Skip to main content
Log in

The Floating Knee Injuries: Does it Need a New Classification System?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aims to determine the differences between the clinical and radiological results of patients based on Karlstrom–Olerud Scoring System who cannot be included in any classification for floating knee injuries and to seek an answer to the question of whether a new classification is needed.

Material and Methods

Seventy patients with floating knee injuries treated in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed between 2008 and 2019 in the study. The results of fractures that classifiable and unclassifiable according to the Fraser, Blake and McBryde classifications were statistically compared based on the Karlstrom–Olerud criteria.

Results

Seventy patients, 64 males and 6 females, participated in the study. The mean age of our patients was 32.3 ± 12.55 (18–68) years. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 30.26 ± 18.19 months (11–60 months). The results of the fractures that could not be classified according to the Blake and McBryde classification were statistically poorer than the results of those that could be classified according to the criteria (p = 0.041).

The results of the fractures that could not be classified according to the Fraser classification were statistically poorer than the results of those that could be classified according to the criteria defined by Karlstrom and Olerud (p = 0.010).

Conclusion

We observed that floating knee injuries that we could and could not classify led to different clinical results. In conclusion, we think that there is a need for a new floating knee classification that includes segmental fractures, patellar fractures and open fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blake, R., & McBryde, A. (1975). The floating knee: Ipsilateral fractures of the tibia and femur. Southern Medical Journal, 68(1), 13–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fraser, R. D., Hunter, G. A., & Waddell, J. P. (1978). Ipsilateral fracture of the femur and tibia. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 60-B(4), 510–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feron, J.-M., Bonnevialle, P., Pietu, G., & Jacquot, F. (2015). Traumatic floating knee: A review of a multi-centric series of 172 cases in adult. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 11, 356–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rethnam, U., Yesupalan, R. S., & Nair, R. (2009). Impact of associated injuries in the floating knee: A retrospective study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14(10), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muñoz Vives, J., Bel, J.-C., Capel Agundez, A., Chana Rodríguez, F., Palomo Traver, J., Schultz-Larsen, M., et al. (2016). The floating knee: A review on ipsilateral femoral and tibial fractures. EFORT Open Reviews, 1(11), 375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hee, H. T., Wong, H. P., Low, Y. P., & Myers, L. (2001). Predictors of outcome of floating knee injuries in adults: 89 Patients followed for 2–12 years. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 72(4), 385–394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ran, T., Hua, X., Zhenyu, Z., Yue, L., Youhua, W., Yi, C., et al. (2013). Floating knee: A modified Fraser’s classification and the results of a series of 28 cases. Injury, 44(8), 1033–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karlström, G., & Olerud, S. (1977). Ipsilateral fracture of the femur and tibia. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 59(2), 240–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kao, F.-C., Tu, Y.-K., Hsu, K.-Y., Su, J.-Y., Yen, C.-Y., & Chou, M.-C. (2010). Floating knee injuries: A high complication rate. Orthopedics., 33(1), 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulkarni, M. S., Aroor, M. N., Vijayan, S., Shetty, S., Tripathy, S. K., & Rao, S. K. (2018). Variables affecting functional outcome in floating knee injuries. Injury, 49(8), 1594–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Piétu, G., Jacquot, F., & Féron, J.-M. (2007). et les membres du GETRAUM [The floating knee: a retrospective analysis of 172 cases]. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l’appareil Moteur, 93(6), 627–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doyle, P., & Oliver, C. W. (1998). Complex floating knee; Trifocal tibial and ipsilateral femoral fracture. Injury, 29(7), 553–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burçin Karslı.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Burçin Karslı, Sezgin Bahadır Tekin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standard Statement

The study protocol was approved by Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Gaziantep University Medical Faculty and the study was conducted in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karslı, B., Tekin, S.B. The Floating Knee Injuries: Does it Need a New Classification System?. JOIO 55, 499–505 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00298-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00298-x

Keywords

Navigation