Skip to main content
Log in

Bioleaching of two different chalcopyrite ores in chloride media

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chalcopyrite is the most abundant copper mineral and its bioleaching has been the subject of several studies due to its refractory nature when submitted to hydrometallurgical processes. Moreover, the growing worldwide demand for copper requires the processing of low-grade ores or mining tailings for which hydrometallurgical processes are a cost-effective alternative. New approaches have shown that the use of chloride ions in chalcopyrite leaching can positively contribute to its dissolution. In this regard, the present work assessed the bioleaching of two chalcopyrite ores—containing 0.34% Cu (copper ore 1) and 1.79% Cu (copper ore 2) by the extreme thermophilic archaea Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. In addition, the effect of different NaCl concentrations (0.25 − 1.0 mol/L) on copper extraction were investigated. In the experiments with the copper ore 1, the copper extractions were higher in the abiotic experiments (from 83 to 90%) than in the biotic experiments (62–80%) for all NaCl concentrations investigated. On the other hand, the experiments with the copper ore 2 showed similar results (around 83% Cu extractions) in all abiotic tests carried out in the presence of chloride and also in the biotic experiments with 0.25 and 0.50 mol/L NaCl concentrations. However, a 97% copper extraction was observed in the biotic experiment carried out with 1.0 mol/L NaCl. Regardless of the type of ore, the lowest copper dissolutions (less than 55%) were obtained in the experiments in the absence of both microorganism and chloride. The XRD analyses of the solid residues of the bioleaching experiments did not reveal the presence of Fe(III)-precipitates such as jarosite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anjum F, Shahid M, Akcil A (2012) Biohydrometallurgy techniques of low grade ores: a review on black shale. Hydrometallurgy 117–118:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton IF, Hiskey JB (2022) Chalcopyrite leaching in novel lixiviants. Hydrometallurgy 207:105775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behrad Vakylabad A, Nazari S, Darezereshki E (2022) Bioleaching of copper from chalcopyrite ore at higher NaCl concentrations. Miner Eng 175:107281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bevilaqua D, Lahti H, Suegama PH, Garcia O Jr, Benedetti AV, Puhakka JA, Tuovinen OH (2013) Effect of Na–chloride on the bioleaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate in shake flasks and stirred tank bioreactors. Hydrometallurgy 138:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bobadilla-Fazzini RA, Pérez A, Gautier V, Jordan H, Parada P (2017) Primary copper sulfides bioleaching vs. chloride leaching: advantages and drawbacks. Hydrometallurgy 168:26–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro MFC, Leão VA (2007) The role of sodium chloride on surface properties of chalcopyrite leached with ferric sulphate. Hydrometallurgy 87:73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castro C, Donati E (2016) Effects of different energy sources on cell adhesion and bioleaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate by extremophilic archaeon Acidianus copahuensis. Hydrometallurgy 162:49–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang-Li L, Jin-Lan X, Zhen-Yuan N, Yi Y, Chen-Yan M (2012) Effect of sodium chloride on sulfur speciation of chalcopyrite bioleached by the extreme thermophile Acidianus manzaensis. Bioresour Technol 110:462–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gericke M, Pinches A, Van Rooyen JV (2001) Bioleaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate using an extremely thermophilic culture. Int J Miner Process 62:243–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He H, Xia J-L, Hong F-F, Tao X-X, Leng Y-W, Zhao Y-D (2012) Analysis of sulfur speciation on chalcopyrite surface bioleached with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Miner Eng 27–28:60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konishi Y, Tokushige M, Asai S, Suzuki T (2001) Copper recovery from chalcopyrite concentrate by acidophilic thermophile Acidianus brierleyi in batch and continuous-flow stirred tank reactors. Hydrometallurgy 59:271–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu ZY, Jeffrey MI, Lawson F (2000) The effect of chloride ions on the dissolution of chalcopyrite in acidic solutions. Hydrometallurgy 56:189–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martins FL, Leão VA (2023) Chalcopyrite bioleaching in chloride media: a mini-review. Hydrometallurgy 216:105995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martins FL, Patto GB, Leão VA (2019) Chalcopyrite bioleaching in the presence of high chloride concentrations. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 94:2333–2344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol (2021) The initial stages of the dissolution of chalcopyrite in chloride solutions: validity of mixed potential model and comparison with sulfate solutions. Hydrometallurgy 204:105721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi H, Okibe N (2020) The role of bioleaching microorganisms in saline water leaching of chalcopyrite concentrate. Hydrometallurgy 195:105397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker A, Paul R, Power G (1981) Electrochemical aspects of leaching copper from chalcopyrite in ferric and cupric salt solutions. Aust J Chem 34:13–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio A, García Frutos FJ (2002) Bioleaching capacity of an extremely thermophilic culture for chalcopyritic materials. Miner Eng 15:689–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz MC, Montes KS, Padilla R (2011) Chalcopyrite leaching in sulfate–chloride media at ambient pressure. Hydrometallurgy 109:37–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström Ã, Shchukarev A, Paul J (2005) XPS characterisation of chalcopyrite chemically and bio-leached at high and low redox potential. Miner Eng 18:505–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velásquez-Yévenes L, Nicol M, Miki H (2010) The dissolution of chalcopyrite in chloride solutions: part 1. The effect of solution potential. Hydrometallurgy 103:108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilcáez J, Suto K, Inoue C (2008) Bioleaching of chalcopyrite with thermophiles: Temperature-pH-ORP dependence. Int J Miner Process 88:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S (2005) Copper leaching from chalcopyrite concentrates. JOM 57:48–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Gan X, Zhao H, Hu M, Li K, Qin W, Qiu G (2016) Dissolution and passivation mechanisms of chalcopyrite during bioleaching: DFT calculation, XPS and electrochemistry analysis. Miner Eng 98:264–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Yin S, Deng B, Wu A (2022) Copper sulfides leaching assisted by acidic seawater-based media: ionic strength and mechanism. Miner Eng 175:107286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watling HR (2014) Chalcopyrite hydrometallurgy at atmospheric pressure: 2. Review of acidic chloride process options. Hydrometallurgy 146:96–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watling HR, Collinson DM, Corbett MK, Shiers DW, Kaksonen AH, Watkin ELJ (2016) Saline-water bioleaching of chalcopyrite with thermophilic, iron(II)-and sulfur–oxidizing microorganisms. Res Microbiol 167:546–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J-L, Yang Y, He H, Zhao X-J, Liang C-L, Zheng L, MA C-Y, Zhao Y-D, Nie Z-Y, Qiu G-Z (2010) Surface analysis of sulfur speciation on pyrite bioleached by extreme thermophile Acidianus manzaensis using Raman and XANES spectroscopy. Hydrometallurgy 100:129–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto. Funding was provided by the agencies Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The CNPq scholarship to V. A. Leão is also appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flávio Luiz Martins.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martins, F.L., Leão, V.A. Bioleaching of two different chalcopyrite ores in chloride media. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 41, 475–485 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-023-00361-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-023-00361-8

Keywords

Navigation