Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emissions of carbon dioxide from electricity production in ASEAN countries: GMM and quantile regression analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the economies of ASEAN countries have grown, making energy has become one of their biggest concerns. This research examines CO2 emissions from electricity production sources in ASEAN countries. The paper examined data from 1971 to 2020 using methodologies such as ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed-effects (FE), random effects (RE), generalized methods of moments (GMM), and quantile regression (QR). Here, the Housman test reveals that FE is better than RE. The Hansen and Sargan tests show that all instruments are valid. According to the FE, RE, and GMM approaches, electricity generated from coal and oil deteriorates the environment. The use of coal and natural gas results in higher CO2 emissions, according to the OLS and QR methods. All available evidence suggests that coal-fired power generation has a higher impact on emissions than any other source. There is a strong correlation between CO2 and coal at 0.514. While CO2 and hydro have the strongest negative correlation, this is − 0.530. All regression methods assure that hydroelectricity generation can reduce CO2 emissions more than any other energy source. A 1% rise in hydro power reduces CO2 emissions by 0.576% in FE and by 0.05% in differenced GMM estimation. On the other hand, a 1% rise in coal-generated electricity increases CO2 emissions by 0.158% in FE and 0.017% in the differenced GMM estimation. The study suggests that CO2 emissions can be reduced without significantly affecting electricity generation if fossil fuel consumption is reduced. The government should launch public and private initiatives to promote renewable energy sources such as wind, hydropower, and solar to counteract climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Source: Author's estimates

Fig. 4

Source: Author's estimates

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data can be available on request.

References

  • Amri F (2017) Intercourse across economic growth, trade and renewable energy consumption in developing and developed countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanasoglou PP, Brissimis SN, Delis MD (2008) Bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 18(2):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awosusi AA, Adebayo TS, Altuntaş M, Agyekum EB, Zawbaa HM, Kamel S (2022) The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: a quantile regression evidence. Energy Rep 8:1979–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin M (2019) The effect of biomass energy consumption on economic growth in BRICS countries: a country-specific panel data analysis. Renew Energy 138:620–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho Y, Lee J, Kim TY (2007) The impact of ICT investment and energy price on industrial electricity demand: dynamic growth model approach. Energy Policy 35:4730–4738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantama YU, Abdullahi YZ, Inuwa N (2012) Energy consumption-economic growth nexus in Nigeria: an empirical assessment based on ARDL bound test approach. European Sci J 8(12)

  • Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econ J Econ Soc 50:1029–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Krigsvoll G, Johansen F, Liu Y, Zhang X (2018) Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1906–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hon CL (2022) Decarbonization roadmaps for ASEAN and their implications. Energy Rep 8:6000–6022 (ISSN 2352-4847, rw)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2019) Southeast Asia energy outlook 2019, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/southeast-asia-energy-outlook-2019. Accessed 10 Feb 2022

  • Kim H, Kim M, Kim H, Park S (2020) Decomposition analysis of CO2 emission from electricity generation: comparison of OECD countries before and after the financial crisis. Energies 13(14):3522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristmannsdottir H, Armannsson H (2003) Environmental aspects of geothermal energy utilization. Geothermics 32(4–6):451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag B, Parikh J (2000) Indicators of carbon emission intensity from commercial energy use in India. Energy Econ 22(4):441–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen KH, Kakinaka M (2019) Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions, and development stages: some evidence from panel cointegration analysis. Renew Energy 132:1049–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I (2010) A literature survey on energy–growth nexus. Energy Policy 38(1):340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shisong C, Wenji Z, Hongliang G, Deyong H, You M, Wenhui Z, Shanshan L (2018) Comparison of remotely sensed PM2. 5 concentrations between developed and developing countries: results from the US, Europe, China, and India. J Clean Prod 182:672–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbi B (2017) CO2 emissions reduction in road transport sector in Tunisia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank, World Development Indicators (2021) Energy consumption, Atlas method [Data file]. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ASEAN.EC.PCAP.CD. Accessed 10 Feb 2022

  • Wang W, Mu H, Kang X, Song R, Ning Y (2010) Changes in industrial electricity consumption in china from 1998 to 2007. Energy Policy 38:3684–3690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xie T, Yang S (2017) Carbon emission and its decoupling research of transportation in Jiangsu province. J Clean Prod 142:907–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo SH (2005) Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Korea. Energy Policy 33:1627–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Liu W, Chen L, Eti S, Dinçer H, Yüksel S (2019) The effects of electricity production on industrial development and sustainable economic growth: a VAR analysis for BRICS countries. Sustainability 11(21):5895

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to world bank for data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LCV—methodology, writing. MAI—data collection, software. AR—writing, editing. MMR—editing, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liton Chandra Voumik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing inerests.

Ethical consent

We declare that we have no human participants, human data, or human tissues.

Consent for publication

N/A.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voumik, L.C., Islam, M.A., Rahaman, A. et al. Emissions of carbon dioxide from electricity production in ASEAN countries: GMM and quantile regression analysis. SN Bus Econ 2, 133 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00318-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00318-y

Keywords

Navigation