Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: the case of Jordan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-financial information is subject to development based on the expectations of stakeholders. As the financial information alone no longer satisfies their desires, this has contributed to improving the phenomenon of disclosure for many countries, especially in issues related to sustainability. In Jordan, disclosure practices are still emerging and voluntary. This study, therefore, investigates the level of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in the published annual reports of industrial companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange and examines several factors related to corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on the level of disclosure. The current study used content analysis to determine the level of disclosure. The results showed that the level of disclosure on ESG performance is still weak. Still, it is developing over time in response to the pressure of stakeholders. The results also revealed a significant impact of the board size and board meetings on the ESG performance. In contrast, the results were disappointing concerning the rest of the proposed factors (non-executive directors, audit committee, auditor type, and board compensation). It did not play any role in explaining the practices of companies in the disclosure of ESG. The case study results help shed light on the interaction of the Jordanian industrial companies listed on sustainability issues. They are considered of interest to various stakeholders, regulators, and relevant government agencies and provide recent evidence of disclosure literature in emerging countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad C, Bravo F (2018) Audit committee accounting expertise and forward-looking disclosures. Manag Res Rev 41(2):166–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu Qa’dan MB, Suwaidan MS (2019) Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan. Soc Responsibil J 15(1):28-46

  • Adams CA (2002) Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising. Account Audit Account J 15(2):223–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Adnan SM, Hay D, van Staden CJ (2018) The influence of culture and corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure: a cross country analysis. J Clean Prod 198:820–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Agyei-Mensah BK (2019) The effect of audit committee effectiveness and audit quality on corporate voluntary disclosure quality. African J Econ Manage Stud 10(1):17–31

  • Al Amosh HA (2021) The Role of Governance Attributes in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices Evidence From Jordan. In: Alqatan A, Hussainey K, Khlif H (eds) Corporate Governance and Its Implications on Accounting and Finance. IGI Global, pp 255-279. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4852-3.ch012

  • Al Amosh HAM, Mansor N (2018) Sustainability and corporate reporting: a review on environmental and social accounting disclosure. Int J Account 3(8):78–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Amosh H, Mansor N (2020) The implications of ownership structure on the environmental disclosure in Jordan. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 10(3):330–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Amosh H, Mansor N (2021) Disclosure of integrated reporting elements by industrial companies: evidence from Jordan. J Manag Gov 25(1):121–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Farooque O, Ahulu H (2017) Determinants of social and economic reportings: evidence from Australia, the UK and South African multinational enterprises. Int J Account Inf Manag 25(2):177–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-01-2016-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albawwat A, Basah M (2015) Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of interim financial reporting in Jordan. J Public Adm Gov 5(2):100–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfraih MM, Almutawa AM (2017) Voluntary disclosure and corporate governance: empirical evidence from Kuwait. Int J Law Manag 59(2):217–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Alhazaimeh A, Palaniappan R, Almsafir M (2014) The impact of corporate governance and ownership structure on voluntary disclosure in annual reports among listed jordanian companies. Procedia-Social Behav Sci 129:341–348

  • Al-Janadi Y, Abdul Rahman R, Alazzani A (2016) Does government ownership affect corporate governance and corporate disclosure? evidence from Saudi Arabia. Manage Audit J 31(8/9):871-890

  • Ali W, Frynas JG, Mahmood Z (2017) Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: a literature review. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 24(4):273–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzoubi ESS (2019) Audit committee, internal audit function and earnings management: evidence from Jordan. Meditari Account Res 27(1):72–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2017-0160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aureli S (2017) A comparison of content analysis usage and text mining in CSR corporate disclosure. Int J Digit Account Res 17:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Baba BU, Abdul Manaf KB (2017) Board Governance mechanisms and sustainability disclosure: a moderating role of intellectual capital. Asian J Multidiscip Stud 5(10):163–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Bani-Khalid T (2019) Examining the quantity and quality of online sustainability disclosure within the Jordanian industrial sector: a test of GRI guidelines. Probl Perspect Manage 17(4):141

  • Barontini R, Bozzi S (2011) Board compensation and ownership structure: empirical evidence for Italian listed companies. J Manage Govern 15(1):59–89

  • Bozzolan S, Favotto F, Ricceri F (2003) Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure. J Intellect Cap 4(4):543–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo F, Reguera-Alvarado N (2019) Sustainable development disclosure: environmental, social, and governance reporting and gender diversity in the audit committee. Bus Strateg Environ 28(2):418–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Buallay A, Al-Ajmi J (2020) The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. J Appl Account Res 21(2):249–264

  • Cancela BL, Neves MED, Rodrigues LL, Gomes Dias AC (2020) The influence of corporate governance on corporate sustainability: new evidence using panel data in the Iberian macroeconomic environment. Int J Account Inf Manage 28(4):785–806

  • Chariri A, Januarti I, Yuyetta ENA (2017) Firm characteristics, audit committee, and environmental performance: insights from Indonesian companies. Int J Energy Econ Pol 7(6):19–26

  • Coombs JE, Gilley KM (2005) Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strat Manage J 26(9):827–840

  • Cormier D, Ledoux MJ, Magnan M (2011) The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Manag Decis 49(8):1276–1304

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C, Unerman J (2011) Financial accounting theory, Second European. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias A, Rodrigues LL, Craig R (2017) Corporate governance effects on social responsibility disclosures. Australasian Accoun Bus Fin J 11(2)

  • Dienes D, Velte P (2016) The impact of supervisory board composition on CSR reporting. Evidence from the German two-tier system. Sustainability, 8(1):63

  • Elfeky MI (2017) The extent of voluntary disclosure and its determinants in emerging markets: evidence from Egypt. J Finance Data Sci 3(1–4):45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgammal MM, Hussainey K, Ahmed F (2018) Corporate governance and voluntary risk and forward-looking disclosures. J Appl Acc Res 19(4):592–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallah MA, Mojarrad F (2019) Corporate governance effects on corporate social responsibility disclosure: empirical evidence from heavy-pollution industries in Iran. Soc Responsib J 15(2):208–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasan M, Mio C (2017) Fostering stakeholder engagement: the role of materiality disclosure in integrated reporting. Bus Strateg Environ 26(3):288–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Feijoo B, Romero S, Ruiz S (2018) Financial auditor and sustainability reporting: does it matter? Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25(3):209–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Forker JJ (1992) Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Account Bus Res 22(86):111–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, De Colle S (2010) Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Garas S, ElMassah S (2018) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures. Crit Perspect Int Bus 14(1):2–26

  • García-Sánchez IM, Martínez-Ferrero J (2018) How do independent directors behave with respect to sustainability disclosure? Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25(4):609–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray GL, Ratzinger NV (2010) Perceptions of preparers, users and auditors regarding financial statement audits conducted by Big 4 accounting firms. Int J Discl Gov 7(4):344–363

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (2015) Gri’S History. Global reporting initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/gri-history/Pages/GRI’shistory.aspx. Accessed 15 Sept 2021

  • Guthrie J, Abeysekera I (2006) Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: what is new? J Hum Resour Costing Account 10(2):114–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Habbash M, Hussainey K, Awad AE (2016) The determinants of voluntary disclosure in Saudi Arabia: an empirical study. Int J Account Audit Perform Eval 12(3):213–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajek P, Henriques R (2017) Mining corporate annual reports for intelligent detection of financial statement fraud—a comparative study of machine learning methods. Knowl Based Syst 128:139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan MK, Lahyani FE (2019) Media, independent non-executive directors and strategy disclosure by non-financial listed firms in the UAE. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 20(2):216–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazaea SA, Tabash MI, Khatib SF, Zhu J, Al-Kuhali AA (2020) The impact of internal audit quality on financial performance of Yemeni commercial banks: an empirical investigation. J Asian Fin Econ Bus 7(11):867–875

  • Hazaea SA, Tabash MI, Zhu J, Khatib SFA, Farhan NHS (2021a) Internal audit and financial performance of Yemeni commercial banks: Empirical evidence. Banks Bank Syst 16(2):137–147. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazaea SA, Zhu J, Al-Matari EM, Senan NAM, Khatib SFA, Ullah S (2021b) Mapping of internal audit research in China: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Cogent Bus Manag 8(1):1938351. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1938351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong B, Li Z, Minor D (2016) Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 136(1):199–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu M, Loh L (2018) Board governance and sustainability disclosure: a cross-sectional study of Singapore-listed companies. Sustainability 10(7):2578

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain N, Rigoni U, Orij RP (2018) Corporate governance and sustainability performance: analysis of triple bottom line performance. J Bus Ethics 149(2):411–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Finance Econ 3(4):305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jizi M (2017) The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Bus Strateg Environ 26(5):640–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Katmon N, Mohamad ZZ, Norwani NM, Al Farooque O (2019) Comprehensive board diversity and quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from an emerging market. J Bus Ethics 157(2):447–481

  • Kent P, Monem R (2008) What drives TBL reporting: good governance or threat to legitimacy? Aust Account Rev 18(4):297–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Khan I, Senturk I (2019) Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: evidence from Pakistan. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 19(6):1187–1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatib SFA, Nour A-NI (2021) The impact of corporate governance on firm performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Malaysia. J Asian Finance Econ Bus 8(2):0943–0952. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO2.0943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib SFA, Abdullah DF, Hendrawaty E, Elamer AA (2021a) A bibliometric analysis of cash holdings literature: current status, development, and agenda for future research. Manag Rev Q. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00213-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib SFA et al (2021b) Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: a systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions. Bus Strateg Environ 30(2):985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Li T, Chen H, Xiang E, Ruan W (2019) Executives’ excess compensation, legitimacy, and environmental information disclosure in C hinese heavily polluting companies: the moderating role of media pressure. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26(1):248–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim HJ, Mali D (2021) A comparative analysis of human capital information opaqueness in South Korea and the UK. J Intellect Cap. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2021-0002

  • Liu J, Andersson T (2014) Mind the Gap: expectations on the Role of UK Non-Executive Directors. Regent’s Working Papers in Business & Management, Regent’s University London

  • Mahmood Z, Kouser R, Ali W, Ahmad Z, Salman T (2018) Does corporate governance affect sustainability disclosure? A mixed method study. Sustainability 10(1):207

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuszak Ł, Różańska E, Macuda M (2019) The impact of corporate governance characteristics on banks’ corporate social responsibility disclosure. J Account Emerg Econ 9(1):75–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach-Hörmanseder S, Hummel K, Rammerstorfer M (2020) The information content of corporate social responsibility disclosure in Europe: an institutional perspective. Eur Account Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1763818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RD, Tronnes PC (2018) The determinants of voluntary strategy disclosure: an international comparison. Account Res J 31(3):423–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudiyanselage NCSR (2018) Board involvement in corporate sustainability reporting: evidence from Sri Lanka. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 18(6):1042–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen THH, Ntim CG, Malagila JK (2020) Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial performance: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Int Rev Finance Anal 71:101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Okafor CE, Ujah NU (2020) Executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: does a golden parachute matter? Int J Manag Finance 16(5):575–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid A (2018) The influence of corporate governance practices on corporate social responsibility reporting. Soc Responsib J 14(1):20–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowbottom N, Lymer A (2010) Exploring the use and users of narrative reporting in the online annual report. J Appl Account Res 11(2):90–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadou A, Alom F, Laluddin H (2017) Corporate social responsibility disclosures in Malaysia: evidence from large companies. Soc Responsibil J 13(1):177–202

  • Samaha K, Khlif H, Hussainey K (2015) The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: a meta-analysis. J Int Account Audit Tax 24:13–28

  • Sampong F, Song N, Boahene KO, Wadie KA (2018) Disclosure of CSR performance and firm value: new evidence from South Africa on the basis of the GRI guidelines for sustainability disclosure. Sustainability (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaltrito D (2016) Voluntary disclosure in Italy: firm-specific determinants an empirical analysis of Italian listed companies. EuroMed J Bus 11(2):272–303‏

  • Shan YG (2019) Do corporate governance and disclosure tone drive voluntary disclosure of related-party transactions in China? J Int Account Audit Tax 34:30–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Shihadeh F (2021) Financial inclusion and banks’ performance: evidence from palestine. Invest Manag Financial Innov 18(1):126–138. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(1).2021.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sial MS, Zheng C, Khuong NV, Khan T, Usman M (2018) Does firm performance influence corporate social responsibility reporting of Chinese listed companies? Sustainability 10(7):2217

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundarasen SDD, Je-Yen T, Rajangam N (2016) Board composition and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 16(1):35–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamimi N, Sebastianelli R (2017) Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Manag Decis 55(8):1660–1680

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarus JK (2020) Do board size and firm size affect environmental accounting disclosure? Evidence from selected listed firms in kenya. Econ Res 4(1)

  • Wong J, Wong N, Li WY, Chen L (2016) Sustainability assurance: an emerging market for the accounting profession. Pac Account Rev 28(3):238–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Qiao M, Che B, Tong P (2019) Regional anti-corruption and CSR disclosure in a transition economy: the contingent effects of ownership and political connection. Sustainability 11(9):2499

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Wen J, Li Y (2020) The impact of environmental information disclosure on the firm value of listed manufacturing firms: evidence from China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(3):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaid MA, Wang M, Adib M, Sahyouni A, Abuhijleh ST (2020) Boardroom nationality and gender diversity: implications for corporate sustainability performance. J Clean Prod 251:119652

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamil IA, Ramakrishnan S, Jamal NM, Hatif MA, Khatib SFA (2021) Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: a systematic review. J Financial Report Account. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2021-0110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (2017) Users’ perceptions of the drivers for corporate sustainability disclosures made by Chinese listed companies, Ph.D. thesis, Edith Cowan University

  • Zhou C (2019) Effects of corporate governance on the decision to voluntarily disclose corporate social responsibility reports: evidence from China. Appl Econ 51(55):5900–5910

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamzeh Al Amosh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and informed consent

This research does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S.F.A. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: the case of Jordan. SN Bus Econ 1, 165 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00167-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00167-1

Keywords

Navigation