Skip to main content
Log in

Science in the forest management in colonial Assam (1826–1947)

  • Project Report
  • Published:
Indian Journal of History of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since ancient period human beings have been dependent on forest and forest products, which gradually led to the evolvement of indigenous forest management system. The indigenous rulers and people revered the forest and forest products in form of sacred groves, trees and plants. Jhum or shifting cultivation is one such traditional method of cultivation which was favourable for the climate of Assam. Guha and Gadgil argued that in hilly and forestry land, where the plough could not penetrate, led to the adaptation of shifting cultivation in large expanses. For the first time the commercialization of forest products was started by the colonial administrators and for maximum production, science was introduced in the forest management. The application of science could be identified with forest plantation, silviculture, taungya and regulation on forest fires, grazing, wild animals, climbers, insects, parasitic plants and so on. The training programme for British foresters was also introduced. Under the taungya system indigenous people were allowed to cultivate along with the plantation. It firstly, allowed the colonial government to earn revenue and secondly, avoid any rift with the indigenous people. The forest legislations were used as an instrument for the maximum use of forest products by the Colonial Government and to debar the indigenous people’s rights over the access of forest and forest produces. However, the experiments by the colonial ruler led to the transformation of jungle (natural forest) into a more regulated modern forest. The brief report examines the development of scientific forest management practices in colonial Assam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable.

Notes

  1. Assam State Archive, Resolution on the report on forest administration in the province of Assam for the year 1925–26, order by the Governor, Government of Assam, 1926. p. 1.

  2. Assam State Archive, Progress report of forest administration in the province of Assam for the year 1930–31, 1931, p. 6.

  3. Assam State Archive, Progress report of forest administration in Assam, for the year 1877–78, Shillong, 1878, pp.14–17.

  4. Assam State Archive, Progress report of forest administration in Assam for the year 1885–86, Shillong, 1886, p. 14.

  5. Assam State Archive, Progress report of forest administration in Assam for the year 1888–89, Shillong, Printed at the Assam Secretariat Press, 1889, p. 11.

  6. Assam State Archive, Progress report of forest administration in Assam for the year 1894–95, Shillong, p. 19.

References

  • Arupjyoti, S. (2011). Forests and ecological history of Assam, 1826–2000. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASA, (1895). Progress Report of Forest Administration in Assam for the year 1894–95, Shillong, p. 19.

  • Goswami, S. (2007). Traditional ecological knowledge of North-East India. The Journal of the Assam Research Society, xxxix (1) &@, (20042006). Kamrupa Anusandhan Samiti, Guwahati.

  • Guha, R., & Gadgil, M. (2013). This fissured land: An ecological history of India. Oxford India Perennials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, R. M., Tiwari, B. K., & Choudhury, D. (2018). Report of working group III shifting cultivation: Towards a transformational approach, contributing to sustainable development in Indian Himalayan region. NITI Aayog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stracey, P. D. (1967). A note on Nagaland. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 64, 440–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, U. K., Bank, S. K., & Tripathi, R. (1998). Sacred groves of Meghalaya. In P. S. Ramkrishna, K. G. Saxena, & U. M. Chandrashekara (Eds.), Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management (pp. 253–262). Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, B. K., Barik, S. K., & Tripathi, R. S. (1999). Sacred forests of Meghalaya: Biological and cultural diversity. Regional Centre, National Afforestation and Eco-Development Board, North Eastern Hill University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geetashree Singh.

Additional information

The project was accomplished under the sponsorship of Indian National Commission for History of Science between the period September 2018 and December 2021.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, G. Science in the forest management in colonial Assam (1826–1947). Indian J Hist. Sci. 58, 82–85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-023-00077-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-023-00077-1

Keywords

Navigation