Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the influence of damage characteristics of longitudinal ballastless track on the dynamic performance of train-track-bridge coupled systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-speed railway bridges are inevitably damaged under external loads during operation, which may lead to abnormal vibration of trains, and even threaten running safety. Aiming at the practical problem of high-speed railway longitudinal ballastless track structure damage, based on the train-track-bridge interaction theory, a three-dimensional coupled vibration model of a train-track-bridge was developed using the finite element method. The dynamic response calculation program (TTBCS) was developed using the Newmark-β numerical calculation method. The model and program were used to calculate and analyze the influence of damage to the main components of high-speed railway ballastless track-bridge structure on the dynamic response of the system, including fastener failure, interlayer component damage, and bearing vertical stiffness degradation. The results show that the fastener failure significantly influences the vertical interaction of the wheel-track. The number of fastener failures should not exceed one pair otherwise there is a risk of derailment. When the CA (cement and emulsified asphalt) mortar layer and the slide layer void length exceeds the critical value, the dynamic irregularity of the track-bridge system significantly increases the vertical vibration of the wheel-track system. The critical value of void should be given more attention to in the operation of high-speed railways. The vertical dynamic performance of the train is not sensitive to the change in vertical support stiffness within a certain range of stiffness values but within a certain operation speed range, adjusting the bearing stiffness can play a certain vibration isolation effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

Data avaliable on request from the authors.

References

  1. Bezin Y, Farrington D, Penny C, Temple B, Iwnicki S. The dynamic response of slab track constructions and their benefit with respect to conventional ballasted track. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010;48(sup1):175–93.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhai W. Numerical Method and Computer Simulation for Analysis of Vehicle–Track Coupled Dynamics 2020.

  3. Xu L, Yu Z, Shi C. A matrix coupled model for vehicle-slab track-subgrade interactions at 3-D space. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020;128:105894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu X, Kim C-W, Chang K-C. Finite Element Analysis Framework for Dynamic Vehicle-Bridge Interaction System Based on ABAQUS. Int J Str Stab Dyn. 2020;20(03):2050034.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Galvín P, Romero A, Domínguez J. Fully three-dimensional analysis of high-speed train–track–soil-structure dynamic interaction. J Sound Vib. 2010;329(24):5147–63.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Galvín P, Romero A, Domínguez J. Vibrations induced by HST passage on ballast and non-ballast tracks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2010;30(9):862–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biondi B, Muscolino G, Sofi A. A substructure approach for the dynamic analysis of train–track–bridge system. Comput Struct. 2005;83(28–30):2271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Antolín P, Zhang N, Goicolea JM, Xia H, Astiz MÁ, Oliva J. Consideration of nonlinear wheel–rail contact forces for dynamic vehicle–bridge interaction in high-speed railways. J Sound Vib. 2013;332(5):1231–51.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lei X, Zhang B. Analysis of dynamic behavior for slab track of high-speed railway based on vehicle and track elements. J Transp Eng. 2011;137(4):227–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Auersch L. Dynamics of the railway track and the underlying soil: the boundary-element solution, theoretical results and their experimental verification. Veh Syst Dyn. 2005;43(9):671–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu X, Jiang L, Lai Z, Xiang P, Chen Y. Sensitivity and dynamic analysis of train-bridge coupled system with multiple random factors. Eng Struct. 2020;221:111083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Xiang P, Jiang L, Lai Z, Zhou T, Chen Y. Stochastic analysis of train-bridge system using the karhunen-loéve expansion and the point estimate method. Int J Str Stab Dyn. 2020;20(02):2050025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kun L, Lei X, Zeng S. Influence analysis on the effect of rail fastening parameters on the vibration response of track–bridge system. Adv Mech Eng. 2017;9(8):168781401770283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li T, Su Q, Kaewunruen S. Influences of dynamic material properties of slab track components on the train-track vibration interactions. Eng Failure Anal. 2020;115:104633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li X, Liang L, Wang D. Vibration and noise characteristics of an elevated box girder paved with different track structures. J Sound Vib. 2018;425:21–40.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wan H-P, Ni Y-Q. An efficient approach for dynamic global sensitivity analysis of stochastic train-track-bridge system. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2019;117:843–61.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Blanco-Lorenzo J, Santamaria J, Vadillo EG, Oyarzabal O. Dynamic comparison of different types of slab track and ballasted track using a flexible track model. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 2011;225(6):574–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xin L, Li X, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Xiao L. Resonance analysis of train–track–bridge interaction systems with correlated uncertainties. Int J Str Stab Dyn. 2019;20(01):2050008.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferdous W, Manalo A. Failures of mainline railway sleepers and suggested remedies – Review of current practice. Eng Fail Anal. 2014;44:17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cantero D, Arvidsson T, Obrien E, Karoumi R. Train–track–bridge modelling and review of parameters. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2015;12(9):1051–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luo W, Lei X. Analysis of Dynamic Behavior for Ballastless Track-Bridge with a Hybrid Method. Intell Auto Soft Comput. 2014;20(4):487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tan CJ, Ji WH. Research into the parameter influence on coupled vibration analysis of high speed train and bridge. Appl Mech Mater. 2011;90–93:884–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Z. Relationship between track stiffness and dynamic performance of vehicle–track–bridge system. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;59(12):1825–43.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu C, Xiang J, Mao J, Gong K, He S. Influence of slab arch imperfection of double-block ballastless track system on vibration response of high-speed train. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2018;40(2).

  25. Zheng L, Jiang L, Feng Y, Liu X, Lai Z, Zhou W. Effects of foundation settlement on comfort of riding on high-speed train-track-bridge coupled systems. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 2020;1–19.

  26. Zhu S, Fu Q, Cai C, Spanos PD. Damage evolution and dynamic response of cement asphalt mortar layer of slab track under vehicle dynamic load. SCIENCE CHINA Technol Sci. 2014;57(10):1883–94.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu S, Cai C. Interface damage and its effect on vibrations of slab track under temperature and vehicle dynamic loads. Int J Non-Linear Mech. 2014;58:222–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiang P, Huang W, Jiang L, Lu D, Liu X, Zhang Q. Investigations on the influence of prestressed concrete creep on train-track-bridge system. Construct Build Mater 2021;293.

  29. Kalker JJ. On the rolling contact of two elastic bodies in the presence of dry friction 1967.

  30. Yu J, Jiang L, Zhou W, Feng Y, Liu X. Study on power spectral density curve of track geometric ieregularity under lateral random earthquake. Chin Civil Eng J. 2022;55(02):61–72 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhou Wangbao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaohui, L., Lizhong, J., Wangbao, Z. et al. Study on the influence of damage characteristics of longitudinal ballastless track on the dynamic performance of train-track-bridge coupled systems. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 23, 23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00561-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00561-y

Keywords

Navigation