Skip to main content
Log in

Brazilian railways separability infrastructure/operations: investigation by production indicators

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation of the scale, scope and production density of Brazilian railways engaged in freight transportation would be invaluable and the results could support verticalization measures or measures to separate operation and infrastructure as well as providing an understanding of concession performance in recent years. This article proposes a non-parametric approach using Data Envelopment Analysis—DEA—to measure scale and scope and addresses the relation of the railways’ production density, scale scope and efficiency using a system of equations, graphic analysis, simple regressions, and an automatic selection of variables. There is a perceptible, statistically significant relation of production density with scale and positive efficiency, suggesting a relation between increase in net freight per kilometer transported and efficiency gains via scale level, but the relation with economies of scope indicate the possibility of diseconomy occurring, albeit not statistically significant. Furthermore, there is heterogeneity among the production scales. The results show the need for further investigation because scale is influenced by production density insofar as the companies with the greatest production density are those with the greatest efficiency. The results are not sufficiently robust to categorically state which structure is better: verticalization or separation dilemma. However, they do point to heterogeneity of treatment among the companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due is a private information worked to the paper but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. We have annotated the entire data building process and empirical techniques presented in the paper.

Notes

  1. Morris (2005) describes that relationship in the United States context and particularly the cases of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller.

  2. TUthousands = useful ton; TU_MINFER = useful ton ore; TU_OUTROS = useful ton non-ore; TKUmilions = Ton Usable Kilometer; TKU_MINFERR = Ton Usable Kilometer ore; TKU_OUTROS = Ton Usable Kilometer non-ore; VMC = average commercial speed; VMP = Average Travel Speed; Trenskm = kilometer trains; TrensForm = formed trains; PESS_T = total workers; PESS_Opera = operational workers; PESS_Infra = infrastructure workers; LocoMedio = medium locomotives; ManutLoco = Locomotive Maintenance; VagHoras = Average number of wagons per hour; VagMed = Average Number of Wagons; ManutVag = Wagons Maintenance; ConsCombusTKU = TKU Fuel Consumption; ConsCombusTKB = TKB Fuel Consumption; ProdM_Vag_TU = Average Production Wagon TU; ProdM_Vag_TKU = Average Production Wagon TKU; PercMedioLoco = Medium Route Locomotive.

References

  • Adhikari DR, Guru-Gharana K (2014) Econometric test of cost subadditivity in U.S. electric industry. J Econ Econ Educ Res 15:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Azad MD, Abul K, Wanke P, Raihan M, Anwar SM, Mustafa R (2020) Bank efficiency in Bangladesh revisited: a slack-based network DEA approach. J Econ Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-01-2019-0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2020) Econometric analysis of panel data. Springer international, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker R, Cooper W, Seiford L, Thrall R, Zhu J (2004) Returns to scale in different DEA models. Eur J Oper Res 154:345–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00174-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker R, Natarajan R (2008) Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Oper Res 56:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker R, Zheng Z, Natarajan R (2010) DEA-based hypothesis tests for comparing two groups of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 206:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan I, Bowlin W, Cooper W, Sueyoshi T (1996) Models and measures for efficiency dominance in DEA—Part I: additive models and MED measures. J Oper Res Soc Jpn. https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.39.322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W (1977) On the proper cost tests for natural monopoly in a multiproduct industry. Am Econ Rev 67(5):809–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayanjargal D, Bagdat Y, Batsukh T (2020) A new class of production function. Theor Econ Lett 10:356–365. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2020.102024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benegas M, Da Silva FGF (2014) Estimação da eficiência técnica do SUS nos estados Brasileiros na presença de insumos não-discricionários. Rev Bras Econ 68:171–196. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402014000200002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzan J (2000) Railroad Cost Conditions: implications for Policy, No 231804. UGPTI Department Publication, North Dakota State University, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitzan J (2003) Railroad costs and competition: the implications of introducing competition to railroad networks. J Trans Econ Policy 37:201–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Borts GH (1954) Increasing returns in the railway industry. J Polit Econ 62(4):316–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borts GH (1960) The estimation of rail cost functions. Econometrica 28(1):108–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin W (1998) Measuring performance: an introduction to data envelopment analysis (DEA). J Cost Anal. https://doi.org/10.1080/08823871.1998.10462318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello Branco, José Eduardo Sabóia (2008) A segregação da infraestrutura como elemento reestruturador do sistema ferroviário de carga no Brasil. Tese (Doutorado). Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. UFRJ/COPPE, 2008. Disponível em: pp. 36/59

  • Cazals C, Florens J-P, Simar L (2002) Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. J Econom 106:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00080-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, FGF (2018) Estudo da Produção de Ferrovias Tipo Heavy Haul Brasileiras a Luz da Teoria Econômica. In: 32o Congresso de Ensino e Pesquisa em Transportes, 2018, Gramado - RS. 32o Congresso de Ensino e Pesquisa em Transportes, 2018

  • Da Silva FGF, Martins F, Rocha CH, Araujo C (2013) Does investment in surface transport cause economic growth? A Quant Study JTL—RELIT 7:124–145. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2238-10312013000200007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva FGF, Macambira JK, Rocha CH (2019) Medindo a eficiência produtiva do transporte por ferrovias brasileiras: uma aplicação dos modelos DEA e Tobit. Pesquisa e Planejamento econômico 49(3):153–186

  • Da Silva FGF, Oliveira R, Marinov M (2020) An analysis of the effects on rail operational efficiency due to a merger between Brazilian rail companies: the case of RUMO-ALL. Sustainability 12:4827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva FGF, Prado MV, Nascimento CF (2018) A REFSA entre 1969 e 1993: um estudo empírico. Revista SODEBRAS 13(146):2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Deprins D, Simar L, Tulkens H (2006) Measuring labor-efficiency in post offices. In: Chander P, Drèze J, Lovell CK, Mintz J (eds) Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-25534-7_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Marchetti DS (2019) Efficiency in rail systems through three different approaches and contributions to push the Brazilian rail system toward high performance. Rio de Janeiro, (2019) 176 f. Tese Doutorado em Administração—Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, p 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll P, McGuirk A (1992) A class of separability flexible functional forms. J Agric Res Econ. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.30947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico C, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132:245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS, Heckman JJ (1984) A test for subadditivity of the cost function with an application to the bell system. Am Econ Rev 74(4):856–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Friebel G, Ivaldi M, Pouyet J (2013) Separation versus Integration in International Rail Markets: a Theoretical Investigation, TSE Working Paper, n. 11–248, July 18, 2011, revised March 2013

  • Fukui K (1992) Japanese National Railways Privatization Study; The Experience of Japan and Lessons for Developing Countries, World Bank - Discussion Papers 172, World Bank.

  • Fuss M, McFadden D, Mundlak Y (1978) A Survey of Functional Forms in the Economic Analysis of Production in Melvyn Fuss; Daniel McFadden and Yair Mundlak (eds.), History of Economic Thought Chapters, vol 1, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought

  • Gabriele P, Brandao L, Treinta F, Mello J, Carvalhal R (2013) Comparação internacional da eficiência ambiental dos modos de transporte rodoviário e ferroviário. J Transp Lit 7:212–229. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2238-10312013000100006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnepain P, Ivaldi M (2002) (2002) Stochastic frontiers and asymmetric information models. J Prod Anal 18(2):145–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016582220790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golany B, Roll Y, Rybak D (1994) Measuring efficiency of power plants in Israel by data envelopment analysis. Eng Manag IEEE Trans 41:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.310144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto M, Inoue T, Sueyoshi T (2013) Structural reform of Japanese electric power industry: separation between generation and transmission and distribution. Energy Policy 56:186–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Growitsch C, Jamasb T, Pollitt M (2006) Quality of service, efficiency, and scale in network industries: an analysis of european electricity distribution. Appl Econ 41:2555–2570. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701262872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Growitsch C, Wetzel H (2008) Testing for economies of Scope in European Railways: an efficiency analysis. J Trans Econ Policy 43(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2006) Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.902657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivaldi M (2005) Restructuring Railways: In Theory and Practice. CESifo DICE Report, v. 03, n. 4, p. 3–9, 2005.

  • Ivaldi M, McCullough G (2008) Subadditivity tests for network separation with an application to US Railroads. Rev Netw Econ 7:159–171. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.528542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivaldi M, McCullough G, Linari C (2002) U. S. Railroad Mergers: A Structural Econometric Perspective, pp 1–26

  • Kortelainen M (2008) Dynamic environmental performance analysis: a malmquist index approach. Ecol Econ 64:701–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortelainen M, Kuosmanen T (2004) Measuring eco-efficiency of production: a frontier approach, econometrics 0411006. University Library of Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen T, Kortelainen M (2006) Valuing environmental factors in cost-benefit analysis using data envelopment analysis. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.912464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattos E, Terra R (2015) Qualidade do Gasto Público. p. 211–233, 2015. Em Boueri, Rogério; Rocha, Fabiana; Rodopoulos, Fabiana. Avaliação da Qualidade do Gasto Público e Mensuração da Eficiência/ Rogério Boueri, Fabiana Rocha, Fabiana Rodopoulos (Organizadores) - Brasília: Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional, 2015. 463 p.

  • McFadden D (1978) Estimation techniques for the elasticity of substitution and other production parameters Histoy of Economic Thought Chapters. In: Fuss M, McFadden D (eds)Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, volume 2, chapter 4, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.

  • Mizutani F (2005) Regulation and deregulation in the Japanese rail industry. Cesifo DICE Rep 3:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani F (2020) A comparison of vertical structural types in the railway industry: a simple mathematical explanation model. Res Transp Econ 81:100865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani F, Chris Nash AS, Uranishi S (2015) Comparing the costs of vertical separation, integration, and intermediate organisational structures in European and East Asian Railways. J Trans Econ Policy 49(3):496–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani F, Kozumi H, Matsushima N (2009) Does yardstick regulation really work? Empirical evidence from Japan’s rail industry. J Regul Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-009-9097-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani F, Shoji K (2004) Rail operation-infrastructure separation: the case of Kobe rapid transit railway. Transp Policy 11:251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani F, Uranishi S (2012) Does vertical separation reduce cost? An empirical analysis of the rail industry in European and East Asian OECD Countries. J Regul Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9193-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani F, Uranishi S (2020). An analysis of the inter-effect of structural reforms and rail mode share, Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100862

  • Moreira LS, Ferreira WL, Soares de Mello JCCB (2019) Cálculo de eficiência na alocação de mão de obra em estações ferroviárias da malha do Rio de Janeiro por meio da análise envoltória de dados (DEA). TRANSPORTES 27: 24–35. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v27i4.1644.

  • Morita H (2003) Analysis of economies of scope by data envelopment analysis: comparison of efficient frontiers. Int Trans Oper Res 10:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-3995.00415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. R. (2005). The tycoons: How Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, Jay Gould, and J.P. Morgan invented the American supereconomy. New York: Times Books

  • Nauges C, Van Berg C (2008) Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: a study of four developing and transition economies. J Regul Econ 34:144–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-008-9063-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira MA, Rosa FSDA, Lunkes RJ (2015). Análise da eficiência ferroviária no Brasil nos anos entre 2009 a 2013. TRANSPORTES. 23. 56. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v23i3.909.

  • Reis J, Sacramento K, Mello J, Angulo-Meza L (2017) Avaliação de eficiência das ferrovias brasileiras: Uma aplicação do método multicritério para seleção de variáveis em DEA e Representação Gráfica Bidimensional. Espacios 38:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M. S. (2011). Avaliação da eficiência produtiva das ferrovias de carga no Brasil: uma aplicação da metodologia DEA. Dissertação de Mestrado, Programa de PósGraduação em Engenharia de Transportes, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, 78 fl.

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2002) (2002) Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. Eur J Oper Res 139(1):115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00167-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Hiroshi M, Manabu S, Takeshi A, Yoshiyasu Y (1997) Privatization of Japan national railways: Dea time series approaches. J Oper Res Soc Japan 40(2):186–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas-Agnan C, Aragon Y, Daouia A (2005) Nonparametric frontier estimation: a conditional quantile-based approach. Economet Theor 21:358–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466605050206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzouvelekas V, Tzouvelekas E (2000) Approximation properties and estimation of the translog production function with panel data. Agric Econ Rev 1(1):26412

    Google Scholar 

  • Velde D, Nash C, Smith A, Mizutani F, Uranishi S, Lijesen M, Zschoche F (2012) Eves-Rail - Economic effects of Vertical Separation in the railway sector; Full technical report for CER – Community of European Railways and Infrastructure Companies. p. 188, 2012. at: https://www.cer.be/publications/brochures-studies-and-reports/eves-rail-study-economic-effects-vertical-separation

  • Wanke PF, Affonso CR (2011) Determinantes da eficiência de escala no setor brasileiro de operadores logísticos. Production [on-line]. 2011, 21(1), 53–63 ISSN: 0103–6513. at: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=396742042006

  • Wanke P, Fleury PF (2006) Transporte de cargas no Brasil: estudo exploratório das principais variáveis relacionadas aos diferentes modais e às suas estruturas de custos, p. 55, 2006. Estrutura e dinâmica do setor de serviços no Brasil/organizadores: João Alberto De Negri, Luis Claudio Kubota. - Brasília: IPEA, 2006. 502 p. ISBN: 858617082-8

  • Waters WG (2007). Evolution of Railroad Economics, Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 11–67, January.

  • Wetzel H (2009) European railway deregulation: essays on efficiency and productivity of European Railways (Doctoral dissertation. Lüneburg, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Diss., p 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) through grants 422898/2018-0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Gildemir Ferreira da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, F.G.F. Brazilian railways separability infrastructure/operations: investigation by production indicators. SN Bus Econ 2, 78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00245-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00245-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation