Abstract
In this research, the effects of tin as a promoter for the Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst on the kinetic parameters and mechanism of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis are examined. The investigation was conducted utilizing a fixed bed micro-reactor at the temperature range of 463–533 K, pressure of 2–8 bar, H2/CO feed ratio of 2, and space velocities (GHSV) of 3600 h−1 and 4200 h−1. Considering the mechanistic study and the Langmuir–Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) theory, CO consumption rates were defined through four mechanisms and 16 kinetic models. Using nonlinear regression analysis, the models were adjusted to the experimental data. A kinetic model (\(-{r}_{CO}=\frac{\left(k{P}_{CO}{P}_{H2}\right)}{(1+a{P}_{CO}+b{P}_{H2}^{0.5}{)}^{2}})\) was selected as the best one based on the statistical criteria. The mechanism of this catalytic system was based on the enol reaction, involving the molecular adsorption of CO species and surface adsorption of H2 in a dissociative or associative manner. The activation energy for the optimum kinetic model was estimated as 31.69 kJ/mol. Tin promoter decreased the activation energy of γ-Al2O3 supported cobalt catalyst in the CO hydrogenation reaction.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
Abbasi M, Mirzaei AA, Atashi H (2019) The mechanism and kinetics study of Fischer–Tropsch reaction over iron-nickel-cerium nano-structure catalyst. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(45):24667–24679
Arsalanfar M et al (2020) Study of mechanism and kinetic modeling of CO hydrogenation reaction over the impregnated Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. J Chin Chem Soc 67(7):1152–1166
Atashi H et al (2012) Intrinsic kinetics of the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over an impregnated cobalt-potassium catalyst. Korean J Chem Eng 29(3):304–309
de Oliveira AHS, Aguiar EFS, Cavalcante CL (2022) Production of liquid hydrocarbons via Fischer–Tropsch synthesis on a pilot-scale reactor using a cobalt-based mesoporous catalyst. Braz J Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-021-00203-5
Fazlollahi F et al (2012) Development of a kinetic model for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over Co/Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. J Ind Eng Chem 18(4):1223–1232
Gambaro C et al (2011) Hydrocracking of Fischer–Tropsch waxes: kinetic modeling via LHHW approach. AIChE J 57(3):711–723
Jiang F et al (2021) Fischer-Tropsch synthesis to lower α-olefins over cobalt-based catalysts: dependence of the promotional effect of promoter on supports. Catal Today 369:158–166
Kim JH et al (2023) A hybrid modeling framework for efficient development of Fischer-Tropsch kinetic models. J Ind Eng Chem 118:318–329
Levenspiel O (1998) Chemical reaction engineering. John Wiley & Sons
Liuzzi D, Pérez-Alonso FJ, Rojas S (2021) Ru-M (M= Fe or Co) catalysts with high ru surface concentration for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Fuel 293:120435
Ma W et al (2011) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: effect of Pt promoter on activity, selectivities to hydrocarbons and oxygenates, and kinetic parameters over 15% Co/Al2O3. Synthetic liquids production and refining. ACS Publications, pp 127–153
Ma W et al (2012) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: effect of Pd, Pt, Re, and Ru noble metal promoters on the activity and selectivity of a 25% Co/Al2O3 catalyst. Appl Catal A 437:1–9
Mazurova K et al (2022) Influence of the promoter deposition conditions on the catalytic properties of ruthenium-cobalt systems in the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Pet Chem 62(11):1308–1314
Méndez CI, Ancheyta J (2020) Kinetic models for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis for the production of clean fuels. Catal Today 353:3–16
Mousavi S et al (2020) Impact of promoter on the cobalt based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: a comprehensive kinetic study. React Kinet Mech Catal 130:117–140
Nikparsa P, Mirzaei A, Atashi H (2014) Effect of reaction conditions and kinetic study on the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over fused Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. J Fuel Chem Technol 42(6):710–718
Yaghoobpour E et al (2021) On efficiency of vanadium-oxide promoter in cobalt Fischer–Tropsch catalysts. Catal Ind 13(2):161–167
Yang J et al (2003) Detailed kinetics of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis on an industrial Fe–Mn catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res 42(21):5066–5090
Yang X et al (2022) Kinetic insights into the effect of promoters on Co/Al2O3 for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Chem Eng J 445:136655
Yates IC, Satterfield CN (1991) Intrinsic kinetics of the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis on a cobalt catalyst. Energy Fuels 5(1):168–173
Zohdi-Fasaei H et al (2016a) Exploiting the effects of catalyst geometric properties to boost the formation of light olefins in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: statistical approach for simultaneous optimization. J Natl Gas Sci Eng 35:1025–1031
Zohdi-Fasaei H et al (2016b) Effects of mass transfer on fischer-tropsch kinetics over mesoporous silica-supported CoMnCe nano catalysts in a fixed-bed reactor. J Natl Gas Sci Eng 32:262–272
Zohdi-Fasaei H et al (2017) Modeling and optimization of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over Co–Mn–Ce/SiO2 catalyst using hybrid RSM/LHHW approaches. Energy 128:496–508
Acknowledgements
The authors’ sincere gratitude goes to the University of Sistan and Baluchestan for supporting this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pordeli, F., Zohdi, S.H., Mirzaei, A.A. et al. Kinetic modeling of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in the presence of Sn promoted Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-023-00409-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-023-00409-9