Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment of Septic Arthritis of the Hip Joint Using Repeated Aspirations: When Should We Operate?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The well-accepted treatment of septic arthritis of the hip joint (SAHJ) is surgical drainage of the joint, but repeated aspirations of the hip joint under sonography, have been used for over twenty years with significant success in some centers, including ours. In recent years, we identified some children who did not respond to aspirations and had to undergo arthrotomies. We were concerned that some children may have reached the operating room after a longer than ideal time.

Objective

Identification of the characteristics of patients who did not respond to repeated aspirations and development of a treatment algorithm that expedites decision-making regarding the necessity of surgery.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis. All the patients diagnosed with SAHJ between 2007 and 2019 were identified. Patients who responded to repeated aspirations were compared to those who did not improve and required surgery. Demographic and clinical data and laboratory results were obtained from the patients’ electronic medical records.

Results

Forty-eight children (88.9%) were treated successfully with repeated aspirations and six children (11.1%) did not improve after aspirations and underwent hip arthrotomies. Five out of 48 children from the aspiration group (10.4%) and 4 out of 6 from the arthrotomy group (66.7%) had chronic comorbidities (p = 0.0051). The mean duration of fever over 38.5 degrees centigrade and the length of stay were higher in the arthrotomy group (p = 0.0040, p = 0.0301, respectively). When we examined the change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels before and after the first aspiration (Delta CRP), we found a decrease in the aspiration group and an increase in the arthrotomy group (p = 0.0044).

Conclusion

The new algorithm which we present allows an expeditious assessment of the patient’s response to the repeated aspiration method and thus prevents unnecessary surgeries for the treatment of SAHJ. Patients with chronic comorbidities, prolonged fever, and an increase in CRP level following the first aspiration, are at risk of treatment failure and should be treated with an arthrotomy.

Level of evidence: (for clinical articles)

Level 4—cohort study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett, O. M., & Namnyak, S. S. (1992). Acute septic arthritis of the hip joint in infancy and childhood. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199208000-00021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Herndon, W. A., Knauer, S., Sullivan Andy, J., & Gross, R. H. (1986). Management of septic arthritis in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 6, 576–578. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198609000-00009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Montgomery, N. I., & Epps, H. R. (2017). Pediatric Septic Arthritis. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 48, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shukla, A., Beniwal, S. K., & Sinha, S. (2014). Outcome of arthroscopic drainage and debridement with continuous suction irrigation technique in acute septic arthritis. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 5, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2014.01.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. De Sa, D., Cargnelli, S., Catapano, M., et al. (2015). Efficacy of hip arthroscopy for the management of septic arthritis: A systematic review. Arthroscopy Journal of Arthroscopy Related Surgery, 31, 1358–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Sayed, A. M. M. (2008). Treatment of early septic arthritis of the hip in children: Comparison of results of open arthrotomy versus arthroscopic drainage. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics, 2, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-008-0094-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Givon, U., Liberman, B., Schindler, A., et al. (2004). Treatment of septic arthritis of the hip joint by repeated ultrasound-guided aspirations. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 24, 266–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-200405000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weigl, D. M., Becker, T., Mercado, E., & Bar-On, E. (2016). Percutaneous aspiration and irrigation technique for the treatment of pediatric septic hip: Effectiveness and predictive parameters. J Pediatr Orthop Part B, 25, 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kotlarsky, P., Shavit, I., Kassis, I., & Eidelman, M. (2016). Treatment of septic hip in a pediatric ED: A retrospective case series analysis. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 34, 602–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pääkkönen, M. (2017). Septic arthritis in children: Diagnosis and treatment. Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 8, 65–68. https://doi.org/10.2147/phmt.s115429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Caird, M. S., Flynn, J. M., Leung, Y. L., et al. (2006). Factors distinguishing septic arthritis from transient synovitis of the hip in children: A prospective study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Series A, 88, 1251–1257. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Verbakel, J. Y., Lemiengre, M. B., De Burghgraeve, T., et al. (2018). Point-of-care C reactive protein to identify serious infection in acutely ill children presenting to hospital: Prospective cohort study. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 103, 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel, L., Michael, J., Schroeder, L., et al. (2019). Can a septic hip decision rule aid in the evaluation of suspected pediatric musculoskeletal infections? Journal of Emergency Medicine, 56, 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levine, M. J., McGuire, K. J., McGowan, K. L., & Flynn, J. M. (2003). Assessment of the test characteristics of C-reactive protein for septic arthritis in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 23, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-200305000-00018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Journeau, P., Wein, F., Popkov, D., et al. (2011). Hip septic arthritis in children: Assessment of treatment using needle aspiration/irrigation. Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research, 97, 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.01.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kabak, S., Halici, M., Akcakus, M., et al. (2002). Septic arthritis in patients followed-up in neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics International, 44, 652–657. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-200X.2002.01649.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffet, J., Oborocianu, I., Rubio, A., et al. (2011). Percutaneous aspiration irrigation drainage technique in the management of septic arthritis in children. The Journal of Trauma Injury Infection and Critical Care, 70, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820318f0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Çaksen, H., Öztürk, M. K., Üzüm, K., et al. (2000). Septic arthritis in childhood. Pediatrics International, 42, 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-200X.2000.01267.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mignemi, M. E., Menge, T. J., Cole, H. A., et al. (2014). Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pericapsular pyomyositis of the hip in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 34, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy, R. F., Plumblee, L., Barfield, W. B., et al. (2019). Septic arthritis of the hip-risk factors associated with secondary surgery. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 27, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00058

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. GR MD and Dr. NZ-A MD contributed to data acquisition and analysis, drafted and edited the manuscript. Dr. ST MD, Dr. AS MD, Dr. NS-L MD and Dr. DW MD interpreted the results and edited the manuscript. Dr. UG MD, conceptualized and designed the study, contributed to data analysis, interpreted the results and edited the manuscript. All authors were actively involved in the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript, and each approved the final version that is submitted

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilad Rotem.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies animals performed by any of the authors. This study contains patient data and was approved by the institutional research committee and conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Approval reference number: 3441-16-SMC.

Informed consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rotem, G., Zur-Aviran, N., Sherr-Lurie, N. et al. Treatment of Septic Arthritis of the Hip Joint Using Repeated Aspirations: When Should We Operate?. JOIO 56, 1090–1095 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00616-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00616-5

Keywords

Navigation