Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shear rupture behaviors of intact and granulated Wombeyan marble with the flat-jointed model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many large hydropower projects have been constructed in the highly interlocked and non-persistently jointed rock mass (e.g., the columnar jointed basalt). Regarding the granulated Wombeyan marble as an analog of such rock mass, a series of direct shear test simulations under constant normal loading (CNL) and constant normal stiffness (CNS) boundary conditions were performed to better understand its shear rupture behavior using the flat-jointed model based on the discrete element method. The results show that the shear process under the CNS condition can be divided into four stages: linear-elastic stage, yielding stage, shear wear stage and shear sliding stage. The strain-strengthening in the shear wear stage is evident due to the feedback normal stress provided by the cap induced by shear dilation. As the initial applied normal stress increases, the peak shear strength point of specimens under CNL approaches the yield point of specimens under CNS. Additionally, the shear rupture process under CNS is strain controlled in granulated specimens but stress controlled in intact specimens. Correspondingly, the shear rupture zone creation in granulated specimens is not but that in intact specimens is dependent on the initial applied normal stress. Finally, it is demonstrated that the CNS condition can improve the stability of rock slopes or underground excavations embedded in such rock mass and its improvement effect increases with the normal stiffness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bewick RP, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF. Shear rupture under constant normal stiffness boundary conditions. Tectonophysics. 2014;634:76–90.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Asahina D, Wang Z. Shear behavior and acoustic emission characteristics of en-echelon joints under constant normal stiffness conditions. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2020;109:102772.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shang J, Zhao Z, Ma S. On the shear failure of incipient rock discontinuities under CNL and CNS boundary conditions: insights from DEM modelling. Eng Geol. 2018;234:153–66.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tang ZC, Wong LNY. Influences of normal loading rate and shear velocity on the shear behavior of artificial rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2016;49:2165–72.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao Q, Sun Z, Stephansson O, Li C, Stillborg B. Shear fracture (mode II) of brittle rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2003;40(3):355–75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Petit JP. Normal stress dependent rupture morphology in direct shear tests on sandstone with applications to some natural fault surface features. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1988;25(6):411–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Obert L, Brady BT, Schmechel FW. The effect of normal stiffness on the shear resistance of rock. Rock Mech. 1976;8(2):57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Y, Wen G, Hu J. Analysis of deformation characteristics of fully grouted rock bolts under pull-and-shear loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2020;53:2981.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li KH, Cao P, Zhang K, Zhong YF. Macro and meso characteristics evolution on shear behavior of rock joints. J Cent South Univ. 2015;22:3087–96.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Archambault G, Flamand R, Rouleau A, Daigneault R. Mechanics of fault zone development in brittle dilatant analogue geomaterial. The 33th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS): American Rock Mechanics Association, 1992.

  11. Bewick RP, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF. DEM simulation of direct shear: 2. Grain boundary and mineral grain strength component influence on shear rupture. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2013;47(5):1673–92.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang X, Lin H, Wang Y, Zhao Y. Creep damage model of rock mass under multi-level creep load based on spatio-temporal evolution of deformation modulus. Arch Civil Mech Eng. 2021;21(2):71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang X, Lin H, Wang Y, Yong R, Zhao Y, Du S. Damage evolution characteristics of saw-tooth joint under shear creep condition. Int J Damage Mech. 2021;30(3):453–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cho N, Martin C, Sego D. Development of a shear zone in brittle rock subjected to direct shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2008;45(8):1335–46.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bewick RP, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF, Bahrani N. DEM simulation of direct shear: 1. Rupture under constant normal stress boundary conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2013;47(5):1647–71.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meng B, Jing H, Yang S, Wu Y, Wang Y, Huang Y. Experimental investigation on shear behavior of intact sandstones under constant normal stiffness conditions. Int J Geomech. 2021;21(2):04020259.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ji H, Zhang JC, Xu WY, Wang RB, Wang HL, Yan L, et al. Experimental investigation of the anisotropic mechanical properties of a columnar jointed rock mass: observations from laboratory-based physical modelling. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2017;50(7):1919–31.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi A, Wei Y, Zhang Y, Tang M. Study on the strength characteristics of columnar jointed basalt with a true triaxial apparatus at the baihetan hydropower station. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2020;53(11):4947–65.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiang Z, Wang H, Xu W, Xie W-C. Experimental study on hydro-mechanical behaviour of anisotropic columnar jointed rock-like specimens. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2020;53(12):5781–94.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosengren K, Jaeger J. The mechanical properties of an interlocked low-porosity aggregate. Geotechnique. 1968;18(3):317–26.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walton G, Alejano LR, Arzua J, Markley T. Crack damage parameters and dilatancy of artificially jointed granite samples under triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2018;51:1637.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bahrani N, Kaiser PK. Strength degradation of non-persistently jointed rockmass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2013;62:28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li Y, Bahrani N. A continuum grain-based model for intact and granulated Wombeyan marble. Comput Geotech. 2021;129:103872.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou X, Xie Y, Long G, Zeng X, Li J, Yao L, et al. DEM analysis of the effect of interface transition zone on dynamic splitting tensile behavior of high-strength concrete based on multi-phase model. Cement Concret Res. 2021;149:106577.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li K, Cheng Y, Fan X. Roles of model size and particle size distribution on macro-mechanical properties of Lac du Bonnet granite using flat-joint model. Comput Geotech. 2018;103:43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang Z, Gao G, Xiong X, Wang Y. Mechanical response and deformation mechanisms of porous PZT95/5 ceramics under shock-wave compression. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2021;41(2):1251–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Potyondy D. Simulating perforation damage with a flat-jointed bonded-particle material. In: 51st US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium: American Rock Mechanics Association, 2017.

  28. Xu G, He C, Wang J, Chen Z. Study on the mechanical behavior of a secondary tunnel lining with a yielding layer in transversely isotropic rock stratum. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2020;53:2957.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gutiérrez-Ch JG, Senent S, Melentijevic S, Jimenez R. A DEM-based factor to design rock-socketed piles considering socket roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2021;54:3409.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gerogiannopoulos NG. A critical state approach to rock mechanics: Imperial College London. London: University of London; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wu S, Xu X. A study of three intrinsic problems of the classic discrete element method using flat-joint model. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2016;49(5):1813–30.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheng Y, Wong LNY. A study on mechanical properties and fracturing behavior of Carrara marble with the flat-jointed model. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech. 2020;44(6):803–22.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bahrani N, Kaiser PK, Valley B. Distinct element method simulation of an analogue for a highly interlocked, non-persistently jointed rockmass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2014;71:117–30.

    Google Scholar 

  34. ASTM. Standard test method for performing laboratory direct shear strength tests of rock specimens under constant normal force. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang P, Yin Z-Y, Zhou W-H, Chen W-B. Micro-mechanical analysis of soil–structure interface behavior under constant normal stiffness condition with DEM. Acta Geotech. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01374-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li K, Yin ZY, Cheng Y, Cao P, Meng J. Three-dimensional discrete element simulation of indirect tensile behaviour of a transversely isotropic rock. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech. 2020;44(13):1812–32.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fan X, Jiang X, Liu Y, Lin H, Li K, He Z. Local stress distribution and evolution surrounding flaw and opening within rock block under uniaxial compression. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2021;112:102914.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fan X, Yang Z, Li K. Effects of the lining structure on mechanical and fracturing behaviors of four-arc shaped tunnels in a jointed rock mass under uniaxial compression. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2021;112:102887.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang J, Gutierrez MS, Dove JE. Numerical studies of shear banding in interface shear tests using a new strain calculation method. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech. 2007;31(12):1349–66.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Huang D, Wang J, Liu S. A comprehensive study on the smooth joint model in DEM simulation of jointed rock masses. Granular Matter. 2015;17(6):775–91.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang J, Dove JE, Gutierrez MS. Discrete-continuum analysis of shear banding in the direct shear test. Géotechnique. 2007;57(6):513–26.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Patton FD. Multiple modes of shear failure in rock. In: 1st ISRM Congress: International Society for Rock Mechanics, 1966.

  43. Lajtai E. Mechanics of second order faults and tension gashes. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1969;80(11):2253–72.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tchalenko J. Similarities between shear zones of different magnitudes. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1970;81(6):1625–40.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Saeb S, Amadei B. Modelling joint response under constant or variable normal stiffness boundary conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr Pergamon. 1990;27:213–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41807241), the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Grant No. UGC/FDS13/E06/18) and Guangdong basic and applied basic research fund project (Grant No. 2020A1515110468). The authors would like to acknowledge the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which have greatly improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongya Han.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, K., Han, D., Fan, X. et al. Shear rupture behaviors of intact and granulated Wombeyan marble with the flat-jointed model. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 22, 51 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00377-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00377-w

Keywords

Navigation