Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

PROMIS is superior to established outcome measures in capturing disability resulting from sagittal malalignment in patients with back pain

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) is a quality of life metric that has gained increased popularity due to computer adaptive testing. Previous studies have shown that PROMIS correlates with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in patients with back pain and takes significantly less time to complete. However, the ability of PROMIS to capture disability from spinal malalignment relative to established metrics is unknown. The aim of the present study is to validate the correlation between ODI and PROMIS in patients with back pain, analyze correlations of PROMIS and legacy metrics to sagittal alignment, and identify major drivers of PROMIS scores and ODI in patients with back pain.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively collected outcome measures database (PROMIS, ODI, VAS Back, VAS Leg, VAS Neck, and VAS Arm) of spine patients > 18 years. Inclusion criteria for the present study was a chief complaint of back pain and full length weight bearing X-rays within 30 days of health related quality of life (HRQL) completion. Demographic information, radiographic alignment, psychiatric diagnoses, and comorbidities were recorded. PROMIS metrics were correlated to legacy metrics (ODI and VAS). Next, outcome metrics were correlated with sagittal alignment variables T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA), SVA, PT, and PI-LL. Patients were grouped based on the presence of spinal deformity (defined radiographically as any one of SVA > 4 cm, PI-LL > 10°, PT > 20°) and mean HRQL scores were investigated for the adult spinal deformity (ASD) and non-ASD groups. Finally, drivers of PROMIS PF scores and ODI scores were determined using multiple stepwise regression.

Results

150 patients met inclusion criteria including 60 patients with ASD and 90 patients without. For the whole cohort, PROMIS PF correlated with ODI (r = − 0.651, p < 0.001), VAS Back (r = − 0.260, p = 0.014) and Charleson Comorbidity Index (r = − 0.336, p < 0.001). PROMIS PF had higher correlations than ODI for each sagittal alignment parameter tested, including TPA, SVA, PT, and PI-LL. When patients with ASD were compared to non-ASD patients, the PROMIS score was different between the groups but the ODI and VAS scores were not. Finally, stepwise linear regression showed that SVA, PI-LL, and VAS Leg were significant drivers of PROMIS PF (r2 = 0.406, p < 0.001). VAS Leg and VAS Back were significant contributors to ODI (r2 = 0.376, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In a cohort of 150 patients with back pain, PROMIS correlated strongly with legacy outcome metrics, including VAS and ODI. PROMIS PF correlated more strongly with sagittal malalignment than ODI. Additionally, patients with spinal deformity had significantly worse PROMIS PF scores but similar ODI scores as patients without ASD. Finally, sagittal alignment was found to be a significant driver of PROMIS PF scores but not ODI scores. PROMIS PF should be utilized as a disability assessment tool in patients with spinal deformity due to ease of use, strong correlations with legacy metrics, and ability to capture disability resulting from sagittal alignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crow WT, Willis DR (2009) Estimating cost of care for patients with acute low back pain: a retrospective review of patient records. J Am Osteopath Assoc 109:229–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz JN (2006) Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 2):21–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Porter ME (2010) What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 363:2477–2481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Misailidou V, Malliou P, Beneka A et al (2010) Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools. J Chiropr Med 9:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liebenson C, Yeomans S (2002) Outcomes assessment in musculoskeletal medicine. Man Ther 2:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al (2007) The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Med Care 45:S3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fidai MS, Saltzman BM, Meta F et al (2018) Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system and legacy patient-reported outcome measures in the field of orthopaedics: a systematic review. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 34:605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B et al (2014) The PROMIS physical function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 67:516–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS (2016) PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:744–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI et al (2013) The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 73:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwab FJ, Dubey A, Gamez L et al (2005) Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1082–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N et al (2014) The T1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1631–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papuga MO, Mesfin A, Molinari R et al (2016) Correlation of PROMIS physical function and pain CAT instruments with oswestry disability index and neck disability index in spine patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM et al (2011) Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 173:676–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brodke DS, Goz V, Voss MW et al (2017) PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:921–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel AA, Dodwad S-NM, Boody BS et al (2018) Validation of patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 43:1521–1528. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Glassman SD, Bridwell KM, Dimar JR et al (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2024–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained for the purposes of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Health, 305 East 15th St., New York, NY, 10003, USA

    Nicholas D. Stekas, Bradley Johnson, David Jevotovsky, Michael J. Moses, Frank Segreto, Charla Fischer, Aaron J. Buckland, Thomas J. Errico & Themistocles S. Protopsaltis

Authors
  1. Nicholas D. Stekas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bradley Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Jevotovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael J. Moses
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frank Segreto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Charla Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Aaron J. Buckland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thomas J. Errico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Themistocles S. Protopsaltis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Themistocles S. Protopsaltis.

Ethics declarations

IRB statement

Internal Review Board approval was obtained at each participating site prior to study initiation and informed consent was obtained from each patient at enrollment.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stekas, N.D., Johnson, B., Jevotovsky, D. et al. PROMIS is superior to established outcome measures in capturing disability resulting from sagittal malalignment in patients with back pain. Spine Deform 8, 499–505 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00068-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00068-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation