Skip to main content
Log in

Early Results and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) of an Intraosseous Device for Arthrodesis of the First Tarso-Metatarsal (TMT) Joint

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We describe a new surgical technique for arthrodesis of the first tarso-metatarsal (TMT) joint using an intraosseous fixation device and the early results including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS).

Materials and Methods

Seventeen consecutive procedures with this method were included. Indication for surgery was hallux valgus. The average age was 42 years (range 26–65). PROMS were collected and the patients were asked to fill out a satisfaction questionnaire. A retrospective review of radiographs and electronic medical notes was conducted.

Results

Overall fusion rate was 94%. Complications included a case of failed fusion, a superficial wound infection and a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). At a mean follow-up of 24 months (range 10–38) radiographic results demonstrated significant improvement in the intermetatarsal angle or IMA (11.7 ± 2.8 degrees to 6.9 ± 2.4 degrees, P < 0.001) and hallux valgus angle or HVA (28.1 ± 7.3 degrees to 12.2 ± 4.3 degrees, P < 0.001). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score improved significantly from a mean of 7.6 (SD 0.85) preoperatively, to a mean of 2.1 (SD 1.83) post-operatively (P < 0.0001). The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) significantly improved from a mean of 35.8 (SD 10.2), to a mean of 9.2 (SD 17) (P < 0.0001). The final result was satisfactory for 88% of the patients.

Conclusions

The early results show intraosseous fixation to be a safe and efficient method for the fusion of the first TMT joint providing good patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 

Source: a https://www.extremitymedical.com/lower-extremity/io-fix/. b Extremity medical IO Fix surgical technique handbook

Fig. 2

Source: a, b Extremity medical IO Fix surgical technique handbook

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Besse, J., Chouteau, J., & Laptoiu, D. (2010). Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint with ball and cup reamers and osteosynthesis with pure titanium staples: Radiological evaluation of a continuous series of 54 cases. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 16(1), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coughlin, M. J. (2000). Rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction. A long-term follow-up study. JBJS, 82(3), 322–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coughlin, M. J., Grebing, B. R., & Jones, C. P. (2005). Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for idiopathic hallux valgus: Intermediate results. Foot & Ankle International, 26(10), 783–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ginsburg, A. I. (1979). Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: A practical procedure. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 69(6), 367–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grimes, J. S., & Coughlin, M. J. (2006). First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis as a treatment for failed hallux valgus surgery. Foot & Ankle International, 27(11), 887–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brodsky, J. W., Passmore, R. N., Pollo, F. E., & Shabat, S. (2005). Functional outcome of arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using parallel screw fixation. Foot & Ankle International, 26(2), 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mann, R. A., & Oates, J. C. (1980). Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot & Ankle, 1(3), 159–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roth, K. E., Peters, J., Schmidtmann, I., Maus, U., Stephan, D., & Augat, P. (2014). Intraosseous fixation compared to plantar plate fixation for first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: A cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Foot & Ankle International, 35(11), 1209–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Knutsen, A. R., Fleming, J. F., Ebramzadeh, E., Ho, N. C., Warganich, T., Harris, T. G., et al. (2017). Biomechanical comparison of fixation devices for first metatarsocuneiform joint arthrodesis. Foot & Ankle Specialist, 10(4), 322–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klos, K., Simons, P., Hajduk, A., Hoffmeier, K. L., Gras, F., Fröber, R., et al. (2011). Plantar versus dorsomedial locked plating for Lapidus arthrodesis: A biomechanical comparison. Foot & Ankle International, 32(11), 1081–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klos, K., Gueorguiev, B., Mückley, T., Fröber, R., Hofmann, G. O., Schwieger, K., et al. (2010). Stability of medial locking plate and compression screw versus two crossed screws for Lapidus arthrodesis. Foot & Ankle International, 31(2), 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coughlin, M. (2007). Hallux valgus. In M. J. Coughlin, R. A. Mann, & C. L. Saltzmann (Eds.), Surgery of the foot and ankle (8th ed., pp. 183–362). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Müller, M. E., Perren, S., Allgöwer, M., Müller, M. E., Schneider, R., & Willenegger, H. (1991). Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF group. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. DeVries, J. G., Granata, J. D., & Hyer, C. F. (2011). Fixation of first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis: A retrospective comparative cohort of two techniques. Foot & Ankle International, 32(2), 158–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burchard, R., Massa, R., Soost, C., Richter, W., Dietrich, G., Ohrndorf, A., et al. (2018). Biomechanics of common fixation devices for first tarsometatarsal joint fusion—a comparative study with synthetic bones. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13(1), 176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cottom, J. M., & Vora, A. M. (2013). Fixation of lapidus arthrodesis with a plantar interfragmentary screw and medial locking plate: A report of 88 cases. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 52(4), 465–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ungersboeck, A., Geret, V., Pohler, O., Schuetz, M., & Wuest, W. (1995). Tissue reaction to bone plates made of pure titanium: A prospective, quantitative clinical study. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine, 6(4), 223–229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Saxena, A., Nguyen, A., & Nelsen, E. (2009). Lapidus bunionectomy: Early evaluation of crossed lag screws versus locking plate with plantar lag screw. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 48(2), 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Drampalos, E., Vun, S. H., & Fayyaz, I. (2016). Intramedullary and intra-osseous arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 24(3), 358–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Drampalos, E., Vun, S. H., Bayam, L., & Fayyaz, I. (2017). Early results of an intraosseous device for arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 51, 299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parker, L., Ray, P., Grechenig, S., & Grechenig, W. (2014). Does the IOFIX improve compression in ankle fusion? Foot and Ankle Surgery, 20(4), 258–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel, S., Garg, P., Fazal, M. A., & Ray, P. S. (2019). First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using an intraosseous post and lag screw with immediate bearing of weight. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 58(6), 1091–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Segal, D., Ohana, N., Nyska, M., & Palmanovich, E. (2020). Does the IOFix implant improve union rates? BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singhal, R., Kwaees, T., Mohamed, M., Argyropoulos, M., Amarasinghe, P., & Toh, E. (2018). Result of IOFIX (Intra Osseous FIXation) device for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: A single surgeon’s series. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 24(5), 466–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dureja, K., & Bhardwaj, S. H. (2021). The functional outcome of hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using hallux intramedullary fusion device. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 55(1), 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Ryan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was authorized by the local ethical committee as part of the Clinical Effectiveness & Audit Department (Registered number 8661) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2000.

Informed consent

Informed Consent consent was taken from all patients included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayam, L., Ryan, P., Bilal, M. et al. Early Results and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) of an Intraosseous Device for Arthrodesis of the First Tarso-Metatarsal (TMT) Joint. JOIO 56, 895–901 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-021-00572-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-021-00572-6

Keywords

Navigation