupka FJ, Harper D (2006) Availability of physical activity–related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: a national study. Am J Public Health 96(9):1676–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eime RM, Harvey J, Charity MJ, Casey M, Westerbeek H, Payne WR (2017) The relationship of sport participation to provision of sports facilities and socioeconomic status: a geographical analysis. Aust NZ J Publ Heal 41(3):248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Puhalla J, Krans J, Goatley G (2020) Sports fields: a manual for design, construction and maintenance, third edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

  25. Cheng H, Hu Y, Reinhard M (2014) Environmental and health impacts of artificial turf: a review. Environ Sci Technol 48(4):2114–2129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Riches D, Porter I, Dingle G, Gendall A, Grover S (2020) Soil greenhouse gas emissions from Australian sports fields. Sci Total Environ 707(10):134420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Beard JB, Green RL (1994) The role of turfgrasses in environmental protection and their benefits to humans. J Environ Qual 23(3):452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Binkley HM, Beckett J, Casa DJ, Kleiner DM, Plummer PE (2002) National Athletic Trainers’ Association position statement: exertional heat illnesses. J Athl Train 37(3):329

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jim CY (2017) Intense summer heat fluxes in artificial turf harm people and environment. Landsc Urban Plan 157:561–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hahn T, Figge F, Pinkse J, Preuss L (2010) Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can’t have your cake and eat it. Bus Strat Environ Spec Issue 19(4):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nilsson M, Weitz N (2019) Governing trade-offs and building coherence in policy-making for the 2030 agenda. Polit Gov 7(4):254–263

    Google Scholar 

  32. André K, Baird J, Swartling ÅG, Vulturius G, Plummer R (2017) Analysis of Swedish forest owners’ information and knowledge-sharing networks for decision-making: insights for climate change communication and adaptation. Environ Manag 59(6):885–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Valente TW, Chou CP, Pentz MA (2007) Community coalitions as a system: effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention. Am J Public Health 97(5):880–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Garney WR, Patterson MS, Garcia K, Muraleetharan D, McLeroy K (2020) Interorganizational network findings from a nationwide cardiovascular disease prevention initiative. Eval Program Plann 79:101771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nik-Bakht M, El-Diraby TE (2020) Beyond chatter: profiling community discussion networks in urban infrastructure projects. J Infrastruct Syst 26(3):05020006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peachey JW, Cohen A, Shin N, Fusaro B (2018) Challenges and strategies of building and sustaining inter-organizational partnerships in sport for development and peace. Sport Manag Rev 21(2):160–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harris S, Houlihan B (2016) Implementing the community sport legacy: the limits of partnerships, contracts and performance management. Eur Sport Manag Q 16(4):433–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Crane A, Ruebottom T (2010) Stakeholder theory and social identity: rethinking stakeholder identification. J Bus Ethics 102(1):77–87

    Google Scholar 

  39. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management a stakeholder approach. Pittman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grimble R, Wellard K (1997) Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric Syst 55(2):173–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hoolohan C, Larkin A, Mclachlan C, Falconer R, Soutar I, Suckling J, Yu D (2018) Engaging stakeholders in research to address water–energy–food (WEF) nexus challenges. Sustain Sci 13(5):1415–1426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fouche E, Brent A (2020) Explore, design and act for sustainability: a participatory planning approach for local energy sustainability. Sustainability 12(3):862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Milan BF (2016) How participatory planning processes for transit-oriented development contribute to social sustainability. J Environ Stud Sci 6(3):520–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Brugmann J (1996) Planning for sustainability at the local government level. Environ 16(4-6):363–379

    Google Scholar 

  45. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2018) Analyzing social networks, second edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

  46. Valente TW, Palinkas LA, Czaja S, Chu KH, Brown CH (2015) Social network analysis for program implementation. PLoS One 10(6):e0131712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dyer M, Wu S, Weng MH (2021) Convergence of public participation, participatory design and NLP to co-develop circular economy. Circ Econ Sust 2021:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bertino G, Rose G, Kisser J (2021) Drivers and barriers for implementation and international transferability of sustainable pop-up living systems. Circ Econ Sust 2021:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rincón-Moreno J, Ormazábal M, Jaca C (2021) Stakeholder perspectives in transitioning to a local circular economy: a case study in Spain. Cir Econ Sust:1–19

  50. Robertson J, Eime R, Westerbeek H (2019) Community sports clubs: are they only about playing sport, or do they have broader health promotion and social responsibilities? Ann Leis Res 22(2):215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rosso EG, McGrath R (2017) Community engagement and sport? Building capacity to increase opportunities for community-based sport and physical activity. Ann Leis Res 20(3):349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Keane L, Hoare E, Richards J, Bauman A, Bellew W (2019) Methods for quantifying the social and economic value of sport and active recreation: a critical review. Sport Soc 22(12):2203–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pittz T, Bendickson JS, Cowden BJ, Davis PE (2020) Sport business models: a stakeholder optimization approach. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 28(1):134–147

  54. Jones GJ, Wegner CE, Bunds KS, Edwards MB, Bocarro JN (2018) Examining the environmental characteristics of shared leadership in a sport-for-development organization. J Sport Manag 32(2):82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Trendafilova S, Ziakas V, Sparvero E (2017) Linking corporate social responsibility in sport with community development: an added source of community value. Sport Soc 20(7):938–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    C. M. Straw

  2. Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    B. P. McCullough & M. S. Patterson

  3. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, Dallas, TX, USA

    C. Segars

  4. Energy Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    B. Daher

Authors
  1. C. M. Straw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. P. McCullough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Segars
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Daher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. S. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Straw.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Straw, C.M., McCullough, B.P., Segars, C. et al. Reimagining Sustainable Community Sports Fields of the Future: a Framework for Convergent Science-Stakeholder Decision-Making. Circ.Econ.Sust. 2, 1267–1277 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00115-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00115-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation