Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Osteoporosis and Vertebral Column

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis is an age-related metabolic disease which has a significant impact on bone health and overall quality of life. It is gaining importance as a major medical consideration with the rapid increase in geriatric population globally. It increases the risk of vertebral fractures, progressive spinal deformities and neurological complications, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Increase in life expectancy and advancement of medical technology has led to an increase in the proportion of geriatric patients undergoing orthopaedic procedures. It is becoming vital to adequately evaluate, investigate and treat osteoporosis before planning spinal surgery, especially spinal fusions and instrumentation.

Content

Historically, osteoporosis was considered a contraindication to spine surgery adding to the burden of Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and mortality. Conversely, osteoporotic patients who underwent spine surgery were not adequately optimized, leading to an increase in failure and complication rates. Better understanding of the pathophysiology of osteoporosis and the biomechanics of an osteoporotic spine with knowledge of current standards of treatment of osteoporosis facilitate the timely and adequate management of this disease. Advances in surgical and anaesthetic techniques facilitate successful surgeries on high-risk elderly and osteoporotic patients with multiple comorbidities allowing for a significantly high predictability for long-term positive outcomes.This article discusses the biomechanics of the osteoporotic spine, the diagnosis and management of osteoporotic patients with spinal disease, and the new treatments, recommendations, surgical indications, strategies and advances in instrumentation in patients with osteoporosis who require spinal surgery.

Implications

In this article, the authors aim to provide a generalized overview for better understanding of the pathophysiological processes underlying osteoporosis in the vertebral column. This review provides a comprehensive set of guidelines for overall health and management of spine patients with pathologies, either caused by or compounded with osteoporosis. An overview of current techniques, strategies and technologies designed to address the challenges associated with spine surgery in osteoporotic patients is also outlined.

Sources

Content for this article has been sourced from routinely cited articles available via PubMed, from National Institute of Health consensus development conference, from the recommendations by World Health Organization technical report series, from previous articles by the authors and from the protocols established by the authors in their clinical practice based on experience and detailed case reviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Consensus Development Conference [Copenhagen]. 1991. Diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. The American Journal of Medicine, 90(1), 107–110.

  2. NIH Consensus Development Conference. (2001). Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. JAMA, 285(6), 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Malhotra, N., Mithal, A., et al. (2008). Osteoporosis in Indians. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 127(3), 263–268.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Agrawal, P., & Agrawal, G. (2020). Osteoporosis in orthopaedics: Review of literature and clinical approach. The Indian Practitioner, 73(5), 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kessenich, C. (1997). The pathophysiology of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Rehabilitation Nursing., 22(4), 192–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanis, J. A. (2002). Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet, 359, 1929–1936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Briggs, A., Greig, A., et al. (2007). The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: A review of aetiopathogenesis. Osteoporosis International, 18, 575–584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrison, R. A., Siminoski, K., et al. (2007). Osteoporosis related kyphosis and impairments in pulmonary function: A systematic review. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 22(3), 447–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferguson, S. I., & Steffen, T. (2003). Biomechanics of the aging spine. European Spine Journal, 12(2), 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazess, R. B. (1982). On aging bone loss. Clinical Orthopaedics, 165, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindsay, R., Silverman, S., et al. (2001). Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA, 285(3), 320–323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keller, T., & Harrison, D. (2003). Prediction of osteoporotic spinal deformity. Spine, 28(5), 455–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cortet, B. (2011). Bone repair in osteoporotic bone: Postmenopausal and cortisone induced osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International, 22, 2007–2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cornell, C. N. (2003). Internal fracture fixation in patients with osteoporosis. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 11, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giannoudis, P., Tzioupis, C., et al. (2007). Fracture healing in osteoporotic fractures: Is it really different? A basic science perspective. Injury, 38(1), 590–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tannirandorn, P., & Epstein, S. (2000). Drug-induced bone loss. Osteoporosis International, 11(8), 637–659.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Glaser, D., & Kaplan, F. (1997). Osteoporosis: Definition and clinical presentation. Spine, 22(24), 12S-16S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thorngren, K. (1995). Fractures in the elderly. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 266(Suppl), 208–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Genant, H. K., Wu, C. Y., et al. (1993). Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 8, 1137–1148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization. (1994). Technical report series 843. WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kanis JA, On Behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group. Technical report. World Health Organization collaborating centre for metabolic bone diseases, University of Sheffield; UK: 2007. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level.

  22. Sozen, T., Ozisic, L., et al. (2017). An overview and management of osteoporosis. European Journal of Rheumatology, 4(1), 46–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Link, T. (2016). Radiology of osteoporosis. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal., 67(1), 28–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bonaiuti, D., Shea, B., et al. (2002). Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD000333.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Osteoporosis Foundation. 2008. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. http://www.nof.org/professionals/cliniciansguide_form.asp. Accessed 2009 Oct 22.

  26. Dawson-Hughes, B., Tosteson, A., et al. (2008). National Osteoporosis Foundation Guide Committee. Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporosis International, 19, 449–458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Riggs, B., & Parfit, A. (2005). Drugs used to treat osteoporosis: The critical need for a uniform nomenclature based on their action on bone remodelling. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 20(2), 177–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rizzoli, R., Burlet, et al. (2008). Osteonecrosis of the jaw and bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis. Bone, 42(5), 841–847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Allison, M., Markman, L., et al. (2013). Atypical incomplete femoral fractures in asymptomatic patients on long term bisphosphonate therapy. Bone, 55(1), 113–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boyle, W., Simonet, W., et al. (2003). Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature, 423(6937), 337–342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fiani, B., Newhouse, A., et al. (2021). Special considerations to improve clinical outcomes in patients with osteoporosis undergoing spine surgery. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 15(2), 386–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ritter, M., Albohm, M., et al. (1998). Life expectancy after total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 13(8), 874–875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. White, A., & Panjabi, M. (1990). Clinical biomechanics of the spine (2nd ed.). Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hewitt, R. E., Lissina, A., et al. (2005). The bisphosphonate acute phase response: Rapid and copious production of pro inflammatory cytokines by peripheral blood and T cells in response to amino bisphosphonates is inhibited by statins. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 139(1), 101–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. DeWald, C., & Stanley, T. (2006). Instrumentation-related complications of multilevel fusions for adult spinal deformity patients over age 65: surgical considerations and treatment options in patients with poor bone quality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31(19), 144–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tome-Bermejo, F., Pinera, A., et al. (2017). Osteoporosis and management of spinal degenerative disease (I). The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 5(5), 272–282.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Agrawal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaddha, R., Agrawal, G., Koirala, S. et al. Osteoporosis and Vertebral Column. JOIO 57 (Suppl 1), 163–175 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-01046-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-01046-7

Keywords

Navigation