Skip to main content
Log in

Questioning Basalla’s question (yet again): The view from cognitive history

  • Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of History of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1967, George Basalla posed the question: “How did modern science diffuse from Western Europe and find its place in the world?” Here, we consider this question particularized to India: “How did modern science find its place in India?” In answering his own question Basalla posited a 3-phase model–one that has been severely criticized by some prominent social historians and sociologists of modern Indian science. In this paper, we question Basalla’s question anew from the perspective of cognitive history, wherein the focus is on specific, individual scientific productions as knowledge-consuming/knowledge-generating creative phenomena. Drawing on Asiatic Society records on the work of British scientists in nineteenth century India and contributions made in the same period by five Indian pioneers of science, namely, Radhanath Sikdar, Yesudas Ramchandra, Mahendra Lal Sircar, Jagadis Chandra Bose and Prafulla Chandra Ray–each of whom is presented here as representing a distinct aspect of science–we argue that: (1) the biographical records of the British scientists in nineteenth century India does not resonate in important ways with phase I of the Basalla model; (2) with one notable exception, the work of the British scientists and that of the Indian protagonists ran on essentially parallel tracks; (3) the distinction between Basalla’s phase II ‘colonial scientist’ and phase III ‘independent scientist’ dissolves in the case of our Indian protagonists; and (4) most importantly, we answer the Basalla question by way of identifying specific and distinctive contributions made to the knowledge-consuming/knowledge-producing enterprises constituting creative science. In the final analysis, we suggest that the Basalla model played virtually no role in understanding or explaining the genesis of modern science in India as practiced by our protagonists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here I am, of course, referring to the various models of scientific methodology as proposed by Popper (1968), Laudan (1977), Kuhn (2012) and Lakatos (1978) and their followers.

  2. I explore the thorny distinction between ‘information’, ‘data’ and ‘knowledge’ in Dasgupta (2016).

  3. Some returned to their homeland because of ill-health; some retired and returned; others died and were buried in India.

  4. The abbreviations stand for the following: FRS—Fellow of the Royal Society (of London); FRSE—Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh; FLS—Fellow of the Linnaean Society; FRAS—Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society; FRGS—Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society.

  5. The first Indian to become a member of the Asiatic Society was Dwaraknath Tagore, Rabindranath’s grandfather, in 1832, almost a half-century after the formation of the Society. Dwaraknath was, of course, not a scientist.

  6. For a far more extensive discussion of the cognitive model presented here see Dasgupta (2019, esp. pp. 1–12, 60–80); and Dasgupta (2022, pp. 1–21).

  7. For more extensive discussions of what might be called the theory of artifacts, see Kubler (1962); the collection of articles in Bensaude-Vincent & Newman (2007), especially the introductory essay by the editors; and Dasgupta (2019, pp. 13–27).

  8. Kochhar has explored further Sikdar’s non-involvement in the computation of the Himalayan heights.

  9. It is interesting to note that in his 450-page history of the Trigonometrical Survey of India, Matthew Edney (1997) dismisses Sikdar’s as “a Calcutta Brahmin” who had been incorrectly credited with the computation of XV’s height (p. 262).

  10. It should be noted that in his adult working life Ramchandra was as much a man of letters in Urdu as he was a mathematician. (See Raina & Habib, 1990; Minault, 2003).

  11. See Dasgupta (2022), p. 194 et seq for examples of operational principles and their representations in the context of Renaissance engineering.

  12. U.S. Patent 755,840, March 19, 1904.

  13. See Koyré (1968) for a magnificent body of evidence of correspondences between Newton and his contemporaries in the seventeenth century.

  14. Bose republished this paper in Electrician: see the relevant bibliographic entry below.

References

  • Adas, M. (1989). Machines as the measure of man: Science, technology, and ideologies of western dominance. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W. (2018). Remembering the spread of western science. Historical Records of Australian Science. https://doi.org/10.1071/HR17027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1976). A century: Indian association for the cultivation of science, 1876–1976. The Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. (2000). Science, technology and medicine in colonial India. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basalla, G. (1967). The spread of western science. Science, 156, 611–622.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, J. (1984). The scientist’s role in society: A comparative study. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensaude-Vincent, B., & Newman, W. R. (Eds.). (2007). The artificial and the natural. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, A. K. (2000). Gleanings of the past and the science movement. The Asiatic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, A. K. (2001). Father Eugene Lafont of St. Xavier’s College, Kolkata and the contemporary science movement. The Asiatic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (1981). The creative mind. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, J. C. (1895). On the polarisation of electric rays by doubly refracting crystals. The Electrician, 36, 289–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, J. C. (1901). The response of inorganic matter to mechanical and electrical stimulus. Friday Evening Discourse, May 10, 1901, The Royal Institution. In P. Bhattacharya & M. Engineer (Eds.), (1996) Acharya J. C. Bose: A scientist and a dreamer (Vol. 1, pp. 205–217). Bose Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, J. C. (1994). In D. Sen (Ed.), Letters to Rabindranath Tagore (in Bangla). The Bose Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, P. N. (1880). Undescribed fossil carnivora from the Siválik hills in the collection of the British museum. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 36(1–4), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. L. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, P. (2004). Western science in modern India: Metropolitan methods, colonial practices. Permanent Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, A. (2014). Chemistry of nitrites: Contributions of P. C. Ray and some later developments. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 91, 1205–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A. K. (1995). Three 19th century Calcutta astronomers. Indian Journal of History of Science, 3(2–4), 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, D. (2021). Creativity from the periphery: Trading zones of scientific exchange in colonial India. University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (1999). Jagadis Chandra Bose and the Indian response to western science. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (2007). The Bengal Renaissance: Identity and creativity from Rammohun Roy to Rabindranath Tagore. Permanent Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (2016). Disentangling data, information and knowledge. Big Data and Information Analytics, 1(4), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.3934/bdia.2016016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (2018). Judging creativity: The case of the early Jagadis Bose. Indian Journal of History of Science, 53(4), 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (2019). A cognitive historical approach to creativity. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (2022). The Renaissance considered as a creative phenomenon: Explorations in cognitive history. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (2023). An intellectual history of P.C. Ray’s papers on the nitrites of mercury. Indian Journal of History of Science, 58(1), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb Roy, R. (1986). The great trigonometrical survey of India in a historical perspective. Indian Journal of History of Science, 21(2), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney, M. H. (1997). Mapping an empire: The geographical construction of British India 1765–1843. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, D. T. (1997). The work of Jagadis Chandra Bose: 100 years of millimeter-wave research. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 45(12), 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M. (1988). Introduction of western science into colonial India: Role of the Calcutta Medical College. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 132(2), 276–288.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological approach to scientific creativity (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. (1784). Discourse on the institution of a society for inquiry unto the history, civil and natural, the antiquities, arts, sciences and literature of ASIA. In S. Chaudhuri (Ed.), Proceedings of the Asiatic Society: 1784–1800 (Vol I) (pp. 2–6). Bose Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochhar, R. K. (2005). 67th Acharya Jagadis Chandra Bose memorial lecture on Modern science in India: Colonial compulsions, nationalist aspirations and global circumventions. Kolkata.

  • Kochhar, R. K. (2021). Did Radhanath Sikdar measure the height of Mount Everest first? Retrieved July 14, 2023 from https://science.thewire.in/.

  • Kochhar, R. K. (1991). Science as a tool in British India. Economic and Political Weekly., 26, 1927–1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A. (1968). Newtonian studies. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler, G. (1962). The shape of time: Remarks on the history of things. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D. (1997). Science and the Raj 1857–1905. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourdasamy, J. B. (2003). The Indian association for the cultivation of science: A tortuous tryst with modern science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(4), 381–396.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. (1961). The Royal institution. The Royal Institution of Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minault, G. (2003). Master Ramchandra of Delhi college: Teacher, journalist and cultural intermediary. The Annual Review of Urdu Studies, 18, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musès, C. (1998). De Morgan’s Ramanujan: An incident in recovering our endangered cultural memory of mathematics. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 20(3), 47–51.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiry, U. (1995). St Xavier’s, the making of a Calcutta institution. Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N. (1995). Opening the black box: Cognitive science and history of science. Osiris, 10, 194–211. 2nd series.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. J. & Robertson, E. F. (2016). Ramchandra. School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of St. Andrews. Retrieved July 14, 2023 from https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Ramchandra.

  • Palit, C. (1991). Mahendra Lal Sircar, 1853–1904: The quest for national science. In D. Kumar (Ed.), Science and Empire: Essays in Indian context (pp. 152–160). Anamika Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palladino, P., & Warboys, M. (1993). Science and imperialism. Isis, 84, 103–108.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, G. (1999). Another reason: Science and the imagination of modern India. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raina, D. (1999). From west to non-west? Basalla’s three-stage model revisited. Science and Culture, 8(4), 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raina, D., & Habib, S. I. (1990). Ramchandra’s Treatise through the haze of the golden sunset: An aborted pedagogy. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, K. (2007). Relocating modern science. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramchandra, Y. (1859). A treatise on problems of maxima and minima. London: W. M. H. Allen (Original Work Published 1850)

  • Ramnath, A. (2017). The birth of an Indian profession: Engineers, industry, and the state 1900–47. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. F. (1958). Microwave antenna and waveguide techniques before 1900. Proceedings of the IRE, 46(2), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P. C. (1896). On mercurous nitrite (part II). Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 65, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy Chaudhuri, R. (Ed.). (1986). Centenary review of the Asiatic Society 1784–1984. The Asiatic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. N. (1966). The character of the introduction of western science in India during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Indian Journal of History of Science, 1(2), 112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures. (Canto edition). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1959)

  • Sokal, A. (2008). Beyond the hoax: Science, philosophy and culture. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbarayappa, B.V. (2013). Science in India: A historical perspective. Rupa.

  • Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank an anonymous referee for constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subrata Dasgupta.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dasgupta, S. Questioning Basalla’s question (yet again): The view from cognitive history. Indian J Hist. Sci. 59, 65–82 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-024-00112-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-024-00112-9

Keywords

Navigation