Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of thermal and mechanical properties of perlite-based lightweight geopolymer composites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of this study include minimizing the thermal conductivity of the produced materials, reducing dead loads of structures through lightweight composite material production, and increasing perlite use in areas close to material deposits. To this end, lightweight geopolymer composites were produced using ground raw perlite as a precursor, expanded perlite as an aggregate, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as an activator. The produced samples were cured in an oven at 110 °C for 24 h. Within the scope of this study, unit weight, compressive strength, and thermal conductivity coefficient tests were conducted. Additionally, microstructure analysis was carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). As a result, it has been shown that ground raw perlite can be used as a precursor in geopolymer composites, while expanded perlite demonstrates suitability as a lightweight and porous aggregate for heat insulation applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Alakara EH, Nacar S, Sevim O, Korkmaz S, Demir I. Determination of compressive strength of perlite-containing slag-based geopolymers and its prediction using artificial neural network and regression-based methods. Constr Build Mater. 2022;359: 129518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sevim O, Demir I, Alakara EH, Bayer İR. Experimental evaluation of new geopolymer composite with inclusion of slag and construction waste firebrick at elevated temperatures. Polymers. 2023;15(9):2127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gökçe HS, Tuyan M, Nehdi ML. Alkali-activated and geopolymer materials developed using innovative manufacturing techniques: a critical review. Constr Build Mater. 2021;303: 124483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alhawat M, Ashour A, Yildirim G, Aldemir A, Sahmaran M. Properties of geopolymers sourced from construction and demolition waste: a review. J Build Eng. 2022;50: 104104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh B, Ishwarya G, Gupta M, Bhattacharyya SK. Geopolymer concrete: a review of some recent developments. Constr Build Mater. 2015;85:78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahmoodi O, Siad H, Lachemi M, Dadsetan S, Sahmaran M. Optimization of brick waste-based geopolymer binders at ambient temperature and pre-targeted chemical parameters. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;268: 122285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadi MNS, Al-Azzawi M, Yu T. Effects of fly ash characteristics and alkaline activator components on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater. 2018;175:41–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JS. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete.’ Cem Concr Res. 2007;37(12):1590–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash binder: effect of the activator. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(10):1984–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li C, Sun H, Li L. A review: the comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40:1341–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Akbarnezhad A, Huan M, Mesgari S, Castel A. Recycling of geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2015;101:152–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sevim O, Alakara EH, Demir I, Bayer IR. Effect of magnetic water on properties of slag-based geopolymer composites incorporating ceramic tile waste from construction and demolition waste. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2023;23(2):107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amran YM, Alyousef R, Alabduljabbar H, El-Zeadani M. Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete—a review. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;251:119679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rostami M, Behfarnia K. The effect of silica fume on durability of alkali activated slag concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2017;134:262–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olivia M, Nikraz H. Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method. Mater Des. 2012;36:191–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Noushini A, Castel A. The effect of heat-curing on transport properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2016;112:464–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z, Provis JL, Reid A, Wang H. Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction. Constr Build Mater. 2014;56:113–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhardwaj B, Kumar P. Comparative study of geopolymer and alkali activated slag concrete comprising waste foundry sand. Constr Build Mater. 2019;209:555–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kul A, Ozel BF, Ozcelikci E, Gunal MF, Ulugol H, Yildirim G, Sahmaran M. Characterization and life cycle assessment of geopolymer mortars with masonry units and recycled concrete aggregates assorted from construction and demolition waste. J Build Eng. 2023;78: 107546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozcelikci E, Kul A, Gunal MF, Ozel BF, Yildirim G, Ashour A, Sahmaran M. A comprehensive study on the compressive strength, durability-related parameters and microstructure of geopolymer mortars based on mixed construction and demolition waste. J Cleaner Prod. 2023;396: 136522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu LH, Ou H, Lee LL. Investigation on pozzolanic effect of perlite powder in concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2003;33:73–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Çelikten S, Isikdag B. Strength development of ground perlite-based geopolymer mortars. Adv Concr Constr. 2020;9(3):227–34.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Top S, Vapur H, Altiner M, Kaya D, Ekicibil A. Properties of fly ash-based lightweight geopolymer concrete prepared using pumice and expanded perlite as aggregates. J Mol Struct. 2020;1202: 127236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nematollahi B, Ranade R, Sanjayan J, Ramakrishnan S. Thermal and mechanical properties of sustainable lightweight strain hardening geopolymer composites. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2017;17(1):55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ASTM C109/C109M-21. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken: ASTM International. 2021.

  26. ASTM D7984–21. Standard test method for measurement of thermal effusivity of fabrics using a modified transient plane source (MTPS) instrument. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. 2021.

  27. ASTM D4404–18. Standard test method for determination of pore volume and pore volume distribution of soil and rock by mercury intrusion porosimetry. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. 2018.

  28. Diamond S. Mercury porosimetry: an inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res. 2000;30(10):1517–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gonzalez-Corominas A, Etxeberria M, Poon CS. Influence of steam curing on the pore structures and mechanical properties of fly-ash high performance concrete prepared with recycled aggregates. Cem Concr Compos. 2016;71:77–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Elyamany HE, Elmoaty MA, Elshaboury AM. Setting time and 7-day strength of geopolymer mortar with various binders. Constr Build Mater. 2018;187:974–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaur K, Singh J, Kaur M. Compressive strength of rice husk ssh based Geopolymer: the effect of alkaline activator. Constr Build Mater. 2018;169:188–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Papa E, Medri V, Murri AN, Laghi L, Aloysio GD, Bandini S, Landi E. Characterization of alkali bonded expanded perlite. Constr Build Mater. 2018;191:1139–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wongsa A, Sata V, Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J, Chindaprasirt P. Mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight geopolymer mortar incorporating crumb rubber. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;195(10):1069–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang L, Liu P, Jing Q, Liu Y, Wang W, Zhang Y, Li Z. Strength properties and thermal conductivity of concrete with the addition of expanded perlite filled with aerogel. Constr Build Mater. 2018;188:747–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozer Sevim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The authors state that this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

The authors declared their approval to participate in the submitted manuscript.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that they all agree to publish this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir, I., Güzelküçük, S., Sevim, O. et al. Investigation of thermal and mechanical properties of perlite-based lightweight geopolymer composites. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 23, 266 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00808-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00808-2

Keywords

Navigation