Abstract
Purpose
The choice of entry point, Greater trochanter (GT), or Piriformis entry (PE) for antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of the femur is crucial. This study was performed to compare these two entry points in the patients with shaft of femur fractures regarding intra-operative parameters, radiological and functional outcomes.
Materials and Methods
Twenty-four patients underwent GT entry nailing, while 25 patients underwent PE nailing. Surgical time, Intra-operative blood units transfused, Intra-operative fluoroscopy exposure by number of C-arm shots taken, mean drop in hemoglobin, and incidence of iatrogenic fracture were recorded. Patients were followed up at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months to look for radiological healing and improvements in functional outcome using Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS). MRI of bilateral hips with pelvis was done in 25 patients at 6 months of follow-up to detect any preliminary signs of AVN.
Results
The mean drop in hemoglobin in the GT group was significantly lesser than the PE group (p = 0.02). Mean MHHS at 4 weeks post-op was also significantly higher in the GT group (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between both the groups regarding surgical duration, fluoroscopy exposure, radiological and functional outcomes in the long term. None of the patients who underwent MRI displayed any preliminary sign of AVN.
Conclusion
GT entry nails lead to lesser surgical time, fluoroscopy exposure, and intra-operative blood loss. Both the nailing systems achieve excellent fracture unions and comparable functional outcomes in the long term, and there is a minuscule risk of AVN in adult patients undergoing IMN.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Winquist, R. A., Hansen, S. T., Jr., & Clawson, D. K. (2001). Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am., 83(12), 1912.
Christie, J., Court-Brown, C., Kinninmonth, A. W., & Howie, C. R. (1998). Intramedullary locking nails in the management of femoral shaft fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol, 70(2), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.70B2.3346289
Ricci, W. M., Devinney, S., Haidukewych, G., Herscovici, D., & Sanders, R. (2005). Trochanteric nail insertion for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthopaed Trauma, 19(8), 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000164594.04348.2b
McMaster, W. C. (1979). Closed insertion technique for the prebent Sampson femoral rod. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res, 138, 238–242.
McKee, M. D., & Waddell, J. P. (1994). Intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures in morbidly obese patients. Journal of Trauma, 36(2), 208–210. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199402000-00011
Ostrum, R. F. (1996). A greater trochanteric insertion site for femoral intramedullary nailing in lipomatous patients. Orthopedics, 19(4), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19960401-12
Ostrum, R. F., Marcantonio, A., & Marburger, R. (2005). A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing. J Orthopaed Trauma, 19(10), 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000184145.75201.1b
Kumar, P., Neradi, D., Kansal, R., Aggarwal, S., Kumar, V., & Dhillon, M. S. (2019). Greater trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry nails for femur shaft fractures: resolving the controversy. Injury, 50(10), 1715–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.011
Ricci, W. M., Schwappach, J., Tucker, M., Coupe, K., Brandt, A., Sanders, R., & Leighton, R. (2006). Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthopaed Trauma, 20(10), 663–667. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000248472.53154.14
Stannard, J. P., Bankston, L., Futch, L. A., McGwin, G., & Volgas, D. A. (2011). Functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of the femur: a prospective randomized comparison of piriformis fossa and greater trochanteric entry portals. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol, 93(15), 1385–1391. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00760
Sheth, U., Gohal, C., Chahal, J., Nauth, A., & Dwyer, T. (2016). Comparing entry points for antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Orthopedics, 39(1), e43-50. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151218-09
Starr, A. J., Hay, M. T., Reinert, C. M., Borer, D. S., & Christensen, K. C. (2006). Cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of high-energy proximal femur fractures in young patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry portal. J Orthopaed Trauma, 20(4), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200604000-00002
Kumar, P., Sen, R., Aggarwal, S., Agarwal, S., & Rajnish, R. K. (2019). Reliability of modified Harris Hip score as a tool for outcome evaluation of Total Hip replacements in Indian population. J Clin Orthop Trauma., 10(1), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.019
Vishwanathan, K., Akbari, K., & Patel, A. J. (2018). Is the modified Harris hip score valid and responsive instrument for outcome assessment in the Indian population with pertrochanteric fractures? J Orthopaed, 15(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2017.12.001.PMID:29326497
Dora, C., Leunig, M., Beck, M., Rothenfluh, D., & Ganz, R. (2001). Entry point soft tissue damage in antegrade femoral nailing: a cadaver study. J Orthopaed Trauma, 15(7), 488–493. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200109000-00005
Ansari Moein, C. M., Verhofstad, M. H., Bleys, R. L., & van der Werken, C. (2005). Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip. Injury, 36(11), 1337–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.07.052
Kim, J. W., Oh, J. K., Byun, Y. S., Shon, O. J., Park, J. H., Oh, H. K., Shon, H. C., Park, K. C., Kim, J. J., & Lim, S. J. (2016). Incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 542 cases. Medicine (Baltimore), 95(5), e2728. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002728
Funding
No funding was obtained from any source for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: PS, PK, VK. Methodology: VK, AG, PK. Formal analysis and investigation: AG, MP. Writing—original draft preparation: AG, PK. Writing—review and editing: AG, VK, SCM. Supervision: PS, VK, PK, SP.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics committee approval and written informed consent were taken prior to the study. The ethical committee number is INT/IEC/2020/SPL-112.
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gaurav, A., Kumar, P., Sudesh, P. et al. Choice of Entry Point Does Not Affect Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Antegrade Intra-medullary Nailing in Patients with Shaft of Femur Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. JOIO 58, 339–344 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01104-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01104-8