Abstract
Background
This study aims to determine the differences between the clinical and radiological results of patients based on Karlstrom–Olerud Scoring System who cannot be included in any classification for floating knee injuries and to seek an answer to the question of whether a new classification is needed.
Material and Methods
Seventy patients with floating knee injuries treated in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed between 2008 and 2019 in the study. The results of fractures that classifiable and unclassifiable according to the Fraser, Blake and McBryde classifications were statistically compared based on the Karlstrom–Olerud criteria.
Results
Seventy patients, 64 males and 6 females, participated in the study. The mean age of our patients was 32.3 ± 12.55 (18–68) years. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 30.26 ± 18.19 months (11–60 months). The results of the fractures that could not be classified according to the Blake and McBryde classification were statistically poorer than the results of those that could be classified according to the criteria (p = 0.041).
The results of the fractures that could not be classified according to the Fraser classification were statistically poorer than the results of those that could be classified according to the criteria defined by Karlstrom and Olerud (p = 0.010).
Conclusion
We observed that floating knee injuries that we could and could not classify led to different clinical results. In conclusion, we think that there is a need for a new floating knee classification that includes segmental fractures, patellar fractures and open fractures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blake, R., & McBryde, A. (1975). The floating knee: Ipsilateral fractures of the tibia and femur. Southern Medical Journal, 68(1), 13–16.
Fraser, R. D., Hunter, G. A., & Waddell, J. P. (1978). Ipsilateral fracture of the femur and tibia. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 60-B(4), 510–515.
Feron, J.-M., Bonnevialle, P., Pietu, G., & Jacquot, F. (2015). Traumatic floating knee: A review of a multi-centric series of 172 cases in adult. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 11, 356–360.
Rethnam, U., Yesupalan, R. S., & Nair, R. (2009). Impact of associated injuries in the floating knee: A retrospective study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14(10), 7.
Muñoz Vives, J., Bel, J.-C., Capel Agundez, A., Chana Rodríguez, F., Palomo Traver, J., Schultz-Larsen, M., et al. (2016). The floating knee: A review on ipsilateral femoral and tibial fractures. EFORT Open Reviews, 1(11), 375–382.
Hee, H. T., Wong, H. P., Low, Y. P., & Myers, L. (2001). Predictors of outcome of floating knee injuries in adults: 89 Patients followed for 2–12 years. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 72(4), 385–394.
Ran, T., Hua, X., Zhenyu, Z., Yue, L., Youhua, W., Yi, C., et al. (2013). Floating knee: A modified Fraser’s classification and the results of a series of 28 cases. Injury, 44(8), 1033–1042.
Karlström, G., & Olerud, S. (1977). Ipsilateral fracture of the femur and tibia. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 59(2), 240–243.
Kao, F.-C., Tu, Y.-K., Hsu, K.-Y., Su, J.-Y., Yen, C.-Y., & Chou, M.-C. (2010). Floating knee injuries: A high complication rate. Orthopedics., 33(1), 14.
Kulkarni, M. S., Aroor, M. N., Vijayan, S., Shetty, S., Tripathy, S. K., & Rao, S. K. (2018). Variables affecting functional outcome in floating knee injuries. Injury, 49(8), 1594–1601.
Piétu, G., Jacquot, F., & Féron, J.-M. (2007). et les membres du GETRAUM [The floating knee: a retrospective analysis of 172 cases]. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l’appareil Moteur, 93(6), 627–634.
Doyle, P., & Oliver, C. W. (1998). Complex floating knee; Trifocal tibial and ipsilateral femoral fracture. Injury, 29(7), 553–555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Burçin Karslı, Sezgin Bahadır Tekin declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standard Statement
The study protocol was approved by Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Gaziantep University Medical Faculty and the study was conducted in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent
For this type of study informed consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karslı, B., Tekin, S.B. The Floating Knee Injuries: Does it Need a New Classification System?. JOIO 55, 499–505 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00298-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00298-x